Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

TSA Adjusting Prohibitions/Designated "Ask Bart" Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA Adjusting Prohibitions/Designated "Ask Bart" Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 11:45 am
  #706  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,389
Deleted

Last edited by Bart; Jan 6, 2008 at 9:29 pm
Bart is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 12:07 pm
  #707  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by Bart
Thanks, but I will only be training at SAT.
Don't you want to start earning frequent flyer miles and hotel points at government expense as well?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 4:37 pm
  #708  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DEN
Posts: 1,962
Originally Posted by goalie
Bart is yet again correct and this is from the tsa website (which i carry with me). scroll down and bolding is not mine but on the website: http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/airtrav...eds/index.shtm

People with disabilities, those with prosthetic devices, and those with medical conditions do not have to remove their shoes during this heightened security level nor has this been the case during routine travel times. Those who keep their shoes on will be subjected to additional screening that includes a visual or physical and explosive trace detection sampling of their footwear.
Except when the TSO insists.
Katja is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 4:46 pm
  #709  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by Katja
Except when the TSO insists.


Why have rules if the screeners either don't know them or refuse to follow them? Like in this thread:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=606339
FWAAA is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 5:23 pm
  #710  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Francisco
Programs: AA 3mm Plat
Posts: 10,068
Question: I have two relatives who wear leg braces. Screening has been hell for both of them for a long time.

Do people who wear leg braces that depend on the integrity of the brace-shoe relationship have to remove shoes?

Strictly speaking a brace in not a prosthetic.

Thanks in advance for any help on this!

Last edited by Teacher49; Sep 27, 2006 at 5:42 pm
Teacher49 is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 7:11 pm
  #711  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DEN
Posts: 1,962
They should not have to remove shoes, no. Here is the TSA guidance for "Persons with Prosthetic Devices, Casts, Body Braces": http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/airtrav...rial_1370.shtm.

Security Officers will need to see and touch your prosthetic device, cast or support brace as part of the screening process. We will not ask nor require you to remove your prosthetic device(s), cast, or support brace. During the screening process, please do not remove or offer to remove your prosthetic device(s).
Also read further down the page for "Orthopedic Shoes, Support Appliances, and Other Exterior Medical Devices".
Katja is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 7:45 pm
  #712  
dtc
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SFO, SJC
Programs: Restarting life as UA newb; AA Lifetime Gold
Posts: 930
Originally Posted by Teacher49
Still I am chilled by this particular part of your advice. While this is a good strategy in any social interaction, the implication of their being negative consequences for someone staying within the law and yet doesn't smile and allows themselves a "smart remark" is troublesome. It bespeaks of advice to be subservient to authority even when it is abused.

I may choose to smile, but why should be a necessary strategy to avoid trouble?
This isn't really just a TSA thing though - returning things at Best Buy (even if they're broken at the fault of Best Buy) requires the same behavior.

humans!
dtc is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 7:49 pm
  #713  
dtc
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SFO, SJC
Programs: Restarting life as UA newb; AA Lifetime Gold
Posts: 930
Originally Posted by Bart
3. If you aren't making any progress with the supervisor, ask them to notify the Ground Security Coordinator for the airlines. Explain your concerns to the GSC. A good GSC will challenge the STSO's call in this case and/or follow it up with a call to the FSD's office. Either way, one of the following will occur:
Is there a Visio doc somewhere that explains the reporting/authority between a FSD/STSO/GSC? And why would notifying the airlines help?
dtc is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 7:52 pm
  #714  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by dtc
Is there a Visio doc somewhere that explains the reporting/authority between a FSD/STSO/GSC? And why would notifying the airlines help?
I'm sure it looks something like this:

http://www.19.5degs.com/element/16536.php

Superguy is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 8:55 pm
  #715  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
Originally Posted by Katja
Except when the TSO insists.
Katja, sorry you had to remove your shoes but again, your shouldn't have been told that. take a look at this thread http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=592162 and look at my posts starting with post #10 and see what i have done. in addtion, i carry not only the printout from the tsa website but also this http://www.tsa.gov/assets/pdf/special_needs_memo.pdf (courtesy of GeoGirl's post #661 in this thread) and anything short of compliance by the tsa with what is reference ond page 3 means i call a leo immediatley (see post 15 from the above thread).
goalie is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 9:10 am
  #716  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,389
Deleted

Last edited by Bart; Jan 6, 2008 at 9:29 pm
Bart is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 9:15 am
  #717  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Originally Posted by FWAAA
Why have rules if the screeners either don't know them or refuse to follow them?
So the rules can be quoted to Congress, the media or anyone else who needs smoothing. The bit about "more in the breach than the observance" is usually omitted, however.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 7:21 pm
  #718  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
Smile (yet another) question for Bart

Bart-

forgive me but as goalie-sis would say, i'm having a bald moment....

in between the full liquid ban and the recenetly revised "3oz"limit, i was allowed to carry nose drops/spray in my briefcase as long as it was less than 4oz. i'm all set to go this w/e with my baggie and 3oz or less containers (btw, edge shaving cream travel size is 2.75 oz but i digress....) but my question is.....can i still carry my 2.5oz nose drops/spray (used to help clear my sinuses & pop my ears) in my briefcase or is this one of the "declared items". my crazy rationale is that once i'm past the checkpoint, everything in my baggie gets removed and put in my toiltery case in my wheels and stored in the overhead and i'd rather leave the nose drops in the briefcase as that sits under the seat in frnt of me. just curious and sorry for such a silly question (and fwiw, the nose drops live in my briefcase and were never looked at with a "bag check" during either the full or modified (pre 30z rules))
goalie is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 7:48 pm
  #719  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater DC
Programs: UA plus
Posts: 12,947
Originally Posted by goalie
Bart-

forgive me but as goalie-sis would say, i'm having a bald moment....

in between the full liquid ban and the recenetly revised "3oz"limit, i was allowed to carry nose drops/spray in my briefcase as long as it was less than 4oz. i'm all set to go this w/e with my baggie and 3oz or less containers (btw, edge shaving cream travel size is 2.75 oz but i digress....) but my question is.....can i still carry my 2.5oz nose drops/spray (used to help clear my sinuses & pop my ears) in my briefcase or is this one of the "declared items". my crazy rationale is that once i'm past the checkpoint, everything in my baggie gets removed and put in my toiltery case in my wheels and stored in the overhead and i'd rather leave the nose drops in the briefcase as that sits under the seat in frnt of me. just curious and sorry for such a silly question (and fwiw, the nose drops live in my briefcase and were never looked at with a "bag check" during either the full or modified (pre 30z rules))
isn't that still the declared OUTSIDE of baggie items, e.g. they are not limited by size just by "medical" or whatever nonsense requirement that TSA indicated. You still need to pull it out to show them but it's "legal" regardless if it fits or not.
GoingAway is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 8:28 pm
  #720  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,389
Deleted

Last edited by Bart; Jan 6, 2008 at 9:28 pm
Bart is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.