2011 OnePass Program Changes
#196




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,761
Again, well said & why the UA folk aren't happy re: CR1s and SWUs. Also I go to Europe a lot & usually the delta between a non-SWU fare & a SWU-fare is minimal, sometimes as little as $50 & sometimes $200. But at least Europe bound rarely above that. So SWUs aren't 'worthless'.
Current fares are no guarantee of future fares. NW had great upgrade fares pre-merger that all pretty much went away without the fare classes changing - M fares just went up a thousand dollars or two.
#197




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,761
Probably right after CO's IT department figures it out, too.
On a recent trip on CO my wife (1P with alphabetically "lower" name) got onto the waiting list right before me (1K). She cleared, I didn't. Folks here in this forum explained it with CO treating 1P/1K as equivalent and sort within them by alphabet.
On a recent trip on CO my wife (1P with alphabetically "lower" name) got onto the waiting list right before me (1K). She cleared, I didn't. Folks here in this forum explained it with CO treating 1P/1K as equivalent and sort within them by alphabet.
#198




Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SDF
Programs: -=- UA: LT GS 4MM; Hilton: LT Diamond; Marriott: Gold; Hertz: President's Circle
Posts: 701
I'm fine with 75k level not being put into combined system until 2012. But, I'm not happy about non-unified 1K in 2011.
#199
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New York City
Programs: CO Platinum, Amex Platinum, SPG Platinum
Posts: 45
Just wanted to throw my two cents into the discussion.
First a huge caveat: this is entirely based on my travel patterns and habits. I completely understand if they are not yours.
I see this as a big improvement. My EUA clear so rarely that I'd love having the RU for flights where I really want to be in F, but not have to spend the miles/$ to jump the line.
The SWU issues is also an improvement for me. I tend to have one vacation to Europe and Asia each year that I buy a B fare on for the extra EQM and lack of BF co-pay. So the new restrictions don't really impact me. I'll be saving a ton of miles now.
EUA ordering, again, doesn't really bother me as I've had exactly one clear this year. When flying CO I don't expect to fly F unless I've purchased an instant upgrade fare.
Lastly, while my EUA never clear, I've always been in an exit row seat so E+ is a wash for me on CO metal.
As always YMMV
First a huge caveat: this is entirely based on my travel patterns and habits. I completely understand if they are not yours.
I see this as a big improvement. My EUA clear so rarely that I'd love having the RU for flights where I really want to be in F, but not have to spend the miles/$ to jump the line.
The SWU issues is also an improvement for me. I tend to have one vacation to Europe and Asia each year that I buy a B fare on for the extra EQM and lack of BF co-pay. So the new restrictions don't really impact me. I'll be saving a ton of miles now.
EUA ordering, again, doesn't really bother me as I've had exactly one clear this year. When flying CO I don't expect to fly F unless I've purchased an instant upgrade fare.
Lastly, while my EUA never clear, I've always been in an exit row seat so E+ is a wash for me on CO metal.
As always YMMV
#200
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K2MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,315
Sillyness.
More CR1s or less CR1s has NO BEARING AT ALL on the overall benefits of the elite program, because they have no bearing on the number of F seats on the planes. They just change who gets the F seats.
More CR1s are better for lower-tier elites. More CR1s are bad for higher tier elites, because the easier CR1s are to get, the more low-tier elites can hop ahead of high-tier elites in EUA. That's all there is to it.
If you're top-tier elite, you want CR1s to die entirely.
More CR1s or less CR1s has NO BEARING AT ALL on the overall benefits of the elite program, because they have no bearing on the number of F seats on the planes. They just change who gets the F seats.
More CR1s are better for lower-tier elites. More CR1s are bad for higher tier elites, because the easier CR1s are to get, the more low-tier elites can hop ahead of high-tier elites in EUA. That's all there is to it.
If you're top-tier elite, you want CR1s to die entirely.
Many of us like to confirm UGs in advance without buying YB(M) fares or using miles.
Last edited by UA-NYC; Nov 17, 2010 at 6:18 am
#201


Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Homosassa, FL & Ringwood, NJ -UA-G(Lifetime); SPG-Plat (Lifetime)
Posts: 6,122
Another unaddressed issue pertains to us million milers at CO. Currently, if I reach Platinum, my wife enjoys the same status.
If I fly 100,000 miles in January 2011, will my wife ALSO be above 'those not flying 100,000 miles' for domestic UG purposes, or will she just be 'plain' Platinum.
I hope Scott thought of something like this, but in the chaos to get things done, who knows. Scott, are you there?
If I fly 100,000 miles in January 2011, will my wife ALSO be above 'those not flying 100,000 miles' for domestic UG purposes, or will she just be 'plain' Platinum.
I hope Scott thought of something like this, but in the chaos to get things done, who knows. Scott, are you there?
#202
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CLT
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Platinum, Penalty Box 2K, PWP Posting Unit 9
Posts: 13,515
Another unaddressed issue pertains to us million milers at CO. Currently, if I reach Platinum, my wife enjoys the same status.
If I fly 100,000 miles in January 2011, will my wife ALSO be above 'those not flying 100,000 miles' for domestic UG purposes, or will she just be 'plain' Platinum.
I hope Scott thought of something like this, but in the chaos to get things done, who knows. Scott, are you there?
If I fly 100,000 miles in January 2011, will my wife ALSO be above 'those not flying 100,000 miles' for domestic UG purposes, or will she just be 'plain' Platinum.
I hope Scott thought of something like this, but in the chaos to get things done, who knows. Scott, are you there?
#203
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Another unaddressed issue pertains to us million milers at CO. Currently, if I reach Platinum, my wife enjoys the same status.
If I fly 100,000 miles in January 2011, will my wife ALSO be above 'those not flying 100,000 miles' for domestic UG purposes, or will she just be 'plain' Platinum.
I hope Scott thought of something like this, but in the chaos to get things done, who knows. Scott, are you there?
If I fly 100,000 miles in January 2011, will my wife ALSO be above 'those not flying 100,000 miles' for domestic UG purposes, or will she just be 'plain' Platinum.
I hope Scott thought of something like this, but in the chaos to get things done, who knows. Scott, are you there?
The kicker is on the SWU/CR1 question. Today you have to actually fly to get the SWUs; a spouse does not receive them. The way the new rules are written it is about flying a certain number of miles, not achieving a certain status level to receive the SWUs. This suggests that spousal benefits would continue to not receive the SWUs. It also opens the window to MMers not receiving the SWUs which would be quite a devaluation.
#204


Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Central Florida
Programs: Bonvoy-Gold, HH-Gold, UA-Gold, *A-Gold, Hyatt-Discoverist
Posts: 2,046
Also, at the SMD2 there was no UA/CO exec and staff that worked for the FF programs that said ONEPASS on their nametags, they ALL said MILEAGE PLUS.
OnePass is dead. Get used to remembering UA's 10-11 digit number over OP alphanumeric.
PresPlat going away because 1K will be it. Same thing with the Presidential Plus Card...a new name will be unveiled also.
President's Club will be gone too (and I think Red Carpet Club also) and a new name a la Crown Room / World Club -> Skyclub at DL will be implemented...you can't have a RED carpet club when there is NO RED in your company colors; it's just bad branding.
Prepare yourself former CO flyers...your airline will LOOK LIKE CO, but sound like UA.
- HF
#205


Join Date: Sep 2008
Programs: A3 *G, AA exePlat, AS MVP 75k Gold, JL sapphire, UA silver
Posts: 4,786
but the level was not announced now. those who fly 75K would be pissed for being at a lower level than those plat with 100K.
#206
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K2MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,315
#207
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K2MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,315
After yesterday's devaluation, and the ominous lack of talk around E+, I think many of us on the UA side would greatly prefer an airline that LOOKED like UA but sounded like CO...
#208
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: EWR
Programs: UAPlat; *Gold; Hyatt Diam; SPG Plat; PWP goddess
Posts: 16,579
#209
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
I thought that UA 3MM got the SWUs each year. If I'm wrong there my bad.
#210
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K2MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,315
Nothing at 2MM, just lifetime RCC (though I think my FIL got 3 or 4 SWUs last year when he hit it) - a one time thing
3MM was 1K for life, so they would have received them. Can't imagine there are too many of them though!
3MM was 1K for life, so they would have received them. Can't imagine there are too many of them though!

