Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

United CFO Rainey Implies Certain Elites were "Over Entitled".

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

United CFO Rainey Implies Certain Elites were "Over Entitled".

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2012, 7:49 am
  #961  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Trenton NJ
Programs: UA Gold MM, Honors Diamond, Marriott Gold, Hertz President’s Circle
Posts: 3,668
This "over-entitled" multi-year 1K will be taking a slightly different tack than most. My business travel is primarily to Germany on LH due to the non-stop EWR-DUS (HQ is about 45 miles north of DUS). Until my relocation to the east coast for this position, I was doing a lot of personal travel to visit family back east from CA (spent many a Friday night on the LAX-IAD redeyes). I had been topping off my account with mileage runs to maintain my 1K status.

However, when the programs were merged I was bumped up to a Million Miler with lifetime Gold. Honestly, that's all I care about since it allows me lounge access for overseas personal trips (company trips are in business). I've barely sniffed an upgrade over the past two years if it wasn't supported. I don't play the W fare TATL/TPAC lotto (those GPUs work great on EWR-DUS though). I'm tired of not having dedicated 1K1Call service as I've had to call in and hold for at least an hour while I get passed to the MPSC to get my LH and LX flights to credit properly. I figured I was going to have to do the same with my US flights but they credited faster than my own UA flights.

What I will be doing is traveling locally. After being away from New England for 25 years, I had forgotten all the things that are available to me within a reasonable drive. I may still take the odd trip and it will likely be on UA but I won't be pushing myself to keep 1K status especially since it means less and less these days.
Bluehen1 is offline  
Old May 23, 2012, 7:56 am
  #962  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Who is over entitled?

At this point, can there be any doubt that 1k's are the group primarily targeted by Rainey? This makes Shannon's message that ignores all of this and instead talks about how much easier it's become to get an E+ seat all the more infuriating. I also have little doubt that message was dictated by one of the same Texas Meathead Tyrants responsible for these changes that we are supposed to like. Never before in my life have I seen so many blatant lies. These guys must have read a Soviet era playbook on propaganda to kick off the takeover but they should have read it more carefully because their execution sucks.

By the way, is it against TOS to link to UA Parody videos on YouTube. I've posted twice but both were deleted. They are hilarious and more true by the day.

Last edited by FlyWorld; May 23, 2012 at 8:02 am
FlyWorld is offline  
Old May 23, 2012, 7:56 am
  #963  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,330
Originally Posted by Bluehen1

However, when the programs were merged I was bumped up to a Million Miler with lifetime Gold. Honestly, that's all I care about since it allows me lounge access for overseas personal trips
I guarantee that will change within 12 months. EVERY UA elite that walks in the door of a TG or SQ or BD Lounge etc costs $mi$ek $US25.

Someone will die when they see this year's bill due to a ton more "Golds".

MP Plats and up will the only MP members to get * Lounge access within a year.

All true MMs should have got MP Plat but they did not. CO IEs went one better - they got 1K for life after all. They were the Chosen People of course, as they were CO good ole Boys.

Please post back then about how great the current deal is.
.
ozstamps is offline  
Old May 23, 2012, 7:57 am
  #964  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by dsquared37
Time will tell. I'm hoping you're wrong.
So, now you are rooting for UA to fail?

Why?

Originally Posted by ozstamps
United is headed for Chapter 11 within the next 12 months.
Talk about delusional...

Check back with me on 5/23/2013 and we'll see where things are.
LarkSFO is offline  
Old May 23, 2012, 8:03 am
  #965  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,172
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
So, now you are rooting for UA to fail?

Why?
Reality check - none of us who despise COdbaUA are rooting for it to "go out of business" fail - it's more about rooting for failure in the near term (next few quarters) to the extent that the BoD will start to question the dubious choices made by this leadership team.

A clean slate of more customer-focused executives would go a long way.
UA-NYC is online now  
Old May 23, 2012, 8:06 am
  #966  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by mitchmu
At this point, can there be any doubt that 1k's are the group primarily targeted by Rainey?
After reviewing the presentation again, and thinking about the changes over the past 12 months, I am 100% certain that Mr. Rainey was not referring to 1K's with his statement.

2P's (primarily), and 1P's (to a lesser extent) have borne the brunt of the changes.
LarkSFO is offline  
Old May 23, 2012, 8:07 am
  #967  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
Reality check - none of us who despise COdbaUA are rooting for it to "go out of business" fail - it's more about rooting for failure in the near term (next few quarters) to the extent that the BoD will start to question the dubious choices made by this leadership team.

A clean slate of more customer-focused executives would go a long way.
+1

I am rooting for $mi$ek and his cronies to be fired and their bonuses taken away and for a new management team to restore the dignity for which I admired UA.
FlyWorld is offline  
Old May 23, 2012, 8:08 am
  #968  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
Reality check - none of us who despise COdbaUA are rooting for it to "go out of business" fail - it's more about rooting for failure in the near term (next few quarters) to the extent that the BoD will start to question the dubious choices made by this leadership team.

A clean slate of more customer-focused executives would go a long way.
He said he wants to see UA in bankruptcy. Sounds like he is rooting for UA to fail.

I understand your perspective as well - you want UA to do poorly enough that Smisek and Co. are removed.

Be careful what you wish for, a new regime could just as easily be worse for elites...
LarkSFO is offline  
Old May 23, 2012, 8:08 am
  #969  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
After reviewing the presentation again, and thinking about the changes over the past 12 months, I am 100% certain that Mr. Rainey was not referring to 1K's with his statement.

2P's (primarily), and 1P's (to a lesser extent) have borne the brunt of the changes.
Don't understand how you can draw that conclusion after reviewing all that's been posted in just the last 24 hrs.
FlyWorld is offline  
Old May 23, 2012, 8:10 am
  #970  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Programs: UA 1K 3 Million/ex-many year GS, AA PLT/2 Mil, AS MVPG, HH Dia, Starwood Life Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,401
The thing I don't get with the UA benefit reductions for 1Ks is that most of them are not monetary.

- 1K dedicated phone line: you have to have these folks answering phones anyway. Set it up so there is a dedicated 1K set of agents and overflow other calls to them if there aren't any 1Ks on hold. NO additional agents, just as efficient, but you get the old 1K line at no extra cost.
- Checkin dedicated 1K lines - same thing - this is about setting up ropes and signs. That 1K check in agent pulls folks from the next line down when no 1K is waiting. Again - no staffing change and no cost.
- On board meal selection. No cost to who gets which meal so why not give a 1K first choice.
- Boarding - everyone is getting on the plane. Permitting 1Ks (and in this case GS) have a useable bypass if they get to the gate 2 minutes after boarding started costs nothing.

Yes - the upgrade mess may be cost issue, although the request here is at least in part for fair access to buyups and fair processing of instruments. CPUs vs TODs is a potential cost issue we can debate.

My point is that the new UA is doing what appear to be stupid things to annoy 1Ks that save nothing on the cost side. Clever revenue enhancement is one thing but these changes just make no sense to me.
pdx1M is offline  
Old May 23, 2012, 8:10 am
  #971  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IAD
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Rewards - LTPP
Posts: 4,240
Originally Posted by ozstamps

Someone will die when they see this year's bill due to a ton more "Golds".
Do you really think there are THAT many more golds on the combined carrier than the sum of the subsidiary airlines??
njcommodore is offline  
Old May 23, 2012, 8:13 am
  #972  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Alexandria, Va. USA
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, DL Silver, UA Gold, *A Gold, OW Emerald
Posts: 1,492
but can you collect on those entitlements?

I am Gold at UA and I have spent much of the time lately flying around in Econ Minus on CO aircraft not yet modified for Econ Plus. I do get an upgrade once in a while and am happy to get it. On paper I may be over entitled but I am rarely able to collect on those fab benefits.
Orion is offline  
Old May 23, 2012, 8:17 am
  #973  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,330
Originally Posted by njcommodore

Do you really think there are THAT many more golds on the combined carrier than the sum of the subsidiary airlines??
Huh? ConUall has subsidiaries?
.
ozstamps is offline  
Old May 23, 2012, 8:21 am
  #974  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,172
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
He said he wants to see UA in bankruptcy. Sounds like he is rooting for UA to fail.

I understand your perspective as well - you want UA to do poorly enough that Smisek and Co. are removed.

Be careful what you wish for, a new regime could just as easily be worse for elites...
I don't root for BK, but I do root for enough short term failure that would lead to a new leadership team. Presumably one selected to not continue down the ill-advised $misek & Rainey path, but rather realize it's okay to try to make money and treat your valued customers well.
UA-NYC is online now  
Old May 23, 2012, 8:28 am
  #975  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 251
Originally Posted by LarkSFO

I understand your perspective as well - you want UA to do poorly enough that Smisek and Co. are removed.

Be careful what you wish for, a new regime could just as easily be worse for elites...
Worse for Elites???

What could they do?

Promise us upgrades and not deliver? Wait, they've done that.
Not credit mileage correctly? Wait, they've done that.
Make it excruciating to deal with an irrops change? Wait, they've done that.
Get the employees so mad that they hate their jobs and us? Wait, they've done that.
Lose our reservations? Wait, they've done that.
Lie to us? Wait, they've done that.
Tell us every broken promise is a "glitch" that will take over a year to fix? Wait, they've done that.
Belittle us as over-entitled? Wait, they've done that.
Remove our access to dedicated, excellent phone agents? Wait, they've done that.
Use bait and switch tactics? Wait, they've done that.
Sell the benefits they've promised us to any once-a-year flyer with an few extra $20s? Wait, they've done that.


Short of strap us to the outside of the plane I doubt there is more a worse regeime could do. And, frankly, I doubt one could find a worse regeime. Would Lorenzo take over again?
desperationsearch is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.