Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Excon bracelets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 4:57 pm
  #31  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: United Mileage Plus Premier Executive, AmericanAdvantage Gold
Posts: 180
Originally Posted by palmetto86
All three FAs on my IAH-DCA flight on 3/29 had small ExCon lapel pins with the "Con" part clearly in old Continental font.

At the end of our flight, the capt said something like, "This Houston-based, former Continental flight crew thanks you for flying United."
How unprofessional! I make a comment to a gate agent the other day who said now boarding Continental flight from IAH to PNS. I thought it was rude. I always asked if I should be boarding because I paid to fly United. I guess Continental does exist in policies which are horrible. I would write up any employee with this attitude. CO employees seem to have an arrogance which shows in their awful service.
TWATWA is offline  
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 5:13 pm
  #32  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hold it down for The Bay, reppin' Oakland
Programs: Lowly UA gold, Marriott Ambassador/Tit4Lyf, IHG Diamond
Posts: 1,811
It may not be 100% professional or "on message," but...

this seems like a really petty thing to complain about. The integration has not been easy for anyone, and I do not begrudge United/Continental employees a chance to let off steam in a harmless and humorous manner. It might even be good for morale. If seeing an ex-con bracelet on a flight attendant is the worst thing that happened on your flight, you must have had a wonderful trip. Save the bellyaching for real problems, like long hold times, reservations that don't ticket, lost legs and seat assignments, and irrops chaos.

Last edited by lexdevil; Apr 2, 2012 at 10:12 pm
lexdevil is offline  
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 10:02 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: DEN
Programs: 2012 Plat-2013 Plat-2014 Silver-2015 GM
Posts: 818
United they stand, divided they fall.
ibuyyoufly is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 6:44 am
  #34  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,424
Originally Posted by lexdevil
this seems like a really petty thing to complain about. The integration has not been easy for anyone, and I do not begrudge United/Continental employees a chance to let off steam in a harmless and humorous manner. It might even be good for morale. If seeing an ex-con bracelet on a flight attendant is the worst thing that happened on your flight, you must have had a wonderful trip. Save the bellyaching for real problems, like long hold times, reservations that don't ticket, lost legs and seat assignments, and irrops chaos.
While I agree with the spirit of your post, I actually don't think it's good for morale.
It's fine for the employees of a company to "let off steam". I'm sure we all do it.
But when it's done on the job, in front of customers, I think it's unprofessional. To me, it comes across as whiny and small-minded. I'm a life-long CO flyer, but I'm sort of embarrased for CO when I hear a pilot announce that the passengers are being served by a Continental crew.
IFlyHarder is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 6:57 am
  #35  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,309
Originally Posted by IFlyHarder
While I agree with the spirit of your post, I actually don't think it's good for morale.
It's fine for the employees of a company to "let off steam". I'm sure we all do it.
But when it's done on the job, in front of customers, I think it's unprofessional. To me, it comes across as whiny and small-minded. I'm a life-long CO flyer, but I'm sort of embarrased for CO when I hear a pilot announce that the passengers are being served by a Continental crew.
And it is just as bad to hear a pilot say "thanks for flying on a real United plane with a real United flight crew."

things like this tell me management hasn't done a good job of developing a "one team" spirit.
halls120 is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 7:06 am
  #36  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now MFE... formerly SEA and DCA
Programs: Now UA free!, AA Ex Plat, AS MVP, Marriott Titanium for life
Posts: 664
Originally Posted by halls120
And it is just as bad to hear a pilot say "thanks for flying on a real United plane with a real United flight crew."

things like this tell me management hasn't done a good job of developing a "one team" spirit.
ABSOLUTELY!

While JS talks and talks, he has done nothing to gain support of his co-workers. Try creating a vision that your team can get behind! Allowing things like this to fester will only cause continued division.
Luvs2snowbordbut1kSEA is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 7:44 am
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
60 Nights
50 Countries Visited
3M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 27,399
to the Ex-Cons for wearing these bracelets (their tacky uniforms make clear they are Ex-Cons, so I don't understand the need for the bracelet).

What makes me more angry is that in my last 6-7 calls to the elite line in which I got an Ex-Con person, they never mentioned UNITED AIRLINES. Not cool.
MatthewLAX is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 8:32 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta Silver, Hilton Gold
Posts: 966
Originally Posted by electroflyer
As a former PMCO frequent flyer, I like seeing the former Continental employees taking pride in their previous airline.

As for complaining, the only complaints I have seen in person have been from United ticket/gate agents and flight attendants. "Oh, that's a Continental thing. We don't know how to do that." and "I don't know how to do that, but you should go online and check for yourself." have been common refrains from United people post-merger.
+1
UA767400 is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 8:42 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now MFE... formerly SEA and DCA
Programs: Now UA free!, AA Ex Plat, AS MVP, Marriott Titanium for life
Posts: 664
Originally Posted by UA767400
+1
Hmmm OK. Hey just an FYI- there is no more onepass.

Luvs2snowbordbut1kSEA is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 9:13 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: AAdvantage, MileagePlus(ick)
Posts: 296
Originally Posted by ibuyyoufly
All of this should make for a great time trying to merge the two company workgroups. Will everyone be able to set aside the past when working on the future?
I would hope so.
With that said, I'm one who manifests a lot of pride in my employer.
If I were in this position I would likely show my PM CO or UA pride, but would also conduct my duties as an ambasador of the new organization.

Nothing wrong in being proud of your heritage as long as it doesn't affect your job.
JBEagle1000G is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 9:37 am
  #41  
Original Member
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: CT/NY
Programs: UA Plat/1.5MM, AA PltPro, B6 M4 25for25, Marriott LT Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 7,333
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
to the Ex-Cons for wearing these bracelets (their tacky uniforms make clear they are Ex-Cons, so I don't understand the need for the bracelet).

What makes me more angry is that in my last 6-7 calls to the elite line in which I got an Ex-Con person, they never mentioned UNITED AIRLINES. Not cool.
I don't think that's intentional - rather, I don't think it's part of their answer script. For instance, got a PMUA agent couple nights ago and she just answered with her name.
PTahCha is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 9:38 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,933
Personally, I don't care what they wear as long as I get friendly, prompt, and professional service!

There are certainly bigger problems, as of late, than copping an attitude about where their loyalty should be. Some of these people are evidently unhappy about having to join forces with another carrier and if they can't get over it maybe they should go back to school to learn another trade!

I'm not happy about this merger, but I'm also not going to let it bother me, either!!!

Having said all that, a uniform is exactly what is means, everyone should be dresses "UNIFORMLY" and intentionally changing the dress code is something that an employer should strictly enforce, and a personal statement should not, even if it's intended to show past pride, be tolerated. This lack of enforcement of these rules starts at the top.

But again, I personally don't care is they come to work in a diaper which would definitely be more fitting!!!
LilAbner is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 9:40 am
  #43  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SEA
Posts: 12,485
Originally Posted by Luvs2snowbordbut1kSEA
ABSOLUTELY!

While JS talks and talks, he has done nothing to gain support of his co-workers. Try creating a vision that your team can get behind! Allowing things like this to fester will only cause continued division.
I'm all for the concept of one big happy family, but I'm not sure how you gain the support of co-workers when they are represented by two separate unions and must be segregated in all aspects of their jobs.
sxf24 is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 7:11 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta Silver, Hilton Gold
Posts: 966
What do the ex con pins look like? When I fly I wear a United shirt with the globe and a United pin as well as a CO pin sometimes.
UA767400 is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 10:30 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: DEN
Programs: 2012 Plat-2013 Plat-2014 Silver-2015 GM
Posts: 818
Originally Posted by UA767400
What do the ex con pins look like? When I fly I wear a United shirt with the globe and a United pin as well as a CO pin sometimes.
I think thats acceptable.

On my flight today, DEN-JAC F/R, I got a PMCO glass with old logo(Tom Collins size) in lieu of the PMUA short glass. Should I be offended?
ibuyyoufly is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.