Abandoned by United in SFO
#61
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,026
Can’t blame passenger for much here, but definitely the missed opportunity caused by standing at a customer service line when other, more expedient/direct options exist - 1) call, 2) text, or 3) just walk over to the gate desk of the next flight (while doing 1 or 2). The time spent in a line is accomplishing nothing towards the goal, especially if there are other avenues. Checking the app easily would have shown seat availability of the next flight. All BE passengers would have been given seat assignments, NRSAs wouldn’t have been cleared yet. Even then, no shows might provide a few more. If there’s 2 seats left and 10 people in the customer service line ahead of me, I wouldn’t be waiting in line any more - I’d be trying something else.
Last edited by IAH-OIL-TRASH; Mar 28, 2023 at 6:17 pm
#63
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS 75K, DL Silver, UA Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Platinum + LT Gold
Posts: 10,515
The later flight is the last flight of the day.
And what if the inbound was delayed further? We also have no idea on the fare availability of the later connecting flight or the earlier connecting flight. There could be a all kinds of scenario, but based on OP's account, UA should have done more, especially those with F seats.
And what if the inbound was delayed further? We also have no idea on the fare availability of the later connecting flight or the earlier connecting flight. There could be a all kinds of scenario, but based on OP's account, UA should have done more, especially those with F seats.
#64
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.997MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,859
They had a 2 hour connection, they did not book the last flight of the day and UA could not get a non-status F passenger on the potential backup flight. What more could they have done? I see nothing to fault them. That the nature of irrops for non-status travels and status sometimes.
However, they were not abandon by UA .
#65
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA LT Gold; BA Silver; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,081
As a former counter dragon/Gate slayer, and airline manager - anytime someone says "don't worry, you'll make your connection" on a late or delayed flight - its a lie. We want to get you on the plane so we can go home, make you someone else's problem. (Not being a b... or anything, just being honest).
#66
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,693
I also concur w/ other posters who have suggested calling UA (or now scanning the QR code provided to chat) w/ an agent rather than stand in a customer service line. That’s a lesson I learned, like, a quarter century ago. I think it was so long ago I used a pay phone to call United.
#68
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA MM
Posts: 4,130
I appreciate your honesty. I figure any gate agent who says that really has no way of knowing what will happen when the flight lands at the connecting airport so It's useless prattle. Right up there with "Our dreadfully expensive credit card has a sign-on bonus of XX,000 points- enough for a Business Class round trip to Europe!" and "If there's anything we can do to make your flight more enjoyable..."
Afterwards, a family member who worked for UA insisted I write to UA about the incident. All I got back was a form letter saying we hope to see you again soon, or something like that. They didn’t see me soon… not for about the next year.
#69
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 700
If a redeye flight across the country can't be held for a few minutes when 15 passengers show up right at the scheduled departure time then something is really wrong with how the operation is being run. Saying the crew might time out is bogus. What if they had a 15 minute mechanical delay which happens frequently? Would that have caused a full cancelation due to timeout?
Yes, in retrospect I should have immediately called 800 United right way. As we ran to the connection I actually had searched my phone for United's number, but then focused all my attention on running tot the gate instead. And per a prior comment, I similarly said to my iwife: boy, you could have a heart attack sprinting for a connection. We then ran to a rebooking agent desk, rather than hopping on the phone because - like lemmings the dozen plus of us all did the same thing at the same time.
Two hours to connect domestically late at night should have been plenty of time, we thought. We avoid tight connections when we can. Setting aside the fact UA sold the connection to us.
The "cleaning crew in Kona" reference is not me trying to lash out at folks. That explanation was given to me by three different United ground crew at KOA as a few hundred passengers waited to board in the open air terminal. Each said to me the cleaning crew was well known for not moving quickly enough. They explained "we cannot let you board while the crew is still cleaning."
The captain called out every close connecting flight as we approached SFO, together with the departure gates. Plainly UA knew all of our schedules and advocated that we dash for our connecting flights. And then? The worlds' meanest/least empathetic gate agent tells us: "no one ever said anything to us about holding the plane, there was a miscommunication." I don't believe that for a second. And, as SFO was slowing down at 11 pm the idea that our EWR flight "had to clear the gate" is not credible. We waited on the runway 30 minutes, so too could any plane which may have needed that gate. A timing out crew is similarly no excuse.
Finally, save for one outstanding supervisor in SFO who got us blankets, some snack bars and water we were shown no empathy at all from any United agent we interacted with that evening. Frankly, UA created the nightmare; for hours led us to believe they were on top of a solution ("you will make your connections"); lied to us when we arrived at the EWR bound flight; and then treated us terribly when we tried to solve the problem they created. insult to injury? Not once did we ever receive an "I'm sorry" from anyone we dealt with that night.
#70
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco
Programs: GM on VX, UA, AA, HA, AS, SY; Budget Fastbreak
Posts: 27,626
Ngl Hawaii to New Jersey is just a brutal long day. Total shame that the koa-sfo wasn’t earlier in the day. It totally bites to connect late at night. Just not fun. I don’t know what to suggest for future Hawaii trip other than choosing an intentionally long connection in order to enjoy a day or half day in your connection city.
#71
Join Date: May 2001
Location: RNO, NV, USA.
Programs: UA 2MM
Posts: 5,063
flyer16 - You have my complete sympathies here. You have clearly explained your flight saga. A very credible account. Surely it is reasonable to book a two hour connection at SFO, late in the evening. This was not one of SFO’s frequent weather related delays. United Airlines failed you, as well as the other connecting pax. It was hardly their Finest Hour! No one took it upon themselves to address the issue of connecting pax. I suppose only GS members rate personal concierge service these days. “Abandoned” is a strong word, but I don’t think it is inappropriate here. I hope you write to UA and request compensation for your overnight delay.
#72
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,026
The real problems for your late arrival to the gate were 1) the late departure from SFO of your plane, 2) the long taxi at SFO on arrival, 3) the 15 minute wait for a gate. No need to smear cleaners based on hearsay. 1, 2, and 3 are facts.
#73
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,417
The captain called out every close connecting flight as we approached SFO, together with the departure gates. Plainly UA knew all of our schedules and advocated that we dash for our connecting flights. And then? The worlds' meanest/least empathetic gate agent tells us: "no one ever said anything to us about holding the plane, there was a miscommunication." I don't believe that for a second.
Not every gate at SFO can accept a widebody plane. And even if an alternate gate were available, it wouldn't necessarily follow that an alternate ramp crew, gate agent, etc. were also available.
Except that it really could be, and in fact it fits what you describe quite well (except that the gate agent could have just said that). The rest of it though -- pulling away from the gate and then stopping to finish paperwork? That's absolutely in line with the idea of someone nearing the end of their duty day. The airline needed to make a decision whether to offload you all or not, because not only might someone else on standby already have taken your seats, but they also needed to know how much fuel to load and whether or not the weight and balance checked out. Closing the door and pushing back from the gate ensures that the flight gets logged as an on-time departure and the cabin crew gets paid; waiting to complete the calculations can then allow them to make their wheels-up time that would allow them to land prior to hitting their flight duty limits. While you may be thinking that another minute or two might not make a difference, or since the plane was just sitting there, they should have let you on -- a minute or two really could make a difference, because if they miss wheels-up they may have to wait behind on-time traffic; and they may have to throw out all of their calculations and start from scratch, or even take on additional fuel, in order to accommodate 15+ additional passengers that they didn't think were going to make it. The three additional minutes it would have taken to allow you on the plane really could have meant a time-out and cancellation. (And, unless you checked the seat map and saw a bunch of empty seats -- there probably were standby passengers for SFO-EWR. And since you were traveling up front -- I can just about guarantee your seats had been given to upgraders when you failed to appear -- so if you'd have gotten on board, at best you were looking at middle seats in the back of the plane).
#74
Join Date: Sep 2001
Programs: Alaska Tanzanite 100K
Posts: 3,858
I appreciate your honesty. I figure any gate agent who says that really has no way of knowing what will happen when the flight lands at the connecting airport so It's useless prattle. Right up there with "Our dreadfully expensive credit card has a sign-on bonus of XX,000 points- enough for a Business Class round trip to Europe!" and "If there's anything we can do to make your flight more enjoyable..."
Fact is, we can't predict the future, and just as what happened with the OP - they got screwed by the ground delay time in SFO. Any agent working isn't going to have time to read thru the comments in the reservation, see what was promised, etc. That human being (who is probably being yelled at, and called EVERY name in the book) is either going to follow company policy & handle you, or do *whatever it takes* to get you to Point C. Sadly, the tone of the downline station causes the first part to happen more than most, which then swings the agent helping you mood to the crapper.
Sometimes stations WILL hold planes, but its not a guarantee. Airlines will honestly hold planes for a certain amount of travelers (or even a cerrtain ONE) - but its not always at the discretion of the folks working in the 1st station.
#75
Join Date: May 2022
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Programs: AAdvantage Platinum, Aeroplan 25k, Hyatt Explorist, Marriott Gold
Posts: 196