Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Discussion: Constitutionality of BOS (Logan) BDO program

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Discussion: Constitutionality of BOS (Logan) BDO program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 4:00 pm
  #181  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: DL Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,777
I'm wish you. The agents at TLV are very good at what they do. They approach with a disarming demeanor and explain things simply. Even my crazy want to be Massad agent Mother doesn't freak out with them. They will ask what they determine is needed to make sure you're not a threat but they ask in such a manner not to entice a negative situation....something the TSA needs lessons in immediately. After going through TLV Europe is nothing and US TSA are just disrespectful. *Generalization*

Originally Posted by mtkeller
In before the move to TS&S.

I have mixed views on this one. I've been grilled by Israeli security at TLV while departing with a Saudi visa in my passport. It was done very respectfully, and I understood the need for security. After that, the WTMD and X-ray for my bag were super easy. However, this is conditioned on well-trained agents doing the questioning in a professional manner. I don't have confidence that the TSA can carry things out in that manner, and there is a bit of an issue of whether it's even constitutional in the US.
Yoshi212 is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 4:13 pm
  #182  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,145
Originally Posted by mikeef
I think this was in response to the original "How would you make the TSA better?"

I stick with my original suggestion.

Mike
I quoted the OP -- I'm curious about DL_TIDE's response to the screener's questions.
TheGolfWidow is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 4:16 pm
  #183  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: DL, WN, US, Avis, AA
Posts: 663
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
It will be interesting for us to document and start to build a data base of how they react once this becomes widespread and we start getting in their faces or simply refusing to answer. As I think I have asserted before, these confrontations should be easy to record because you still have access to all of your stuff.
You raise a very good point. How will the questioner react if a passenger's first response to a question is to very deliberately take out his phone, recorder, etc., start recording and say something like, "The date is _____, time is _____. I am at the screening location for Concourse _______. With me is a TSA employee who wishes to question me. Agent, please state your full name for the record."? I wonder if the extensive, 4-day training course covers that scenario.
T-the-B is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 4:19 pm
  #184  
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 392
Originally Posted by neko
+1

"For my own safety, I don't give personal information to strangers."
Exactly the answer I gave at HOU a while back, and the TDC asked me DY...T. He wouldn't let me through until I gave him my name.
CavePearl is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 4:21 pm
  #185  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,077
Originally Posted by avidflyer
This is a pilot program in BOS that started today. It is expected to roll out to LAX in the next month. Modeled on El Al.
It's been out for a little over a week now.

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...oning-bos.html
goalie is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 4:26 pm
  #186  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Will some in the government try to bait some fool into becoming a "terrorist" wannabee and send them to the airport to be caught by the TSA clowns in order to chalk up a "victory" in the "war on terror" so as to ramp up this voodoo "security" BDO dog and pony show at airports near and far?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 4:33 pm
  #187  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,145
Originally Posted by CavePearl
Exactly the answer I gave at HOU a while back, and the TDC asked me DY...T. He wouldn't let me through until I gave him my name.
That is a different boondoggle than the new expanded behavior detection boondoggle...no?
TheGolfWidow is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 4:40 pm
  #188  
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 392
Originally Posted by TheGolfWidow
That is a different boondoggle than the new expanded behavior detection boondoggle...no?
At HOU all the boondoggles are all now lumped into one. They chit-chat, they ask personal questions and all pretend to be BDOs. How do we separate new behavior detection from old behavior detection? For that matter, how do we distinguish anything from anything if we don't know what the SOP is in the first place? Sigh.

I need a drink. I think I'll pull out a couple of mini-bottles now.

Salud!
CavePearl is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 4:40 pm
  #189  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 110
Originally Posted by saulblum
It is none of a government's agent's business why I am traveling within the USA, with whom I am staying, who I am visiting, and the nature of my trip. Would you feel the same way if the toll-taker asked you the same questions when crossing the George Washington Bridge from New Jersey to New York? Or if the token booth clerk (yes, I am dating myself) asked you the same when buying your MetroCard? Then why should I be asked these questions when I am flying from Chicago to San Francisco?
It's based on the north Korean doctrine.
kburges is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 4:43 pm
  #190  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,972
Originally Posted by chollie
Being physically unable to assume and hold the position in the NoS subjects a person to a thorough screening....
Weren't we told in some thread that that's not true, that such people are sent to the WTMD?
RichardKenner is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 5:08 pm
  #191  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
Originally Posted by GUWonder
In the comments section, "Ray" really hit the nail on the head:

Freedom OF speech includes freedom FROM speech. Government should NEVER be empowered to compel speech. What happens if incriminating statements are made in the course of these interviews? When I''m traveling, the LAST people I care to have ANY conversation with is TSA. So what now? Either speak or you forgo your flight? And with fares being non-refundable, I'm clearly suffering as a result, so how is this not a denial of my right to due process?

BY Ray on 08/15/2011 at 18:45
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 5:08 pm
  #192  
3M100 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Western PA
Programs: ExPlAAt; United 1K
Posts: 486
Originally Posted by Often1
It's not invasive, it's not unconstitutional and is used to make judgments about whether some people need secondary inspection.

Fortunately, it will only take a few prosecutions of people who deliberately lie to TSA (18 USC Sec. 1001 provides a 5-year felony penalty for that) before the jokesters stop giving poor advice.

In the meantime, BOS-ATL is easily driveable and a wonderful view of scenic I-95!
It's starting to sound like another "don't mess with my author-i-tay" approach. You know, retribution for when you don't follow silly, unpublished rules, or when you try to exercise your rights.
jackonferry is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 5:12 pm
  #193  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 959
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Will some in the government try to bait some fool into becoming a "terrorist" wannabee and send them to the airport to be caught by the TSA clowns in order to chalk up a "victory" in the "war on terror" so as to ramp up this voodoo "security" BDO dog and pony show at airports near and far?
Humpfh! Why bother going to that much trouble when they can just claim (as some do now) that terrorists haven't blown up any airplanes because they are obviosly so intimidated by this voodoo magic "security" procedure, that they know they would be caught if they even tried.
DeafBlonde is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 5:26 pm
  #194  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
Originally Posted by 14940674
I am sure there are many people like you who negotiate Israel's airports every day. In Tel Aviv the security agents handle passengers with grace and respect, so their nervousness is not exacerbated or mistaken for a threat. We can only hope the TSA approaches this in similar fashion.
So someone identified as a potential threat just has to say that they are a child of the DDR times and came from a family shattered by the regime and have repressed memories of crossings at Marienborn and being monitored by the Stasi in childhood and then they are simply no longer a threat?

This sounds like a very good improvement in security...

exbayern is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 5:32 pm
  #195  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Programs: One Pass Gold, Delta Medallion , Avis, Hertz, Budget, most hotels
Posts: 462
The entire program is an utter waste of time and an excuse to maintain TSA's bloated budget. Nothing more than another jobs program wasting taxpayer money on useless jobs for the otherwise unemployable.

For frequent fliers this will quickly devolve into the same kind of "canned" responses used to get through customs. A bunch of vague answers interspersed with a few fabrications and a grain of truth.

Expect to see yet another string of abuse stories in the news, a few lawsuits and more double speak from TSA trying to explain their way out of criticism from the public, press and lawmakers.
Fisher1949 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.