Last edit by: ChrisFlyer66
For the 2021 shutdown thread, click here: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/manufactured-spending/2031831-2021-shutdown-thread.html
When reporting/posting here please give as many details as you can or you will be asked for it anyways. Copy and paste the text below and alter as needed.
1. SHUTdn by Bank, Credit Card info. (@m3x, chs3 ,c1t1 and brcl@y)
2. Length of account before closure and CL?
3. Average monthly account balance checking and savings?
4. Volume of ms per month and how many months?
5. Cycle CL?
6. Did you BP using both options?
- BP by issuing bank (@m3x, chs3, c1t1 and brcl@y)
- BP by Vis/MC
7. Did you spell out the bank's full name in an internet forum?
When reporting/posting here please give as many details as you can or you will be asked for it anyways. Copy and paste the text below and alter as needed.
1. SHUTdn by Bank, Credit Card info. (@m3x, chs3 ,c1t1 and brcl@y)
2. Length of account before closure and CL?
3. Average monthly account balance checking and savings?
4. Volume of ms per month and how many months?
5. Cycle CL?
6. Did you BP using both options?
- BP by issuing bank (@m3x, chs3, c1t1 and brcl@y)
- BP by Vis/MC
7. Did you spell out the bank's full name in an internet forum?
2020 Shutdown Thread
#91
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 57
Look, I know all these agreements have a clause that the bank can close your accounts without a reason. Often they add that they will confiscate all rewards when an account is closed. But that doesn't prevent arbitration on a number of grounds. For example, suppose a bank said it would pay you 10% cash back at the end of six months for all your purchases with no limits on rewards earned--and then closed all accounts that earned $1K or more after five months. Could it really win a court case or arbitration by saying the terms gave it the right to confiscate rewards and close accounts without giving a reason at any time? I don't think our system works that way. It's bait and switch, false advertising--likely many other legal violations of consumer and advertising and banking laws, regardless of what the bank says in its terms. And whether ultimately successful or not, you can still make a stink and get paid to shut up.
I'm out $1400 in doublecash rewards that would have posted on my next statement cycle, and $500 from checking/savings bonus that would have posted if they didn't close me.
Total loss $1900 + $200 for the arbitration fee. So the minimum I should request is $2100.
What amount do you think I should try for? $2500 total?
#92
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 317
I'd ask for $20,000 at least. You can always settle for less. Pain and suffering. Worries about your credit. You can't sleep at night. Your reputation has been ruined. You have all sorts of reactions to the closures that I can't possibly know.
Seriously, I don't give legal advice. It's an arbitration. Be a PITA. See what happens.
Seriously, I don't give legal advice. It's an arbitration. Be a PITA. See what happens.
#93
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
Thank you. 1 more thing to mention. Not sure if it matters or not, but my Citi cashback balance was at $0, BUT I already had made enough purchases that I would have gotten $1400 cashback on my statement closing date.
Also I lost out on $500 bonus for checking/savings account since they closed those as well a couple weeks before it would have posted. (I already met all the requirements and was just waiting on bonus to post)
Also I lost out on $500 bonus for checking/savings account since they closed those as well a couple weeks before it would have posted. (I already met all the requirements and was just waiting on bonus to post)
I will let the others chime in but all those I know whom were closed they didnt ram everything in in their 1st month
If I figured correctly, you said you earned $1400 in 2% ca$h back, only now do you say your statement never closed so that seems to say you charged $70K during your < 1 month having the CC, I can be dead wrong but I doubt you had a $70K CL, how many times did you prepay off the CC? Im not sure if paying the $200 fee isnt simply throwing good money after bad money
#94
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
You make a great point!
I'm out $1400 in doublecash rewards that would have posted on my next statement cycle, and $500 from checking/savings bonus that would have posted if they didn't close me.
Total loss $1900 + $200 for the arbitration fee. So the minimum I should request is $2100.
What amount do you think I should try for? $2500 total?
I'm out $1400 in doublecash rewards that would have posted on my next statement cycle, and $500 from checking/savings bonus that would have posted if they didn't close me.
Total loss $1900 + $200 for the arbitration fee. So the minimum I should request is $2100.
What amount do you think I should try for? $2500 total?
#95
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 317
It seems this was a brand new account, is that correct? What was your CL and how much did you charge in total in what appears to be the < 1 month you had the CC and did you pay off your Citi CC by depositing the MOs to your Citi acct?
I will let the others chime in but all those I know whom were closed they didnt ram everything in in their 1st month
If I figured correctly, you said you earned $1400 in 2% ca$h back, only now do you say your statement never closed so that seems to say you charged $70K during your < 1 month having the CC, I can be dead wrong but I doubt you had a $70K CL, how many times did you prepay off the CC? Im not sure if paying the $200 fee isnt simply throwing good money after bad money
I will let the others chime in but all those I know whom were closed they didnt ram everything in in their 1st month
If I figured correctly, you said you earned $1400 in 2% ca$h back, only now do you say your statement never closed so that seems to say you charged $70K during your < 1 month having the CC, I can be dead wrong but I doubt you had a $70K CL, how many times did you prepay off the CC? Im not sure if paying the $200 fee isnt simply throwing good money after bad money
#96
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
There's nothing in the terms of any card that prohibits cycling credit limits. How the card was used likely won't even come up in the arbitration, Trust me--paying the 250 arbitration fee (again, use the other arbitration organization, not the one Citi wants you to use) is a good bet. No guarantees, but it's a small risk to take.
Is there anything regarding the Citi 2% ca$h back about not earning the CB on Cash like products eg ca$h adv, gift cards, ATM withdrawls, do you think the $500 for opening up a savings and checking is due the OP? since Citi closed the accts before the min amount of time they needed to be open was reached (albeit it was Citi that closed them)
#97
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 57
There's nothing in the terms of any card that prohibits cycling credit limits. How the card was used likely won't even come up in the arbitration, Trust me--paying the 250 arbitration fee (again, use the other arbitration organization, not the one Citi wants you to use) is a good bet. No guarantees, but it's a small risk to take.
#98
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 57
Is there anything regarding the Citi 2% ca$h back about not earning the CB on Cash like products eg ca$h adv, gift cards, ATM withdrawls, do you think the $500 for opening up a savings and checking is due the OP? since Citi closed the accts before the min amount of time they needed to be open was reached (albeit it was Citi that closed them)
#99
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
I realize you are out the fees paid for the cards and MOs or BPs, but if it was me Id want to know if those who won in arbitration what the T&Cs stated for them. If there was nothing regarding GCs or ca$h eqv then although you can hope cave, Citi may not since the T&Cs are different. If the others had the same T&Cs and won they its worth a try
It seems from what Ive read that you arent in the same exact position as the others were,T&C wise, it seems you are in a much weaker position, in regards to teh 2% CB, Id forget about the bonus for opening up the accts its a slam dunk IMO that Citi wins, sort of like opening a CC and the bonus is 100K pts but the pts are credited only after 6 months = if the acct is closed before fulfilling all the T&Cs you dont get the bonus pts no matter who closed the acct since it wasnt opened for the min amount of time. Although if you are going to arb then add this as well just dont get your hopes up for the $500, since Citi can say it was closed since all your accts werent in good standing
good luck you will need it Citi robbed for $80 and it took close to 2 months to get my money back, ATM withdrawl $$ out of my acct but no cash from the ATM, even the branch mgr tried everything and it was like talking to the wall, and the ATM was well over the $80 in excess ca$h when it was audited the next day
#100
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 317
Again, don't focus on legal arguments or the merits of the case. Focus on the fact that in a JAMS arbitration, Citi will have to be represented by an attorney charging hundreds of dollars per hour and will have to pay thousands of dollars in filing fees. IMHO the arbitrator will never hear the case. Citi will offer you some bucks to get you to drop it. View it as a fun learning experience if you wish.
#102
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
Again, don't focus on legal arguments or the merits of the case. Focus on the fact that in a JAMS arbitration, Citi will have to be represented by an attorney charging hundreds of dollars per hour and will have to pay thousands of dollars in filing fees. IMHO the arbitrator will never hear the case. Citi will offer you some bucks to get you to drop it. View it as a fun learning experience if you wish.
I hear you, but in which city did you apply for Arb? Would it matter any if say the OP is based in NY,LA etc etc a major city where Citi has a major presence and probably has lawyers on staff? I can hear if the OP is Dayton based and Citi lets say has no presence then either they send someone ($$ tkts, hotel etc) or pay for a local, and I can fully see where it will be cheaper just to pay the claimant off, but not if they have legal staff where the Arb will take place. But I may be dead wrong in my thinking. If there wasnt a filing fee then Id do it, with a fee and what I may not consider a strong case I wouldnt want to waste any more of my $$
Could be Im overthinking this, but some DPs of folks who went to Arb in places that Citi has a strong presence and got their $$ is important
#104
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,322
Writing as someone who's been through this exact situation --
1. You don't need a lawyer to write the letters I described in my post.
2. Demanding "pain & suffering" will be seen as frivolous and won't advance your cause. Stick to what you actually unconditionally earned, i.e., the cash back.
3. Citi's opening offer to settle will likely be a flat $500; probably good to think now whether that will be acceptable to you.
4. For various reasons that I'm not going to detail here, filing for arbitration with AAA is better than JAMS, imho.
5. T&C applicable to my card says that Citibank will pay my share of the arbitration fee for Claims of $75,000 or less if they are unrelated to debt collection
6. If you don't understand that the idea here is to get reasonable settlement in lieu of actual arbitration, this approach isn't for you.
1. You don't need a lawyer to write the letters I described in my post.
2. Demanding "pain & suffering" will be seen as frivolous and won't advance your cause. Stick to what you actually unconditionally earned, i.e., the cash back.
3. Citi's opening offer to settle will likely be a flat $500; probably good to think now whether that will be acceptable to you.
4. For various reasons that I'm not going to detail here, filing for arbitration with AAA is better than JAMS, imho.
5. T&C applicable to my card says that Citibank will pay my share of the arbitration fee for Claims of $75,000 or less if they are unrelated to debt collection
6. If you don't understand that the idea here is to get reasonable settlement in lieu of actual arbitration, this approach isn't for you.
#105
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
Writing as someone who's been through this exact situation --
1. You don't need a lawyer to write the letters I described in my post.
2. Demanding "pain & suffering" will be seen as frivolous and won't advance your cause. Stick to what you actually unconditionally earned, i.e., the cash back.
3. Citi's opening offer to settle will likely be a flat $500; probably good to think now whether that will be acceptable to you.
4. For various reasons that I'm not going to detail here, filing for arbitration with AAA is better than JAMS, imho.
5. T&C applicable to my card says that Citibank will pay my share of the arbitration fee for Claims of $75,000 or less if they are unrelated to debt collection
6. If you don't understand that the idea here is to get reasonable settlement in lieu of actual arbitration, this approach isn't for you.
1. You don't need a lawyer to write the letters I described in my post.
2. Demanding "pain & suffering" will be seen as frivolous and won't advance your cause. Stick to what you actually unconditionally earned, i.e., the cash back.
3. Citi's opening offer to settle will likely be a flat $500; probably good to think now whether that will be acceptable to you.
4. For various reasons that I'm not going to detail here, filing for arbitration with AAA is better than JAMS, imho.
5. T&C applicable to my card says that Citibank will pay my share of the arbitration fee for Claims of $75,000 or less if they are unrelated to debt collection
6. If you don't understand that the idea here is to get reasonable settlement in lieu of actual arbitration, this approach isn't for you.
I understand you are saying just file since Citi will settle anyways and never let it go to an actual arbitration, I hear that and it has merit to it as long as anyone else is in the same boat, personally if I didnt have #5 as you did I doubt Id throw the $$ out and would rather stop my loss $$ I paid in MO and card fees then add to it
Now if theres no #5 then Citi can decide to pay or draw it out and pay later on, theyd probably view it as a nuisance suit and as you said simply want it to go away and not worth its time and effort
Your point #3 is extremely important does a person simply hope to get back the $s they paid in fees for the cards and MOs or try and get the CB so called earned but pending.I guess one needs to include the filing fee as well. Id be happy walking away even and not out any $$ I dont see the CB as something that I lost or would be out. I see it as a biz decision that didnt workout. Either way w/o having your #5 as part of my T&Cs I would simply move on, rather then chance being out another $200 or 250. But as the Lotterys say You got to be in it to win it. I dont play the lotterys
Just trying to give the OP some food for thought and have them understand if they are in the same boat as those who went down this same path, if they dont have your #5 then they arent in the boat you were in, and would need some DPs from someone who also didnt have #5