FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues-686/)
-   -   UA flight diverted (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues/591165-ua-flight-diverted.html)

Spiff Aug 16, 2006 11:15 am


Originally Posted by SAT Lawyer
Neither did the US government, the British government, or United Airlines authorize her pre-diversion nonsense.

Yeah, somebody should have just busted a cap in grandma's ..., right?

That would have taken care of the 'nonsense' panic attack. :rolleyes:

GUWonder Aug 16, 2006 11:22 am


Originally Posted by SAT Lawyer
It's a hell of a lot easier to make that charge from the comfort of your armchair after the fact when the airplane is safely back on terra firma.

Armchair or not, there's being in a really dangerous situations where the threats were not merely threats and then there's this kind of "official" nonsense where the threat is little more than a mere threat. Clearly, this was a situation where there was no real danger to the lives of the majority of the people on board. That should have been obvious to any non-paranoid on board the flight with even a partial line of sight. That the obvious was skipped shows that we are dealing with a bunch of paranoids who behave in knee-jerk manners or others who seriously lack in good judgment.


Originally Posted by SAT Lawyer
On the flipside, it is awfully difficult to read the mind of a disturbed passenger from afar.

Better to read their actions and realistic access to implements than to read minds. ;)


Originally Posted by SAT Lawyer
Maybe the usual cadre of complainers would get more slack if we all didn't know that they would be the first to be levying charges of incompetence and criminal negligence at the government if and when one of these threats turns out to be real.

The usual cadre of government apologists say such things repeatedly. However, such claims are based on little more than conjecture and creative attempts to reverse engineer that are too broad to have any specific meaningfulness.

Javan69 Aug 16, 2006 11:22 am


Originally Posted by Evrytania

If there was never any threat of a terrorism, why are they inspecting each bag...also, why didn't they divert the airplane to Bangor?

---------------
Oooh, what was that Stephen King story/movie where a jumbo ---> BOS diverted to Bangor? Great story (good movie).

Spiff Aug 16, 2006 11:31 am


Originally Posted by Javan69
---------------
Oooh, what was that Stephen King story/movie where a jumbo ---> BOS diverted to Bangor? Great story (good movie).

The Langoliers

yogimax Aug 16, 2006 11:35 am

This is a total NON-EVENT that the media will embellish to make a major story

Spiff Aug 16, 2006 11:36 am


Originally Posted by yogimax
This is a total NON-EVENT that the media will embellish to make a major story

Was it also a non-event for all those inconvenienced by this diversion?

GUWonder Aug 16, 2006 11:39 am


Originally Posted by yogimax
This is a total NON-EVENT that the media will embellish to make a major story

This is another event where official incompetence and state-sponsored, public paranoia have exhibited themselves. But that story won't be breaking news.

Ducatibiker Aug 16, 2006 11:42 am

Free advertisement for United ?

Spiff Aug 16, 2006 11:44 am


Originally Posted by Ducatibiker
Free advertisement for United ?

Buy One Destination Get Another Destination Free

Hmm... not sure that's really what I look for in a transatlantic carrier... ;)

Wally Bird Aug 16, 2006 11:55 am


Originally Posted by SAT Lawyer
... they would be the first to be levying charges of incompetence and criminal negligence at the government...

We're already doing that, some of us. Try to keep up. ;)

justageek Aug 16, 2006 11:59 am


Originally Posted by bocastephen
I shudder to think of the effect on our country's psyche (as well as the airline business) if an aircraft was ever shot down - especially if it was later found to be of no threat.

At the rate we're going, I wouldn't be surprised if it happens within the next five years. That should keep the passengers in line!

It's for the children.

aisleorwindow Aug 16, 2006 12:49 pm


Originally Posted by xyzzy
After they "shoot it out of the sky" do you think that it just disappears and the problem is over? No, it crashes into the homes and businesses of innocent people.

Just to be clear - I don't support having the fighter jets up there. As a matter of fact, I think it's insanity.
I was just explaining why they're there, as another poster referenced them earlier in the thread.

Of course, in this case, had the govt. chosen to shoot the plane down, it most likely would have landed in the Atlantic Ocean. Also, if the cockpit was breached, and the Feds had reason to believe it was heading towards the White House or say, the Sears Tower, they might choose to shoot it out of the sky and have it land in innocent peoples' neighborhoods.

The bottom line is: The fact there were fighter jets to escort this flight or ANY flight is scary and underlines the insanity of the situation.

aisleorwindow Aug 16, 2006 12:50 pm


Originally Posted by Ducatibiker
Free advertisement for United ?

Well, there's the old saying: "There's no such thing as bad publicity."
;)

yogimax Aug 16, 2006 12:56 pm


Originally Posted by Spiff
Was it also a non-event for all those inconvenienced by this diversion?

From a news standpoint it was a TOTAL NON-EVENT. To have Fox and other networks devoting hours of live coverage is ridiculous.

Sure it affected the passengers, but my point was simple... from a news standpoint this was nothing!

Spiff Aug 16, 2006 1:01 pm


Originally Posted by yogimax
From a news standpoint it was a TOTAL NON-EVENT. To have Fox and other networks devoting hours of live coverage is ridiculous.

Sure it affected the passengers, but my point was simple... from a news standpoint this was nothing!

What if the passengers attacked those who made this stupid decision to divert and those who harassed them upon landing?

Would that be newsworthy? ;)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:03 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.