Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Seat Swap Request Horror Stories

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Seat Swap Request Horror Stories

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2016, 5:47 pm
  #811  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17,457
Originally Posted by Proudelitist
It's an issue because it creates and places a burden and inconvenience on the legitimate seat holder and unexpectedly places them in an awkward situation, forcing them to acquiesce or appear like a jerk in public. It's presumptuous and forces the poachers problem upon them.
This is very much the truth. A couple with separate seats sits together - in the most advantageous of their two choices of course - then looks at you like you're a home wrecker when you want your seat. Its happened enough (and I suspect this applies to everyone who travels solo a lot) that I've begun to think this is a fall back strategy that couples engage in rather than taking the time and trouble ensuring or - heaven forbid! -purchasing adjacent seats. And I say that having recently noticed that this seems remarkably prevalent on return trips from vacation destinations. Who wants to spend time checking in on the last day of vacation; just do it at the airport and sit together regardless.
rickg523 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 6:02 pm
  #812  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,375
far too many have destroyed the entire "It's usually easier to apologize than to ask permission" paradigm by effectively saying "blank apologizing, blank asking; I'll just be passive-aggressive and get what I want anyway"

it's not so much that common sense isn't so common any more, it's that common courtesy is an endangered species verging on extinct
jrl767 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 6:10 pm
  #813  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: BOI
Posts: 223
Originally Posted by Proudelitist
Yeah, apparently you missed the fact that non-revs have strict rules regarding asking rev pax to switch and most policies state that asking revs to switch is enough to get your non-rev privileges revoked. That's just ASKING. What do you suppose poaching will get you?

It is a serious violation and SHOULD be reported.
Pardon my ignorance, but how does one tell that another passenger is non-rev?
travellingwineO is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 7:34 pm
  #814  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: DFW
Programs: UA 1K, AA Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 466
Originally Posted by Proudelitist
It was the employee who thrust himself into MY affairs by putting a burden on me..one I was not in the mood for after a 32 hour trip from South America. Not only did he break the rules, he broke them on the assumption that the person whose seat he stole wouldn't know the rules. Perhaps no more non-rev travel for a year and mark in his record will make him think twice about doing this again.
The thing is that the non-rev is question wasn't even riding on his/her own airline. United can't really punish someone that doesn't work for them. And I seriously doubt Southwest would even take the time to figure who it was out of thousands of employees, especially when it wasn't even on their own metal. Unless you got their name, I doubt any boss would look much into it.
saxman66 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 9:30 pm
  #815  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PDX
Programs: kayaker
Posts: 851
Originally Posted by jrl767
far too many have destroyed the entire "It's usually easier to apologize than to ask permission" paradigm by effectively saying "blank apologizing, blank asking; I'll just be passive-aggressive and get what I want anyway"

it's not so much that common sense isn't so common any more, it's that common courtesy is an endangered species verging on extinct
(bolding mine)

This is the part that bugs me to no end. Yesterday on a transcon (EWR-SFO) a family with two kids ages approximately 7 and 10 got on towards the end of boarding. They were assigned four different middles throughout E+ on a 777, and were loudly speaking to each other from opposite aisles: "I know we're separate, but we'll just have to get someone to switch." "Why don't you ask the guy in that seat there?" "No, it would be better if we get those seats there together, ask her."

All super loud, all very obvious to the entire E+ mini-cabin. Also obvious to me: a family who didn't want to shell out the extra $115/person at check-in to sit together (and yes, there were plenty of adjacent sets of four seats available at T-24 hours).

Now, I understand why families want to sit together. I understand them not wanting to pay an extra $500 to do so. Frankly, I think the airlines should reserve a couple rows in E- for exactly that purpose. But that's not what United does, and the family chose to go with them as a carrier and chose to not pay to sit together. Instead, they used the passive-aggressive approach to guilt/bully people into switching for their middles.
o mikros is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 9:40 pm
  #816  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,572
Originally Posted by rickg523
The big deal is that entirely too many people become convinced they are ENTITLED to the seat they poached simply because they're in it and instead of politely moving when asked by the passenger assigned to that seat, they argue, whine, go entirely non responsive. If so many poachers didn't pull that nonsense, if they simply accepted that this is not a negotiation, that they are ASKING FOR A FAVOR, and that their wishes are not automatically granted by the passenger they've apparently mistaken for the Seat Genie, there wouldn't be hundreds of posts about how messed up the simple process of getting on a damned airplane has become.
That's definitely a big deal. Getting out of the way of everyone else trying to board while waiting for the owner of a seat you would like to trade is not a big deal.
rjque is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 9:43 pm
  #817  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,572
Originally Posted by Proudelitist
It's an issue because it creates and places a burden and inconvenience on the legitimate seat holder and unexpectedly places them in an awkward situation, forcing them to acquiesce or appear like a jerk in public. It's presumptuous and forces the poachers problem upon them.
I disagree that the legitimate seat holder "appear[s] like a jerk in public" when he declines to trade, but even so, isn't that true whether the "poacher" makes the request from a seated or standing position?
rjque is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 9:54 pm
  #818  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: QFF Gold, Flying Blue, Enrich
Posts: 5,366
Originally Posted by rjque
I disagree that the legitimate seat holder "appear[s] like a jerk in public" when he declines to trade, but even so, isn't that true whether the "poacher" makes the request from a seated or standing position?
If it's standing it's not a poacher.

If it's already planted its fat arse in your seat then it is, and it has the potential to try to make you look like the bad guy.
BadgerBoi is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2016, 12:07 am
  #819  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Midwest
Programs: Delta PM, Hhonors Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 114
Originally Posted by rjque
That's definitely a big deal. Getting out of the way of everyone else trying to board while waiting for the owner of a seat you would like to trade is not a big deal.
It is to me and, TBH, if someone wants my seat, my opinion is the only one that matters.
Henla is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2016, 1:25 am
  #820  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wonderful Weald of kent
Programs: BAEC Bronze
Posts: 989
Like many others on the thread, my experience is that those who desire swaps in the main always want to improve their situation rather than offering up their own more attractive seat for trade.

My own experience was on a BA flight from AMS to LGW. I had selected seat 1F when online check in opened (and I had nearly the whole cabin to choose from at that point), and was one of the first to board and settle into my seat with my book. I became aware of a couple of older ladies standing in the aisle having a discussion ABOUT me rather than WITH me.

One of the ladies was clearly my 1D seat mate, and they wanted me to swap seats with her friend, but weren't asking me outright - it was things like "I'm sure she'll move for you" and "we need to sit together" rather than "Excuse me would you mind swapping seats with me as I would like to sit next to my friend?". I interrupted their chat and told them that I would not be changing my front row window seat for her aisle seat at the rear of the cabin, and suggested that if they wished to sit together, that they could ask the person at the back if they would like to swap for the front row.

At this point, the companion attempted to sit in 1E (BA block out the centre seat in their business cabin) at which point the cabin crew member intervened and told her to go to her seat, and reiterated that they should ask the other passenger if they wished to swap. Needless to say, Mrs 1D had no intention whatsoever of changing her prime seat for a window seat in row 6, and the sat down very grumpily (I don't think her friend bothered asking her seatmate to swap!

It was funny watching the behaviour of Mrs 1D though. She dumped her huge bag in the centre seat immediately the seatbelt light went off trying to stop me getting any benefit from it (didn't need it as I already had everything I needed for the flight), tried to obstruct the F&B service ( but the nice FA simply leaned round the bulkhead to hand me my drink and then my food tray), and refused to move to let me out for the loo - again the set up meant that I didn't actually need her to move, so all her attempts to make me uncomfortable and punish me for not giving in were absolutely wasted. Her infantile behaviour was not lost on other passengers in the cabin either, quite a few of whom laughed with me as we were waiting for our luggage. The cabin crew were also highly amused by her antics, as the chap who had thrown the middle seat squatter out rolled his eyes in her direction as I went back to my seat.
CarolynUK is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2016, 1:37 am
  #821  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Midwest
Programs: Delta PM, Hhonors Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 114
Originally Posted by rjque
That's definitely a big deal. Getting out of the way of everyone else trying to board while waiting for the owner of a seat you would like to trade is not a big deal.
It doesn't seem too hard for the person wishing to trade to take his/her assigned seat and then to go back to make the request, as I presume you aren't talking about someone sitting in my seat and then asking me to go so far toward the back that it is hard to get forward from that seat to ask me first.

Anyway, it may be easier for a poacher to sit in my seat but, again, it's not easier for me to stand there and to inform the poacher that it's my seat.
Henla is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2016, 2:50 am
  #822  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: The Indo Jungle
Programs: AA EXP, IHG Spire
Posts: 1,319
Originally Posted by Proudelitist
Yeah, apparently you missed the fact that non-revs have strict rules regarding asking rev pax to switch and most policies state that asking revs to switch is enough to get your non-rev privileges revoked. That's just ASKING. What do you suppose poaching will get you?

It is a serious violation and SHOULD be reported.
Nope. I never missed that fact. Serious is in the eye of the beholder I suppose.
DeepUnderground is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2016, 7:05 am
  #823  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
Originally Posted by BadgerBoi
If it's standing it's not a poacher.

If it's already planted its fat arse in your seat then it is...
Exactly. On the very few occasions when I have wanted to engineer a seat swap to sit with my wife, I STAND in the desired row until the rightful owner comes along, then ask politely. And I would never ask someone to downgrade from an aisle or window to a middle; the proposed swap has to be like-for-like or better.

Originally Posted by Henla
It doesn't seem too hard for the person wishing to trade to take his/her assigned seat and then to go back to make the request...
Once the rightful owner sits down, a swap request becomes twice as onerous.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2016, 7:18 am
  #824  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Originally Posted by Proudelitist
It was the employee who thrust himself into MY affairs by putting a burden on me..one I was not in the mood for after a 32 hour trip from South America. Not only did he break the rules, he broke them on the assumption that the person whose seat he stole wouldn't know the rules. Perhaps no more non-rev travel for a year and mark in his record will make him think twice about doing this again.
For all we know, this nonrev does the same thing on every flight. If no one ever reports him/her, he/she wins at the expense of revenue passengers.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2016, 7:32 am
  #825  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: SFO
Programs: AS 75K (OW), SK Silver (*A), UR, MR
Posts: 3,347
How about leaving a brief seat swap request note and when the person looks around, wave kindly back?
vanillabean is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.