Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

Baby Stroller Incident on AA591 SFO>DFW April 21st

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Baby Stroller Incident on AA591 SFO>DFW April 21st

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2017, 3:23 pm
  #301  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: DAL
Posts: 1,448
Originally Posted by dweick
Sounds to me like she knew what she was doing, planned well and was naturally distraught when some ogre started demanding she gate check one of her carry-on items that was allowed under the airline rules.

I didn't realize this mother was the very first mother to have carry on items gate checked. I have been on a few flights which had involuntary gate check when the bins were full.

The male crew member should have been removed because he escalated the situation with the male passenger. I wouldn't have objected if both were removed from the flight.
TGarza is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 3:23 pm
  #302  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by Terence.Hill
One of the reasons why after everything I still fly United. I have seen my share of incompetence, ignorance and arrogance with them but not this type of aggressive and vindictive "stand your ground" culture.
UA is no better/different.
JonNYC is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 3:23 pm
  #303  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9
This is a collision of many things: bag fees, on time pressure, cranky consumers, terrible coach seats made for little people, and I'm sure there is more I'm not thinking of. Overall, the flying experience is just an awful and stressful event. Try traveling with two little ones alone, international. W/o getting into the details, things like this are bound to happen in the current messed up environment. Really disappointing the hardline 'flyertalk' crowd takes the side of AA and some even call the Mom an 'idiot'.

Just watch, there will be more 'incidents' in the coming weeks/months.
hjplano is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 3:30 pm
  #304  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: RDU
Programs: AS MVP 75k, *G LT, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 62
Originally Posted by JonNYC
UA is no better/different.
The difference to their recent incidence is that they called LEOs to handle a dispute instead of trying to gain personal satisfaction out of the physical abuse of other people. But you are correct in that this difference will go away as they will stop this practice and have their crews try to resolve disputes. God bless those planes and the people in them....
Terence.Hill is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 3:30 pm
  #305  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: MCO
Programs: Hilton Diamond, AA PP
Posts: 541
Originally Posted by GUWonder
The wonan's travel party was entitled to more than one bag plus one personal item.



Gate-checked car seats do get dropped. Compared to carries-on car seats, dropped car seats may not be as structurally robust in case of a car accident after the airline drops it (repeatedly).



Was 2F a FAM?
I don't believe so, as the women in 2D seemed to be touching him with a sense of familiarity when trying to get him back into his seat.
Annerk is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 3:32 pm
  #306  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 30,044
Originally Posted by Annerk
I don't believe so, as the women in 2D seemed to be touching him with a sense of familiarity when trying to get him back into his seat.
I was thinking that was his wife.
enviroian is online now  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 3:35 pm
  #307  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: MCO
Programs: Hilton Diamond, AA PP
Posts: 541
Originally Posted by enviroian
I was thinking that was his wife.
What I meant, although it also could have been a girlfriend. Either way, she seemed familiar with him, not a random stranger sitting next to him by chance.
Annerk is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 3:38 pm
  #308  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 30,044
Originally Posted by Annerk
What I meant, although it also could have been a girlfriend. Either way, she seemed familiar with him, not a random stranger sitting next to him by chance.
could be a girlfriend. Dude has a ring on though. Perhaps his nightmare is only starting...
enviroian is online now  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 3:41 pm
  #309  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by Annerk
I don't believe so, as the women in 2D seemed to be touching him with a sense of familiarity when trying to get him back into his seat.
I think you're correct. On-duty FAM being accompanied by a female companion passenger in the seat next to them would be unusual.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 3:44 pm
  #310  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 7
I always thought families with small children were the first ones to board. I don't see how that many people were on the plane already that the OHB were already filled.
sandtiger is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 3:54 pm
  #311  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,278
Originally Posted by MDJennings
Definitely agree here. I'm surprised the male FA didn't have the male pax arrested (or at least removed) for threatening to assault him.

Threatening to, "knock [him] silly," sure seems like intimidation to me.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/49/46504

I'm guessing the male FA was the one that AA removed from service early this morning for attempting to goad the male pax into hitting him. That's the only wrongdoing on AA's part here IMO.


Anyway, when is the boycott? Hopefully everyone faux outraged decides to cancel their award reservations so others can have some sAAver awards.
While you're at it, can you check https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/49/46501 and let us know if an aircraft at the gate is within the "special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States", which is required for 49 U.S.C. § 46504 to apply?
javabytes is online now  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 4:00 pm
  #312  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by sandtiger
I always thought families with small children were the first ones to board. I don't see how that many people were on the plane already that the OHB were already filled.
No. Most carriers in the US don't most commonly have families with small children boarding first. That era is long gone, and now it's more commonly the "elite" of the "elites" before those with infants/toddlers (unless the same).

My last several AA flights this month got AA elites and military boarding before infants/toddlers on my same flights. Can't say I'm a fan of this, but that is how it often goes when flying AA too.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 4:02 pm
  #313  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 87
Originally Posted by GUWonder
The wonan's travel party was entitled to more than one bag plus one personal item.



Gate-checked car seats do get dropped. Compared to carries-on car seats, dropped car seats may not be as structurally robust in case of a car accident after the airline drops it (repeatedly).



Was 2F a FAM?
However the woman is not entitled to three check-in items if she bought two tickets : the huge backpack, the car seat and the stroller. I don't know where the car seat is in the video I saw, but the eyewitness accounts of the interaction indicated one child was in a car seat when she started refusing to relinquish the stroller.
DiscHandler is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 4:04 pm
  #314  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by DiscHandler
However the woman is not entitled to three check-in items if she bought two tickets : the huge backpack, the car seat and the stroller. I don't know where the car seat is in the video I saw, but the eyewitness accounts of the interaction indicated one child was in a car seat when she started refusing to relinquish the stroller.
The devil is in the details.

She had three tickets, as even with two the devil is in the details.

In other words, I wouldn't be so certain that you're claim above is right.

FAA-approved car seat for a ticketed and seated infant doesn't count against the cabin baggage allowance limit of "one cabin bag + one personal item".

From what I can see, and even including the car seat, there doesn't seem to be an excessive cabin baggage item limit hit by this female passenger's travel party.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 4:04 pm
  #315  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Air marshal in window seat? Notta chance.
FWAAA is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.