Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > External Miles and Points Resources
Reload this Page >

View from the Wing [VFTW] discussions

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

View from the Wing [VFTW] discussions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2015, 7:50 pm
  #376  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: ORF
Programs: Amex Plat, AA, BA Silver, Marriott Plat, Choice Gold, HHonors Gold, IHG Diamond
Posts: 3,749
Originally Posted by kokonutz
The ultimate result of totally free unregulated markets tends to be oligopolies and monopolies.

And too many of us are all about buying the fake dream that we are a part of, or party to, the party.



The Kochs wouldn't be caught dead flying in CX or LH F (let alone precious AA's F). Commercial is for suckers and the little people. @:-)

This is what I don't get. I can buy C or F on any flight for cash with dynamic pricing. Using points I only have a binary option: published points fare or no fly at all.

That's not supply and demand. That's not how markets are meant to work.
I'll try not to get too far into OMNI territory here, but most libertarians I am aware of are what I call I-bertarians. In other words (and to try to keep this out of OMNI territory), GTL thinks that if there were no government, no arbitrary big companies, and no society, I would be allowed to do what I want: which is to sell my award services in a free market where fixed award charts and arcane rules would make it better for the average guy to need my services to walk his way through booking an award flight. And I can make money.

It's (and it's where I'm veering back into OMNI territory) all the Ayn Rand wannabees want to be. And, from my perspective, where GTL goes off the rails is ignoring that there is a government (and understanding the inefficiencies in any large organization) that is essentially us, there are big companies, and there is a society. So, the Great Thought Leader tries to play both sides of the fence: arguing for an award system that makes his business necessary while arguing against a likely foreseeable free market evolution of the award system.
lwildernorva is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 1:38 am
  #377  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by nsx
He should at least support dynamic pricing as an ADDITIONAL offering to supplement a capacity-controlled award chart.
Delta already had dynamic pricing as an additional offering to supplement the since-masked capacity-controlled award charts. "Pay with miles" type options are that.

Why should he support Delta providing that "pay with miles" path when it provides on average a return less than the value of cash-back card programs and other alternatives? Because of DL credit card kickbacks? I am glad he doesn't support DL's consumer-unfriendly SkyMiles shenanigans despite the credit card referral fees.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:22 am
  #378  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Original Poster
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Delta already had dynamic pricing as an additional offering to supplement the since-masked capacity-controlled award charts. "Pay with miles" type options are that.
GUWonder, that is a GREAT observation!

Delta must have concluded that chart-based redemption at traditional prices could not be maintained profitably. I don't understand the reasoning, but I wonder how in the world it would not apply even more strongly to redemption for travel on partner airlines. Gary seems to be hinting that the next shoe to drop is taking the value out of partner redemptions.

It's almost as if Delta wants to drive all its customers to Citbank's Double Cash card.
nsx is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 7:37 am
  #379  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by nsx
GUWonder, that is a GREAT observation!

Delta must have concluded that chart-based redemption at traditional prices could not be maintained profitably. I don't understand the reasoning, but I wonder how in the world it would not apply even more strongly to redemption for travel on partner airlines. Gary seems to be hinting that the next shoe to drop is taking the value out of partner redemptions.

It's almost as if Delta wants to drive all its customers to Citbank's Double Cash card.
I have no doubt that DL will hit hard with devaluing the DL partner airline awards too.

DL did not conclude that chart-based redemption at traditional mileage prices could not be maintained profitably; rather, it could be maintained profitably. But this isn't about maintaining profits and profit margin; instead it's about hitting targeted objectives to increase pay offs for current management and (non-longer-terms) shareholders.

Being profitable isn't sufficient; it's a matter of being more profitable than before. That is why devaluations of the program and its peers is so very expected from the consumer perspective. It doesn't take a thought leader in anything to understand this.

Last edited by GUWonder; Aug 3, 2015 at 7:46 am
GUWonder is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 9:41 am
  #380  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,611
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I have no doubt that DL will hit hard with devaluing the DL partner airline awards too.

DL did not conclude that chart-based redemption at traditional mileage prices could not be maintained profitably; rather, it could be maintained profitably. But this isn't about maintaining profits and profit margin; instead it's about hitting targeted objectives to increase pay offs for current management and (non-longer-terms) shareholders.

Being profitable isn't sufficient; it's a matter of being more profitable than before. That is why devaluations of the program and its peers is so very expected from the consumer perspective. It doesn't take a thought leader in anything to understand this.
As I mentioned in the DL forum recently, as an airline agnostic I quite like DL's apparent move from an elite/miles focused airline to one that offers good fares in premium cabins.

That's exactly why I am typing this from DTW terminal C right now instead of ORD terminal F.
kokonutz is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 3:05 pm
  #381  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by kokonutz
As I mentioned in the DL forum recently, as an airline agnostic I quite like DL's apparent move from an elite/miles focused airline to one that offers good fares in premium cabins.

That's exactly why I am typing this from DTW terminal C right now instead of ORD terminal F.
As an equal opportunity critic of airlines -- something that certainly doesn't hold true for some bloggers -- I find that DL's no more or less a fan of offering cheaper fares in premium cabins than other airlines.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 3:36 pm
  #382  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,611
Originally Posted by GUWonder
As an equal opportunity critic of airlines -- something that certainly doesn't hold true for some bloggers -- I find that DL's no more or less a fan of offering cheaper fares in premium cabins than other airlines.
Hey, you leave AA ALONE.

We thought leaders still trust AA doncha know!

DL may not be a fan of offering cheaper fares I premium cabins but in my anecdotal experience they have been beating the pants off the competition in price in domestic F all year. And best of all when a DL domestic F ticket connects to a baby bird with no F I still get SKY boarding priority. On UA my priority on a baby bird connection reverts to my 'lowly' Gold Million Miler status: group 2.

So while I fully understand why Gary is slut shaming DL, ther IS another side to the coin: if DL wants to replace upgraders and award ticket pax with premium revenue pax they are going to have to compete for thAt business! ^
kokonutz is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 9:18 pm
  #383  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: IAD
Posts: 6,148
Originally Posted by kokonutz
Hey, you leave AA ALONE.

We thought leaders still trust AA doncha know!
LOL

Anyway, I don't have a blog or whatever it is that makes one a Thought Leader, let alone a Great Thought Leader, but I would assume than an announcement on Delta tying compensation guarantees to Corporate Operational Performance for corporate sales agreements would be a thought leadery thing to write about.

While it's crazy that the controller of an alternate currency wants to control it as the free market says they can, resulting in many blistering blog posts on Skymiles, I would expect something written, or even linked, about DL calling out its biggest rivals where it hurts the most: at the corporate sales level.
whlinder is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2015, 2:12 am
  #384  
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,182


Thought leader gets good advice
oliver2002 is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2015, 2:15 am
  #385  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Four Seasons Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA, VS, HH, IHG, MB, MR
Posts: 26,871
Someone once posted on Head for Points that I used too many commas ....

The thing is, when I looked at it closely I decided that he might have been right and have been cutting back ever since!
Raffles is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2015, 7:33 am
  #386  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Original Poster
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
Originally Posted by Raffles
Someone once posted on Head for Points that I used too many commas ....
Obviously a punctilious reader!
nsx is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2015, 9:31 pm
  #387  
Marriott 5+ Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: MEL
Programs: Bonvoy LT Plat. WOH Glob. SQ Gold
Posts: 1,637
Originally Posted by kokonutz

The Kochs wouldn't be caught dead flying in CX or LH F (let alone precious AA's F). Commercial is for suckers and the little people. @:-)
What a shame. I know, unlike lesser blogs, The Thought Leader doesn't have to rely on guest writers etc, but I would have loved to get David H's view on the value of IHG points or Charles' photos of the AA Flagship lounge at LAX
chad75 is offline  
Old Aug 7, 2015, 2:44 am
  #388  
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,182
The recent 550EUR promo/mistake fare from OSL to SFO in J was also not mentioned...
oliver2002 is offline  
Old Aug 7, 2015, 3:07 pm
  #389  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Are the VFTW comments moderated to remove non-spam comments that are on topic? Or are moderated comments of non-spam nature just slow to show there and/or sometimes subject to extra hurdles before being published?

Today in the comments section of a VFTW blog entry -- in the course of an exchange (there about the history of the SkyPesons terminology) between the blogger and another person -- I posted about how DL SkyPesos was the successor to "Delta pesos", with the latter certainly not invented by the VFTW blogger. I even presented evidence showing that "delta pesos" was in use at least some months before the December 2009 reference (from Flyertalk) to SkyPesos made by the VFTW blogger and which was put up by the blogger in the comments section to claim credit as the creator of the "SkyPesos" term.

I don't know what I want to make of that, but it is interesting to me.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Aug 7, 2015, 4:19 pm
  #390  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,611
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Are the VFTW comments moderated to remove non-spam comments that are on topic? Or are moderated comments of non-spam nature just slow to show there and/or sometimes subject to extra hurdles before being published?

Today in the comments section of a VFTW blog entry -- in the course of an exchange (there about the history of the SkyPesons terminology) between the blogger and another person -- I posted about how DL SkyPesos was the successor to "Delta pesos", with the latter certainly not invented by the VFTW blogger. I even presented evidence showing that "delta pesos" was in use at least some months before the December 2009 reference (from Flyertalk) to SkyPesos made by the VFTW blogger and which was put up by the blogger in the comments section to claim credit as the creator of the "SkyPesos" term.

I don't know what I want to make of that, but it is interesting to me.
Sometimes comments have to be approved by Gary.

But there's a weird thing there where if I comment as 'kokonutz' the post never appears. If I post as 'kokomutz' it does.

Maybe our user names are blocked!?

Nah, your comments are up there.

FWIW, Gary's not an AEI guy. He's a Koch/libertarian guy.

And it seems really important to him to have been the one to take Delta Pesos and made it SkyPesos. So we ought to just give it to him. ^

Of course, if I was Delta I'm not sure I'd even bother messing with the Freddies since it's operator hates them so much.

Last edited by kokonutz; Aug 7, 2015 at 4:36 pm
kokonutz is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.