Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, Brussels, LOT and Other Partners | Miles & More
Reload this Page >

Denied boarding first flight by SN, due to lack of visa for connecting flight

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Denied boarding first flight by SN, due to lack of visa for connecting flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2015, 4:22 am
  #76  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,896
Originally Posted by warakorn
Proper documentation does not mean it has to be a visa or onward flight ticket.
So if we rule out an "onward/return flight ticket" and we also rule out "entry/transit visa", can you please tell us what "proper documentation" can mean?
irishguy28 is online now  
Old Oct 20, 2015, 4:35 am
  #77  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,896
Originally Posted by US Embassy, Moscow

The Russian government maintains a restrictive and complicated visa regime for foreigners who visit, transit, or reside in the Russian Federation. A U.S. citizen who does not comply with Russian visa laws can be subject to arrest, fines, and/or deportation.

<snip>

U.S. citizens should also be aware that Russian immigration and visa laws change regularly, and the implementation of new regulations has not always been transparent or predictable.

<snip>

Entry Visas: To enter Russia for any purpose, a U.S. citizen must possess a valid U.S. passport and a bona fide visa issued by a Russian Embassy or Consulate. It is impossible to obtain an entry visa upon arrival, so travelers must apply for their visas well in advance. U.S. citizens who apply for Russian visas in third countries where they do not have permission to stay more than 90 days may face considerable delays in visa processing. Travelers who arrive in Russia without an entry visa will not be permitted to enter the country, and face immediate return to the point of embarkation at their own expense.
I think it is really rather fanciful to think a US traveller could obtain a Russian visa while travelling through Europe for a month, even if they stayed at the place of application for the entirety of their stay.
irishguy28 is online now  
Old Oct 20, 2015, 4:51 am
  #78  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Originally Posted by irishguy28
I think it is really rather fanciful to think a US traveller could obtain a Russian visa while travelling through Europe for a month, even if they stayed at the place of application for the entirety of their stay.
Fanciful or not, I know of multiple people who only have American passports and have received Russian visas outside the USA, including some who received in London while simply visiting there for a couple of weeks
joshwex90 is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2015, 5:50 am
  #79  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,312
Originally Posted by Myyra
..have sufficient means .. for the return to their country of origin or transit to a third country..
It's a weak 'or' not an 'and'.

So the pax ability to purchase any ticket to leave Schengen in time should have been sufficient to allow travel in the first legs.
weero is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2015, 10:28 am
  #80  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,896
Originally Posted by joshwex90
Fanciful or not, I know of multiple people who only have American passports and have received Russian visas outside the USA, including some who received in London while simply visiting there for a couple of weeks
Were they in London on a stopover on their ticket to Russia?
irishguy28 is online now  
Old Oct 20, 2015, 10:59 am
  #81  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Originally Posted by irishguy28
Were they in London on a stopover on their ticket to Russia?
Don't know if it was the same ticket or not. Point wasn't about EU entry eligibility but about ability to get a visa in Europe for a non-European
joshwex90 is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2015, 12:24 pm
  #82  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PVG, FRA, SEA, HEL
Programs: UA Premier Gold
Posts: 4,783
Don't know if it was the same ticket or not. Point wasn't about EU entry eligibility but about ability to get a visa in Europe for a non-European
We discussed it and it was shown that this is indeed possible - at the Russian embassy in Helsinki.

So if we rule out an "onward/return flight ticket" and we also rule out "entry/transit visa", can you please tell us what "proper documentation" can mean?
Here you go...

The Schengen Borders Code regulation EC 562/2006 states, for non-EU nationals, among others:

they justify the purpose and conditions of the intended stay, and they have sufficient means of subsistence, both for the duration of the intended stay and for the return to their country of origin or transit to a third country into which they are certain to be admitted, or are in a position to acquire such means lawfully;

(Article 5, 1, c)
If he opted for the Finland option (to where he didnt even have to Finland to), he would have been in a position to get that visa.
Russia sometimes denies visa, but thats largely out of political considerations or because of formal mistakes. They most likely wont hit ordinary people.

Of course you can say that it is not guaranteed 100 per cent that he gets the visa. Point taken!
However, what is 100 per cent?
A lot of countries issue visa on arrival entry documents. Of course, no one can be 100 per cent sure to be able to receive that visa. Some weird stuff can always happen.
warakorn is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2015, 2:47 am
  #83  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: a proud member of FT since 05-05-1998
Programs: DL, AF and KL - UA - *G
Posts: 2,239
Bottom line did not even need that he could just take the train to anywhere outside Shengen or have a credit card to return to the US so no need to even to continue to Russia from BRU to get entry.....- therefore he was IDB and every court will recognize that!
Germanfflyer is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2015, 4:14 am
  #84  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,312
Originally Posted by Germanfflyer
...therefore he was IDB and every court will recognize that!
While I agree that it was an IDB, I doubt that 'every' court would agree.

Especially higher courts are exclusively designed to manufacture elaborate rationalisations for things normal folks perceived as construed or incoherent.
weero is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2015, 6:48 am
  #85  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: a proud member of FT since 05-05-1998
Programs: DL, AF and KL - UA - *G
Posts: 2,239
Not my experience....YMMV
Germanfflyer is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2015, 10:31 am
  #86  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Capetown
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG and Hilton Diamond, LH SEN, BA Gold
Posts: 10,177
Originally Posted by Germanfflyer
Bottom line did not even need that he could just take the train to anywhere outside Shengen or have a credit card to return to the US so no need to even to continue to Russia from BRU to get entry.....- therefore he was IDB and every court will recognize that!
It depends on the story he told or made plausible. We did not witness the situation. I, however, certainly agree that the airline's approach stinks. It is. certainly again, not a IDB privileged under the EU rules but a massive breach of contract with all remedies available under the OP's local law. And this can be by far more interesting than the tiny money under EU rules.
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2015, 5:44 am
  #87  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Belgium
Programs: Miles&More IHG
Posts: 148
Am I the only one thinking that the topic starter is releasing very minimal information and also seems to ignore all the other information (ticketing) requests?

Maybe it's just a post to discredit an airline....
Koja78 is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2015, 5:51 am
  #88  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,405
Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer
certainly again, not a IDB privileged under the EU rules but a massive breach of contract with all remedies available under the OP's local law.
It can be both. One does not exclude the other.
NickB is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2015, 5:57 am
  #89  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: a proud member of FT since 05-05-1998
Programs: DL, AF and KL - UA - *G
Posts: 2,239
Originally Posted by Koja78
Am I the only one thinking that the topic starter is releasing very minimal information and also seems to ignore all the other information (ticketing) requests?

Maybe it's just a post to discredit an airline....
Yeah sure!
Germanfflyer is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2015, 12:08 am
  #90  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Capetown
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG and Hilton Diamond, LH SEN, BA Gold
Posts: 10,177
Originally Posted by NickB
It can be both. One does not exclude the other.
Nobody said so. However, the EU regulation is not a penalty on the airline, it is a privilege compared to the remedies available under other concepts. Some people tend to forget this.
Flying Lawyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.