Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

BNA Police Officer Threatens Arrest for Filming TSA Checkpoint, Confiscates Phone

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

BNA Police Officer Threatens Arrest for Filming TSA Checkpoint, Confiscates Phone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 28, 2010, 4:40 pm
  #91  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 70
Originally Posted by OttawaMark
Confiscate:



Taken from here.

By definition confiscation is taking possession of an object. One would have thought a LEO worth his salt would know this.
Thanks, OttawaMark. I was really looking for the definition of taking 'position' of the iPhone. The poster seemed to feel that taking 'position' then returning the iPhone was okay, and that the officer never confiscated it.

To me, taking something that belongs to me away, would be considered stealing; officer or not. If they are seizing evidence used in commission of a crime, there is a protocol to follow. They don't just walk up, and take what is yours.
PartlySunny is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2010, 4:43 pm
  #92  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,439
Do airport police enforce only the law, or TSA's arbitrary and unwritten "rules"?

Originally Posted by pmocek
Originally Posted by Bearcat06
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
TSA posted about a year ago on photography at the checkpoints.
Having worked as a Airport LEO for several years, I've seen TSA change their minds about how they are doing business on a daily basis......sometimes several times within the day......and one time about 3-4 different times over a two hour period.....before they came up with what they wanted to do.....
At that time, did you take direction from TSA airport staff? Were they used as a source of information about what was lawful and what was not? More generally, what bearing did TSA staff "changing their minds" have on your duty to enforce the law?
I've thought a lot about these questions since I asked them, and I'm concerned that they may have come across as rhetorical or as an attempt to play "gotcha". Neither was my intent. I'm genuinely curious about your experience, Bearcat06, working as a police officer at an airport. You come across here as a reasonable person who is willing to "tell it like it is," and I'd appreciate your input.

Based on my personal experience and on the video of this guy at BNA having his property confiscated by a police officer until a TSA security guard gave the "OK" for him to give it back to its owner, it seems that TSA staff are directing the actions of our police officers. Bearcat06, did TSA staff's frequent "changing their minds about how they are do business" have any bearing on how you went about your job of enforcing the law? If not, what did you mean to imply when you relayed your observation?

Last edited by pmocek; Nov 28, 2010 at 5:03 pm Reason: add missing closing quote mark
pmocek is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2010, 4:48 pm
  #93  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 42,185
Originally Posted by pmocek
I've thought a lot about these questions since I asked them, and I'm concerned that they may have come across as rhetorical or as an attempt to play "gotcha". Neither was my intent. I'm genuinely curious about your experience, Bearcat06, working as a police officer at an airport. You come across here as a reasonable person who is willing to "tell it like it is," and I'd appreciate your input.

Based on my personal experience and on the video of this guy at BNA having his property confiscated by a police officer until a TSA security guard gave the "OK" for him to give it back to its owner, it seems that TSA staff are directing the actions of our police officers. Bearcat06, did TSA staff's frequent "changing their minds about how they are do business have any bearing on how you went about your job of enforcing the law? If not, what did you mean to imply when you relayed your observation?
Good question, Phil. I'd like to know the answer too (although maybe it varies from airport to airport).

I thought when TSA called in an LEO that they were, in effect, escalating the situation. I didn't think they called an LEO as subordinate backup to follow TSA directions. Certainly some other posters have related situations where the LEO made the final judgment call, not TSA. Doesn't sound like that's the way it works at Bearcat06's airport.

Last edited by chollie; Nov 28, 2010 at 5:44 pm
chollie is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2010, 4:51 pm
  #94  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,726
Originally Posted by CitizenTerrorist
I used to work for the airport authority of a midsized US airport, and complaints made to anyone from the officer's direct supervisor up through the chief of police were generally ignored. Submit a complaint to the airport's legal department and things happened a little differently (the general counsel would generally at least perform a cursory investigation before ignoring it ).
The only thing I would be sending to the general counsel would be a notice of claim.
n4zhg is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2010, 5:11 pm
  #95  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,439
Originally Posted by chollie
I thought when TSA called in an LEO that they were, in effect, escalating the situation.
I thought they were calling a police officer for help just like anyone else would, and that the police officer would assess the situation and take action based on what he or she sees and on his or her understanding of the law. It doesn't seem that anything TSA staff say to law enforcement officers about TSA policies should have much, if any, bearing on a police officer's reaction.

Originally Posted by chollie
I didn't think they called an LEO as 'dumb muscle' to follow TSA directions.
I didn't mean to put it like that, but I'm very curious if airport police, as a general rule, take direction from TSA airport staff. It doesn't seem that most police officers would put up with such a power balance, but who knows. Federal agencies can be quite intimidating, TSA do tend to misrepresent their authority, and TSA "rules" are, as far as we know, mostly unwritten.
pmocek is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2010, 10:04 pm
  #96  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,476
Originally Posted by ND Sol
But he did do something. He confiscated a camera when he should have known that was a First Amendment violation.
Huh? How in the world does the 1st apply here? It's recording, not speech!
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2010, 10:33 pm
  #97  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
Huh? How in the world does the 1st apply here? It's recording, not speech!
Photographers, specifically those who work for the press, claim the 1st protects them being interpreted as not limited to speech, but applicable to all forms of communication.

Court opinions have been divided on the issue. No surprise there.

See also "Freedom of the Press" and "Flag Burning".
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2010, 5:10 pm
  #98  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: HNL
Programs: UA/Hawaiian/Marriott
Posts: 840
Originally Posted by Combat Medic
Yep, because some people are more equal than others.
I'm assuming your screen name is correct. Try taking a side-arm from one of your fellow GIs and see what happens....especailly if you are at FOB or out playing elswhere....

Originally Posted by gojirasan
And how is that different from stealing exactly?

Stealing is not giving back.... Hell, the guy never lost sight of the damn thing.. Perhaps you need to go read up on the law some....


Originally Posted by gojirasan
he should be subject to disciplinary action.
I stated that he should be given some remedial training on the issue....and sent back to work.... Thats enough for me being a prior supervisor......

Had he taken the camera and kept it, whacked the guy upside the head, and drug him to jail.....I am suspecting I would have a different resposnse....

Originally Posted by pmocek
At that time, did you take direction from TSA airport staff? Were they used as a source of information about what was lawful and what was not? More generally, what bearing did TSA staff "changing their minds" have on your duty to enforce the law?
I've taken direction from he FSD from time-to-time.... And I've had to figure out what the hell TSA was doing so they didn't get their rears kicked and/or what they were saying was the correct thing for the day.....

And yes, I've seen TSA scream and yell that there was no pictures allowed back in the day....and we dealt with that accordingly after talking to FSD and our Police Chief.....

Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
In my book the police officer stole the persons recording device.

He didn't..... try again...


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
It's certainly not a weapon

In the right hands alomst anything is a weapon.....


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
The persons civil rights where violated.

Pffft.....

Originally Posted by PartlySunny
but what is the difference between taking 'position' of an object, and 'confiscating' it?
He took possession of the device....and gave it back....end of story.

Had he confiscated it, the dude would have never gotten in back......

Originally Posted by n4zhg
Me, I would have demanded that cop's supervisor and filed a criminal complaint.
As a Supervisor, I would have told you to go away..... You go the camera back....and I will talk to my Officer about what transpired....

End of story and thats all you would have gotten from 99.9% of the Supervisory Airport LEOs...

Originally Posted by chollie
I didn't think they called an LEO as subordinate backup to follow TSA directions. Certainly some other posters have related situations where the LEO made the final judgment call, not TSA. Doesn't sound like that's the way it works at Bearcat06's airport.
As stated.....If I came to a TSA/Screening call (which I dreaded 99.9% of the time because they usually started it and wanted us to end it)....I would always talk to a Screening Manger (which were TSA at my 'Port.....MCI has contractors but Screening Managers and above are TSA) to see if there were new TSA Directives that had came out since the last time I worked shift. 99.9% of the time, TSA would come out with stuff and not tell the LEOs..... hence the reason there were issues at times

Not once did TSA Staff tell me or my Officers what to do....it was still our discretion to make arrests...... toss folks from the Airport....or take whatever action that was needed....... Taking pics (at the time) around the screening area was a big no-no.....but several times TSA would change their minds due to the media outcry (usually around holidays) and they would forget to tell us.... That's why I would have to confer with Managers to see what the new deal was. Never, ever would I go ask a screener like this dude did......

And as a side note....my FAVORITE thing in the world was to scratch out a summons to "TSA" folks speeding/blowing stops signs as they were headed late for work. Further, I've arrested several at their respective gates on various warrant charges and lead them off in cuffs.....with TSA Screening Managers crying the blues about being low on folks.....

I hate TSA with a passion.....but until something changes, I'm not one to get riled up over their antics as long as they don't act like LEOs....don't steal my crap.....don't feel my junk.....and leave me alone when I am being screened.....

Hopefully, I will be flying armed again soon enough and not have to deal with them at all....

Last edited by scoow; Nov 29, 2010 at 6:08 pm Reason: merge multiple consecutive posts
Bearcat06 is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2010, 5:54 pm
  #99  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,439
Originally Posted by Bearcat06
I would always talk to a Screening Manger [...] to see if there were new TSA Directives that had came out since the last time I worked shift.
What bearing did TSA directives have on your enforcement of the law?

Originally Posted by Bearcat06
Taking pics (at the time) around the screening area was a big no-no.
I'm no law enforcement expert, but I don't believe "big no-no" is a term of art for your profession. What did you mean by that? Was such photography unlawful?
pmocek is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2010, 6:15 pm
  #100  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,051
That's what interest me. What law s violated by photography of TSO's at work?
LuvAirFrance is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2010, 6:21 pm
  #101  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HH Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Gold, Hyatt something
Posts: 33,614
Originally Posted by LuvAirFrance
What law s violated by photography of TSO's at work?
I'd guess child porn in some cases...
Jaimito Cartero is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2010, 6:46 pm
  #102  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,439
Originally Posted by Jaimito Cartero
I'd guess child porn in some cases...
Oh, come on, be nice.

I'm really curious about the relationship between TSA and airport police.

Bearcat06 has said that unlike the officer in the OP's video, he didn't take direction directly from TSA. Bearcat06, Were they used as a source of information about what was lawful and what was not? More generally, what bearing did TSA staff "changing their minds" have on your duty to enforce the law?

You keep describing "checking in" with them and emphasizing their ever-changing policies, but you've yet to describe any connection between those things and the law. Did your duties as an airport police officer include enforcing TSA's rules-of-the-day? If so, are you familiar with any other situations in which a police officer's duties would include enforcement of something other than the law?

Judging by what detail we've been provided, it seems that airport police treat TSA policies as if they were law. If that's the case, then the TSA staff are, in effect, directing the actions of police officers. Bearcat, does that seem like an accurate assessment of the situation?
pmocek is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2010, 6:51 pm
  #103  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
As a related question, are police officers allowed to see TSA's "SSI" policies? We aren't. Not being able to read the policies makes them pretty difficult to obey. They must be even more difficult to enforce! I can't imagine that a police officer would simply take TSA's word for what the policies are at any given moment.

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2010, 6:54 pm
  #104  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Programs: SSSSS
Posts: 867
Guys,

Please. Bearcat06 is being straightforward in his answers. You may not like the answers, and he has already admitted that his officer probably went a little off the mark and said if he were in a supervisory position, the officer would be disciplined.

Did he take the camera? Yes.
Should he have? Probably not.
Is the TSA ambiguous, arbitrary, capricious and whimsical? Yes indeed.
Will the officer be disciplined? Yes, but along the lines of Gee, George, that wasn't one of your brighter moves--don't do it again. You know how those TSA idiots are.

A little common sense will go a long ways. Our system tolerates a little elasticity at the edges to make sure that most things are ok. On both sides of the uniform.

Suppose the cop had kept the camera as contraband or any other thing. Then you can redress this, through appropriate channels.

Don't bait the Bear!
greentips is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2010, 7:10 pm
  #105  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,439
Originally Posted by greentips
Bearcat06 is being straightforward in his answers.
I completely agree. I appreciate his willingness to discuss this with us. I hope to hear more from him.

Unanswered questions include:

Originally Posted by pmocek
Originally Posted by Bearcat06
Having worked as a Airport LEO for several years, I've seen TSA change their minds about how they are doing business on a daily basis......sometimes several times within the day......and one time about 3-4 different times over a two hour period.....before they came up with what they wanted to do.....
At that time, did you take direction from TSA airport staff? Were they used as a source of information about what was lawful and what was not? More generally, what bearing did TSA staff "changing their minds" have on your duty to enforce the law?
(His response, which was informative but did not answer any of those three questions, was, "I've taken direction from he FSD from time-to-time.... And I've had to figure out what the hell TSA was doing so they didn't get their rears kicked and/or what they were saying was the correct thing for the day..... And yes, I've seen TSA scream and yell that there was no pictures allowed back in the day....and we dealt with that accordingly after talking to FSD and our Police Chief.....")

Originally Posted by pmocek
Bearcat06, did TSA staff's frequent "changing their minds about how they are do business" have any bearing on how you went about your job of enforcing the law? If not, what did you mean to imply when you relayed your observation?
(No response.)

Originally Posted by pmocek
Originally Posted by Bearcat06
I would always talk to a Screening Manger [...] to see if there were new TSA Directives that had came out since the last time I worked shift.
What bearing did TSA directives have on your enforcement of the law?
(No response.)

Originally Posted by pmocek
Originally Posted by Bearcat06
Taking pics (at the time) around the screening area was a big no-no.
I'm no law enforcement expert, but I don't believe "big no-no" is a term of art for your profession. What did you mean by that? Was such photography unlawful?
(No response.)

Originally Posted by LuvAirFrance
What law s violated by photography of TSO's at work?
(No response.)

Originally Posted by bdschobel
are police officers allowed to see TSA's "SSI" policies?
(No response.)

Last edited by pmocek; Nov 29, 2010 at 7:16 pm Reason: add Bruce's question
pmocek is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.