![]() |
Originally Posted by SAT Lawyer
Neither did the US government, the British government, or United Airlines authorize her pre-diversion nonsense.
That would have taken care of the 'nonsense' panic attack. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by SAT Lawyer
It's a hell of a lot easier to make that charge from the comfort of your armchair after the fact when the airplane is safely back on terra firma.
Originally Posted by SAT Lawyer
On the flipside, it is awfully difficult to read the mind of a disturbed passenger from afar.
Originally Posted by SAT Lawyer
Maybe the usual cadre of complainers would get more slack if we all didn't know that they would be the first to be levying charges of incompetence and criminal negligence at the government if and when one of these threats turns out to be real.
|
Originally Posted by Evrytania
If there was never any threat of a terrorism, why are they inspecting each bag...also, why didn't they divert the airplane to Bangor? Oooh, what was that Stephen King story/movie where a jumbo ---> BOS diverted to Bangor? Great story (good movie). |
Originally Posted by Javan69
---------------
Oooh, what was that Stephen King story/movie where a jumbo ---> BOS diverted to Bangor? Great story (good movie). |
This is a total NON-EVENT that the media will embellish to make a major story
|
Originally Posted by yogimax
This is a total NON-EVENT that the media will embellish to make a major story
|
Originally Posted by yogimax
This is a total NON-EVENT that the media will embellish to make a major story
|
Free advertisement for United ?
|
Originally Posted by Ducatibiker
Free advertisement for United ?
Hmm... not sure that's really what I look for in a transatlantic carrier... ;) |
Originally Posted by SAT Lawyer
... they would be the first to be levying charges of incompetence and criminal negligence at the government...
|
Originally Posted by bocastephen
I shudder to think of the effect on our country's psyche (as well as the airline business) if an aircraft was ever shot down - especially if it was later found to be of no threat.
It's for the children. |
Originally Posted by xyzzy
After they "shoot it out of the sky" do you think that it just disappears and the problem is over? No, it crashes into the homes and businesses of innocent people.
I was just explaining why they're there, as another poster referenced them earlier in the thread. Of course, in this case, had the govt. chosen to shoot the plane down, it most likely would have landed in the Atlantic Ocean. Also, if the cockpit was breached, and the Feds had reason to believe it was heading towards the White House or say, the Sears Tower, they might choose to shoot it out of the sky and have it land in innocent peoples' neighborhoods. The bottom line is: The fact there were fighter jets to escort this flight or ANY flight is scary and underlines the insanity of the situation. |
Originally Posted by Ducatibiker
Free advertisement for United ?
;) |
Originally Posted by Spiff
Was it also a non-event for all those inconvenienced by this diversion?
Sure it affected the passengers, but my point was simple... from a news standpoint this was nothing! |
Originally Posted by yogimax
From a news standpoint it was a TOTAL NON-EVENT. To have Fox and other networks devoting hours of live coverage is ridiculous.
Sure it affected the passengers, but my point was simple... from a news standpoint this was nothing! Would that be newsworthy? ;) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:03 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.