Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Functionality issues/questions with "New" (Fall 2015) United.com

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Apr 7, 2016, 2:59 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: physioprof
Originally Posted by Kmxu
If you want to use the old site, as mentioned upthread, you clear the cache and history on your browser and type in "ual.com". This should work.
As of Oct. 26, 2015 it no longer seems possible to access the old version of the website.

Related thread
Consolidated: Is united.com or parts of it down?

Workaround for Login & "We’re sorry, but united.com was unable to complete your request." Problems:

Close United tab, clear browser cache, and delete all United cookies. Instead of logging back in using the home page yellow tile, click on the "Reservations -> Change or view reservations" link, and then login using the "MileagePlus: Sign in or join" link on the upper right of the page.
Print Wikipost

Functionality issues/questions with "New" (Fall 2015) United.com

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 8, 2015, 5:01 pm
  #61  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Since the BoSox and ChiSox won it, now it is the Cubs turn to take the Series. Go Cubs Go!
Posts: 3,685
Originally Posted by sbm12
Which specific date did you try? I just did the exact same search and it worked fine.

Or this is one of the inconsistent bugs on the site.
This is strange. I am using Explorer 11 with Windows 8.1. I"ll try a different browser and see if I get better results.
chitownflyer is offline  
Old Aug 8, 2015, 6:47 pm
  #62  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,901
Just spotted another inconsistency. Checked in through the app for INTL flights tomorrow so needs to print the BPs.

The app shows a departure gate, but the printed BPs say "not assigned".
milepig is offline  
Old Aug 8, 2015, 8:26 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: United Global Services, Amtrak Select Executive
Posts: 4,098
Originally Posted by milepig
Just spotted another inconsistency. Checked in through the app for INTL flights tomorrow so needs to print the BPs.

The app shows a departure gate, but the printed BPs say "not assigned".
Trust the app. It updates the BP every time you refresh to reflect the latest departure gate.
physioprof is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2015, 1:04 am
  #64  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Plat, Avis First, Hertz PC
Posts: 575
Originally Posted by agpt
Any changes should add functionality, not remove it.
This is a noble concept, and sometimes it is the reality for business critical software. For consumer products, this is almost never the case. Microsoft tried this with Windows for many years, the bloat grows exponentially with each release.

For a consumer product it is all about tradeoffs. Most consumers like a simple and intuitive feel (which changes with every generation). Interest drops and frustration quickly increases with additional options. Very few users are experts in the product, we can't all be experts at everything all the time!

Then there is also a psychology layer to entice the kind of consumer behavior that aligns with the business model. Too many options prevents a company from steering its users in the desired direction.

Business travelers usually have their own portals/services/TAs. Consumers want the lowest price and simplest experience. Expert travelers using UA.com may not be a market UA wants to support. If we are headed toward a commoditized travel market where price + (ambiguous marketing effects) is king, extra features that don't monetize easily are dead weight.

Many other factors, all a tradeoff/compromise. Can't please everyone.
johnden is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2015, 5:00 am
  #65  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,618
Originally Posted by johnden
Business travelers usually have their own portals/services/TAs. Consumers want the lowest price and simplest experience. Expert travelers using UA.com may not be a market UA wants to support. If we are headed toward a commoditized travel market where price + (ambiguous marketing effects) is king, extra features that don't monetize easily are dead weight.
This. One of the key downsides to the new site is that you won't be able to individually select class of service for each leg of a multi leg trip. That function lets you put together a cheaper overall fare, which is of course not in UA's interest.
halls120 is online now  
Old Aug 9, 2015, 7:44 am
  #66  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,901
Originally Posted by physioprof
Trust the app. It updates the BP every time you refresh to reflect the latest departure gate.
Understood. In my case the app had the gate when I printed the BPs from the app, but when printed they showed "not assigned" on the actual BP. So it looks like the app has information earlier than the BP printing engine.
milepig is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2015, 7:46 am
  #67  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,901
Originally Posted by halls120
This. One of the key downsides to the new site is that you won't be able to individually select class of service for each leg of a multi leg trip. That function lets you put together a cheaper overall fare, which is of course not in UA's interest.
This was working in the app very recently. Hope it doesn't go away. The downside for me was that when I tried to change things later the system just barfed it up. The app also consistently finds flight options/prices that I can't replicate on the web site.
milepig is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2015, 8:08 am
  #68  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,092
the new site is terrible. The award search is not good at all. I want to be able to change my search dynamically when looking for award space ... this is now super cumbersome.
cfischer is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2015, 8:11 am
  #69  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by halls120
This. One of the key downsides to the new site is that you won't be able to individually select class of service for each leg of a multi leg trip.
Can you give a specific example of segments/CoS choices where it is not working for you on the new site but does on the old? Because I keep getting the option to choose both Y and F on every flight, even if I don't want to, on the new site.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2015, 9:57 am
  #70  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,618
Originally Posted by sbm12
Can you give a specific example of segments/CoS choices where it is not working for you on the new site but does on the old? Because I keep getting the option to choose both Y and F on every flight, even if I don't want to, on the new site.
I flew IAD-SFO-SYD-AKL earlier this year. On the existing site, when I tried to book the first leg domestic first, the second leg BF, and the third leg Y, those were the selections I was offered. When I tried it on the beta site, all I'd get on the third leg was a business ticket. When I ran the booking in reverse, if I started with Y on the AKL-SYD leg, I could never get the new site to show me a BF fare on the SYD-SFO leg - just Y fares.

I just tried the same search on the existing site, and it's now doing the same thing. So I guess mixing fares on an itinerary is now consistent on both sites.

Ran the search on the new site, and if you choose F/BF to SYD, the only seat you get offered on SYD-AKL is Business. If on the return you choose economy on AKL-SYD, you can't choose BF on the SYD-SFO leg.

Last edited by halls120; Aug 9, 2015 at 10:08 am
halls120 is online now  
Old Aug 9, 2015, 10:16 am
  #71  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,901
Originally Posted by halls120
I flew IAD-SFO-SYD-AKL earlier this year. On the existing site, when I tried to book the first leg domestic first, the second leg BF, and the third leg Y, those were the selections I was offered. When I tried it on the beta site, all I'd get on the third leg was a business ticket. When I ran the booking in reverse, if I started with Y on the AKL-SYD leg, I could never get the new site to show me a BF fare on the SYD-SFO leg - just Y fares.

I just tried the same search on the existing site, and it's now doing the same thing. So I guess mixing fares on an itinerary is now consistent on both sites.

Ran the search on the new site, and if you choose F/BF to SYD, the only seat you get offered on SYD-AKL is Business. If on the return you choose economy on AKL-SYD, you can't choose BF on the SYD-SFO leg.
I wonder if this is on purpose to avoid having people save money. I recently saved a chunk of change by booking the short leg of my ORD-YYZ-LHR in E . For that length I didn't care and in the end the upgrade came through.
milepig is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2015, 10:50 am
  #72  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: AA Plat4Life4MM/DL MM SM4Life, UA/CO 1K
Posts: 645
Anyone having problem "importing" an itinerary to their account ?

I was able to do it on the mobile app, but not on the website.
Another problem I run into is, I have cancelled an int'l trip and the agent booked my new travel under that same old PNR, and now, it won't show up on my Reservations, as booked and ticketed.
Everytime when I need to check on my upgrade, I have to search it with the PNR address and name.
AA2MM is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2015, 11:12 am
  #73  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Arrow

Originally Posted by halls120
I flew IAD-SFO-SYD-AKL earlier this year. On the existing site, when I tried to book the first leg domestic first, the second leg BF, and the third leg Y, those were the selections I was offered.
Dunno what specific entries you're using for multi-city, but I can make that search show me the cabins you specified without much trouble. I did IAD-SYD on day X and SYD-AKL on X+2. And it was far cheaper than even Y one way, to say nothing of saving thousands on the one way C fare.









I do see the lack of options on the return for AKL-SYD-???-IAD if the first segment is selected as economy.

I also cannot help but wonder if part of this specific case is related to the way AZ markets trans-Tasman flights.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2015, 11:31 am
  #74  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MRY - CNX - TXL
Programs: UA 1K / *G / Marriott PE / Expedia Gold+ / Hertz PC
Posts: 7,058
I don't like on the new display that it doesn't show a +1 etc for the arrival date/time. You have to click details and then look down below and check.
JVPhoto is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2015, 12:12 pm
  #75  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by JVPhoto
I don't like on the new display that it doesn't show a +1 etc for the arrival date/time. You have to click details and then look down below and check.
Look at the image in the post above. It shows +2 for SFOSYD; it is light blue text above the times.
sbm12 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.