FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld-411/)
-   -   Changes to xONEx Rule Sheet (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld/983365-changes-xonex-rule-sheet.html)

pandaperth Aug 4, 2016 9:32 am


Originally Posted by skunker (Post 27014660)
The old AA ORD-DEL counted as including Europe even though the plane never landed there and you couldn't go back.

It is a moot point now as the ORD-DEL flight is but a distant memory
But Europe was NOT charged for, see http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/14223220-post1.html

skunker Aug 4, 2016 9:45 am


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 27014704)
It is a moot point now as the ORD-DEL flight is but a distant memory
But Europe was NOT charged for, see http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/14223220-post1.html

So, people assumed it was being charged, but weren't? Interesting.

jerry a. laska Aug 4, 2016 11:04 am


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 27014704)
It is a moot point now as the ORD-DEL flight is but a distant memory
But Europe was NOT charged for, see http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/14223220-post1.html

EUR seemed to not be charged for when using the tool. Of course, this required being able to book thru the tool which was not always working or available based upon the itinerary. If you attempted to book thru the AA rtw desk or other TAs I am familiar with you were certainly going to be charged for the continent (this, along with the fact it was considered eastbound, is why I never ended up booking it).

pandaperth Aug 5, 2016 6:17 am

2016-Aug-04 New Version of the Rule Sheet
 
The new rule sheet has now been published on the Oneworld web site

The only change I can se is that posted by JAXBA on August 1st

- namely that Clause 4(h) has had these words removed

*segments between Europe and Middle East are not permitted if travel includes Africa and the itinerary utilises the backtracking provisions in Para 4(e) 3.1.3.or 3.2.3.
Yay!

pbd456 Aug 5, 2016 6:29 am


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 27019176)
The new rule sheet has now been published on the Oneworld web site

The only change I can se is that posted by JAXBA on August 1st

- namely that Clause 4(h) has had these words removed

Yay!

thank you!

pandaperth Aug 5, 2016 6:51 am

WHAT THE *#@%!!! - AA does it its way!
 
So the new fare rules have been published on the Oneworld web site
But AA has obviously decided it is right and Oneworld is wrong

This is what AA's new fare rule looks like in ExpertFlyer (apologies for the crappy formatting and for SHOUTING)

4E. ONLY ONE INTERCONTINENTAL DEPARTURE AND ONE
INTERCONTINENTAL ARRIVAL PERMITTED IN EACH
CONTINENT EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS -
1. TWO PERMITTED IN NORTH AMERICA WHEN ONE IS A
TRANSFER WITHOUT STOPOVER.
2. TWO PERMITTED IN ASIA WHEN ONE IS A TRANSFER
WITHOUT STOPOVER OR ON DIRECT SINGLE PLANE
SERVICE BETWEEN SOUTHWEST PACIFIC AND EUROPE /
MIDDLE EAST.
3. TWO PERMITTED IN EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST
A. FOR TRAVEL ORIGINATING IN AFRICA
//AFRICA-EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST-RTW-EUROPE/MIDDLE
EAST-AFRICA//
- ONE OF THE VISITS TO EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST MUST
BE A TRANSFER WITHOUT STOPOVER BETWEEN AFRICA
AND THE PREVIOUS/NEXT CONTINENT.
B. FOR TRAVEL ORIGINATING OTHER THAN AFRICA
//EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST-AFRICA-EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST//
- IF TRAVEL TO/FROM EUROPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS
THE ITINERARY MAY NOT INCLUDE MAURITIUS/SOUTH
AFRICA.
---
---
H.A MINIMUM OF 3 AND MAXIMUM OF 16 SEGMENTS
INCLUDING SURFACE SEGMENTS BETWEEN ANY 2
AIRPORTS ARE PERMITTED FOR THE ENTIRE
JOURNEY.
FREE FLIGHT SEGMENTS WITHIN EACH CONTINENT ARE
LIMITED AS FOLLOWS -
AFRICA 4
ASIA 4
EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST 4 - NOT MORE THAN 2 OF WHICH
MAY BE BETWEEN THE UK AND ALBANIA/ALGERIA/
BULGARIA/CROATIA/CYPRUS/GREECE/LIBYA/ISRAEL/
MIDDLE EAST/MOROCCO/ROMANIA/RUSSIA WEST OF THE
URALS/TUNISIA/TURKEY/UKRAINE.
SEGMENTS BETWEEN MIDDLE EAST AND EUROPE ARE NOT
PERMITTED IF TRAVEL INCLUDES AFRICA AND THE
ITINERARY UTILISES THE BACKTRACKING PROVISIONS
IN PARAGRAPH FL.E.3.A AND E.3.B
NORTH AMERICA 6
SOUTH AMERICA 4
SOUTHWEST PACIFIC 4
My emphasis
Note this is new wording - previously paragraph 4(h) referred to "3.1.3 and 3.2.3" not "FL.E.3.A and E.3.B"
So it looks like AA will still refuse Europe-Middle East flights on backtracking itineraries
The Qantas fare rules do not have the red text in paragraph 4(h)

pandaperth Aug 5, 2016 7:48 am


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 27008826)
I obviously have too much time on my hands, now that the feeding frenzy that was the ex-MPM fares is over:)

Just been checking on the progress of the implementation of the new rules referred to by JAXBA
  1. The pdf document with the fare rules on oneworld.com has not yet been updated
    Since it is BA that publishes this document, I expect it will be updated when BA gets around to updating its own fare rules
  2. The following airlines HAVE updated their fare rules (according to ExpertFlyer)
    CX IB JL QF S7
  3. The following airlines have NOT yet updated their fare rules
    AB AA BA AY MH QR RJ UL
  4. This airline still has the old (pre-Arpil2016) fare rules - the ones that had the complicated backtrack provisions!
    LA

Checking again, after I spotted that AA is doing its own thing with fare rules - see the post above this one
AB, QR, RJ and UL are now moved to the HAVE updated list
AA is also moved, BUT its fare rules are different* from the rest
So we are still waiting on BA, AY, MH and LA to change their fare rules

* I have checked the fare rules of all the airlines that have updated - except for AA, they are all the same, in other words they have removed all reference to restrictions on Europe-Middle East flights due to backtracking

headinclouds Aug 5, 2016 7:55 am

AA not filing the same rules could mean that unless it was ticketed by AA, the RTW desk will not touch it. Or if they do, they will use AA's rules and not the issuing carrier's rules. Is that possible? Another example of the 'seamless' oneworld travel experience.

pbd456 Aug 5, 2016 8:00 am


Originally Posted by headinclouds (Post 27019617)
AA not filing the same rules could mean that unless it was ticketed by AA, the RTW desk will not touch it. Or if they do, they will use AA's rules and not the issuing carrier's rules. Is that possible? Another example of the 'seamless' oneworld travel experience.

other carriers are not supposed to take over a ticket unless there is a strong reason to, like irregular operation or maybe upgrade via mileage/swu. i believe aa complimentary upgrade does not require it to be reissued.

pandaperth Aug 5, 2016 8:04 am


Originally Posted by pbd456 (Post 27019627)
other carriers are not supposed to take over a ticket unless there is a strong reason to, like irregular operation or maybe upgrade via mileage/swu. i believe aa complimentary upgrade does not require it to be reissued.

Not so, in my experience at least. I have had airlines take over a ticket when I have phoned my next carrier to make date/time changes.

Calchas Aug 5, 2016 8:22 am


Originally Posted by pbd456 (Post 27019627)
other carriers are not supposed to take over a ticket unless there is a strong reason to, like irregular operation or maybe upgrade via mileage/swu. i believe aa complimentary upgrade does not require it to be reissued.

Other carriers can take it over if they like after the first segment is flown

Who knows what rules they would apply

JAXBA Aug 5, 2016 9:45 am


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 27019324)
So the new fare rules have been published on the Oneworld web site
But AA has obviously decided it is right and Oneworld is wrong

This is what AA's new fare rule looks like in ExpertFlyer (apologies for the crappy formatting and for SHOUTING)


My emphasis
Note this is new wording - previously paragraph 4(h) referred to "3.1.3 and 3.2.3" not "FL.E.3.A and E.3.B"
So it looks like AA will still refuse Europe-Middle East flights on backtracking itineraries
The Qantas fare rules do not have the red text in paragraph 4(h)

Ugh!

I checked Amadeus to see how QF and AA had it filed and of course QF doesn't have the para 4(h) line, as we knew. I also compared paras 3(a)(b) for differences and, well, spot the difference:

QF filed:

Code:

            3. TWO PERMITTED IN EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST
            A. FOR TRAVEL ORIGINATING IN AFRICA
            //AFRICA-EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST-RTW-EUROPE/MIDDLE
              EAST-AFRICA//
            - ONE OF THE VISITS TO EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST MUST
            BE A TRANSFER WITHOUT STOPOVER BETWEEN AFRICA
            AND THE PREVIOUS/NEXT CONTINENT
            - IF TRAVEL TO/FROM EUROPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS
            THE ITINERARY MAY NOT INCLUDE MAURITIUS/SOUTH
            AFRICA.
            B. FOR TRAVEL ORIGINATING OTHER THAN AFRICA
            //EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST-AFRICA-EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST//
            - ONE OF THE VISITS TO EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST MUST
            BE A TRANSFER WITHOUT STOPOVER BETWEEN AFRICA
            AND THE PREVIOUS/NEXT CONTINENT
            - IF TRAVEL TO/FROM EUROPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS
            THE ITINERARY MAY NOT INCLUDE MAURITIUS/SOUTH
            AFRICA.


AA filed:

Code:

3. TWO PERMITTED IN EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST
A. FOR TRAVEL ORIGINATING IN AFRICA
//AFRICA-EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST-RTW-EUROPE/MIDDLE
EAST-AFRICA//
- ONE OF THE VISITS TO EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST MUST
BE A TRANSFER WITHOUT STOPOVER BETWEEN AFRICA
AND THE PREVIOUS/NEXT CONTINENT.
B. FOR TRAVEL ORIGINATING OTHER THAN AFRICA
//EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST-AFRICA-EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST//
- IF TRAVEL TO/FROM EUROPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS
THE ITINERARY MAY NOT INCLUDE MAURITIUS/SOUTH
AFRICA.


JAXBA Aug 5, 2016 9:51 am


Originally Posted by pbd456 (Post 27019627)
other carriers are not supposed to take over a ticket unless there is a strong reason to, like irregular operation or maybe upgrade via mileage/swu. i believe aa complimentary upgrade does not require it to be reissued.

Any oneworld member is allowed to reissue any ticket with a published fare issued by any other oneworld member.

Especially RTWs and alliance fare products. They can, they're allowed, they don't need extra permission, it's an internal alliance rule in the oneworld Ticketing Agreement.

Now which rules they apply when they do so is another matter...

pbd456 Aug 5, 2016 10:15 am


Originally Posted by JAXBA (Post 27020141)
Any oneworld member is allowed to reissue any ticket with a published fare issued by any other oneworld member.

Especially RTWs and alliance fare products. They can, they're allowed, they don't need extra permission, it's an internal alliance rule in the oneworld Ticketing Agreement.

Now which rules they apply when they do so is another matter...

yes. but cx told me they wont unless there is.a good reason to. we asked cx to reissue the qf ticket but cx agent that i talked to refuse. as a rule, it is allowed, whether it is being done is another matter. i am thinking to apply mileage upgrade on a cx segment and hope cx to reissue and then un apply the upgrade.

jerry a. laska Aug 5, 2016 11:02 am


Originally Posted by pbd456 (Post 27020254)
yes. but cx told me they wont unless there is.a good reason to. we asked cx to reissue the qf ticket but cx agent that i talked to refuse. as a rule, it is allowed, whether it is being done is another matter. i am thinking to apply mileage upgrade on a cx segment and hope cx to reissue and then un apply the upgrade.

Once travel has started CX has reissued several xonex's originally issued by other airlines for me over the years.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:20 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.