Should a CW main course look like this?
#46
Join Date: Aug 2015
Programs: EY - Gold, BA - Gold
Posts: 512
I agree that it's first world problem, but still interesting to see 'something such' served in CW. Being a (spoilt) fussy eater, that probably explains my view, but my partner, she can eat anything no matter how it looks, what it is, and I envy this - I just grew up having various intolerances and that put me off experimenting. I feel embarrassed by my timid approach to dishes with these sorts of appearances, because they can indeed be delicious (sometimes) I'm sure.
#47
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 2,741
I can't take anyone seriously when they suggest bringing their own food when travelling in CW or F.
#49
Join Date: Jan 2012
Programs: BA Gold member Marriott Platinum
Posts: 281
Wow thats awful!!! I have noticed from the last 2 years that Club food has deteriorated so much its barely worth eating. I think this is as a result of further attempts to cost save and can't see it improving any time soon.
#50
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,676
See - I find it's improved in the last 12 months. The Guinea Fowl dish already mentioned was a particular highlight.
#51
Join Date: Jan 2012
Programs: BA Gold member Marriott Platinum
Posts: 281
I guess it may depend on the route but I recall 3-4 years back it was generally much better. Removal of items like grapes with cheese and the nice chocolates you used to get seem small but with the number of flights per day=massive saving for BA. I fear given the new CEO the trend will continue but cuts will be deeper.
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Little dot in Asia
Programs: AA-EP, TK-*G, HL-DM, HY-GLO, MR-LTP
Posts: 25,932
Is that slopped all over the plate beneath? That is really slipshod.
Note - you cannot cook Risotto properly on an aircraft. Real risotto needs a saucepan and lot's of patience to get the consistency correct - that is not even the colour of a mushroom anything. As for the unspeakable mess next to it - I loath couscous and anything that is made with semolina grains but it's not my dinner.
You should have taken that back to the Galley and asked the CSD to sample it.
Note - you cannot cook Risotto properly on an aircraft. Real risotto needs a saucepan and lot's of patience to get the consistency correct - that is not even the colour of a mushroom anything. As for the unspeakable mess next to it - I loath couscous and anything that is made with semolina grains but it's not my dinner.
You should have taken that back to the Galley and asked the CSD to sample it.
If other airlines can do it right, why can't BA? eg are Singapore Airlines, any of the ME carriers. So is it all down to how much BA wants to spend on their customers. I bet you the CW meals don't cost that much more than what BA spends on their WT passengers.
#54
Join Date: Feb 2016
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 47
#56
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 783
This sort of food/presentation is mainly what i now experience in CW. Basically just slop in a plate/bowl not dissimilar to economy (difference being only the crockery), and everything overcooked and spilling over the edges.
Its been a long time since i had something tasty and well presented, there used to be one nice option ex-NRT as i think it was the japanese menu option - and possibly thats the only reason it was better quality if it wasnt made to the usual spec. I dare say they have probably removed this now though unfortunately.
Its been a long time since i had something tasty and well presented, there used to be one nice option ex-NRT as i think it was the japanese menu option - and possibly thats the only reason it was better quality if it wasnt made to the usual spec. I dare say they have probably removed this now though unfortunately.
#57
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Hague, NL
Programs: GMLFL, Life 2.0 - Mucci Premiere Classe & des Chevaliers Toulousiens
Posts: 22,911
So, all this positive talk about the improvement of BA CW food is nonsense? One of the reasons I started to dislike >8hr longhaul with BA was the (very bad) food (and I am not picky) as well as the lack of flexibility in their service schedules (i.e. no dine on demand, no snack menu).
I thought that the regulars here felt this has changed for the better in the last 3 years... Was I wrong?
I thought that the regulars here felt this has changed for the better in the last 3 years... Was I wrong?
#58
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Falkirk, Scotland,VS Red, BA Gold, HH Diamond,UK Amex Plat
Programs: Master of the Privy Purse des Muccis
Posts: 17,916
Hi,
I found my beef on my last CW flight ( LAX-LHR) last week to be fine and tasty and well presented.
The Hot english breakfast was very good also.
The introduction of the hot meal is a very good addition ( select flights?) and I think the food on the A380 is better than it has been a few years ago.
Overall I would say the food quality has generally improved but the OP's photo is of a very poor food quality.
Regards
TBS
PS Still no meal on demand and did not visit the Club Kitchen on the overnight flight back.
I found my beef on my last CW flight ( LAX-LHR) last week to be fine and tasty and well presented.
The Hot english breakfast was very good also.
The introduction of the hot meal is a very good addition ( select flights?) and I think the food on the A380 is better than it has been a few years ago.
Overall I would say the food quality has generally improved but the OP's photo is of a very poor food quality.
Regards
TBS
PS Still no meal on demand and did not visit the Club Kitchen on the overnight flight back.
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Clearly, sometimes things go wrong - even very wrong. But generally, CW food has improved noticeably in the last 18 months or so.
#60
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,211
So, all this positive talk about the improvement of BA CW food is nonsense? One of the reasons I started to dislike >8hr longhaul with BA was the (very bad) food (and I am not picky) as well as the lack of flexibility in their service schedules (i.e. no dine on demand, no snack menu).
I thought that the regulars here felt this has changed for the better in the last 3 years... Was I wrong?
I thought that the regulars here felt this has changed for the better in the last 3 years... Was I wrong?