[Consolidated] VPN Provider Recommendations
#76
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Ah, very cool. Thanks!
Though, I don't really understand enough about the nitty gritty of Tor. From what I understand of this article, though, the Great Firewall looks for certain SSL certificates that the Chinese government associates with Tor. When it detects those certificates being used, it tries to make a Tor connection to that host. If it can do so, the host is a Tor node and gets blocked. Right?
Though, I don't really understand enough about the nitty gritty of Tor. From what I understand of this article, though, the Great Firewall looks for certain SSL certificates that the Chinese government associates with Tor. When it detects those certificates being used, it tries to make a Tor connection to that host. If it can do so, the host is a Tor node and gets blocked. Right?
I believe there's less disruption of regular SSL connections (unless their address points to FB, Twiitter, etc). Which is why regular SSL VPNs tend to work. Self-signed certificates cannot be verified at a certificate authority.... but self-signing presents some risk especially if the setup of a self-signed certificate occurs through the GF. Self-signing eliminates the need to access a CA (meaning that it's harder for the GF to tell what the certificate association is), but if it's done across the GF could open the certificate to spoofing.
#77
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,223
I dont believe the DNS-based services offer any less security than you would have (or not) normally.
I mean if you are are accessing sites using https, you will have the same security with the DNS-based services. Nobody, including the DNS service provider, can see "inside" your traffic point to point (between your browser and the web server you have the https connection with).
If you are not using https, then you have the same lack of security with or without the DNS-based service. Anybody can see your traffic.
And keep in mind that if you are not using HTTPS, even the VPN offers you very little protection. Your traffic is encrypted between you and the VPN server. But beyond that VPN server (meaning between the VPN server you use and the website that is the final destination) your traffic is unencrypted and can be seen by anybody. The only thing that is masked is your original IP address. (And I believe that you get the same result with the DNS based service).
I mean if you are are accessing sites using https, you will have the same security with the DNS-based services. Nobody, including the DNS service provider, can see "inside" your traffic point to point (between your browser and the web server you have the https connection with).
If you are not using https, then you have the same lack of security with or without the DNS-based service. Anybody can see your traffic.
And keep in mind that if you are not using HTTPS, even the VPN offers you very little protection. Your traffic is encrypted between you and the VPN server. But beyond that VPN server (meaning between the VPN server you use and the website that is the final destination) your traffic is unencrypted and can be seen by anybody. The only thing that is masked is your original IP address. (And I believe that you get the same result with the DNS based service).
#78
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
And keep in mind that if you are not using HTTPS, even the VPN offers you very little protection. Your traffic is encrypted between you and the VPN server. But beyond that VPN server (meaning between the VPN server you use and the website that is the final destination) your traffic is unencrypted and can be seen by anybody. The only thing that is masked is your original IP address. (And I believe that you get the same result with the DNS based service).
If your concern is accessing websites or content that have been "banned" by a country while sitting in a hotel in that country, you probably don't have much of a concern about encryption after the VPN gateway/server.
If your concern is email security and your email is behind the VPN firewall, again, no issue. If the email host is outside the firewall, turn on the encryption/privacy feature on the email system (most email systems allow a secure connection on various protocols).
OTOH, if you don't want anyone to see that you're accessing YouPorn (for example), then yes, you have little protection beyond the VPN endpoint.... and if it's a 3rd party VPN you have no protection from them seeing your traffic.
#80
Join Date: Apr 2004
Programs: AA, UA, SQ, VA, QF, AF, BA
Posts: 2,865
Is anyone else having trouble using Hotspot Shield (the free one) to stream Netflix? I only got an account to use my UA# before it merges/converts to the CO OnePass # but it would be nice to get a couple movies before I cancel it.
#81
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Hotspot Shield lets me use Netflix and Hulu from outside the USA? It looks weird - I can't seem to get a handle on it
#82
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1
I am going to have to start traveling to Saltillo quite often, and I tried to watch Netflix yesterday, and DENIED, can't do it internationally, and I cannot watch Hulu either
And the choices for local tv are horrid.
What are good personal VPNs out there?
I looked at a few, and most of then are about $9/month
And since I am "frugal" are there any good cheaper alternatives
Thanks
And the choices for local tv are horrid.
What are good personal VPNs out there?
I looked at a few, and most of then are about $9/month
And since I am "frugal" are there any good cheaper alternatives
Thanks
#83
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Better go for DNS service rather than VPN because in VPN you are at the mercy of the VPN server you are using. One best DNS service I can recommend is www.unotelly.com .Their subscription rate is $4 only and the quality is quite good. Alternatively if you are too frugal you can use their free service which lets you watch some basic channels(CBS, fox, spotify, turntable) for free !!! Hope this helps. Please comment back. Cheers ^
#85
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles area
Programs: Delta PLAT + 1K United for 2011, ????? for 2012
Posts: 258
if you go to www.unotelly.com it has a great set of links to all the sites,
I am saving it for when I am stuck somewhere in the USA,
Is there something like this so you can watch British TV if you are not in the UK ?
thanks
RB
I am saving it for when I am stuck somewhere in the USA,
Is there something like this so you can watch British TV if you are not in the UK ?
thanks
RB
#86
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Is there some reason people don't like the idea of setting up a VPN router at home? Routers are as cheap as $30, and dd-wrt, which has excellent VPN capability, is free. I've been running dd-wrt on my home routers for a couple of years, now, and find VPN stable and completely reliable.
#87
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,231
Is there some reason people don't like the idea of setting up a VPN router at home? Routers are as cheap as $30, and dd-wrt, which has excellent VPN capability, is free. I've been running dd-wrt on my home routers for a couple of years, now, and find VPN stable and completely reliable.
But yeah, I don't understand either why more people don't do it.
#88
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles area
Programs: Delta PLAT + 1K United for 2011, ????? for 2012
Posts: 258
Is there some reason people don't like the idea of setting up a VPN router at home? Routers are as cheap as $30, and dd-wrt, which has excellent VPN capability, is free. I've been running dd-wrt on my home routers for a couple of years, now, and find VPN stable and completely reliable.
Thanks
RB
#89
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,231
My personal experience is that Tomato is easier to use and more forgiving of a bad firmware flash (less likely to brick your router) but DD-WRT supports a wider range of devices.
#90
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
That's the dd-wrt home page. There you can look up compatible routers and get full instructions for installing dd-wrt on them.