FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   U.K. and Ireland (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/u-k-ireland-484/)
-   -   Local lockdowns in the UK (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/u-k-ireland/2025295-local-lockdowns-uk.html)

ahmetdouas Apr 5, 2021 2:13 pm

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...mpression=true

good piece about vaccine passport mess

RB211 Apr 5, 2021 2:13 pm


Originally Posted by ahmetdouas (Post 33154272)
... also funny how it is open in some cases to any person even if they are not a resident as long as they have their ID with them, vaccine tourism ?
...

I think that's a bit blown out of proportion. Certainly some cases yes, but those cases (that aren't using up what's come out of the freezer and has to be used that day - I almost got mine that way very early on) make the news and/or are relayed by friends and become legend (just like we hear more on here about bad flights than good ones!) And as the tiers are progressed through, some counties in some states are being given the instruction to vaccinate as many people as possible.

I do find it a bit strange that the US is pretty rock solid on the 3 / 4 weeks to second/booster shot for Pfizer / Moderna respectively. I think CWS pointed out that it would be better if they had delayed the second shot for most in order to get something into the arms of more people earlier! I think the science is very solid on that, and has been for a while, and yet the old plan is still being followed. The UK plan to delay it to 12 weeks (IIRC) is saving lives.

rb211.

KARFA Apr 5, 2021 2:14 pm


Originally Posted by KSVVZ2015 (Post 33153890)
im perfectly grown thank you :)

In all seriousness - and I say this as a lawyer - most people’s definitions of the freedoms they expect are not based on a reading of laws or international treaties. So while reasonable minds can disagree - I respect that (even when told to grow up) - I don’t apologize for expecting freedom of movement in and out of the country (especially as a foreign citizen) as a fundamental right.

as a lawyer what is your opinion of the question I noted a few posts above?

TomMM Apr 5, 2021 2:19 pm


Originally Posted by RB211 (Post 33154346)

I do find it a bit strange that the US is pretty rock solid on the 3 / 4 weeks to second/booster shot for Pfizer / Moderna respectively. I think CWS pointed out that it would be better if they had delayed the second shot for most in order to get something into the arms of more people earlier! I think the science is very solid on that, and has been for a while, and yet the old plan is still being followed. The UK plan to delay it to 12 weeks (IIRC) is saving lives.

rb211.

I don't know the science but Isn't the second shot required within a specific time frame for effectiveness? Having said that, here in Fla the local mass vaccination sites are moving to the J&J vaccine.

ahmetdouas Apr 5, 2021 2:20 pm


Originally Posted by RB211 (Post 33154346)
I think that's a bit blown out of proportion. Certainly some cases yes, but those cases (that aren't using up what's come out of the freezer and has to be used that day - I almost got mine that way very early on) make the news and/or are relayed by friends and become legend (just like we hear more on here about bad flights than good ones!) And as the tiers are progressed through, some counties in some states are being given the instruction to vaccinate as many people as possible.

I do find it a bit strange that the US is pretty rock solid on the 3 / 4 weeks to second/booster shot for Pfizer / Moderna respectively. I think CWS pointed out that it would be better if they had delayed the second shot for most in order to get something into the arms of more people earlier! I think the science is very solid on that, and has been for a while, and yet the old plan is still being followed. The UK plan to delay it to 12 weeks (IIRC) is saving lives.

rb211.

i did a test booking and all you needed was your name and date of birth and they clearly said no status (residency) required just an ID. So any tourist would be able to do that.

I believe in the uk you need NHS number ?

I have the say the US is looking quite impressive now, they are opening up much quicker than we are, they say no testing + quarantine required for vaccinated people (not the case here), they are vaccinating very quickly, you can choose which one upon booking, etc.

KARFA Apr 5, 2021 2:21 pm


Originally Posted by TomMM (Post 33154363)
I don't know the science but Isn't the second shot required within a specific time frame for effectiveness? Having said that, here in Fla the local mass vaccination sites are moving to the J&J vaccine.

not necessarily. The az vaccine in the Uk for example was approved on the basis of the second jab by 12 weeks - simply because there was no data for beyond that period. It doesn’t mean it wouldn’t work if given at 14 or 20 weeks. In fact for many vaccines, efficacy often improves with a longer gap between jabs.

JEM_NYC Apr 5, 2021 2:28 pm


Originally Posted by HB7 (Post 33153687)
I think today would have done a lot of that - Paul Charles has been crowing for weeks now that May 17 will be the date and today we would get some 'major update' - remember, I think it was one of my posts where I put a quote of him saying we will get an update today and it would be good news - and we got absolutely zilch today.

I think hearing you are still on schedule (so far) with the roadmap is very good news.

Kgmm77 Apr 5, 2021 2:44 pm


Originally Posted by Silver Fox (Post 33154331)
Macron and Merkel have done considerably more damage than any anti-vaxxers ever could have hoped to achieve.

Yawn, change the record. The decisions to suspend in Germany was made by an independent regulatory authority and nothing to do with Merkel.

Funny enough you haven’t mentioned Canada’s more recent and similar restriction on use and the US authorities negative comments on the trial data. Perhaps they don’t fit with your usual Brexit narrative?

KARFA Apr 5, 2021 2:52 pm


Originally Posted by Kgmm77 (Post 33154422)
Yawn, change the record. The decisions to suspend in Germany was made by an independent regulatory authority and nothing to do with Merkel.

I think Silver Fox was referring in part to the statement by Macron about the AZ vaccine being quasi ineffective on over 65s.

Also I think it was the head of the Italian regulatory authority who said suspension there was not due to data, but rather a political one because others in Europe had done it. Tbh it would make more sense if the EMA handled these issues on an EU level rather than national bodies making such decisions.

13901 Apr 5, 2021 2:59 pm


Originally Posted by KARFA (Post 33154451)
I think Silver Fox was referring in part to the statement by Macron about the AZ vaccine being quasi ineffective on over 65s.

Also I think it was the head of the Italian regulatory authority who said suspension there was not due to data, but rather a political one because others in Europe had done it. Tbh it would make more sense if the EMA handled these issues on an EU level rather than national bodies making such decisions.

Care for sources?

KARFA Apr 5, 2021 3:04 pm


Originally Posted by 13901 (Post 33154469)
Care for sources?

Of course.

https://www.politico.eu/article/coro...tive-older-pe/

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-h...-idUSKBN2B80KK

LGWClosedAgain Apr 5, 2021 3:11 pm

MHRA considering restricting AZ vaccine for under 30’s

Not great, not terrible.

IAN-UK Apr 5, 2021 3:13 pm


Originally Posted by cauchy (Post 33153935)
I'm not sure it's quite so straightforward as reading some treaty, etc. But in case it is, you can have a look at the UN's website about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (https://www.un.org/en/about-us/unive...human-rights):


I was painting a picture of the scope of fundamental human rights our lawyer friend believes are being trampled over by the the UK government. Putting things in perspective, if you will.

Declarations on human rights tend to be light on haircuts, pubs and overseas trips.



Originally Posted by cauchy (Post 33153935)
Originally Posted by Article 13
Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Fine. But I think you maybe you missed the detailed interpretations adopted by the Human Rights Committee OHCR

The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any restrictions except those which are provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order (ordre public), public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Covenant.

KARFA Apr 5, 2021 3:14 pm


Originally Posted by LGWClosedAgain (Post 33154509)

And on the basis that by the time under 30s are offered other vaccines will be in play (Novavax and Moderna), it may be quite reasonable to target specific vaccines to certain age groups.

NickB Apr 5, 2021 3:28 pm


Originally Posted by KSVVZ2015 (Post 33153672)
It’s not impatience (given it’s pretty easy to find a loophole to travel under). It’s a belief that the government is trampling on fundamental freedoms.

Whichever particular spin or label you want to put on it, it still doesn't detract from the fact that this is a vision that is simply not dominant in the general public.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.