![]() |
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33196383)
Instead of trying to troll me, maybe try and understand what I'm saying.
Show me your relevant qualifications and I’ll listen to you, otherwise I’m fine to go with the consensus view of qualified people. There’s a few great articles at the minute in the FT and elsewhere on the government’s performance when it ignored science, such as the ventilator fiasco of a year ago. |
Hindsight is a marvellous invention. I remember when the scientists told us "diesel good, petrol bad". I think we can all agree that everyone can be wrong.
|
Originally Posted by USA_flyer
(Post 33196397)
In your opinion. I'm not ready for that yet.
Our media have a lot to explain on this. I've given up reading the BBC because it's just Covid, more Covid and a side of Covid. The other day Al Jazeera's app had the situation in Ethiopia and Chad as the main stories (as they should in my opinion) while the BBC had, you guessed it, Covid. They even had a live coverage of the "hunt" for the missing person with the ZA variant a few weeks ago, like it's Farhenheit 451 and we're all called to search for Guy Montag! |
Originally Posted by 13901
(Post 33196415)
Bit of a shame really as some countries (such as Iceland, where I may have half a chance to do a trail there if I get vaccinated, time off and I can train enough) are accepting it. I'm hoping that whatever HMG comes up with is not just fully electronic: I'm a EU citizen with indefinite leave to remain and as such all I have to prove it is an email or a website. That simply doesn't work abroad.
|
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
(Post 33196454)
Iceland is accepting the NHS issued vaccination cards and the NHS App. But watch this space, nothing is going to be announced before travel restrictions are lifted.
|
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33196383)
There are some scientists who disagree of course, as in every different field where scientists are involved. However, when a scientist comes out and says in the summer (at least two months away) we are going to have another wave, when at that point we are likely to have given almost every adult a first dose, mask wearing is mandatory in almost every public indoor venue/public transport AND it is much warmer (the virus is less transmissible in the summer, as evidence has showed last summer) - you don't see this as pointless scare-mongering? Do you not actually sit up and say, wait a second, how can that be right? Because if that is right, then vaccines really aren't working are they?
However my 95% plus counts for nothing. There are so many things that could go wrong, so many things unknown, so many people with Covid right now that we have to be cautious. Every death is now avoidable, so making the wrong call, or making a premature call, can and will kill. If the evidence continues to be this conclusive, and we discover that variants can be managed then the restrictions will ease very quickly, at least for those vaccinated or living in a highly vaccinated community. It's just a mater of time and patience, something that we really should be used to by now. Moreover this caution has led to a reduction in death rate by 99% - which is much more than the Americans can say even though they have greater vaccine resources than the UK. So those experts - who incidentally have a range of viewpoints even within SAGE and the big structure feeding into SAGE - have a track record of which to be proud. |
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
(Post 33196461)
OK, cards on the table: I am 95% certain - and rising - that vaccination alone gives a full answer. Of the 50,000 approx who died in the first quarter or 2021, almost all were unvaccinated or early into vaccination at the point of illness. Only a few hundred fatalities were 3 weeks past dose1, if that, and of course this second cohort would usually be the most at risk to Covid. So vaccines appear to work far better than the clinical trials suggested. So much so that if the data continues like this, I will be advocating for proof of vaccination as a condition of entry to the UK, or if not provided, a mandatory vaccine at the border. It's the most effective thing we have given the problems with testing, so I would abandon the lot, apart from LFD for new arrivals and special cases. So my position is close to the CDC.
However my 95% plus counts for nothing. There are so many things that could go wrong, so many things unknown, so many people with Covid right now that we have to be cautious. Every death is now avoidable, so making the wrong call, or making a premature call, can and will kill. If the evidence continues to be this conclusive, and we discover that variants can be managed then the restrictions will ease very quickly, at least for those vaccinated or living in a highly vaccinated community. It's just a mater of time and patience, something that we really should be used to by now. Moreover this caution has led to a reduction in death rate by 99% - which is much more than the Americans can say even though they have greater vaccine resources than the UK. So those experts - who incidentally have a range of viewpoints even within SAGE and the big structure feeding into SAGE - have a track record of which to be proud. |
Originally Posted by Professor Yaffle
(Post 33196392)
The reality is that we are in a truly fantastic position as a result of the vaccine efforts and recent lockdowns, and that now is the time for a full, controlled opening of society, ceasing of excess government propoganda and a controlled reopening of borders with full testing in place.
But isn't the controlled opening of society and borders exactly what we are getting? In the last week I've had a haircut and exhausted the novelty of a drink in chilly pub garden. I can shop to my hearts content and once again the city streets are clogged with traffic. Even greater joys await next month, touch wood. Maybe I'm light headed from the Ferrrero Rocher I was given at the vaccine centre, but i'm fully at ease with the cautious, step by step approach being taken. |
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
(Post 33196461)
OK, cards on the table: I am 95% certain - and rising - that vaccination alone gives a full answer. Of the 50,000 approx who died in the first quarter or 2021, almost all were unvaccinated or early into vaccination at the point of illness. Only a few hundred fatalities were 3 weeks past dose1, if that, and of course this second cohort would usually be the most at risk to Covid. So vaccines appear to work far better than the clinical trials suggested. So much so that if the data continues like this, I will be advocating for proof of vaccination as a condition of entry to the UK, or if not provided, a mandatory vaccine at the border. It's the most effective thing we have given the problems with testing, so I would abandon the lot, apart from LFD for new arrivals and special cases. So my position is close to the CDC.
However my 95% plus counts for nothing. There are so many things that could go wrong, so many things unknown, so many people with Covid right now that we have to be cautious. Every death is now avoidable, so making the wrong call, or making a premature call, can and will kill. If the evidence continues to be this conclusive, and we discover that variants can be managed then the restrictions will ease very quickly, at least for those vaccinated or living in a highly vaccinated community. It's just a mater of time and patience, something that we really should be used to by now. Moreover this caution has led to a reduction in death rate by 99% - which is much more than the Americans can say even though they have greater vaccine resources than the UK. So those experts - who incidentally have a range of viewpoints even within SAGE and the big structure feeding into SAGE - have a track record of which to be proud. I'm an engineer, as is my dad, and I have two scientists in the family, and naturally in my work I know many scientists. There are views that are different, and when scientists make a call, they require evidence to back it up. Unfortunately, when I sit there and question a scientist, some people jump on, troll and insult me because I "have no qualifications" or "I have no right to dare question the scientist". It's got to stop. When it comes to COVID, the vaccines are much more effective than first thought. And we have vaccinated over half the country, and continuing at a quick pace. No one is saying abandon all restrictions today, but in the summer, surely we can manage to ease a lot more, and a lot more people will be vaccinated, therefore, we shouldn't be having any more waves. |
Originally Posted by Kgmm77
(Post 33196449)
Show me your relevant qualifications and I’ll listen to you.
|
I can't wait for the borders to be open and for travel to return to normal, but I think governments across the world are right to be taking a cautious approach in the face of very serious new waves and possibly dangerous variants. It's by no means only the UK that is proceeding slowly.
|
Originally Posted by cauchy
(Post 33194781)
I'm afraid the "lockdown detractors" in academia have been excluded from SAGE and other government advisory committees. Perhaps the most notable examples are Oxford professors Sunetra Gupta and Carl Heneghan. Academic communities, like all communities, can be echo chambers. So how might SAGE be held to account?
However, in or out of Sage, she was invited to advise government, I understand BJ consulted her in December, together with the Swedes, over the mainstream expert consensus regarding the need for a "circuit breaker". She wasn't shy about leaking the advice she offered. I guess BJ knew the advice he wanted to hear, ignored the experts, and the rest is history. Henaghan is less of a maverick, though the "anti-mask" position he developed late last year against sound expert opinion, did little to enhance his credibility. |
Perhaps already reported, but Northern Ireland has opened up vaccinations to the 35+ age group: https://www.health-ni.gov.uk/news/ea...vid-19-vaccine.
Might this be the last age-group that AstraZeneca is used on? |
Originally Posted by 13901
(Post 33196248)
Has anyone here brought their yellow fever vaccination booklet with them? Of those who have and have been vaccinated I heard consistently conflicting info. Some have said that they got the booklet stamped, no questions asked. A few have gotten something scribbled on it. Roughly half have obtained a “computer says no” answer.
Originally Posted by 13901
(Post 33196415)
Bit of a shame really as some countries (such as Iceland, where I may have half a chance to do a trail there if I get vaccinated, time off and I can train enough) are accepting it.
Originally Posted by fransknorge
(Post 33196404)
I have to admit that here Germany is shining, for once. And I do not understand why this is not more widespread. A German Health Insurance Card is always also a EHIC card, and the German vaccination booklet is also a yellow fever booklet, hence removing the need to have both the WHO approved one and the national one, it does both.
|
Originally Posted by Silver Fox
(Post 33196450)
Hindsight is a marvellous invention. I remember when the scientists told us "diesel good, petrol bad". I think we can all agree that everyone can be wrong.
Regards |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:00 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.