United cutting first class meal service on flights less than 900 miles? (now "snack")
#346




Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Programs: JAL Global Club & oneworld Sapphire, ANA SFC & Star Alliance Gold
Posts: 4,478
With respect to all this "premium service never works in the US market" stuff, I just want to point out that one of the key features of CO's turnaround and business model was offering better service than other airlines, including (gasp) meals in Y. And their domestic F (which I experienced a few times) was excellent. Gordon Bethune explained this in detail in his book. I once flew CO in J on a TPAC flight in 1999, and the soft product (food and amenities) far exceeded anything on any US carrier today and came close to today's SQ, NH, and JL.
Also, before Doug Parker degraded AA's product (slashing meals and shrinking MCE), wasn't AA earning higher RASM?
Also, before Doug Parker degraded AA's product (slashing meals and shrinking MCE), wasn't AA earning higher RASM?
#347



Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alexandria, Longboat Key
Programs: UA Gold Marriott Gold Choice Gold Wyndham Platinum IHG Platinum Avis President's Club Amtrak Select
Posts: 2,950
With respect to all this "premium service never works in the US market" stuff, I just want to point out that one of the key features of CO's turnaround and business model was offering better service than other airlines, including (gasp) meals in Y. And their domestic F (which I experienced a few times) was excellent. Gordon Bethune explained this in detail in his book. I once flew CO in J on a TPAC flight in 1999, and the soft product (food and amenities) far exceeded anything on any US carrier today and came close to today's SQ, NH, and JL.
Also, before Doug Parker degraded AA's product (slashing meals and shrinking MCE), wasn't AA earning higher RASM?
Also, before Doug Parker degraded AA's product (slashing meals and shrinking MCE), wasn't AA earning higher RASM?
Bringing it back to United, the change, which reportedly had some strong dissent at Willis Tower, matched UA to AA/DL on meal window of 900 miles and no exceptions. I would have been certain that routes like LAX-DEN/DEN-ORD, which always had meals served no matter what, would be introduced as exceptions but nope. Race to the bottom for all three.
#348




Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Houston
Programs: UA GS 3MM & LT UC, Qantas Platinum, HA Pualani Gold, Hilton Lifetime Diamond, Bonvoy Ambassador
Posts: 9,809
With respect to all this "premium service never works in the US market" stuff, I just want to point out that one of the key features of CO's turnaround and business model was offering better service than other airlines, including (gasp) meals in Y. And their domestic F (which I experienced a few times) was excellent. Gordon Bethune explained this in detail in his book. I once flew CO in J on a TPAC flight in 1999, and the soft product (food and amenities) far exceeded anything on any US carrier today and came close to today's SQ, NH, and JL.
Also, before Doug Parker degraded AA's product (slashing meals and shrinking MCE), wasn't AA earning higher RASM?
Also, before Doug Parker degraded AA's product (slashing meals and shrinking MCE), wasn't AA earning higher RASM?
#349


Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: KUSA
Programs: Whatever AMEX Plat comes with... I buy on price.. Spirit Big Front Seat, want First/buy First
Posts: 1,880
I agree -- except that I would add that airline travel -- especially domestically -- today is really just a commodity with very little differentiation at all any longer. Lodging as you point out is seen more as an experience -- therefore a wide range of property types are available....
Some of you may be old enough to remember the airline Midwest Express - "The Best Care in the Air" - AFAIK this was the only long term "premium" airline to exist for more than just a few years in the US market. Their cookies were amazing!
Some of you may be old enough to remember the airline Midwest Express - "The Best Care in the Air" - AFAIK this was the only long term "premium" airline to exist for more than just a few years in the US market. Their cookies were amazing!
The UA cutting of meals on key routes like ORD-DEN and such is really disappointing. I'm never on that leg unless it's a double-connect, which means I probably didn't have time for food other than a quick loop through a UC. I'd rather have the meal, for what it's worth, on UA than most of what I can get quickly to go in the airport.
#350




Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morris County, NJ
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Avis Pres, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,466
Pretty much anyone in business should.
All of our conference rooms in my office have a plush banana, thanks to Gordon's book.
All of our conference rooms in my office have a plush banana, thanks to Gordon's book.
#351




Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 6,513
news flash. The years of experience in business and handling customers cant be learned on Google.
If the airlines pitched food altogether and used those resources to get there on time, I would not miss it one iota. Im a crappy cook and yet can make a better meal than any airline in 15 minutes, but I cant get myself from EWR to SFO in 5 hours no matter how hard I pedal
#352
Flyertalk Evangelist, Moderator: United Airlines MileagePlus


Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL DM, UA Nostalgist, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 16,045
I have to strongly agree with the comment upthread that VX was the modern example of "a carrier with a domestic F service that was a cut above". It didn't work at a financial level, and honestly when flying VX I constantly wondered how much extra I was paying for that 55" pitch which, while nice, was kind of overkill.
If I were running an airline though, I think there is ample room to try to differentiate with an extra $5-10 or so per seat-flight to improve catering. These cuts, like the Snacking discussed in this thread, just seem so remarkably short-sighted because the cost savings are immediate and any reputational impact will take years to accumulate.
If I were running an airline though, I think there is ample room to try to differentiate with an extra $5-10 or so per seat-flight to improve catering. These cuts, like the Snacking discussed in this thread, just seem so remarkably short-sighted because the cost savings are immediate and any reputational impact will take years to accumulate.
#353
Original Poster




Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,007
I worked for Midwest Express until the end. Yes, people loved the cookies and meals and the seats. But then loved low fares more. Enough people wouldn't even pay an extra $25 for the wide seats given a choice on a flight like MKE-DCA. But, alas, YX could not complete mainly because it didn't know how. Our VP of Customer Service had not flown another airline in nearly 20 years. I remember when the combination of NW and TPG bought the company... supposed to be synergies with NW as a lot of cost savings (then they bought DL and lost interest). One of the first things (which may have actually pre-dated the ownership) was codeshare from LAX/SFO/SEA. I recall one particular meeting where marketing was trying to determine how do we direct connecting passengers over to NW at those transfer points.... their idea was having the flight attendants come through the aisle and hand out glossy brochures with detailed instructions on getting to the NW gates. I laughed as did my boss. We said, you know what Northwest will do, if anything? I had a copy of a WorldTraveler magazine in my office... I went and got it... opened to the airport terminal diagrams... and pointed to LAX where there were gates for a dozen codeshare partners noted with little dots/colors. I said, we will get a mention in this little box. They had no idea, because nobody there had ever worked anywhere else or knew anything outside of the insular company. It was their downfall. They also believed in holding for connecting passengers at MKE no matter what. We used to cheer when we had a 35% on time for the day.
The UA cutting of meals on key routes like ORD-DEN and such is really disappointing. I'm never on that leg unless it's a double-connect, which means I probably didn't have time for food other than a quick loop through a UC. I'd rather have the meal, for what it's worth, on UA than most of what I can get quickly to go in the airport.
The UA cutting of meals on key routes like ORD-DEN and such is really disappointing. I'm never on that leg unless it's a double-connect, which means I probably didn't have time for food other than a quick loop through a UC. I'd rather have the meal, for what it's worth, on UA than most of what I can get quickly to go in the airport.
Same with me and ORD-DEN. It's usually a double-hop with 40 minute connections so there's NO time to get food at the airport and my ALB-ORD flight will usually leave at 5:50 a.m. or so which means nothing is open at the airport (well unless you wanna stand in line at Starbucks for 30 minutes). So the meal was a nice plus when I'd be traveling 7 hours and up for 12 without any food.
#354




Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 6,513
I miss Midwest Express.
Same with me and ORD-DEN. It's usually a double-hop with 40 minute connections so there's NO time to get food at the airport and my ALB-ORD flight will usually leave at 5:50 a.m. or so which means nothing is open at the airport (well unless you wanna stand in line at Starbucks for 30 minutes). So the meal was a nice plus when I'd be traveling 7 hours and up for 12 without any food.
Same with me and ORD-DEN. It's usually a double-hop with 40 minute connections so there's NO time to get food at the airport and my ALB-ORD flight will usually leave at 5:50 a.m. or so which means nothing is open at the airport (well unless you wanna stand in line at Starbucks for 30 minutes). So the meal was a nice plus when I'd be traveling 7 hours and up for 12 without any food.
#355
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, AS MVP Gold, MR LTT, HH Dia, IHG Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 37,033
Looks like UA is at it again. Sorry if this has already been posted, but with the major W24/25 update last night it looks like all coast to coast red-eyes have changed from Dinner to Snack. I checked SFO-BOS and SFO-EWR and early as well as late red-eyes got dinner removed.
checked 10/27 and a few dates around that
checked 10/27 and a few dates around that
#356
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 27,363
Looks like UA is at it again. Sorry if this has already been posted, but with the major W24/25 update last night it looks like all coast to coast red-eyes have changed from Dinner to Snack. I checked SFO-BOS and SFO-EWR and early as well as late red-eyes got dinner removed.
checked 10/27 and a few dates around that
checked 10/27 and a few dates around that
#357
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 12,778
Looks like UA is at it again. Sorry if this has already been posted, but with the major W24/25 update last night it looks like all coast to coast red-eyes have changed from Dinner to Snack. I checked SFO-BOS and SFO-EWR and early as well as late red-eyes got dinner removed.
checked 10/27 and a few dates around that
checked 10/27 and a few dates around that
#358
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, AS MVP Gold, MR LTT, HH Dia, IHG Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 37,033
#359
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 12,778


