Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Discussion: Constitutionality of BOS (Logan) BDO program

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Discussion: Constitutionality of BOS (Logan) BDO program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:13 pm
  #136  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 642
Originally Posted by PresRDC
Another stupid TSA scheme.
Very, very stupid!
jtodd is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:17 pm
  #137  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
Originally Posted by 14940674
In Tel Aviv the security agents handle passengers with grace and respect,
...and without the constraints of the Constitution of the United States of America.

..thermonuclear difference...
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:19 pm
  #138  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by 14940674
The TSA is only using college educated agents for this assignment, which should help on that front.
Is that what you think? There is "college educated," and, "college educated." Attending a college guarantees nothing.

Also I think you misjudge the El Al approach. It is much more centered on training and skill than profiling.
Which is why it will fail here. The people in Israel who do this are trained and experienced intelligence professionals. The people in the U.S. who do this are "college-educated" clerks who couldn't find a better job than working for TSA.

They would not have their perfect security record just by hassling every Arab passenger flying on El Al.
I agree with this. However, what TSA is doing may look like Israeli-style security, but it isn't Israeli style security and, moreover, its presumptively unconstitutional.
PTravel is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:21 pm
  #139  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by vvortex1
Several years ago, my boarding passes used to get flagged for secondary screening frequently, and they'd ask questions along these lines. It is intrusive, but unless the tactic has changed, they're less interested in the answers than in how you act. It's fine to say that the purpose of your trip was "to visit family," or "to go to a conference" and unlike Immigration, they probably won't inquire any further, provided that you don't act nervous or cause a problem.
If that's the case, then let them ask other questions:

Seen any good movies lately?

How 'bout this weather?

I love dogs. Do you?

or even

What's your favorite airline?

I wouldn't mind answering these questions. I have absolutely no intention of telling a government agent anything as personal as what I do for a living, why I'm traveling, etc.
PTravel is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:22 pm
  #140  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
"Am I required to answer these questions before I am allowed to fly because, frankly, the answers are none of your da*n business..."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
PTravel is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:23 pm
  #141  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: here and there
Programs: EB*G, UA ex1K
Posts: 573
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
"Am I required to answer these questions before I am allowed to fly because, frankly, the answers are none of your da*n business..."
+1

"For my own safety, I don't give personal information to strangers."

"Company policy bars me from discussing details of our business travel."
neko is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:23 pm
  #142  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: WAS
Programs: AMEX Platinum, Global Entry, Priority Pass, SPG Gold, HHonors Gold
Posts: 1,594
Originally Posted by PTravel
Which is why it will fail here. The people in Israel who do this are trained and experienced intelligence professionals. The people in the U.S. who do this are "college-educated" clerks who couldn't find a better job than working for TSA.
Would you support the program if the TSA hired employees of Israeli-caliber?
14940674 is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:25 pm
  #143  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: LHR / BHX / MAN / ATL
Programs: DL DM 2MM - IHG Diamond
Posts: 4,075
Originally Posted by BearX220
Those guys are a little different from TSA guys. Here we have guys who have never seen the word "Lufthansa" before and find it suspicious, or will ask you if Zurich is a place in the USA.

I actually have no problem with the AMS gate talks because I feel the inquisitor is intelligent and guided by a well-designed program...
+1

I personally know TSA airport agents that have never been on an airplane in their life. And these people are supposed to make judgements about where or why I fly?

As long as TSA insists on hiring people that think going to Disney World once when they were in elementary school constitutes having "traveled" before, I will be more than a little skeptical of this program.
ecaarch is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:27 pm
  #144  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by 14940674
Would you support the program if the TSA hired employees of Israeli-caliber?
Absolutely not. Unlike Israel, (1) we have a constitutional prohibition against this kind of interrogation, (2) we are not in a state of constant war with hostile powers. Because of the skill of our intelligence services (post-9/11) there has not been a terrorist attack on American soil -- interdiction works here and, rather than sacrifice the Constitutional guarantees of freedom of liberty that have worked for this country for more than 200 years, I'd rather put my faith and trust in the FBI, CIA, NSA and real police agencies, than the Kafka-esque incompetent nightmare that is TSA.
PTravel is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:28 pm
  #145  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: London; Bangkok; Las Vegas
Programs: AA Exec Plat; UA MM Gold; Marriott Lifetime Titanium; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,876
Originally Posted by 14940674
Would you support the program if the TSA hired employees of Israeli-caliber?
No. This isn't Israel.

We have a Constitution that prohibits this type of coerced government questioning. Boarding an airplane does not exempt the government from compliance with the Constitution.

If this is going to make us safer, how come we didn't have a single hijacking in the 10-year period before or after 9/11? We seem to have done ok without it.

Just tell this out-of-control government, "NO!"
Always Flyin is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:31 pm
  #146  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: London; Bangkok; Las Vegas
Programs: AA Exec Plat; UA MM Gold; Marriott Lifetime Titanium; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,876
Originally Posted by neko

"For my own safety, I don't give personal information to strangers."

"Company policy bars me from discussing details of our business travel."
Screw that. You're still giving them responses.

The only response should be, "I don't have to answer your questions and I am not going to." Then walk past them.
Always Flyin is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:32 pm
  #147  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
Sorry, Annie Babe...

Originally Posted by 14940674
"At Logan, about 70 agents all with college degrees are undergoing training by an international consulting firm that includes a four-day classroom course and 24 hours of on-the-job experience, said TSA spokeswoman Ann Davis."

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/reg...icleid=1355725
...We caught you in a lie again. Do you even bother to read your own agency's vacancy announcements???

SPOTNik Vacancy Notice -- 2 vacancies in PHL

By the way, here are the qualifications:

Qualifications and Evaluations

QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED:

To qualify for the SV-H Pay Band (equivalent to GS-12) you must have one year of experience equivalent to the SV-G Pay Band or the GS-11 in the Federal service or equivalent in the private sector. Specialized Experience is defined as experience that has equipped you with the particular knowledge, skills and abilities to successfully perform the duties of the position, and is typically in or related to the work of the position to be filled. Such experience includes:
    FliesWay2Much is offline  
    Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:41 pm
      #148  
     
    Join Date: Jul 2011
    Location: ONT
    Programs: AA Gold, WN A-, UA S, HH ♦, IHG Spire, Hertz Prez O, TSA Disparager
    Posts: 2,159
    Originally Posted by gobluetwo

    Seriously, though, I just don't see how the execution of this program will result in any tangible positive outcome. The training they are supposed to be getting is said to be relatively minimal. We don't know that these people have a suitable background or temperament for this sort of behavioral analysis. We don't know the effectiveness of this analysis in such a brief encounter. I'm sure a bunch of shrinks somewhere came up with a manual instructing people to look for facial tics, shifty eyes, crossed arms, or whatever, which may or may not be indicative of anything beyond a fear of flying, gas, or a real intention to do harm (99.999999% sure it won't EVER be that last one). And, as this thread is proving, this is just another way for them to take the focus off the patdowns and body scans and improve their PR.
    +1
    The TSA only exists so we feel safe about flying. Liquids, shoes, pat-downs, x-ray and now questions are just PR.
    Michael El is offline  
    Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:42 pm
      #149  
     
    Join Date: Apr 2009
    Location: WAS
    Programs: AMEX Platinum, Global Entry, Priority Pass, SPG Gold, HHonors Gold
    Posts: 1,594
    Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
    ...We caught you in a lie again. Do you even bother to read your own agency's vacancy announcements???
    I was referring to the qualifications required in Boston. In there is no need for personal attacks on this forum. The TSA is not my agency.

    I agree with PTravel and Always Flyin that the US does not need this level of airport security, even if it is conducted competently.
    14940674 is offline  
    Old Aug 19, 2011 | 1:45 pm
      #150  
    Suspended
     
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Location: DCA
    Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
    Posts: 50,253
    Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
    ...We caught you in a lie again. Do you even bother to read your own agency's vacancy announcements???

    SPOTNik Vacancy Notice -- 2 vacancies in PHL

    By the way, here are the qualifications:
    FT has too many posts to count in which posters rant about how they want TSA to function more like Israeli aviation security. That's what this is. It's not invasive, it's not unconstitutional and is used to make judgments about whether some people need secondary inspection.

    Fortunately, it will only take a few prosecutions of people who deliberately lie to TSA (18 USC Sec. 1001 provides a 5-year felony penalty for that) before the jokesters stop giving poor advice.

    In the meantime, BOS-ATL is easily driveable and a wonderful view of scenic I-95!

    Last edited by Often1; Aug 19, 2011 at 2:53 pm Reason: Typo
    Often1 is offline  


    Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

    This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.