Last edit by: WineCountryUA
Previous thread -
Voluntary Denied Boarding - VDB/Bump on UA [2017]
Voluntary Denied Boarding - VDB/Bump on UA [2016]
Voluntary Denied Boarding - VDB/Bump on UA [2015]
Related thread - Is this IDB? Am I entitled to IDB compensation? [Consolidated]
VDB -- Voluntary Denied Boarding -- is when the flight is overbooked and the airline is looking for volunteers to change their travel plans. It is voluntary and you do not need to participate. The compensation is 100% negotiable. It could be $100's in future travel vouchers, it might be food vouchers, a different routing (perhaps more direct or for MR's more indirect ), perhaps lodging if overnight and sometimes a bump in cabin. It all depends on how desperate the airline is and how flexible you are.
The standard UA policy is after you have agreed to a voucher amount and additional VDBs are still needed, if those passengers get a higher amount, you will also get the higher amount.
The are no DoT requirement for VDB compensation, it is whatever you and the airline agree to. The DoT does require the airline to try VDB before moving to IDB.
Voluntary Denied Boarding - VDB/Bump on UA [2017]
Voluntary Denied Boarding - VDB/Bump on UA [2016]
Voluntary Denied Boarding - VDB/Bump on UA [2015]
Related thread - Is this IDB? Am I entitled to IDB compensation? [Consolidated]
VDB -- Voluntary Denied Boarding -- is when the flight is overbooked and the airline is looking for volunteers to change their travel plans. It is voluntary and you do not need to participate. The compensation is 100% negotiable. It could be $100's in future travel vouchers, it might be food vouchers, a different routing (perhaps more direct or for MR's more indirect ), perhaps lodging if overnight and sometimes a bump in cabin. It all depends on how desperate the airline is and how flexible you are.
The standard UA policy is after you have agreed to a voucher amount and additional VDBs are still needed, if those passengers get a higher amount, you will also get the higher amount.
The are no DoT requirement for VDB compensation, it is whatever you and the airline agree to. The DoT does require the airline to try VDB before moving to IDB.
The changing story of IDB on UA since the merge and post-Dao
source: BTS Data
source: BTS Data
Code:
IDB/VDB data for UA (w/o UX) 1st Qtr Year VDB IDB 2018 8,214 27 2017 15,917 900 2016 14,380 929 2015 17,373 1,817 2014 21,469 4,395 2013 14,095 2,592 IDB/VDB data for UA (w/ UX) 1st Qtr Year VDB IDB 2018 16,973 51
Voluntary Denied Boarding - VDB/Bump Experiences on UA [2018]
#76
Join Date: May 2016
Location: SLC
Programs: United Gold, Hilton Silver, Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 768
Monday my wife had a flight DEN-SLC scheduled on a CRJ-200. Not sure why, but it was oversold. When checking it, we noticed that the next flight (1 hour later on a larger plane) had seats available, so she didn't hesitate to volunteer upon check-in. Because of the situation, we thought minimizing the dollar request might improve her chances, so she volunteered at $175.
They called several hours before flight time and asked if she was still interested. They put her in first class on the flight an hour later and gave her the $175 voucher. I've never had them call in advance like that, so this was a pretty good deal, even for a low dollar-amount.
They called several hours before flight time and asked if she was still interested. They put her in first class on the flight an hour later and gave her the $175 voucher. I've never had them call in advance like that, so this was a pretty good deal, even for a low dollar-amount.
#77
Join Date: Jan 2016
Programs: UA 1K; *G, AA Plat
Posts: 1,700
Monday my wife had a flight DEN-SLC scheduled on a CRJ-200. Not sure why, but it was oversold. When checking it, we noticed that the next flight (1 hour later on a larger plane) had seats available, so she didn't hesitate to volunteer upon check-in. Because of the situation, we thought minimizing the dollar request might improve her chances, so she volunteered at $175.
They called several hours before flight time and asked if she was still interested. They put her in first class on the flight an hour later and gave her the $175 voucher. I've never had them call in advance like that, so this was a pretty good deal, even for a low dollar-amount.
They called several hours before flight time and asked if she was still interested. They put her in first class on the flight an hour later and gave her the $175 voucher. I've never had them call in advance like that, so this was a pretty good deal, even for a low dollar-amount.
It's a great deal!
#78
Join Date: May 2016
Location: SLC
Programs: United Gold, Hilton Silver, Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 768
In this case I think it really was just a plain overbooking, as it was showing full with no available seats for sale several days before the flight. I wonder if there was a group booked on the flight. Whatever the cause, it worked out well!
#79
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Tri Valley Area Northern CA
Programs: UA GS
Posts: 579
Yesterday, I was on an upgraded (award saver) STL/IAH/SFO itinerary (departing STL @ 2:45 pm). At the gate, they called me up to podium and asked if i would take the 5:55 pm STL/SFO nonstop in First for an $800 travel certificate. I thought about it for a minute, as I deliberately booked the ealier connection at 2:45 pm versus the 5:55 nonstop, to avoid spending an extended amount of time in STL (no lounge and arrived at the airport at 1 pm). I accepted, despite the fact that they no longer had First available.
At Noon, I was still on the waitlist for the STL/IAH upgrade (E175), with 1 FC seat still available. Between the time I was upgraded, and boarding, United somehow overbooked First. I asked, out of curiosity, what happened. Since it was a 175, I assumed it wasn't for a FAM. The agent wasn't able to provide any details, outside of saying that perhaps a First class seat was unbooked and needed to be rebooked. .
The ironic aspect this situation was this STL/IAH/SFO was my backup plan, in case my meetings finished early. I had a paid Southwest flight at 5:55 pm (booked a couple of week earlier, and about 50% of United's fare).
At Noon, I was still on the waitlist for the STL/IAH upgrade (E175), with 1 FC seat still available. Between the time I was upgraded, and boarding, United somehow overbooked First. I asked, out of curiosity, what happened. Since it was a 175, I assumed it wasn't for a FAM. The agent wasn't able to provide any details, outside of saying that perhaps a First class seat was unbooked and needed to be rebooked. .
The ironic aspect this situation was this STL/IAH/SFO was my backup plan, in case my meetings finished early. I had a paid Southwest flight at 5:55 pm (booked a couple of week earlier, and about 50% of United's fare).
#80
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: LBB
Programs: UA 1K 1MM ★G | Marriott LTT | Hilton ♦ | Hertz PC | Global Entry TSA Pre ✓
Posts: 2,820
UA5688 DEN-BOI on 2/16 was over by 1, and they climbed up to $1000 before anyone nabbed it. They ended up taking that pax, even though there was a delay for mx. Not bad. I was, unfortunately, at the gate nextdoor on a non-oversold flight. The VDB drought for me extends now to 11 months.
#81
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,413
??? I would have countered with "If I can't go until 6 PM, I'd rather find my own way home. How about the $800 voucher and you clear out the itinerary and I'll write for a refund?" Best of both worlds.
#82
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Madrid
Programs: IB+ Emerald (Platino), M&M Senator (Gold), Meliá Rewards Platino, NH Platinum
Posts: 436
A basic question- what are the UA routes with most overbooked flights?
I saw a lot of full IAH-LAX-IAH and IAD-YYZ. I would bet that also LAX-SFO or IAD-EWR, but not sure ...
I saw a lot of full IAH-LAX-IAH and IAD-YYZ. I would bet that also LAX-SFO or IAD-EWR, but not sure ...
#83
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: DTW/MBS
Programs: UA 1K, HHonors Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, Formerly Starbucks Gold
Posts: 3,525
More likely, cities that have large events going on are more prone to overbooking as that event starts and ends is a better answer.
#84
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,857
UA VDB rates are half of last year and 1/4 what they were 5 years ago. There are no guarantee VDB routes anymore.
Look at the size of this thread over the years as another indication.
#85
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: CLE
Programs: UA, AA Plat Pro, DL, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 477
Last week, there was an overbooking situation where they needed two volunteers for CLE-->ORD. Frankly, I'm surprised that was needed, given the capacity on that city pair (lots of daily seats), but it was one of the regional jet flights on a route that is mainline for the other 80% of the flights. It was only for $150 and the one volunteer that ended up being needed was on the next flight which was only 75 minutes later. I used to hear calls for volunteers on UA out of CLE all the time back during the hub years, but even then not on a Chicago flight.
#86
Join Date: May 2012
Programs: UA
Posts: 1,098
Another "close call" for me.
EWR-DEN on 2/18 after the snow storm in EWR on 2/17. Asked for volunteers at OLCI with the usual lottery. I went up to the gate and the agent said yes, $1000 and PS to LAX arriving 5 hours later (my final destination). 1/2 through BG4, I get told they don't need me and to board. They end up taking 3 standbys. I'm pretty reserved to just board and have them get me onboard at this point.
I guess hub-hub, which I usually fly, isn't very VDB friendly.
EWR-DEN on 2/18 after the snow storm in EWR on 2/17. Asked for volunteers at OLCI with the usual lottery. I went up to the gate and the agent said yes, $1000 and PS to LAX arriving 5 hours later (my final destination). 1/2 through BG4, I get told they don't need me and to board. They end up taking 3 standbys. I'm pretty reserved to just board and have them get me onboard at this point.
I guess hub-hub, which I usually fly, isn't very VDB friendly.
#87
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,413
It runs both ways. It's likely that they're willing to overbook by more seats on a hub-hub route, both because the extra seats are extremely lucrative and because they know some people will misconnect. However, the fact that some people will misconnect means that they're less likely to need the volunteers that they asked for in the first place. If UA is doing their job properly -- and evidence suggests that they are -- these two factors should basically cancel out.
#88
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Tri Valley Area Northern CA
Programs: UA GS
Posts: 579
While on the plane (175) before the door closed, the person sittlng next to me was asked to deplane. I got the impression she was on a standby customer (thought I saw TSA on her shirt) and that someone else would take the seat. The cabin door closed and I had 2 seats for myself. What was strange was there were 2 other open seats on the plane. The only thing I could think of is that she was removed for Weight/balance considerations.
#89
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,413
Good point. I was on a saver award ticket so the miles would just be credited back. I flew out on Southwest the day before (connecting in LAX) and I saw all the flights to Chicago (MDW) had signficant delays. My flight back was via MDW (50 minute connection) and I 1) did not want to chance a misconnection in case there was some weather issues and 2) saw the MDW/SFO flight appeared to be full. So I decided to take the STL/SFO non stop.
I definitely see the logic in taking the UA nonstop over a 50-minute MDW connection. Somehow, I was thinking that the WN flight was also non-stop. I was mostly just thinking that I'd rather have miles in my UA account than a WN flight credit, since I try to avoid flying WN. Anyway, it sounds like it worked out very nicely indeed. ^
#90
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: LBB
Programs: UA 1K 1MM ★G | Marriott LTT | Hilton ♦ | Hertz PC | Global Entry TSA Pre ✓
Posts: 2,820
It runs both ways. It's likely that they're willing to overbook by more seats on a hub-hub route, both because the extra seats are extremely lucrative and because they know some people will misconnect. However, the fact that some people will misconnect means that they're less likely to need the volunteers that they asked for in the first place. If UA is doing their job properly -- and evidence suggests that they are -- these two factors should basically cancel out.
The statisticians at this point are still overselling flights, but are erring on the side of leaving seats open for standbys in the wake of the PR incident last year..... I haven't seen any evidence this year that things are changing. On the regional jet markets, it is rare to see a cabin able to be overbooked in advance, I have found (I attest to this based on phone calls to agents to check inventories from time to time).