So, I got refused admission to the IAD United Club...
#61
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: between SFO & SJC
Programs: UA 1MM (and no longer flying much)
Posts: 777
#62
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
This came up in a focus group once about 5 or 6 years ago; UA was interested (they brought it up and wanted to know how we'd feel about it), but nothing ever came of it obviously.
#63
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Do you believe that this behavior is "well known" to the broader FT community?
I have never before seen a thread on FT that describes the pervasive "making up of rules" that you mention is "well known" to have occurred in the past.
I also feel well qualified to personally question this assertion, because during my years as both a GS and a 1K, IAD was my primary hub. I worked on a project that required me to fly to/from IAD on a very routine basis for several years, and, I used IAD as the jumping off point for many European flights. As such, I have more experience with IAD than any airport other than my home airport of SFO, and I can tell you for a fact that I never once experienced any sort of "rogue" behavior from a PMUA employee at an RCC lounge as OP describes in this thread.
I have never before seen a thread on FT that describes the pervasive "making up of rules" that you mention is "well known" to have occurred in the past.
I also feel well qualified to personally question this assertion, because during my years as both a GS and a 1K, IAD was my primary hub. I worked on a project that required me to fly to/from IAD on a very routine basis for several years, and, I used IAD as the jumping off point for many European flights. As such, I have more experience with IAD than any airport other than my home airport of SFO, and I can tell you for a fact that I never once experienced any sort of "rogue" behavior from a PMUA employee at an RCC lounge as OP describes in this thread.
Even at the SFO UCs, the lounge guards still stamp the BPs and deny the existsence of the GFL.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...ata-point.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...c-members.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...oing-intl.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...d-threads.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...-resolved.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...k-chits-g.html
Etc ad nauseam.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...c-members.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...oing-intl.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...d-threads.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...-resolved.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...k-chits-g.html
Etc ad nauseam.
I have come across it myself and I scratch my head because for the life of me I cannot understand it, as I can see it there is no benefit to the employee for turning away a passenger who rightfully belongs there (especially if the PAX decided to further the issues the employee could end up in trouble).
Dan
Last edited by Xyzzy; May 27, 2013 at 10:09 pm Reason: Fixed UBB code
#64
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
I certainly did. In fact, IAD is probably the *only* airport I've ever had any trouble with a club moat dragon (Oh wait - there was that one incident at ORD more than a decade past). Even as a GS I was routinely subjected to random rules and surly attitudes there. I still can't decide whether it's IAD or IAH that makes me feel more like I'm in the 3rd World.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...ata-point.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...c-members.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...oing-intl.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...d-threads.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...-resolved.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...k-chits-g.html
Etc ad nauseam.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...c-members.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...oing-intl.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...d-threads.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...-resolved.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...k-chits-g.html
Etc ad nauseam.
I can see how drink chits are a problem at IAD and how the behavior/attitude at the bars there is also bad. I had a fight with one of the bartenders there who refused to accept my drink chit. I forgot about that, as it was a long time ago, and I don't usually drink before/after/during flight.
But, your example doesn't seem to point to a well known pattern of denying entry to members or other forms or arbitrary rule fabrication.
I will never understand why agents makeup rules, there is just no rhyme nor reason for doing so.
I am positive that UA does NOT deduct funds from employee's paychecks for allowing in passengers who rightfully belong there (even if the club is crowded), likewise I am positive that UA does NOT remunerate employees for denying passengers access to the club who rightfully belong there, so what could be reasoning for an employee do so?
There has to be a reason!
I am positive that UA does NOT deduct funds from employee's paychecks for allowing in passengers who rightfully belong there (even if the club is crowded), likewise I am positive that UA does NOT remunerate employees for denying passengers access to the club who rightfully belong there, so what could be reasoning for an employee do so?
- Poor Training?
- Rouge Club Manager?
- Employees with Curmudgeonly Personalities?
There has to be a reason!
#65
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Programs: MYOB
Posts: 1,292
You should have collected their names for the complaint letter. A gratis year of UC is appropriate compensation. You should have called the United Club complaint line while waiting.
After the walk way between T3 and the international terminal was added, for a while I did get 'tude from RCC wardens in the latter terminal. But was never denied.
After the walk way between T3 and the international terminal was added, for a while I did get 'tude from RCC wardens in the latter terminal. But was never denied.
Just curious. How was that arrived at for "appropriate compensation?"
#66
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: body: A stone's throw from SFO, mind: SE Asia
Programs: Some of this 'n some of that
Posts: 17,263
#67
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
I have never seen anyone (including myself) that can get UC to do anything.
#68
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Crystal City, VA
Programs: United Mileage Plus 1K 2 MM, HHonors Diamond, Hyatt Platinum
Posts: 2,627
Some clubs (e.g., LAX) aren't as strict as others (e.g., SFO), IMHO. YMMV.
#69
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NCL
Programs: UA 1MM/*G. DL Gold for one more year.
Posts: 5,305
Thanks for doing this research. I note that the key issue here seems to revolve around drink chits. Here, we are talking about making up arbitrary rules, attitudes, and arbitrary denial of access to members based on made up rules. I don't see much in the posts you provided that indicate a pattern of this type. I only see lots of talk about drink chits.
I can see how drink chits are a problem at IAD and how the behavior/attitude at the bars there is also bad. I had a fight with one of the bartenders there who refused to accept my drink chit. I forgot about that, as it was a long time ago, and I don't usually drink before/after/during flight.
But, your example doesn't seem to point to a well known pattern of denying entry to members or other forms or arbitrary rule fabrication.
I can see how drink chits are a problem at IAD and how the behavior/attitude at the bars there is also bad. I had a fight with one of the bartenders there who refused to accept my drink chit. I forgot about that, as it was a long time ago, and I don't usually drink before/after/during flight.
But, your example doesn't seem to point to a well known pattern of denying entry to members or other forms or arbitrary rule fabrication.
There used to be a hilarious thread (now sadly lost, I think there was an FT archive disaster a few years back) in the LH forum about "Matron" who guarded the MUC SEN lounge like a dragon watching over a gold treasure. Everybody had a story about her condescension and capriciousness, and there were lengthy attempts at explaining her psychology. I recall one of them being that, judging by her accent and demeanour, she's probably the daughter of a doctor or a lawyer, and whilst she tries to keep up the pretence that she has a glamorous job at Lufthansa, she is embittered over the fact that she is in fact little more than "a glorified waitress".
Last edited by Passmethesickbag; May 28, 2013 at 12:37 am
#70
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
The point of a membership is to eliminate impediments to using the service.
Indeed it is.
Thanks for doing this research. I note that the key issue here seems to revolve around drink chits. Here, we are talking about making up arbitrary rules, attitudes, and arbitrary denial of access to members based on made up rules. I don't see much in the posts you provided that indicate a pattern of this type. I only see lots of talk about drink chits.
Last edited by mre5765; May 28, 2013 at 12:45 am
#73
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NCL
Programs: UA 1MM/*G. DL Gold for one more year.
Posts: 5,305
#74
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
This is what I get for becoming moderate. Three years ago I called decapitation when a mere guest was refused and was roundly cheered. Today I call for merely a free year of membership when a member was denied and am called over entitled.
Enough.
Proper compensation for OP would be the gift of a scale model, game changing 787 with the cockpit wimdows encrusted with gems cut from the eyes of two C8 dragons.
Enough.
Proper compensation for OP would be the gift of a scale model, game changing 787 with the cockpit wimdows encrusted with gems cut from the eyes of two C8 dragons.
#75
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: HNL
Programs: United Gold
Posts: 1,581
As to not being let in to the UC, I find that very strange and will test it the next time I'm at IAD.