New TV Commercial for p.s.
#136
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,613
They're branding campaigns, while the p.s. ad we're all talking about is more about promoting a specific product / features. Kind of an apples and oranges comparison.
But you need both - most people here are lamenting the lack of emotional connection in the ad, and I agree with you that that is more the domain of a brand campaign than a product highlight. That said, the closest thing to a branding campaign we've seen from UA since the merger is either the Olympics ad (not very good either - just kept rattling off more destinations, more flights, more FEATURES but no emotional connection in the script... the music and athlete imagery maybe, but I don't really know what that is supposed to tell me about United) or the cheesy Chase MileagePlus Explorer commercials (which don't exactly paint the airline in the most aspirational sense).
But you need both - most people here are lamenting the lack of emotional connection in the ad, and I agree with you that that is more the domain of a brand campaign than a product highlight. That said, the closest thing to a branding campaign we've seen from UA since the merger is either the Olympics ad (not very good either - just kept rattling off more destinations, more flights, more FEATURES but no emotional connection in the script... the music and athlete imagery maybe, but I don't really know what that is supposed to tell me about United) or the cheesy Chase MileagePlus Explorer commercials (which don't exactly paint the airline in the most aspirational sense).
http://youtu.be/M6VzhDE1Wso
#137
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: Hyatt GLOB, Marriott Lifetime PLT, UA 1K 1MM.
Posts: 1,728
#138
Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: AA PP, UA 1K/MM, WoH Globalist, HH Gold
Posts: 1,201
So what exactly do you care about a seat if the length, width, etc. does not matter?
#139
Suspended
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,961
Well, you saw at that site that the whole right side of the video was cut off, right? Surely you wouldn't criticize a video based on only viewing 2/3 of it. Are we now attacking UA because they allowed someone to embed part of their YouTube video on a website? How were they supposed to prevent that?
#140
Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: AA PP, UA 1K/MM, WoH Globalist, HH Gold
Posts: 1,201
Actually the work horse of CO's international fleet is the 757. No wonder they think that a domestic 757 is utter luxury and "like flying international".
#141
Suspended
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,961
When I watch this ad I get a list of benefits: 15" screen, 4 course meal, wifi and power, flat bed seats, ice cream sundae. Those are all good things! What conclusion am I supposed to draw from that list of features? "... as luxurious as flying overseas" gives me a hint at what they're trying to get to, but this ad certainly doesn't convey "luxury" to me.
Whether there are enough of those people, whether UA is effective at targeting them, whether you could do a better job of casting a slightly wider net with your marketing, all are valid questions. But the ad seems to be a pretty reasonable job of communicating that core message: UA has an international business-class service on some of its transcontinental domestic flights, that none of its competitors offers (or certainly not to the same degree).
I can imagine a better ad. But some of the hating here just seems absurd.
This is a serious question, I might be missing your point.
Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Jul 2, 2013 at 2:30 pm Reason: merge
#142
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: LAX
Programs: UA MM | BA Silver
Posts: 7,193
#143
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,172
You said you haven't been in the seats on either, just the 777. Having been in them all 3, I can confidently say...there's a difference.
#144
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,185
#145
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,613
Well, you saw at that site that the whole right side of the video was cut off, right? Surely you wouldn't criticize a video based on only viewing 2/3 of it. Are we now attacking UA because they allowed someone to embed part of their YouTube video on a website? How were they supposed to prevent that?
I still think the ad is uninspiring, bland, and isn't going to entice many people to run out and purchase tickets on p.s.
Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Jul 2, 2013 at 2:29 pm Reason: undully personalized comments removed; off-topic
#146
Suspended
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,961
In what way is it better? SeatGuru claims that the 767 seat is actually more constricted. Is that wrong?
#148
Suspended
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,961
Here is a direct link to the YouTube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptb8amWUK4Q
#149
Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: AA PP, UA 1K/MM, WoH Globalist, HH Gold
Posts: 1,201
The thrust of this thread is about the seat so lets get back on topic. You still have not said (aside from the video encoding) if you disagree about the physical aspects of the seat.
And for the record, I've been in sCO "lie flat" seat on both 757s (sUA an sCO) as well as 767-300s (sUA) and it is not the best product out there, and certainly worse than the sUA "lie flat" business seats.
#150
Suspended
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,961
Disagree with what? I think it's a much better seat than any other product that any other airline currently offers on this route. That's the point of the ad and it seems to me to be true. Whether some other seat that you can't book on this route is better than this one seems rather beside the point.