![]() |
|
Originally Posted by sdm1130
(Post 11333844)
Does anyone know if JFK-ICN-BKK // HKT-ICN-LAX-ATL-EWR valid under a Series 4 reward? Or would it be considered 2 open jaws? I guess it's just the JFK and EWR thing I'm not so sure about.
|
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 11333854)
It's fine. JFK/LGA/EWR are considered one airport.
From what I've read, the J seats on KEs 773s (BKK-ICN) are just as bad as they are on the 333 (HKT-ICN), so no loss there. |
|
Originally Posted by jrzyshawn
(Post 11333821)
I'm catching on Chelsea Lately ^
|
Originally Posted by sdm1130
(Post 11333866)
Excellent. Switching to HKT-ICN will give us a few more hours to enjoy Phuket.
From what I've read, the J seats on KEs 773s (BKK-ICN) are just as bad as they are on the 333 (HKT-ICN), so no loss there. I was so glad to switch from KE to KQ. Apparently, KQ has fitted its widebodies with 180/Horizontal flat-beds. The photos on the website look similar to SA/BD's seat. They claim 6' of pitch. |
Originally Posted by jrzyshawn
(Post 11333605)
^^
If you win, you have to take us on a MR that and :rolleyes:tter gets to pick the routing. |
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 11333895)
Enjoy the 01:20am departure :D.
I was so glad to switch from KE to KQ. Apparently, KQ has fitted its widebodies with 180/Horizontal flat-beds. The photos on the website look similar to SA/BD's seat. They claim 6' of pitch. We currently have a 6:25p HKT-BKK flight on TG connecting to a 10:45p departure from BKK-ICN, so at least the late departure will cut out a connection. Hopefully the lounge in HKT is nice (HA!) Nice job on the switch to KQ - I wish we was going that way so I could try for the same. :) |
Originally Posted by cheepneezy
(Post 11333902)
I'd want to see penguins though, I'd have to insist on that.:D
|
Originally Posted by sdm1130
(Post 11333316)
I'm not getting my hopes up (yet) but our KE flights have re-appeared and they're on the correct days! :eek:
I haven't heard back from CO regarding a resolution, but it looks like they were able to work something out. I'm keeping my fingers crossed...
Originally Posted by shell nyc
(Post 11333332)
Ha! Good one.
Saw an ex in the bar last night around the fifth hour (and at least that many beers) of Box HH. An ex that owned me money from a trip to Argentina a few years ago. He was working his mojo with some cute blond thing at the bar. Under the guise of ordering more beers (which we really didn't need at that point) I went up next to him at the bar, casually reminded him about the debt, and went back to the table with rolov and Olton Hall. The look on his face (and hers!) was priceless. And today, I'm $300 richer.
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 11333854)
It's fine. JFK/LGA/EWR are considered one airport.
Originally Posted by rkkwan
(Post 11333872)
|
I've got to find a way to snag some flights on China Southern, CSA, and AirEuropa before the October switch (or at least by booking reward tix by then). Those will be the only SkyTeam carriers I haven't had a crack at. Then again, *A offers a wide selection of obscure carriers to choose from. That'll probably keep me busy for a while. :D
|
It is going to be NY State law that governs the suit.
Here is a summary of the SL section 1. De-icing, Pilot Operating Manual, and other systems were defective as designed. 2. Bombardier placed them in the stream of commerce. 3. Bombardier is an expert airplane manufacturer 4. Defective systems were the proximate cause of the injuries to the P. |
Originally Posted by fozz
(Post 11333930)
Is this for reward reservations? I know they've gone and changed most of the revenue fare rules so EWR is not a coterminal with LGA/JFK.
|
Originally Posted by belynch
(Post 11333589)
CM, you have BBM :rolleyes:
Originally Posted by baglady
(Post 11333784)
I was drinking margaritas with the nanny, and now I'm watching ET. Not exactly a hot night :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by colpuck
(Post 11333938)
It is going to be NY State law that governs the suit.
Here is a summary of the SL section 1. De-icing, Pilot Operating Manual, and other systems were defective as designed. 2. Bombardier placed them in the stream of commerce. 3. Bombardier is an expert airplane manufacturer 4. Defective systems were the proximate cause of the injuries to the P. |
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 11333947)
You sit and drink margaritas with the nanny? I'd be a nanny if I could have a boss like that. I'd pick Two and a Half Men over ET, but you're the boss. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:59 pm. |
|
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.