![]() |
One more New Year wish: please REMOVE the validation for POS (country, particularly) when searching for fares as results are sometimes incomplete (ie SQ fares ex IST and CAI).
|
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 15707951)
Any progress (or reasonable hope) for BA award searches?
Originally Posted by Keter
(Post 15710671)
Any update on new routing rules implementation (which include announced extended Sabre fare information)?
Originally Posted by Keter
(Post 15716317)
One more New Year wish: please REMOVE the validation for POS (country, particularly) when searching for fares as results are sometimes incomplete (ie SQ fares ex IST and CAI).
However, not all GDSs work the same with POS restrictions and as part of the upcoming update, we'll be able to specify additional GDSs to use for Fare Information searches in certain cases, which in the case of SQ, appears to mitigate the problem you mention. (Please email any further examples to [email protected] so we can have them all in one place, thanks.) |
Improved Fare Information Search
Today we released several additions and improvements to the ExpertFlyer Fare Information search:
Here is a screen shot of the new search form: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/membe...are-search.png and the improved Routing Rules: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/membe...ting-rules.png A few notes about using this new features:
We hope that these improvements make ExpertFlyer even more useful. If you come across any issues, please email us at [email protected] |
Originally Posted by ExpertFlyer Voice
(Post 15784573)
Today we released several additions and improvements to the ExpertFlyer Fare Information search:
Here is a screen shot of the new search form: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/membe...are-search.png and the improved Routing Rules: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/membe...ting-rules.png A few notes about using this new features:
We hope that these improvements make ExpertFlyer even more useful. If you come across any issues, please email us at [email protected] |
If I do a search for C availability for LHR-GIG via JFK for today Feb 3rd I get the following:
1 Connections AA (BA) 6142 0 LHR 02/03/11 1:35 PM JFK 02/03/11 4:25 PM 777 Daily 76% / 72m Business - AAnytime Award J 7 AA () 255 0 JFK 02/03/11 10:30 PM GIG 02/04/11 11:45 AM 763 Daily 80% / 27m Business - AAnytime Award J 4 Business - Upgrade C 1 But the C availabilty shows as 0 when I just search JFK-GIG. What gives? |
Originally Posted by 3544quebec
(Post 15792916)
But the C availabilty shows as 0 when I just search JFK-GIG. What gives?
Even though it probably doesn't make much sense, C availability seems to be implemented by linking it to those lower-fare buckets, so you get the effect that you see. This is not an EF issue, it's the way AA works. |
Originally Posted by hillrider
(Post 15792968)
It means that when originating from LHR, AA is willing to open up a lower fare bucket (e.g. D/I) than for those originating from JFK, based on various factors, including total ticket value, competitive fares/availability on the LON-RIO market, etc. etc.
Even though it probably doesn't make much sense, C availability seems to be implemented by linking it to those lower-fare buckets, so you get the effect that you see. This is not an EF issue, it's the way AA works. And as an additional question - if EF shows this C availability somehow based on POS/origination then how does the alert feature work with this? If a C becomes available JFK-GIG for a search originating LHR who does it notify if an alert is in place? Note that the C is available for connections from the AA-coded BA flights LHR-JFK where no C is available on these flights, only on the JFK-GIG sector. |
This looks like a married segment logic issue. This happens a lot with AA (and I suspect other carriers) and is not limited to upgrade and award inventory.
Various fare classes may be available for AAA-BBB or BBB-CCC when you look for AAA-BBB-CCC but not when you look for the segments individually. I've seen the reverse too where the inventory shows on one segment but not if that same segment is part of a multi-segment route. When I set an alert on EF for an upgrade on a multi-segment route I set the alert using both the single segment that I am interested in and also for the entire multi-segment routing for which I am ticketed. If the alert triggers for just the single segment I call AA and ask for that single segment to be upgraded and I get it. As hillrider said, this not an EF issue but the way AA makes the inventory available. |
Originally Posted by hillrider
(Post 15792968)
This is not an EF issue, it's the way AA works.
Originally Posted by inlanikai
(Post 15794612)
This looks like a married segment logic issue. This happens a lot with AA (and I suspect other carriers) and is not limited to upgrade and award inventory.
Originally Posted by 3544quebec
(Post 15793599)
And as an additional question - if EF shows this C availability somehow based on POS/origination then how does the alert feature work with this? If a C becomes available JFK-GIG for a search originating LHR who does it notify if an alert is in place? Note that the C is available for connections from the AA-coded BA flights LHR-JFK where no C is available on these flights, only on the JFK-GIG sector.
|
These are good enhancements; little more will I need to take a copy of fare rules as I ticket.
|
Originally Posted by serfty
(Post 15800126)
These are good enhancements; little more will I need to take a copy of fare rules as I ticket.
But there are some uses of this feature: 1) To see what you did not buy (to dream a bit when you see a thread on FT with a 'gone' remark => you will be able to see that historic fare on screen:D) 2) If you think to buy or not to buy now you are usually only concerned with inventory availability (booking class). However, there are some more things to consider: If fare sales restrictions say, for example, "TICKETS MUST BE ISSUED ON/BEFORE 15FEB11" then be sure to check the fare on 16FEB11 - in my case the fare DL T fare is not available after that date at all... Regardless of T inventory availability. 3) Sale fares and other fares to be changed: if you expect a sale or see sales restrictions as above - be sure to check the future date. The majority of sale and "updated USD level" fares are loaded long before the new first ticketing date. |
Originally Posted by ExpertFlyer Voice
(Post 15784573)
[LIST][*]*The ability to specify a Ticketing Date in the fare search[*]*Historical Fare searching - You can now view historical fares, rules and routing for up to 1 year in the past by specifying a past Departure/Ticketing date.
|
Originally Posted by nbevan
(Post 15812224)
Great enhancement, but it took me a while to work out how to use the feature, as the earliest days in the date pop up still default to yesterday: historical dates have to be typed in.
|
Originally Posted by ExpertFlyer Voice
(Post 13310962)
We also just added Alitalia (AZ) to the list. We're not 100% sure if the classes are the same for partner redemption, so try it out and let us know what you find.
Class Code Z: The requested information could not be retrieved or is not available. This is likely due to invalid input criteria or lack of access to the information from the airline. Please revise the search parameters and try again. Any advice? Thanks! |
example of fares
Bonjour,
Could I see, , for example, how EF shows the fares from LHR to NRT on AF in first class on april 19 to may 9 ? Thank you. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:11 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.