Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

Two-year old denied boarding (and parents are not)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Two-year old denied boarding (and parents are not)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2013, 4:43 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL (for now) and Lifetime Gold, Marriott fan thanks to Bonvoy Moments
Posts: 5,123
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK
And which law are you relying on to make this statement?
EU 261 - a seat has been booked for pax, BA not giving pax a seat...
lorcancoyle is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 4:44 am
  #17  
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club, easyJet and Ryanair
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK/Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 16,033
Originally Posted by lorcancoyle
EU 261 - a seat has been booked for pax, BA not giving pax a seat...
Where is the 'denied boarding' or 'downgrade' as defined by the Regulation?
Tobias-UK is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 5:04 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RTW
Posts: 683
Given that this is an inbound sector and child's second birthday only a few days ago, I wonder if this is a consequence of BA's generous but unusual/little known policy of giving a FOC separate seat on return if baby's second birthday falls between outward & return sectors?
We had a similar experience a couple of years ago ex BKK; infant was on our PNR (& lap) outbound but for return, which would be after turning 2, he was given a separate PNR with promise of a seat at no extra charge. On check-in at BKK, staff advised no seat as no ticket number shown in baby's PNR and would have to sit on lap even though over 2 years old. Qantas (representing BA there at the time) advised no knowledge of any such generous BA policy and that we'd have to buy a seat or go for the lap option. Amazingly the BA station manager also claimed no knowledge of the policy and it took a call from me to BA UK reservations to resolve. As I say, policy is generous but seems to have weaknesses including lack of education of staff & handling agents (particularly since most other airlines just charge for a seat on any sector after 2nd b/day, even if it's mid-trip).

Last edited by Bullswood; Sep 21, 2013 at 5:10 am
Bullswood is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 5:07 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL (for now) and Lifetime Gold, Marriott fan thanks to Bonvoy Moments
Posts: 5,123
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK
Where is the 'denied boarding' or 'downgrade' as defined by the Regulation?
You are taking the p1ss, right? A passenger has a ticket that entitles them to a seat and is told to either not take the flight, or take flight but not get a seat - how is that not a downgrade (BA has a very distinct pricing structure for infants who don't require seats in the first place). The regulation doesn't cover in excruciating detail all potential situations, that's where the various appeal mechanisms come in where judgement and interpretation come into play, eg Sturgeon on extended delays being equivalent to cancellation for compensation purposes

You're not a Ryanair luggage size checker by any chance?
lorcancoyle is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 5:12 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RTW
Posts: 683
lorcancoyle: You're assuming the passenger was charged for a separate seat...see my comment above.
Bullswood is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 5:14 am
  #21  
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club, easyJet and Ryanair
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK/Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 16,033
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by lorcancoyle
You are taking the p1ss, right? A passenger has a ticket that entitles them to a seat and is told to either not take the flight, or take flight but not get a seat - how is that not a downgrade (BA has a very distinct pricing structure for infants who don't require seats in the first place). The regulation doesn't cover in excruciating detail all potential situations, that's where the various appeal mechanisms come in where judgement and interpretation come into play, eg Sturgeon on extended delays being equivalent to cancellation for compensation purposes

You're not a Ryanair luggage size checker by any chance?
No. I am a commercial barrister with over 20 years call with clients that include 5 major airlines. What about you?

Is there really any need for the insults? (Not that there is anything wrong in being a Ryanair luggage size checker)
Tobias-UK is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 5:15 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CNF
Programs: Priority Club, TAM Fidelidade, BAEC, Marriott Rewards
Posts: 2,186
Originally Posted by Bullswood
...infant was on our PNR (& lap) outbound but for return, which would be after turning 2, he was given a separate PNR with promise of a seat at no extra charge. On check-in at BKK, staff advised no seat as no ticket number shown in baby's PNR...
When I did the same (FT is an amazing source of info ) there was no ticket number for baby's reservation too, so we were issued a ticket at the desk at the airport.
neuromancer is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 5:20 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Programs: BAEC Gold, LH M&M Member
Posts: 2,705
Wouldn't a lap-child over two years of age be allowed under EU-OPS?

I think it's not allowed, and if it ever happened BA could be in trouble with the CAA. I may be mistaken though.
NeverFirst is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 5:22 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RTW
Posts: 683
Neuromancer: Yes, it seems the procedure is well intentioned but a bit hit & miss in its delivery. We were unfortunate enough to be dealing with uninformed staff at an outstation & ended up having to call London from a nearby payphone (BA BKK airport manager refused to check with them herself). Even then, QF charged me $35 for ticket issue...
Bullswood is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 5:32 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL (for now) and Lifetime Gold, Marriott fan thanks to Bonvoy Moments
Posts: 5,123
Originally Posted by Bullswood
lorcancoyle: You're assuming the passenger was charged for a separate seat...see my comment above.
OP said the child had been offloaded, if no expectation of seat then he presumably wouldn't have been offloaded as they would still have been working on basis of being seated on lap and would have been on same PNR. So think different to your situation (though possibly symptomatic of same issue)

On the strict interpretation of EU261 if no compensation due, then below would presumably be a straightforward UK claim (depending on the in depth Ts&Cs) as you have bought a ticket including a seat and your child has not been provided with one (I would really love to see BA opinion from a QC justifying same class of service - they do it on CE/CW after all - has the potential to be either remarkably good or remarkably bad)

From BA.com:

You must always have a ticket for your infant's journey.

Children: 2 - 11 years


Infants who become children while travelling

If you're travelling with an infant who reaches the age of two during their journey, your child will need their own seat for any flights on and after their 2nd birthday. However, there is no charge for this; you will still only pay the infant fare for the entire journey.

As your infant will only be required to have a seat for part of your trip, this can't be booked online, so contact us and we'll be pleased to help you.
lorcancoyle is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 5:38 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL (for now) and Lifetime Gold, Marriott fan thanks to Bonvoy Moments
Posts: 5,123
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK
No. I am a commercial barrister with over 20 years call with clients that include 5 major airlines. What about you?

Is there really any need for the insults? (Not that there is anything wrong in being a Ryanair luggage size checker)
My smiley went missing (found it )

I just can't see how, without remarkable gymnastic, acrobatic and yogic feats that result in an Escher-like outcome, an infant/child fare which includes a seat for one leg can be amended to an infant/infant fare without a seat and not be classed as a downgrade when BA defines them as different levels of service. (Even though they cost the same)
lorcancoyle is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 6:08 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RTW
Posts: 683
I'd be interested to know whether the child was actually an overbooking offload (which would beggar belief) or whether his/her booking had simply been cancelled because of the same admin foul-up as I & Neuromancer refer to above. In our case, because the original res agent had apparently forgotten to put a ticket number in the child's separate PNR for the complimentary return seat on the sector back to the UK (despite having given us the allocated seat numbers for the whole party of 2 + 1), the system picked up this omission and unbeknown to us, automatically cancelled the child's booking a few days before the flight departure.
Bullswood is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 6:13 am
  #28  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,873
Originally Posted by lorcancoyle
OP said the child had been offloaded, if no expectation of seat then he presumably wouldn't have been offloaded as they would still have been working on basis of being seated on lap and would have been on same PNR. So think different to your situation (though possibly symptomatic of same issue)

On the strict interpretation of EU261 if no compensation due, then below would presumably be a straightforward UK claim (depending on the in depth Ts&Cs) as you have bought a ticket including a seat and your child has not been provided with one (I would really love to see BA opinion from a QC justifying same class of service - they do it on CE/CW after all - has the potential to be either remarkably good or remarkably bad)

From BA.com:
EU261 doesn't apply to a free ticket anyway

3. This Regulation shall not apply to passengers travelling
free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or
indirectly to the public.
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 6:18 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL (for now) and Lifetime Gold, Marriott fan thanks to Bonvoy Moments
Posts: 5,123
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
EU261 doesn't apply to a free ticket anyway

3. This Regulation shall not apply to passengers travelling
free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or
indirectly to the public.
Ticket still paid for, and widely available to public - AIUI the above applies to things like staff discounted tickets, genuinely free tickets etc.
lorcancoyle is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2013, 6:24 am
  #30  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,873
Originally Posted by lorcancoyle
Ticket still paid for, and widely available to public - AIUI the above applies to things like staff discounted tickets, genuinely free tickets etc.
Um. the infant becoming child ticket is not charged for by BA iirc => a genuinely free ticket and so not covered

It is not the same as a redemption ticket which is specifically covered
Dave Noble is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.