![]() |
Form over function?
Any changes should add functionality, not remove it.
When a new site is rolled out, the default should be that all the functionality of the old site is retained. If the interface could be "streamlined", fine, but there should always be the option for some sort of "expert" mode to give added functionality. I use a mouse and keyboard, not a touchscreen. I don't care about fancy tiles that grow and shrink in size when you click them. These only make the page load more slowly. I want a site that allows me to easily search many flight options, along the lines of ITA Matrix or Google Flights. Though the old site was far from perfect, it was more functional than the new one, and I am sad to see it go. I have been unable to log in to the new site this morning. I called the web support, and I was told that my issue is not isolated. From another standpoint: If a customer cannot log in to the site to book tickets, how will United get that revenue? |
Originally Posted by ctownflyer
(Post 25230330)
I don't understand why more Flyertalkers and bloggers aren't up in arms over the loss of the nonstop award calendar from the old site to the new site.
I find it dead useful in piecing together award flights. It's a massive step backwards IMHO. |
Originally Posted by Lurker1999
(Post 25231473)
Any workarounds to this yet or is this another transparent act by United to head towards dynamic award pricing?
However for the life of me I can't understand why United would want to remove the ability to view a nonstop award calendar. And yet while I hope it's a bug it's yet to show up as something that's going to be fixed. |
Originally Posted by bmwe92fan
(Post 25230188)
OMG yes - this is exactly what I have experienced MANY times - the inconsistency between the two is infuriating.... Something so simple shouldn't be so hard....
I logged into the new site to see if it would return better search results on flights and it turned out to display fewer results/less options. I readily admit not spending a lot of time tweaking with it to see if I could get better results, but it was a pretty simple search and something I wouldn't expect to have to fiddle with. |
Originally Posted by KPHX
(Post 25230127)
Still can't book legs split economy/business cabins. Very disappointing. No chance in hell seeing that feature come back, is there? Believe it or not, it was a key selling point for UA, at least for me.
This seems to work for all segments in each direction. If you want to do it on a per-segment basis, it seems possible using multi-city. |
Originally Posted by agpt
(Post 25231658)
I had used that previous feature as well. On the new site, you can get some of that functionality back by simply searching economy and then selecting the business cabin segments at a higher price.
|
Originally Posted by agpt
(Post 25231385)
Any changes should add functionality, not remove it.
However, there are a few things (pointed out here and on other blogs) that could be added back in for expert users / frequent fliers / profitable customers.
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 25231675)
So it actually provides the same info as the old site, without requiring the user to specify that they want the mixed cabin service, right? That's a good thing, isn't it??
One thing that's missing is the PQM and actual flight miles on a per segment basis. It seems to show the total accrual, but it's not immediately obvious what <500 mile segments were rounded up, etc. That can make a difference, especially with the 1.5 multiplier for premium fares. |
Originally Posted by ft4lyf
(Post 25226026)
I am concerned this kind of functionality will go away with the "new" site. The current "old" site is very useful for types of searches you describe.
|
Originally Posted by KPHX
(Post 25230127)
Still can't book legs split economy/business cabins. Very disappointing. No chance in hell seeing that feature come back, is there? Believe it or not, it was a key selling point for UA, at least for me.
|
Originally Posted by CO FF
(Post 25227441)
Premium cabin meal choice (like AA has) would be a welcome function...
Or they should go back to prioritizing those on full fare tickets first. |
Originally Posted by CO FF
(Post 25227441)
Premium cabin meal choice (like AA has) would be a welcome function...
Unless someone can figure this out, you have to give up one for the other (on AA, you must make your final order at T-24, AFAIK). Given these choices, I would rather UA retain the current SDC policy. |
Really liking the new UAL site. Would love to see the integration of mystatus.united.com with the new site, though.
|
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 25229584)
Should be available via the full search options page at https://www.united.com/ual/en/us/fli.../book-a-flight.
I hope there is a way to get this through to United's IT Department, so it can be fixed. |
Originally Posted by chitownflyer
(Post 25240135)
Thanks for posting this, but I get an error when I try using the my dates are flexible option. For example, my dates are flexible SFO-LHR Sep 23, 2015 8 day trip with Mileage Plus upgrade selected, the site will display a calendar of fares, but when one goes and clicks on a specific date, the following error message occurs on the following page, "No flight schedule could be retrieved using your search criteria. Please use the form below to start a new search."
Or this is one of the inconsistent bugs on the site. |
Originally Posted by agpt
(Post 25231385)
I don't care about fancy tiles that grow and shrink in size when you click them. These only make the page load more slowly. I want a site that allows me to easily search many flight options, along the lines of ITA Matrix or Google Flights.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:58 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.