Which airline is responsible for delayed/lost luggage on a multi-leg journey?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: UA MP, Delta Sky Miles, AA Advantage
Posts: 163
Which airline is responsible for delayed/lost luggage on a multi-leg journey?
A few days ago I was supposed to be flying PIT-YYZ-FRA-LED (first leg on AC, the rest with LH) on LH-issued ticket. AC's PIT-YYZ flight was overbooked. I voluntarily gave up my seat on that flight (couldn't say NO to 400 USD in cash) and was rerouted. My new itinerary was PIT-IAD-FRA-LED. First two legs were on UA, last one - on LH. The gate agent (working for UA, because United handles all AC's operations in PIT) managed to generate a new, UA-specific PNR-code for my itinerary and re-labeled both bags with the new tags, showing the new routing. Original AC's tags have been removed.
When I arrived to LED, one of my bags showed up but the other one was missing. I filed "property irregularity report" with the airport baggage handling agent and, since LH fly the last leg, received LH-specific file number. It has been almost 48 hours since then but the bag hasn't showed up in the tracing system.
If my luggage gets lost, with which airline shall I file the claim for compensation? Should it be LH (they issued the ticket as well as claim number), AC (their flight was overbooked, which caused my re-routing) or UA (they issued the bag tag)? Most likely the bag was lost by either LH or UA and AC has nothing to do with it. So, what prevails: UA's bag tag or LH's ticket and/or file number?
If the bag shows up a few days later, with which airline shall I file the claim for reimbursement for purchasing the necessities (toiletries, clothing, etc): LH or UA? And, if the bag never shows up, will I be compensated only for its contents or for the purchased necessities as well?
When I arrived to LED, one of my bags showed up but the other one was missing. I filed "property irregularity report" with the airport baggage handling agent and, since LH fly the last leg, received LH-specific file number. It has been almost 48 hours since then but the bag hasn't showed up in the tracing system.
If my luggage gets lost, with which airline shall I file the claim for compensation? Should it be LH (they issued the ticket as well as claim number), AC (their flight was overbooked, which caused my re-routing) or UA (they issued the bag tag)? Most likely the bag was lost by either LH or UA and AC has nothing to do with it. So, what prevails: UA's bag tag or LH's ticket and/or file number?
If the bag shows up a few days later, with which airline shall I file the claim for reimbursement for purchasing the necessities (toiletries, clothing, etc): LH or UA? And, if the bag never shows up, will I be compensated only for its contents or for the purchased necessities as well?
#2
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NRT / HND
Programs: AA EXP, NH Plat, Former UA 1K
Posts: 5,699
I'm sure someone else will chime in soon with a more definitive answer, but to my understanding the responsibility falls on the carrier who issued the tag. I've been told this is one reason why some carriers are reluctant to interline bags on separate tickets because they don't want to be held responsible if something happens downline after they have turned over possession to the second, separately ticketed, carrier.
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Programs: TK Elite
Posts: 11,914
No. The last operating carrier will be responsible for delivering the bag to you. That is also why you have received a LH reference No; your point of contact is LH regardless where your bag misconnected.
I would wait until the bag is delivered. From the rush baggage tag on your bag, you will be able to tell where the bag misconnected. You may also be able to see it in the WorldTracerWeb system (you should be able to log with name and LH reference No.). Once it is clear where you bag failed to make the flight, you turn to that carrier for reimbursement. You may also stick to LH and let LH seek reimbursement from UA, if this is a UA issue.
AC has nothing to do with this; neither has the ticket issuing carrier. Either it is UA or LH as they were the operating carriers.
If you have travel insurance it is far easier to get reimbursed there. Keep all receipts; you are going to use originals for the reimbursement. You will get reimbursed for any reasonable purchases made until the bag is delivered. There might be a monetary limit but I'm not aware of policies of LH and UA on this.
Most likely your bag will turn up at some stage. 48h and no trace of it does not mean that it is lost.
I would wait until the bag is delivered. From the rush baggage tag on your bag, you will be able to tell where the bag misconnected. You may also be able to see it in the WorldTracerWeb system (you should be able to log with name and LH reference No.). Once it is clear where you bag failed to make the flight, you turn to that carrier for reimbursement. You may also stick to LH and let LH seek reimbursement from UA, if this is a UA issue.
AC has nothing to do with this; neither has the ticket issuing carrier. Either it is UA or LH as they were the operating carriers.
If you have travel insurance it is far easier to get reimbursed there. Keep all receipts; you are going to use originals for the reimbursement. You will get reimbursed for any reasonable purchases made until the bag is delivered. There might be a monetary limit but I'm not aware of policies of LH and UA on this.
Most likely your bag will turn up at some stage. 48h and no trace of it does not mean that it is lost.
Last edited by SK AAR; Oct 9, 2017 at 3:28 am
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
I'm sure someone else will chime in soon with a more definitive answer, but to my understanding the responsibility falls on the carrier who issued the tag. I've been told this is one reason why some carriers are reluctant to interline bags on separate tickets because they don't want to be held responsible if something happens downline after they have turned over possession to the second, separately ticketed, carrier.
This is a sensible rule and has worked well for 50+ years. In this case, neither UA nor AC serve LED and it is LH which will have the ground-handling and courier capabilities to physically have the bag delivered.
Make certain that you keep LH up-to-date and that it has a good mobile number and solid delivery address. You should be able to locate your claim in WorldTracer and you will then have online access to the same information accessible to LH.
This is not to suggest that if you see that your bag is sitting at YYZ, that you can't call AC but do understand that if AC receives conflicting information, the problem starts all over again.
Hold off on compensation until after your bag shows up (or does not). Keep receipts for reasonable expenses and follow LH's instructions for reimbursement.
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: UA MP, Delta Sky Miles, AA Advantage
Posts: 163
The responsibility for delivering and compensating for loss, damage or interim expenses, is solely the responsibility of the last-delivering carrier, e.g. LH. This is regardless of fault (LH is free to pursue AC or UA if it wishes to do so), but the customer deals with the carrier on the ground.
However, upon arriving to Munich I was denied boarding the Finnair flight. Neither Finnair, not United employees were able to explain me the reason for denied boarding. They mentioned something about the rebooking been done incorrectly. Nevertheless, once again I have been involuntarily rebooked. This time on a later LH’s direct flight MUC-HEL.
As a result of all that ordeal I have arrived to Helsinki seven hours later than I was supposed to. Also my bag was missing and has not been delivered to me until the next day. Hence, I had to go and buy some necessities such as toiletries and skincare products. Even though the PIR claim number was under LH's name (HELLHxxxxx) they suggested that I deal with UA on this matter, since they were the ones who caused all the mess. I filed the reimbursement claim with UA and they paid it. Not LH.
Last edited by GREAKLY; Oct 9, 2017 at 10:17 am
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: UA MP, Delta Sky Miles, AA Advantage
Posts: 163
If after 21 days my bag is declared lost will I be compensated separately for purchasing the necessities AND for contents of the luggage or together? In other words, as per Montreal 22.2 will I get up to 1131 SDR for each one or together?
Last edited by GREAKLY; Oct 9, 2017 at 10:56 am
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Simply IATA convention accepting a common sense reading of the Montreal Convention which points to LH because LH did not deliver the bag.
On the 21st day, the OP would have a claim for as much as approximately EUR 1,410 (SDR will vary slightly by day) which would be total of the fair market value of the bag itself, its contents and any interim reimbursements (which essentially replace items in the bag).
If you have an old beat up suitcase and worn clothes, the fair market value can amount to not much, sometimes a good reason to consider whether your travel insurance is for replacement cost).
On the 21st day, the OP would have a claim for as much as approximately EUR 1,410 (SDR will vary slightly by day) which would be total of the fair market value of the bag itself, its contents and any interim reimbursements (which essentially replace items in the bag).
If you have an old beat up suitcase and worn clothes, the fair market value can amount to not much, sometimes a good reason to consider whether your travel insurance is for replacement cost).
#8
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
This has been my understanding as well until a few months ago, when I was supposed to be flying from Chicago IL (ORD) to Helsinki, Finland (HEL) via Washington DC (IAD) and Munich, Germany (MUC) on United Airlines and Lufthansa. The first flight (UA, ORD-IAD) was delayed due to mechanical reasons to a point where I would have surely missed my connecting flight in Washington. Because of that I have been involuntary rebooked on a direct UA's flight ORD-MUC with further connection to Helsinki on Finnair. Also I was told that I would receive the boarding pass for the Munich-Helsinki flight from Finnair’s staff in Munich (United’s agent who did the rebooking was unable to access Finnair’s system). Both pieces of luggage were not re-tagged.
However, upon arriving to Munich I was denied boarding the Finnair flight. Neither Finnair, not United employees were able to explain me the reason for denied boarding. They mentioned something about the rebooking been done incorrectly. Nevertheless, once again I have been involuntarily rebooked. This time on a later LH’s direct flight MUC-HEL.
As a result of all that ordeal I have arrived to Helsinki seven hours later than I was supposed to. Also my bag was missing and has not been delivered to me until the next day. Hence, I had to go and buy some necessities such as toiletries and skincare products. Even though the PIR claim number was under LH's name (HELLHxxxxx) they suggested that I deal with UA on this matter, since they were the ones who caused all the mess. I filed the reimbursement claim with UA and they paid it. Not LH.
However, upon arriving to Munich I was denied boarding the Finnair flight. Neither Finnair, not United employees were able to explain me the reason for denied boarding. They mentioned something about the rebooking been done incorrectly. Nevertheless, once again I have been involuntarily rebooked. This time on a later LH’s direct flight MUC-HEL.
As a result of all that ordeal I have arrived to Helsinki seven hours later than I was supposed to. Also my bag was missing and has not been delivered to me until the next day. Hence, I had to go and buy some necessities such as toiletries and skincare products. Even though the PIR claim number was under LH's name (HELLHxxxxx) they suggested that I deal with UA on this matter, since they were the ones who caused all the mess. I filed the reimbursement claim with UA and they paid it. Not LH.
Had UA told you to go back to LH for what I presume was a smallish pittance, you could have done so.
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: UA MP, Delta Sky Miles, AA Advantage
Posts: 163
So it was reasonable for me to buy all that stuff as soon as the bag was delayed. If it were my wife's bag, the amount would have been more in the 500-1000 euros ballpark (more perfume, lotions, makeup and etc.). Add to that a change of clothing (underwear, socks, shirt/blouse, pants/jeans, shoes, warm jacket, etc.) and I can easily see justifiable spendings of 1000-1500 euros even if the bag is missing for just 24 hours.
Last edited by GREAKLY; Oct 9, 2017 at 4:42 pm
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: UA MP, Delta Sky Miles, AA Advantage
Posts: 163
I also read that if the bag is found AFTER the compensation has been paid the customer would still be reimbursed with 100% for toiletries while only 50% for clothing. Is it ture?
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Programs: TK Elite
Posts: 11,914
You are not going to get compensation for a lost bag and its contents AND reimbursement for purchases made. The compensation is suppose to put you in a position to purchase the items lost. That is why reimbursements already made will be set-off in the compensation.
Last edited by SK AAR; Oct 10, 2017 at 5:03 am
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: UA MP, Delta Sky Miles, AA Advantage
Posts: 163
No sane carrier or travel insurance comp. is going to reimburse excessive amounts like this. Only reasonable purchases made will be reimbursed. Missing your bag 1-2 days does not mean that you are entitled to do a shopping frenzy. If I was LH/UA or your travel insurance I would only reimburse a fraction of the costs for lotion, cologne, hand cream, eye cream etc which I'm sure will have plenty of value left once your bag is recovered and delivered to you.
Are you suggesting that in such case I should buy cheaper toiletries than I normally use to make it "reasonable"?
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Programs: TK Elite
Posts: 11,914
Expensive hand cream, eye cream etc is not a neccessity IMO. You should be perfectly able to do without them for a couple of days (or with a cheaper brand)
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Programs: TK Elite
Posts: 11,914
The difference is that whilst the wreckage is of no value, the remainder of various creams can still be used and is of significant value (and most likely you would have purchased similar products on your own dime when you are out of stock of these produts at a later stage)
#15
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: UA MP, Delta Sky Miles, AA Advantage
Posts: 163
I COULD live a few days without using any hygienic and cosmetic products. My wife COULD, probably, go for a few days without the makeup. And we both COULD wear the same clothing for a few days. But why SHOULD we. It's the airline, who is at fault, not us. Montreal 22.2 sets the limit of responsibility for delayed baggage. It doesn't say anything about reasonability and its criteria. Do you think, if such case goes to court, arguments like "one should be perfectly able to do without them for a couple of days (or with a cheaper brand)" would have any merit?