The 2013 Air Canada Top Tier Program
#181
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 164
what do you mean? In 2011 star alliance miles qualified as status miles, I did not see any announcements about the change , AC site clearly says
Earn miles when you fly with other Star Alliance member airlines
Earn miles when you fly with other Star Alliance member airlines
#182
Join Date: Jun 2010
Programs: AC SE 1MM
Posts: 344
+1
I think the levels are reasonable and the changes make sense given the competitive nature of the business. It would be nice for ACTopTier to address whether there was any consideration of the CoS disparity.
I think there is at least one International ticket a year I may swing to C/Z or even J there was a higher bonus on both.
It would also help lessen the impact of the 35k changes if one could be encouraged to get higher fares for more Status Miles.
Overall I'm positive in the way Air Canada has handled this.
I think these changes are mostly positive, with the exception of how status miles are accrued. The current structure inherently makes status much harder to achieve than any of the U.S. carriers, especially if you consider that Canadian fares are more expensive to begin with. I would like to see something like this for status miles:
- Tango : 75% (currently only 50% for international)
- Tango+: 100%
- Latitude: 125% (currently no COS bonus)
- Discount J: 150% (international currently only 125%)
- Full-fare J : 175% (currently 150%)
This is much more competitive with United, with the exception of Tango (all their paid fares earn miles).
AC is still able to differentiate Tango as it is a non-upgradable fare class.
I think the levels are reasonable and the changes make sense given the competitive nature of the business. It would be nice for ACTopTier to address whether there was any consideration of the CoS disparity.
I think there is at least one International ticket a year I may swing to C/Z or even J there was a higher bonus on both.
It would also help lessen the impact of the 35k changes if one could be encouraged to get higher fares for more Status Miles.
Overall I'm positive in the way Air Canada has handled this.
I think these changes are mostly positive, with the exception of how status miles are accrued. The current structure inherently makes status much harder to achieve than any of the U.S. carriers, especially if you consider that Canadian fares are more expensive to begin with. I would like to see something like this for status miles:
- Tango : 75% (currently only 50% for international)
- Tango+: 100%
- Latitude: 125% (currently no COS bonus)
- Discount J: 150% (international currently only 125%)
- Full-fare J : 175% (currently 150%)
This is much more competitive with United, with the exception of Tango (all their paid fares earn miles).
AC is still able to differentiate Tango as it is a non-upgradable fare class.
#183
Join Date: May 2007
Location: YOW
Posts: 2,351
Bye AC, hope to see you again in a couple of years.
Even before these changes I thought I would have to make the move over to A3 next year since I have to mini-RTW trips planned, these changes cement a move. A3 is looking pretty useless to me though because the only revenue flight that I have booked so far next year doesn't give 100% miles. I might have to go back to get *S on UA again since they give miles for anything.
If the 2013 program is promising then I will try for early qualification in at the beginning of 2013 using e-upgrades from 2012. From YOW the alternatives to AC are inferior for most of my travel.
My departure has little to do with being upset by these changes, for the most part they look like they could be good for me in 2013 if I get to 50k then.
I am disappointed in the rationale that keeps being used to justify these changes though. The number of EQM earned on different fares should be revisited unless all they are interested in is reducing the number of status members to the bare minimum.
Even before these changes I thought I would have to make the move over to A3 next year since I have to mini-RTW trips planned, these changes cement a move. A3 is looking pretty useless to me though because the only revenue flight that I have booked so far next year doesn't give 100% miles. I might have to go back to get *S on UA again since they give miles for anything.
If the 2013 program is promising then I will try for early qualification in at the beginning of 2013 using e-upgrades from 2012. From YOW the alternatives to AC are inferior for most of my travel.
My departure has little to do with being upset by these changes, for the most part they look like they could be good for me in 2013 if I get to 50k then.
I am disappointed in the rationale that keeps being used to justify these changes though. The number of EQM earned on different fares should be revisited unless all they are interested in is reducing the number of status members to the bare minimum.
#184
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: YVR
Programs: JGC
Posts: 209
You can do a search for the details...there's a thread somewhere on this forum about this. Basically, since AC markets/codeshares the flight (ACxxxx, not SQxxx), they have to assign a fare class to it using AC's own fare chart. However, since SQ operates the flight, whatever fare class SQ assigns becomes the gospel (superceding AC's previously assigned fare class). Unfortunately for us, in this case, SQ gives it a V fare, which isn't eligible for eqms according to SQ's fare chart.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-c...are-class.html
#185
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: YVR
Programs: AC*SE MM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 4,604
United actually decouples reward miles and status miles, but they give 150% to all full-fare Y, and all discount economy get 100%.
This system is not competitive. Tango should be at least 75% (if not 100%) and differentiated by no-upgrade potential. Latitude should offer some COS (AC has actually hinted at this on their top tier Twitter), and I don't see why Exec International does not give 150% when domestic does. The cost multiplier is actually higher for international than domestic in J.
#186
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
I would have preferred seeing only one new tier under 100k and another at 150k.
4 tiers to 100k is too granular.
AC needs to recognize that once someone reaches 100k and flies paid J/C/Z it makes more sense to funnel revenue to another program.
4 tiers to 100k is too granular.
AC needs to recognize that once someone reaches 100k and flies paid J/C/Z it makes more sense to funnel revenue to another program.
#187
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: YVR
Programs: AC*SE MM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 4,604
Which is why cutting the 150,000 SE award from 25,000 to 15,000 Aeroplan miles is just silly. Allowing threshold e-credits to have a 12 month shelf life is a partial way to mitigate this. If it's Sep/Oct and you've hit 100k, you don't have any reason to keep flying AC if your threshold credits will expire before you can use them.
#188
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Quebec and Ontario, Canada
Programs: AC*E50, SPG/Marriott Plat
Posts: 1,917
just a basic enhancement
I don't understand why there is so much people happy with the changes.
- SE : this won't change ANYTHING. Same priority for UG, always the same number of people in MLL...
- 35 / 50 k : no Elite anymore. Big devaluation, not worth it anymore.
- 50k / 99K : yes, there is some improvement for these ranges, but only by limiting the access to benefits to people under them. Actually, there is nothing more for them . How could people be happy with this way to improve a program ? (You have as much as you had, but we've eliminate 50% of the group, so you have more).
Given the fact that the reward part of the program (AE ticket) sucks, since the devaluation and the YQ on close to every career, why somebody which travel less than 50k will stay with AE when he could have *G for less ?!
- SE : this won't change ANYTHING. Same priority for UG, always the same number of people in MLL...
- 35 / 50 k : no Elite anymore. Big devaluation, not worth it anymore.
- 50k / 99K : yes, there is some improvement for these ranges, but only by limiting the access to benefits to people under them. Actually, there is nothing more for them . How could people be happy with this way to improve a program ? (You have as much as you had, but we've eliminate 50% of the group, so you have more).
Given the fact that the reward part of the program (AE ticket) sucks, since the devaluation and the YQ on close to every career, why somebody which travel less than 50k will stay with AE when he could have *G for less ?!
#189
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
Which is why cutting the 150,000 SE award from 25,000 to 15,000 Aeroplan miles is just silly. Allowing threshold e-credits to have a 12 month shelf life is a partial way to mitigate this. If it's Sep/Oct and you've hit 100k, you don't have any reason to keep flying AC if your threshold credits will expire before you can use them.
#190
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: A hotel near you, Seat next to you
Programs: AC SE, PC-Platinum Royal Ambassador, DL-Silver, HH-Gold, Marriott-Gold
Posts: 141
I don't understand why there is so much people happy with the changes.
- SE : this won't change ANYTHING. Same priority for UG, always the same number of people in MLL...
- 35 / 50 k : no Elite anymore. Big devaluation, not worth it anymore.
- 50k / 99K : yes, there is some improvement for these ranges, but only by limiting the access to benefits to people under them. Actually, there is nothing more for them . How could people be happy with this way to improve a program ? (You have as much as you had, but we've eliminate 50% of the group, so you have more).
Given the fact that the reward part of the program (AE ticket) sucks, since the devaluation and the YQ on close to every career, why somebody which travel less than 50k will stay with AE when he could have *G for less ?!
- SE : this won't change ANYTHING. Same priority for UG, always the same number of people in MLL...
- 35 / 50 k : no Elite anymore. Big devaluation, not worth it anymore.
- 50k / 99K : yes, there is some improvement for these ranges, but only by limiting the access to benefits to people under them. Actually, there is nothing more for them . How could people be happy with this way to improve a program ? (You have as much as you had, but we've eliminate 50% of the group, so you have more).
Given the fact that the reward part of the program (AE ticket) sucks, since the devaluation and the YQ on close to every career, why somebody which travel less than 50k will stay with AE when he could have *G for less ?!
I'm glad that the SE requirement didn't go more than 100k to 125K^
As a recent first time SE I know how hard it was to get to to it
But I do agree that SE need more benefits so that AC can make there statement "Enchantments" true
#191
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
Someone who pays full J or even discounted C or Z gets their 100K by flying less than 75K and does it in comfort. Just think about those who have employers who won't spring for premium service who must actually fly 100K (if not more if Tangos are flown overseas) most of it in the back cabin. If they've done it that way they deserve the same perks as this who've been blessed with employers who fly them up front on maybe half the miles of actual flying!
#192
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: YQR
Posts: 2,743
This cements it for me. I'm down to P already for next year as I moved my flying around and did a couple less TATLs. I like Star G for priority access and lounge access mostly and as I mostly do transborder on UA it was a good benefit. The upgrades were nice when the London Pass was around and was well priced, but aerolotto does not interest me so I've been buying C/J. Looks like I'll be spending a few days poking around the UA/Aegean/OZ sites to figure things out.
Clearly, the program will continue to work well for many, but anyone who foresees doing 35-49900k q miles really has little incentive to make it work. AC has been moving for a while to trim their Elites so I expect they are going to have lots of success with this. They lost a lot of my business though, so I wonder how much they will lose with the improvements in the coming year.
Clearly, the program will continue to work well for many, but anyone who foresees doing 35-49900k q miles really has little incentive to make it work. AC has been moving for a while to trim their Elites so I expect they are going to have lots of success with this. They lost a lot of my business though, so I wonder how much they will lose with the improvements in the coming year.
#193
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PHL, NYC, DC
Posts: 9,708
what do you mean? In 2011 star alliance miles qualified as status miles, I did not see any announcements about the change , AC site clearly says
Earn miles when you fly with other Star Alliance member airlines
You can also earn Aeroplan Miles when you fly on eligible scheduled flights operated by Star Alliance member airlines:
Adria airways
Aegean Airlines
Air China
Air New Zealand
ANA
Asiana Airlines
Austrian
Blue 1
BMI
Brussels Airlines
Continental Airlines
Croatia Airlines
Egyptair
LOT Polish Airlines
Lufthansa
SAS Scandinavian Airlines
Shanghai Airlines
Singapore Airlines
South African Airways
Spanair
Swiss
TAM Airlines
TAP Portugal
Thai Airways
Turkish Airlines
United Airlines
US Airways
The Aeroplan Miles you earn on eligible Star Alliance member airlines flights will also count as Air Canada Status Miles qualifying you for Air Canada Top Tier status.
Overall, I am disappointed with the change, AC will see less business from me.
At the same time, I appreciate early notification.
Earn miles when you fly with other Star Alliance member airlines
You can also earn Aeroplan Miles when you fly on eligible scheduled flights operated by Star Alliance member airlines:
Adria airways
Aegean Airlines
Air China
Air New Zealand
ANA
Asiana Airlines
Austrian
Blue 1
BMI
Brussels Airlines
Continental Airlines
Croatia Airlines
Egyptair
LOT Polish Airlines
Lufthansa
SAS Scandinavian Airlines
Shanghai Airlines
Singapore Airlines
South African Airways
Spanair
Swiss
TAM Airlines
TAP Portugal
Thai Airways
Turkish Airlines
United Airlines
US Airways
The Aeroplan Miles you earn on eligible Star Alliance member airlines flights will also count as Air Canada Status Miles qualifying you for Air Canada Top Tier status.
Overall, I am disappointed with the change, AC will see less business from me.
At the same time, I appreciate early notification.
You can do a search for the details...there's a thread somewhere on this forum about this. Basically, since AC markets/codeshares the flight (ACxxxx, not SQxxx), they have to assign a fare class to it using AC's own fare chart. However, since SQ operates the flight, whatever fare class SQ assigns becomes the gospel (superceding AC's previously assigned fare class). Unfortunately for us, in this case, SQ gives it a V fare, which isn't eligible for eqms according to SQ's fare chart.
Hope I cleared the air
#194
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
Someone who pays full J or even discounted C or Z gets their 100K by flying less than 75K and does it in comfort. Just think about those who have employers who won't spring for premium service who must actually fly 100K (if not more if Tangos are flown overseas) most of it in the back cabin. If they've done it that way they deserve the same perks as this who've been blessed with employers who fly them up front on maybe half the miles of actual flying!
#195
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Calgary
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 771
I don't understand why there is so much people happy with the changes.
- SE : this won't change ANYTHING. Same priority for UG, always the same number of people in MLL...
- 35 / 50 k : no Elite anymore. Big devaluation, not worth it anymore.
- 50k / 99K : yes, there is some improvement for these ranges, but only by limiting the access to benefits to people under them. Actually, there is nothing more for them . How could people be happy with this way to improve a program ? (You have as much as you had, but we've eliminate 50% of the group, so you have more).
Given the fact that the reward part of the program (AE ticket) sucks, since the devaluation and the YQ on close to every career, why somebody which travel less than 50k will stay with AE when he could have *G for less ?!
- SE : this won't change ANYTHING. Same priority for UG, always the same number of people in MLL...
- 35 / 50 k : no Elite anymore. Big devaluation, not worth it anymore.
- 50k / 99K : yes, there is some improvement for these ranges, but only by limiting the access to benefits to people under them. Actually, there is nothing more for them . How could people be happy with this way to improve a program ? (You have as much as you had, but we've eliminate 50% of the group, so you have more).
Given the fact that the reward part of the program (AE ticket) sucks, since the devaluation and the YQ on close to every career, why somebody which travel less than 50k will stay with AE when he could have *G for less ?!