![]() |
Originally Posted by jackal
(Post 16191013)
My pet peeves regarding mobile sites: 1) Sites that automatically redirect you to their mobile site with no way of accessing the full site 2) Sites that automatically redirect all incoming deep links to the mobile front page (making accessing a specific page via Google an impossibility on a mobile device) |
How about getting a domain name for the mobile edition that is shorter than "m.expertflyer.com" then? Maybe I just have fat fingers but it takes me a lot longer to type stuff in on my Blackberry and I sure prefer shorter names.
|
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
(Post 16195468)
How about getting a domain name for the mobile edition that is shorter than "m.expertflyer.com" then? Maybe I just have fat fingers but it takes me a lot longer to type stuff in on my Blackberry and I sure prefer shorter names.
|
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
(Post 16195468)
How about getting a domain name for the mobile edition that is shorter than "m.expertflyer.com" then? Maybe I just have fat fingers but it takes me a lot longer to type stuff in on my Blackberry and I sure prefer shorter names.
Regards |
Fare Notification Feature??
I love expertflyer.com! The only thing that would make it better for me is if there was a way to set a fare notification/alert - just like with a fare bucket or seat notification/alert. If I wanted to travel between ABC-XYZ on certain dates, rather than daily checking the fares myself, it would be awesome to receive an alert that a new fare basis was added or a preexisting one had changed prices.
|
Originally Posted by farrish11
(Post 16290127)
I love expertflyer.com! The only thing that would make it better for me is if there was a way to set a fare notification/alert - just like with a fare bucket or seat notification/alert. If I wanted to travel between ABC-XYZ on certain dates, rather than daily checking the fares myself, it would be awesome to receive an alert that a new fare basis was added or a preexisting one had changed prices.
|
Originally Posted by farrish11
(Post 16290127)
I love expertflyer.com! The only thing that would make it better for me is if there was a way to set a fare notification/alert - just like with a fare bucket or seat notification/alert. If I wanted to travel between ABC-XYZ on certain dates, rather than daily checking the fares myself, it would be awesome to receive an alert that a new fare basis was added or a preexisting one had changed prices.
Either way, think about it and if you have any further ideas about what you think might be valuable, please send us an email and we'll take a look. |
Originally Posted by ExpertFlyer Voice
(Post 16291168)
That's an interesting suggestion, however if you are just looking to be notified when there is a low fare price change, Kayak, Yapta, Bing, Farecompare and others have solutions for that already. Even if we did have a published fare tariff alert, it wouldn't necessarily indicate a real world price change as that is dependent on the inventory of a particular flight.
Either way, think about it and if you have any further ideas about what you think might be valuable, please send us an email and we'll take a look. However, at least for domestic itineraries, Travelocity's Fare Watcher is a functional tarrif alert. |
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
(Post 16190819)
Shouldn't the program sense that the request is coming from a mobile and give me the mobile site automatically? That's what most mobile-enabled sites do.
Originally Posted by jackal
(Post 16191013)
Would it at least be possible to detect that the user is accessing from a mobile device and have either a popup or a link at the bottom to the mobile site? Many times I go to sites and don't even realize they have a mobile version that might work better.
Originally Posted by jackal
(Post 16191013)
My pet peeves regarding mobile sites:
1) Sites that automatically redirect you to their mobile site with no way of accessing the full site 2) Sites that automatically redirect all incoming deep links to the mobile front page (making accessing a specific page via Google an impossibility on a mobile device)
Originally Posted by scubadu
(Post 16197581)
Is there a reason you seem to be so averse to simply bookmarking the domain name and moving on? Why would you would want to physically type in a domain name, whether shorter or not, to a site that is apparently important to you and which it sounds like you visit frequently?
Originally Posted by ExpertFlyer Voice
(Post 16291168)
That's an interesting suggestion, however if you are just looking to be notified when there is a low fare price change, Kayak, Yapta, Bing, Farecompare and others have solutions for that already. Even if we did have a published fare tariff alert, it wouldn't necessarily indicate a real world price change as that is dependent on the inventory of a particular flight.
Alternatively, do any of those sites let you create an alert for a lower business class fare? |
First of all, I love the program and have for years. My only issue is the times I have to go elsewhere to get the information I need - nothing would be better than a program as good as EF that had all the info I need.
Thus my question. I also have to use AwardNexus since they have information about award tickets on airlines you can't access. AwardNexus is obviously an independent website. So I realize this it a thread in the 400's and this may have been addressed (and if so, sorry), but if they can do it why can't you? Obviously, someone has access to Lufthansa, BA, etc. |
Originally Posted by stevens397
(Post 16292795)
First of all, I love the program and have for years. My only issue is the times I have to go elsewhere to get the information I need - nothing would be better than a program as good as EF that had all the info I need.
Thus my question. I also have to use AwardNexus since they have information about award tickets on airlines you can't access. AwardNexus is obviously an independent website. So I realize this it a thread in the 400's and this may have been addressed (and if so, sorry), but if they can do it why can't you? Obviously, someone has access to Lufthansa, BA, etc. To answer your question, the reason why we have the information and services that we do, is because we pay for and access the airline reservation systems directly (the GDSs), whereas AwardNexus gets data from directly browsing to various airline websites (QF/BA/ANA/etc). As a result, the data/feature set is different. AwardNexus is a nice front end to the airline websites and makes searching those sites easier, however it can only show the exact same data as those websites. ExpertFlyer, on the other hand, can show data that isn't available anywhere else, not even on airline websites, because of our GDS access. For example, we show upgrade inventory for AA & DL, information that the airline websites don't even show. Also, for all of our supported Award/Upgrade airlines we show the actual inventory values available (0,1,2,3, etc) whereas most airline websites just show a yes/no response for the quantity searched for. It also allows us to provide advanced services like Flight & Seat Alerts, graphical Seat Maps for over 115 airlines, advanced availability and fare searches, etc. It also allows us to have a very scalable and fast architecture that supports our growing user base. If you've noticed, a +/- 3 day Award/Upgrade search for multiple classes takes about the same amount of time as a search for one class on one day. To answer your next question, we cannot do the same kind of screen scraping of airline websites. Partially for technical (speed/stability) reasons, but mainly for legal ones. I hope that answers your question, feel free to also email us with any questions you might have. |
The above exchange regarding award availability makes me curious about the underlying reasons why you can offer this information for some airlines but not others -- do some airlines supply this to some GDSs but not all, or do some airlines not supply this at all, etc.
|
Appreciate your detailed and serious response but am, of course, not surprised - you are a class organization.
But I question your answer to my unasked question (tho you're right - it WAS my next question!). Are you implying that AwardNexus is doing something illegal - since you say you cannot do the same for legal reasons. Is it not possible for users, like me, to be able to check off other airlines not in your GDS system, knowing the search would take longer and that the information might not be as complete, but would be very valuable to me, nonetheless? Is it something that you have decided not to do rather than something you can't do? I've made it clear that whatever your answer, you have me. But to some extent, I'm not sure I really understand that part of your answer.
Originally Posted by ExpertFlyer Voice
(Post 16293023)
Hi stevens397, first, thank you for your support over the years, we're glad ExpertFlyer has been helpful to you.
To answer your question, the reason why we have the information and services that we do, is because we pay for and access the airline reservation systems directly (the GDSs), whereas AwardNexus gets data from directly browsing to various airline websites (QF/BA/ANA/etc). As a result, the data/feature set is different. AwardNexus is a nice front end to the airline websites and makes searching those sites easier, however it can only show the exact same data as those websites. ExpertFlyer, on the other hand, can show data that isn't available anywhere else, not even on airline websites, because of our GDS access. For example, we show upgrade inventory for AA & DL, information that the airline websites don't even show. Also, for all of our supported Award/Upgrade airlines we show the actual inventory values available (0,1,2,3, etc) whereas most airline websites just show a yes/no response for the quantity searched for. It also allows us to provide advanced services like Flight & Seat Alerts, graphical Seat Maps for over 115 airlines, advanced availability and fare searches, etc. It also allows us to have a very scalable and fast architecture that supports our growing user base. If you've noticed, a +/- 3 day Award/Upgrade search for multiple classes takes about the same amount of time as a search for one class on one day. To answer your next question, we cannot do the same kind of screen scraping of airline websites. Partially for technical (speed/stability) reasons, but mainly for legal ones. I hope that answers your question, feel free to also email us with any questions you might have. |
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 16297398)
The above exchange regarding award availability makes me curious about the underlying reasons why you can offer this information for some airlines but not others -- do some airlines supply this to some GDSs but not all, or do some airlines not supply this at all, etc.
Originally Posted by stevens397
(Post 16297946)
Appreciate your detailed and serious response but am, of course, not surprised - you are a class organization.
But I question your answer to my unasked question (tho you're right - it WAS my next question!). Are you implying that AwardNexus is doing something illegal - since you say you cannot do the same for legal reasons. Is it not possible for users, like me, to be able to check off other airlines not in your GDS system, knowing the search would take longer and that the information might not be as complete, but would be very valuable to me, nonetheless? Is it something that you have decided not to do rather than something you can't do? I've made it clear that whatever your answer, you have me. But to some extent, I'm not sure I really understand that part of your answer. |
Appreciate your answer and I can also appreciate that you want this ability even more than people like me want you to have it! I look forward to EF being able to expand this ability - it will be the icing on the cake.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:56 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.