![]() |
|
As if we needed more crap, there is a woot-off in progress.
|
Originally Posted by GTITAN
(Post 12844291)
Ok to teh rest of teh B:rolleyes:x permit me a little more moment of zen, but though not a litigator, I would have thought that Rule 11 (or the equivalent thereof under whatever your rules of procedure are) is always in play?
|
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12844300)
Yes, but there are tactical considerations which lie beyond my pay-grade.
I was very intrigued as there is a certain poster in the main Forum that when he posts, I read very carefully. His insight into the coming changes and the questions that he posed were interesting indeed.@:-) |
Originally Posted by GTITAN
(Post 12844314)
Gotcha, now back to our regularly scheduled B:rolleyes:x discussions.
I was very intrigued as there is a certain poster in the main Forum that when he posts, I read very carefully. His insight into the coming changes and the questions that he posed were interesting indeed.@:-) |
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12844317)
Changes or CHANGEs? :D
|
Originally Posted by Olton Hall
(Post 12844283)
Don't ask. It's a frightening and dangerous book.
|
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12844295)
I'm game. Is it one of those shock you into self-realization self-help books?
|
Originally Posted by Olton Hall
(Post 12844239)
My birth number says I'm effed. (it doesn't say it that but I know what it means by "significant hurdles" and "Since what we're here for doesn't come easy")
|
Originally Posted by Olton Hall
(Post 12844242)
Why thank you sir. Here's a :rolleyes: for you.
|
Originally Posted by Olton Hall
(Post 12844341)
In the form of numerology. It's a simple calculation based on your birtdate. That's your birth number. Then you look in the book and it's freaky how accurate it is. Some lawyers use it to figure out the strengths and weakness of the people they are up against. That's where it gets dangerous. Most people misinterprete the info.
|
Originally Posted by mnmag
(Post 12844353)
See -- you're giving 'energy' to those 'intentions' -- just shrug it off (yeah, I know -- easier said than done!:rolleyes:)! You need to live in the 'moments' as opposed to the minutes -- quality vs. quantity!^:-: (I know that some here may debate that!;))
|
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12844295)
I'm game. Is it one of those shock you into self-realization self-help books?
|
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_1_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7D11 Safari/528.16)
Rule 11 sanctions is the red headed stepchild of the FRCP. A load ask for it, no one gets it. |
Originally Posted by Olton Hall
(Post 12844365)
There I go, working in the negative.
|
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_1_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7D11 Safari/528.16)
I ran into a baker botts senior associate on the plane. After it went tech we discussed who he was going to bill for the delay. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:47 am. |
|
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.