Delta FA's to remain union free
#46
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SAT
Programs: Delta DM, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Gold (LT), Nat EL Exec, Hertz PC
Posts: 625
Point one... (On topic) - this is great news, and means a much better work product for Delta.
Point two... (still quasi-on topic) - One has to wonder if unions were aware, at the time of passing each, they forced their own obsolescence with the support of the FLSA, OSHA, EEOC, Minimum Wage, and other similar laws... One has to wonder if they realized, at the time, that the valid and important protections they offered would no longer be needed (thanks to the Gov't), and that in the future (now) they'd be simply negotiating and striking based on entitlements (pay, insurance, retirement, etc...).
I completely support an employee's right to unionize. I do not (IN ANY WAY) support a union's right to require such membership to work there, nor do I support any other dues collection method aside from individual billing. (No payroll deduction, especially no governmental collection, etc.)
Point two... (still quasi-on topic) - One has to wonder if unions were aware, at the time of passing each, they forced their own obsolescence with the support of the FLSA, OSHA, EEOC, Minimum Wage, and other similar laws... One has to wonder if they realized, at the time, that the valid and important protections they offered would no longer be needed (thanks to the Gov't), and that in the future (now) they'd be simply negotiating and striking based on entitlements (pay, insurance, retirement, etc...).
I completely support an employee's right to unionize. I do not (IN ANY WAY) support a union's right to require such membership to work there, nor do I support any other dues collection method aside from individual billing. (No payroll deduction, especially no governmental collection, etc.)
#47
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Likely being followed...
Programs: DYKWIA Extraordinaire. TrollSlayer Mega Diamond. [insert esoteric sounding status level(s) here]
Posts: 5,240
#48
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,797
Nope. Was not southwest. I don't know which carriers they are from. I presume some are JetBlue, some Delta, and other airlines.
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The best state in the USA - Florida!
Programs: Marriott Titanium/LT Plat, AS MVP75K, AA PlatPro, UA Premier, Disney AP
Posts: 14,497
I have several friends that are PMNW flight attendants. Many of them voted for the union, and many voted against the union.
While PMNW was union and PMDL was not, there were many PMNW FAs that voted no and many PMDL FAs that voted yes.
There is also more than simply earning money with the union - things such as work rules were a big part of it. A very veteran NW FA would rather have all their flights on a line rather than dealing with A Days as PMDL FAs have.
To simplify it would be an injustice to each side.
(fwiw, this is said by someone who sided with the "No Way AFA" camp...)
#50
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Nope, DL's FAs are not the best paid. At top of scale, WN FAs earn about $63/hr, followed by CO at about $51/$50/hr (Intl/Dom) and AA at $49.14/$46/hr. In fourth place is DL at $47/45.73/hr (Intl/Dom). PMNW were near the bottom at $42/$40.56/hr, and will see large pay raises as a result of the outcome of the AFA vote.
The productivity I mentioned earlier stems from the fact that DL FAs (and PMNW FAs) can be scheduled to work a max of 100 hours per month - a scheduling maximum that is exceeded only by B6 and WN. Without a labor contract, they will have fewer hours where they are paid yet not flying.
Yes, WN recorded a large paper loss for the quarter based on the market value of fuel hedges that had not yet matured. That loss may be reversed or may become real (as in real money lost) in future quarters when the hedges mature. Fares? Airlines will charge the fares they can get away with regardless of their costs. And yes, WN's fares are no longer always the lowest and some of their walkup fares are beginning to resemble legacy gouges.
Agreed.
Agreed. Of course, on the typical DL itinerary that competes with WN, DL provides little in the way of food. What meal is served to a DL passenger flying MCO-BNA? On that trip, both airlines serve soft drinks and sell booze (and yes, DL offers F passengers free booze).
The productivity I mentioned earlier stems from the fact that DL FAs (and PMNW FAs) can be scheduled to work a max of 100 hours per month - a scheduling maximum that is exceeded only by B6 and WN. Without a labor contract, they will have fewer hours where they are paid yet not flying.
WN and Jet Blue and F9 are also going to have lower costs than Delta seeing they don't have catering expenses, they don't have the expense of lounges, they don't have gates at some of the more expensive airports like ORD and JFK, they don't provide international service.....
#51
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Programs: UA 1K, HH Diamond
Posts: 2,055
Lots not paint it as broadly as PMNW and PMDL here.
I have several friends that are PMNW flight attendants. Many of them voted for the union, and many voted against the union.
While PMNW was union and PMDL was not, there were many PMNW FAs that voted no and many PMDL FAs that voted yes.
There is also more than simply earning money with the union - things such as work rules were a big part of it. A very veteran NW FA would rather have all their flights on a line rather than dealing with A Days as PMDL FAs have.
To simplify it would be an injustice to each side.
(fwiw, this is said by someone who sided with the "No Way AFA" camp...)
I have several friends that are PMNW flight attendants. Many of them voted for the union, and many voted against the union.
While PMNW was union and PMDL was not, there were many PMNW FAs that voted no and many PMDL FAs that voted yes.
There is also more than simply earning money with the union - things such as work rules were a big part of it. A very veteran NW FA would rather have all their flights on a line rather than dealing with A Days as PMDL FAs have.
To simplify it would be an injustice to each side.
(fwiw, this is said by someone who sided with the "No Way AFA" camp...)
What do you mean "work rules"? How were NW FA unionized work rules different then Delta non-union FA's? curious about details
And what do you mean by "flights on a line" vs "A days"?
Trying to catch up and understand..
#53
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: National Capitol Region
Programs: Delta Dirt Medallion,AA,USairways, WN Rapid Rewards, National Emerald Club
Posts: 3,912
Nope, DL's FAs are not the best paid. At top of scale, WN FAs earn about $63/hr, followed by CO at about $51/$50/hr (Intl/Dom) and AA at $49.14/$46/hr. In fourth place is DL at $47/45.73/hr (Intl/Dom). PMNW were near the bottom at $42/$40.56/hr, and will see large pay raises as a result of the outcome of the AFA vote.
The productivity I mentioned earlier stems from the fact that DL FAs (and PMNW FAs) can be scheduled to work a max of 100 hours per month - a scheduling maximum that is exceeded only by B6 and WN. Without a labor contract, they will have fewer hours where they are paid yet not flying.
#54
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: BNA
Programs: DL PM/MM, Hilton Diamond, *wood plat, UA 1kc
Posts: 921
What is interesting is that when one considers Delta's industry lagging pay, what opportunity is there for any remedy? Sure, I guess there is some informal employee representation, but there is no formal representation so they are left in the position of taking what they are given.
My observation as a passenger is that all WN employees work diligently in exchange for industry leading pay and that management demands and schedules such that productivity is high.
My observation as a passenger is that all WN employees work diligently in exchange for industry leading pay and that management demands and schedules such that productivity is high.
this will all pass. the nw fa's are receiving a considerable raise when you consider the hourly bump AND the impact of union dues. for the current NLRB to side with Delta must mean the election was extremely fair.
#55
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SEA
Posts: 12,485
What is interesting is that when one considers Delta's industry lagging pay, what opportunity is there for any remedy? Sure, I guess there is some informal employee representation, but there is no formal representation so they are left in the position of taking what they are given.
My observation as a passenger is that all WN employees work diligently in exchange for industry leading pay and that management demands and schedules such that productivity is high.
My observation as a passenger is that all WN employees work diligently in exchange for industry leading pay and that management demands and schedules such that productivity is high.
WN flight attendants higher hourly flight pay comes at the expense of greater time spent on the ground not being paid during each trip because of the shorter average stage length. On a take home basis, AA flight attendants are by far the best compensated since they have relatively high per flight hour compensation, the most restrictive work rules, and longer flights with less unpaid time per trip.
#56
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The best state in the USA - Florida!
Programs: Marriott Titanium/LT Plat, AS MVP75K, AA PlatPro, UA Premier, Disney AP
Posts: 14,497
A Days vs. Traditional Reserve is the way reserve was done. Again, hopefully one of the FAs can chime in on A Days (since I'm more familiar with the PMNW system), but all FAs get 3-6 A Days a month, where they are essentially on call to fly. Thus, a PMDL FA might have 3 4-day lines (where they know their schedule in advance and can pick it based on seniority) and a set of 3 A Days where they have to be available to fly but they might not.
At NW, it was straight reserve. If you were a senior FA, you wouldn't be sitting reserve unless you bid on it - you got the routes you wanted on the days you wanted. All the junior FAs pretty much ended up sitting reserve, which means sitting at home waiting for a phone call - picking up a line was extremely rare (though a lot of my friends might have lines in December...bidding gets complicated in that one month...). Sitting reserve means you're not getting paid (unless you get assigned On-Premise Reserve, when you actually have to be at the airport and could be assigned to a flight leaving in 30 minutes).
Essentially, if DL keeps A Days (which it sounds like they will), senior PMNW FAs will have to do some time sitting reserve, which because it can often lead to less hours and/or less desirable trips (being senior and normally working long hauls, but now having to do a 3-night tour of the Midwest in a MD-88 might not be appealing to them at all) might have caused some of the no-votes as it would be an impact on their quality of life.
#57
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: JAX / MUC / BER
Programs: DL DM, LH SEN, Mariott Titanium
Posts: 369
How ridiculous is the AFA press release .... "denies the Delta Flight Attendants any say over their working conditions". Do you seriously give the FAs this little credit or question their intelligence? They just shot themselves and proved all FAs right in voting the way they did....
#58
Join Date: Jul 2004
Programs: DL; AA; UA; CO; LHLX; NZ; QR; EK; BA
Posts: 7,408
but all FAs get 3-6 A Days a month, where they are essentially on call to fly. Thus, a PMDL FA might have 3 4-day lines (where they know their schedule in advance and can pick it based on seniority) and a set of 3 A Days where they have to be available to fly but they might not.
Essentially, if DL keeps A Days (which it sounds like they will), senior PMNW FAs will have to do some time sitting reserve, which because it can often lead to less hours and/or less desirable trips (being senior and normally working long hauls, but now having to do a 3-night tour of the Midwest in a MD-88 might not be appealing to them at all) might have caused some of the no-votes as it would be an impact on their quality of life.
Overall, the A days system is great for the junior folks because it allows them to actually get a "line". These junior folks at PMNW or AA or UA are pretty much on reserve for the first decade of their career, whereas a first-year hire at Delta can already hold a line (and plan their lives), while their 'reserve' requirements are limited to 3-6 days a month. It also doesn't hurt the senior mamas or the middle-of-the-pack either because they will never get A days. The only ones who may view it negatively are those sitting at the border (say at the 60-80th percentile) who may not have had reserve days at PMNW, but may be given A days for some months of the year...
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Programs: Delta DM & MM, Hilton DM, Marriott gold, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska 75K, Wyndham Diamond,
Posts: 15,399
Deltas FA's always dress professionally (with the exception of last month when they could wear jeans for breast cancer awareness and even then the few that did wear jeans I saw had on nice jeans and the pink polo). With Southwest their FA's can wear shorts and it is not uncommon to see a WN FA wearing a pair of shorts, a polo shirts and white socks and white tennis shoes even on a monday morning flight. You will find most passengers dressed more professionally on a monday morning flight than the FA's on Southwest.