![]() |
Originally Posted by KARFA
(Post 32990570)
Arrivals are 10,000 a day now, but will not be at that level once hotel quarantine at passenger cost is brought in.
A lot of countries very reliant on international trade have strict entry restrictions and quarantine restrictions. Cyprus is planning after March 1 allowing all passengers with negative test before departure and rapid one after landing to skip quarantine all together. We can assume Spain and Greece will do similar. Health is a priority until countries run out of money. Even with the local lockdown now weather is cold so easier for people to 'stay home'. In march? Not so much. I don't think hotels for SA and BR is much of an issue to manage can't be more than a few flights a day to meet at the arrival gate. |
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
(Post 32991008)
Cyprus is planning after March 1 allowing all passengers with negative test before departure and rapid one after landing to skip quarantine all together. We can assume Spain and Greece will do similar. Health is a priority until countries run out of money.
With Merkel's proposal to block all arrivals from outside the EU, I doubt residents of Britain will be allowed anywhere this summer. |
Originally Posted by alex67500
(Post 32991029)
Spanish government were quoted on the entry restrictions thread saying that they wouldn't open up to countries outside the EU until 70% of their adult population were vaccinated, and the ETA is end of September.
With Merkel's proposal to block all arrivals from outside the EU, I doubt residents of Britain will be allowed anywhere this summer. |
Originally Posted by alex67500
(Post 32991029)
Spanish government were quoted on the entry restrictions thread saying that they wouldn't open up to countries outside the EU until 70% of their adult population were vaccinated, and the ETA is end of September.
With Merkel's proposal to block all arrivals from outside the EU, I doubt residents of Britain will be allowed anywhere this summer. |
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
(Post 32991008)
its 10,000 with crazy restrictions. Once they ease this number will go up. They can get away with it for now but as the weather gets warmer and touristic countries start to open, will be harder to.
|
Originally Posted by alex67500
(Post 32991029)
Spanish government were quoted on the entry restrictions thread saying that they wouldn't open up to countries outside the EU until 70% of their adult population were vaccinated, and the ETA is end of September.
With Merkel's proposal to block all arrivals from outside the EU, I doubt residents of Britain will be allowed anywhere this summer. |
Originally Posted by NickB
(Post 32991120)
Perhaps I misunderstood what you are trying to say but I fail to see the relevance of touristic countries opening to the feasibility of a hotel quarantine system. People are not going to go away on holidays when the weather gets warmer if they have to face a two-week enforced hotel quarantine at their own expenses when coming back. A hotel quarantine system would mean that only truly essential travel would take place.
|
Even when local movement restrictions are lifted in the UK, do you think the requirement to have tests and self isolate on arrival in to Europe, and more tests and self isolation on return will keep numbers down?
You also seem to think there is no effect on reducing travel if hotel enforced quarantine is brought in and that the 10,000 figure doesn't reduce, and in fact goes up regardless. I can't see many people travelling if they are required to spend 10 days in a hotel at their own cost on arrival in to the UK. Doesn't sound like a fun holiday to me tbh. I am not sure what this minimum of 10,000 people is that doesn't go down regardless of what measures are brought in. Most won't want to travel if it means bills of £500+ per person on tests and hotels on top of normal costs. Even if targeted rather than all arrivals, there is no guarantee these concerning strains won't appear in Spain/Italy/Greece etc, and arrivals from those countries are added to the list. The recent mood music atm from the UK government seems to be focused on vaccination and reopening the domestic economy, not towards international travel or trade. Enabling travel for holiday abroad, with the potential of bringing back new strains simply isn't part of that. |
Originally Posted by KARFA
(Post 32991197)
You also seem to think there is no effect on reducing travel if hotel enforced quarantine is brought in and that the 10,000 figure doesn't reduce, and in fact goes up regardless. I can't see many people travelling if they are required to spend 10 days in a hotel at their own cost on arrival in to the UK.
|
Originally Posted by KARFA
(Post 32991197)
Even when local movement restrictions are lifted in the UK, do you think the requirement to have tests and self isolate on arrival in to Europe, and more tests and self isolation on return will keep numbers down?
You also seem to think there is no effect on reducing travel if hotel enforced quarantine is brought in and that the 10,000 figure doesn't reduce, and in fact goes up regardless. I can't see many people travelling if they are required to spend 10 days in a hotel at their own cost on arrival in to the UK. Doesn't sound like a fun holiday to me tbh. I am not sure what this minimum of 10,000 people is that doesn't go down regardless of what measures are brought in. Most won't want to travel if it means bills of £500+ per person on tests and hotels on top of normal costs. Even if targeted rather than all arrivals, there is no guarantee these concerning strains won't appear in Spain/Italy/Greece etc, and arrivals from those countries are added to the list. The recent mood music atm from the UK government seems to be focused on vaccination and reopening the domestic economy, not towards international travel or trade. Enabling travel for holiday abroad, with the potential of bringing back new strains simply isn't part of that. also govt said Covid is here forever, so if we worried about strains then the borders will be closed forever! Clearly won’t happen, despite the best wishes of some people. uk is too connected for blanket hotel quarantine. It’s not realistic to have one for everyone, especially with no end in sight. you are completely wrong about international travel and trade as the uk is very very reliant on it. Why do you think the uk has such a liberal border policy? Even now all nationals can fly in with limited exceptions such as BR and SA arrivals for 10 days. Otherwise it’s 5 with a test 10 without. 10,000 arrivals during lockdown. Without lockdown and a more open world, much much higher. The border argument is only being led by people such as Hancock and Patel, you ask Sunak and Shapps and they will say not possible for blanket bans forvevwr. someone has to pay the bill eventually and that would mean a global Britain. as daily mail called it, having a few countries not many ppl travel to on the hotel quarantine won’t change much at all, so it’s not much of a story as they are making it to be. it’s like people calling for a stricter lockdown in the uk as cases are not falling enough, just a lot of hot air from people with nothing better to do except criticise and ignore the reality of the situation from all sides (economy, jobs, health of younger people, etc) it’s all about finding a balance |
I think once the meaningless phrase "global Britain" is mentioned as a justification for something, it is time for me to leave the debate :)
|
Originally Posted by KARFA
(Post 32991296)
I think once the meaningless phrase "global Britain" is mentioned as a justification for something, it is time for me to leave the debate :)
|
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
(Post 32991273)
you are completely wrong about international travel and trade as the uk is very very reliant on it.
And if you think that international trade is not a good indicator and something like tourism is more important, tourism represents approximately 11% of UK GDP. By way of comparison, it is around 18% of GDP for Hong Kong or for New Zealand. I am not sure on what the idea that the UK is uniquely reliant on international travel compared to countries with stricter restrictions on entry seems to be based but I struggle to find an objective basis for it. It seems to me that it is a choice that the UK could make if it wanted to, albeit at an economic cost. It is not a choice I would welcome and it still seems to me, notwithstanding the noises around it, still rather at the low end of probabilities but I think that we need to open our eyes that it is not quite as impossible as some might suggest. |
Originally Posted by NickB
(Post 32991350)
Hong Kong and SIngapore are two of the three countries most dependent on international trade. Do you want to go and check what their rules are regarding entry into the country?
And if you think that international trade is not a good indicator and something like tourism is more important, tourism represents approximately 11% of UK GDP. By way of comparison, it is around 18% of GDP for Hong Kong or for New Zealand. I am not sure on what the idea that the UK is uniquely reliant on international travel compared to countries with stricter restrictions on entry seems to be based but I struggle to find an objective basis for it. It seems to me that it is a choice that the UK could make if it wanted to, albeit at an economic cost. It is not a choice I would welcome and it still seems to me, notwithstanding the noises around it, still rather at the low end of probabilities but I think that we need to open our eyes that it is not quite as impossible as some might suggest. Also Singapore and Hong Kong are much stricter countries than the UK, it's a completely different approach society-wise. The UK government is keeping expectations low, while the rumours are getting at peak level. E.g. UK government specifically said no lockdown decisions until Feb 15 and we will see then, but we have speculation about schools, restrictions, travel, all sorts. On a positive note, it seems UK could exceed its target of 15 million vaccinations in Mid-Feb. |
Originally Posted by 13901
(Post 32990683)
I very much doubt this government can pull off a successful hotel quarantine system: I'd love to be wrong but considering they flunked the Track & Trace, the App, distribution of PPE, protection of care homes, school exams, food vouchers...
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:26 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.