![]() |
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 25240148)
Which specific date did you try? I just did the exact same search and it worked fine.
Or this is one of the inconsistent bugs on the site. |
Just spotted another inconsistency. Checked in through the app for INTL flights tomorrow so needs to print the BPs.
The app shows a departure gate, but the printed BPs say "not assigned". |
Originally Posted by milepig
(Post 25241692)
Just spotted another inconsistency. Checked in through the app for INTL flights tomorrow so needs to print the BPs.
The app shows a departure gate, but the printed BPs say "not assigned". |
Originally Posted by agpt
(Post 25231385)
Any changes should add functionality, not remove it.
For a consumer product it is all about tradeoffs. Most consumers like a simple and intuitive feel (which changes with every generation). Interest drops and frustration quickly increases with additional options. Very few users are experts in the product, we can't all be experts at everything all the time! Then there is also a psychology layer to entice the kind of consumer behavior that aligns with the business model. Too many options prevents a company from steering its users in the desired direction. Business travelers usually have their own portals/services/TAs. Consumers want the lowest price and simplest experience. Expert travelers using UA.com may not be a market UA wants to support. If we are headed toward a commoditized travel market where price + (ambiguous marketing effects) is king, extra features that don't monetize easily are dead weight. Many other factors, all a tradeoff/compromise. Can't please everyone. |
Originally Posted by johnden
(Post 25242494)
Business travelers usually have their own portals/services/TAs. Consumers want the lowest price and simplest experience. Expert travelers using UA.com may not be a market UA wants to support. If we are headed toward a commoditized travel market where price + (ambiguous marketing effects) is king, extra features that don't monetize easily are dead weight.
|
Originally Posted by physioprof
(Post 25241999)
Trust the app. It updates the BP every time you refresh to reflect the latest departure gate.
|
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 25242900)
This. One of the key downsides to the new site is that you won't be able to individually select class of service for each leg of a multi leg trip. That function lets you put together a cheaper overall fare, which is of course not in UA's interest.
|
the new site is terrible. The award search is not good at all. I want to be able to change my search dynamically when looking for award space ... this is now super cumbersome.
|
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 25242900)
This. One of the key downsides to the new site is that you won't be able to individually select class of service for each leg of a multi leg trip.
|
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 25243334)
Can you give a specific example of segments/CoS choices where it is not working for you on the new site but does on the old? Because I keep getting the option to choose both Y and F on every flight, even if I don't want to, on the new site. :confused:
I just tried the same search on the existing site, and it's now doing the same thing. So I guess mixing fares on an itinerary is now consistent on both sites. Ran the search on the new site, and if you choose F/BF to SYD, the only seat you get offered on SYD-AKL is Business. If on the return you choose economy on AKL-SYD, you can't choose BF on the SYD-SFO leg. |
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 25243702)
I flew IAD-SFO-SYD-AKL earlier this year. On the existing site, when I tried to book the first leg domestic first, the second leg BF, and the third leg Y, those were the selections I was offered. When I tried it on the beta site, all I'd get on the third leg was a business ticket. When I ran the booking in reverse, if I started with Y on the AKL-SYD leg, I could never get the new site to show me a BF fare on the SYD-SFO leg - just Y fares.
I just tried the same search on the existing site, and it's now doing the same thing. So I guess mixing fares on an itinerary is now consistent on both sites. Ran the search on the new site, and if you choose F/BF to SYD, the only seat you get offered on SYD-AKL is Business. If on the return you choose economy on AKL-SYD, you can't choose BF on the SYD-SFO leg. |
Anyone having problem "importing" an itinerary to their account ?
I was able to do it on the mobile app, but not on the website.
Another problem I run into is, I have cancelled an int'l trip and the agent booked my new travel under that same old PNR, and now, it won't show up on my Reservations, as booked and ticketed. Everytime when I need to check on my upgrade, I have to search it with the PNR address and name. :confused: |
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 25243702)
I flew IAD-SFO-SYD-AKL earlier this year. On the existing site, when I tried to book the first leg domestic first, the second leg BF, and the third leg Y, those were the selections I was offered.
http://gallery.millerworks.net/photo...-48KHVb3-M.jpg http://gallery.millerworks.net/photo...-9VS3hk5-M.jpg http://gallery.millerworks.net/photo...-vzKfcJC-M.jpg I do see the lack of options on the return for AKL-SYD-???-IAD if the first segment is selected as economy. I also cannot help but wonder if part of this specific case is related to the way AZ markets trans-Tasman flights. |
I don't like on the new display that it doesn't show a +1 etc for the arrival date/time. You have to click details and then look down below and check.
|
Originally Posted by JVPhoto
(Post 25244040)
I don't like on the new display that it doesn't show a +1 etc for the arrival date/time. You have to click details and then look down below and check.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:49 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.