Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > Delta SkyMiles (Pre-WorldPerks Merger)
Reload this Page >

Delta's $98 response: detained by the DHS/FBI on a DL MR

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Delta's $98 response: detained by the DHS/FBI on a DL MR

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2007, 3:58 pm
  #76  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still PAL Premier Elite & Hilton Diamond
Posts: 25,419
Originally Posted by jfulcher
They are trying to protect their revenue streams.
Pocketing fares without flying pax to their destinations gives one heck of a yield, even on sLUT fares. I can see why Delta would want to protect that revenue stream.
MikeMpls is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2007, 5:15 pm
  #77  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wayne, PA USA
Programs: DL MM, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, HHonors Gold
Posts: 7,247
Originally Posted by GUWonder
..... talk about painting with a broad brush on the wrong surface.

The phrase quod est absurdum speaks to that attempt to smear by false association.
I think jfulcher is missing a comma. If you read what s/he said as:
Originally Posted by jfulcher
Until you can prove that, you guys are as bad as those saying 9/11 was planned by the US government.
it becomes more reasonable. In other words s/he is trying to compare those accusing Delta of some secret conspiracy to deny the OP his/her mileage run to those who try to accuse the US government of some secret conspiracy to cause the incidents of terrorism that occurred in the US on 11 September 2001.

I'm sure jfulcher wasn't attempting to associate the OP or Delta airlines with the incidents of terrorism that occurred in the US on 11 September 2001.
jimrpa is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2007, 5:16 pm
  #78  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 253
Originally Posted by jimrpa
Just as Delta is not allowed to tell you that you've been moved from 2B to 37E because some deadweight (excuse me, FAM)
Deadweight, is that a step up from ballast?
mmartin4600 is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2007, 5:19 pm
  #79  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wayne, PA USA
Programs: DL MM, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, HHonors Gold
Posts: 7,247
Originally Posted by MikeMpls
Pocketing fares without flying pax to their destinations gives one heck of a yield, even on sLUT fares. I can see why Delta would want to protect that revenue stream.
I suggest that there's a lot more that's being protected here. If Delta is selling a round-trip leaving at 6:00 a.m. and returning at 11:00 p.m. PHL-ATL-PHL for $198, but the 9:00 a.m. departure, 7:00 p.m. return is selling for $600, I'm sure Delta doesn't want everyone booking the $198 fare, failing to show up at 6:00 a.m., then arriving around 8:00 a.m. and demanding to be put on the 9:00 a.m. flight.

Basically, there are cheap flights and more expensive flights. Delta doesn't want people to book the cheap flights, then demand accommodation on the more expensive flights, which is essentially what the OP is demanding.
jimrpa is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2007, 5:21 pm
  #80  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wayne, PA USA
Programs: DL MM, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, HHonors Gold
Posts: 7,247
Originally Posted by mmartin4600
Deadweight, is that a step up from ballast?
Ballast can always be replaced by revenue cargo of an equivalent mass. Deadweight cannot
jimrpa is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2007, 5:46 pm
  #81  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still PAL Premier Elite & Hilton Diamond
Posts: 25,419
Please stop misconstuing what happened with these alternative "suggestions". The OP was on time for his flight. His boarding pass was scanned and he entered the jetway, where he was confronted and led away by federal agents.

Originally Posted by jimrpa
I suggest that there's a lot more that's being protected here. If Delta is selling a round-trip leaving at 6:00 a.m. and returning at 11:00 p.m. PHL-ATL-PHL for $198, but the 9:00 a.m. departure, 7:00 p.m. return is selling for $600, I'm sure Delta doesn't want everyone booking the $198 fare, failing to show up at 6:00 a.m., then arriving around 8:00 a.m. and demanding to be put on the 9:00 a.m. flight.

Basically, there are cheap flights and more expensive flights. Delta doesn't want people to book the cheap flights, then demand accommodation on the more expensive flights, which is essentially what the OP is demanding.
MikeMpls is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2007, 7:23 pm
  #82  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP / LT PLT / 3MM, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 35,537
Originally Posted by MikeMpls
Please stop misconstuing what happened with these alternative "suggestions". The OP was on time for his flight. His boarding pass was scanned and he entered the jetway, where he was confronted and led away by federal agents.
Yes. With all due repect, jimrpa is so far out in left field on this one that he can't hear what anyone else is saying.
vasantn is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2007, 8:21 pm
  #83  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: AA Exec PLT; Marriott PLAT
Posts: 1,120
Can you substantiate that DL WAS required to notify the feds?

If they were not in fact required, then they certainly did prevent the OP from boarding the flight.

Originally Posted by jimrpa
Why? it wasn't Delta's fault that this guy got yanked off a flight and detained! If I don't board a light and it operates normally, then the fare rules govern what happens to me and my ticket? This guy didn't board a flight that operated normally. Delta did not in any way deny him boarding - in fact, he was in the jetway when the government yanked him off the flight.

Prior to the point that agents yanked him out of the jetway, did any Delta employee do or say anything that would indicate that Delta wasn't going to provide the transportation he had purchased? No! He was in the jetway for goodness sake! If Delta were going to deny him boarding, I'm sure they would have. Delta, by their own actions, were ready and willing to transport him!

It amazes me how many apologists (not just you, but the entire "sue Delta because the government abused you" crowd) we have for the increasingly totalitarian regime that passes for a government here.
plat is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2007, 7:07 am
  #84  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wayne, PA USA
Programs: DL MM, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, HHonors Gold
Posts: 7,247
Originally Posted by MikeMpls
Please stop misconstuing what happened with these alternative "suggestions". The OP was on time for his flight. His boarding pass was scanned and he entered the jetway, where he was confronted and led away by federal agents.
Did the OP board the aircraft and take the flight? No. Was it Delta's fault that the OP did not board the aircraft? No. Therefore, the OP did not fulfill his end of the contract. You can't get much simpler than that.
jimrpa is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2007, 7:09 am
  #85  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wayne, PA USA
Programs: DL MM, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, HHonors Gold
Posts: 7,247
Originally Posted by vasantn
Yes. With all due repect, jimrpa is so far out in left field on this one that he can't hear what anyone else is saying.
Please show me, in the OPs original post, where Delta denied the OP boarding, and I'll gladly shut up. It appears that Delta did NOT deny the OP boarding, since he was pulled out of the jetway. Given that Delta was ready to fly him, I don't see how Delta can be held responsible.
jimrpa is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2007, 7:11 am
  #86  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wayne, PA USA
Programs: DL MM, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, HHonors Gold
Posts: 7,247
Originally Posted by plat
Can you substantiate that DL WAS required to notify the feds?

If they were not in fact required, then they certainly did prevent the OP from boarding the flight.
Airlines are required to provide the government with a list of all passengers on an international flight. What the government does with that list, or what actions the government takes in regards to certain passengers on that list, aren't the responsibility of Delta. Bottom line: The government pulled the OP off the flight, not Delta.

The requirement to provide passenger lists to the government has been in place for a while, please see this article from 2001.
jimrpa is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2007, 7:24 am
  #87  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
Originally Posted by jimrpa
Please show me, in the OPs original post, where Delta denied the OP boarding, and I'll gladly shut up. It appears that Delta did NOT deny the OP boarding, since he was pulled out of the jetway. Given that Delta was ready to fly him, I don't see how Delta can be held responsible.
According to the OP both the Feds and the GA of DL told him he would be reaccommadated and taken care of.

Well to me a GA is an offical DL rep, now if the OP was able to get them to put such a note onto his record I dont know, otherwise it could be a He Said/She Said deal.

I guess you feel that if Youre booted out of a Full Fare 1st Class seat by an FAM, that DL doesnt owe you any refund, after all the Feds forced them to boot you since you were the one sitting in the seat they sit in. So DL should refuse to refund you any of the $$ you spent for that 1st class seat and having to fly in Coach, while if you want a refund it should be only by suing the Govt for the difference in $$.

Something tells me you wouldnt be agreeing to that so quickly
craz is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2007, 7:43 am
  #88  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP / LT PLT / 3MM, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 35,537
Originally Posted by jimrpa
Please show me, in the OPs original post, where Delta denied the OP boarding, and I'll gladly shut up. It appears that Delta did NOT deny the OP boarding, since he was pulled out of the jetway. Given that Delta was ready to fly him, I don't see how Delta can be held responsible.
Originally Posted by craz
I guess you feel that if Youre booted out of a Full Fare 1st Class seat by an FAM, that DL doesnt owe you any refund, after all the Feds forced them to boot you since you were the one sitting in the seat they sit in. So DL should refuse to refund you any of the $$ you spent for that 1st class seat and having to fly in Coach, while if you want a refund it should be only by suing the Govt for the difference in $$.

Something tells me you wouldnt be agreeing to that so quickly

Excellent analogy.
vasantn is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2007, 9:52 am
  #89  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wayne, PA USA
Programs: DL MM, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, HHonors Gold
Posts: 7,247
Originally Posted by craz
According to the OP both the Feds and the GA of DL told him he would be reaccommadated and taken care of.
I have previously asked for someone to actually read the OP's post and point out to me where he made the claim that the DL Gate Agent "...told him he would be reaccomodated and taken care of."

In fact, the heck with it - I'll save you the trouble of clicking on a link and I'll quote the relevant portions of the post:
Originally Posted by karthik
Everything had been uneventful when I got to MCO, where I had a 6 hour layover, the longest of my trip. (Arrived MCO at 9:40AM, departure to JFK was at 3:29PM.) I headed to the Crown Room Club to wait out my layover. Went down to the gate 30 minutes before departure, handed my boarding pass to the gate agent who scanned it, and headed onto the jetbridge...where I stood in line for about 15 seconds before two agents came up and said "Please come with us, sir" after showing their badges. I figured they just wanted to ask me a few quick questions; I had printouts of my itinerary and my DL account history with me in case of something like that. As we headed back off the jetbridge, I asked them if Delta would reaccommodate me if I missed my flight. They told me that yes, I would be.

As we headed away from the gate area, I realized this was going to be a bit more drawn out than I expected. I was escorted down to the MCO police station, and the agents took me into a room for my "interview." The agents were an FBI agent and a Federal Air Marshall, with the FBI agent taking the lead on the questioning. I explained the whole mileage run bit to them (and pointed out the FlyerTalk tag on my bag, the first time I'd travelled with it even! The FAM actually seemed intrigued with the concept of a MR.)
Note that, the last contact with a Delta employee according to the OP is when he hands his boarding pass to the Gate Agent and the Gate Agent allows him to board the plane. Further, note that he only recounts asking the "agents who showed badges" if Delta would reaccomodate him. He does not recount any further discussions with Delta employees between the time he is apprehended in the jetway and the time he is questioned. And most telling:
Originally Posted by karthik
The agents escorted me over to the DL ticket counter...where I assumed they'd rebook me as the agents had said when we were leaving the jetbridge.
Note that the OP again refers to the promise made by the government agents and makes no comment about any promises made by a Delta agent.
Originally Posted by craz
Well to me a GA is an offical DL rep, now if the OP was able to get them to put such a note onto his record I dont know, otherwise it could be a He Said/She Said deal.
I have no idea what "note" you're referring to. There's no mention of it in the OP.
Originally Posted by craz
I guess you feel that if Youre booted out of a Full Fare 1st Class seat by an FAM, that DL doesnt owe you any refund, after all the Feds forced them to boot you since you were the one sitting in the seat they sit in. So DL should refuse to refund you any of the $$ you spent for that 1st class seat and having to fly in Coach, while if you want a refund it should be only by suing the Govt for the difference in $$.
Actually, yes, I believe that if an FAM boots me out of a paid F seat (not a complimentary medallion upgrade, but a real, honest to goodness F, A, C, J, D, I ticket) then I would absolutely argue that the government owes me the difference in fare. The reality is that there's no way in heck that I'll ever get the difference in fare from the government. If Delta were then unwilling to displace a non-rev or upgraded passenger, so that they could accommodate me in my paid class of service, I would certainly look to Delta to refund the fare difference. I must admit, I haven't encountered too many F cabins that were completely filled with revenue F, A, C, J, D, or I passengers, and I've never heard of a case of a paid F, A, C, J, D, or I passenger being moved to coach to accommodate an FAM, so I think that this is an interesting, but highly unlikely "thought experiment"
Originally Posted by craz
Something tells me you wouldnt be agreeing to that so quickly
As I said above

Now, let's ask the final question that everyone has been avoiding:
Assuming that Delta absolutely did want to prevent this guy from flying, why did the GA scan his boarding pass and allow him to proceed onboard? Certainly, if Delta had been paging the guy, and looking urgently for him, and if Delta was determined that he would not be allowed to fly, they could have flagged his itinerary in some way so that the machine would flash red and beep when he tried to board? Barring that, couldn't they have just gone to the GA working the flight and said "Listen, do not allow Mr. OP to board flight XYZ." I know Delta has the technical capability to do that, because I've seen it happen before!
jimrpa is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2007, 9:53 am
  #90  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wayne, PA USA
Programs: DL MM, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, HHonors Gold
Posts: 7,247
Originally Posted by vasantn
Yes. With all due repect, jimrpa is so far out in left field on this one that he can't hear what anyone else is saying.
I'm not sure I'm due any respect
jimrpa is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.