Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

AA flights chronically delayed / poor on-time performance

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AA flights chronically delayed / poor on-time performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 20, 2016 | 9:49 pm
  #181  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HOU/IAH
Programs: AA EXP, IHG PLT, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Explorist, Amtrak, WN
Posts: 2,625
Originally Posted by newyorkgeorge
Today at LAX it was a 90 minute venture from landing taxi to Eagles Nest,wait for agent, wait for bus toT4. Landing 40 minutes early meant nothing.
Early-landing flights that become delayed flights due to no available gate has become routine for me. You can land 40 minutes early, but it will take them 60 minutes to locate a gate. Just glad I'm not flying this summer!
brewdog11 is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016 | 11:48 pm
  #182  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: US
Programs: AAdvantage
Posts: 1,752
Originally Posted by JonNYC
Definitely not-- very odd that they would have been so insistent about doing that.
Seconded. The only requirement is for inventory in the same cabin. Even that is negotiable since airport agents (not phone agents) can oversell a lower cabin if there are seats available in a higher one.
ThreeJulietTango is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2016 | 11:12 am
  #183  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Programs: QF WP, AA EXP
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by newyorkgeorge
Today at LAX it was a 90 minute venture from landing taxi to Eagles Nest,wait for agent, wait for bus toT4. Landing 40 minutes early meant nothing.
Sadly this is the often the case with Eagle flights at LAX. Often you are landing on the North runway, so there is a long taxi involved to get around to the other side of the airport. If it's an AM arrival, you will be waiting in a long line for a bus to T4/T6. It's painful and there is really nothing that they can do to improve the taxi situation. They could schedule the busses a bit better knowing how many people are arriving/departing at certain times of the day.
SNA_Flyer is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2016 | 11:23 am
  #184  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,729
Originally Posted by ThreeJulietTango
Seconded. The only requirement is for inventory in the same cabin. Even that is negotiable since airport agents (not phone agents) can oversell a lower cabin if there are seats available in a higher one.
^
JonNYC is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2016 | 2:50 am
  #185  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ORD [formerly] + HKG
Programs: CX Diamond, AA exExPlat, BAEC exGold, HH Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, Starriott Titanium, GE
Posts: 3,087
I got double pwned between LAX-ORD - there is no ORD-LAX 787 anymore (at least not on the day I'm flying) and they cut away the LAX-ORD 6pm departure which means connecting from HKG-LAX is not feasible anymore (OTOH there are now 3 red-eyes for this route...)

G-CIVC is online now  
Old Aug 23, 2016 | 7:55 am
  #186  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by JonNYC
Definitely not-- very odd that they would have been so insistent about doing that.
I wonder if being PMUS agents had something to do with it.
Superguy is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2016 | 7:57 am
  #187  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by ThreeJulietTango
Seconded. The only requirement is for inventory in the same cabin. Even that is negotiable since airport agents (not phone agents) can oversell a lower cabin if there are seats available in a higher one.
So am I better off calling in or heading to an AC?

My normal plan has been to go to an AC if the airport has one, and calling in if not.
Superguy is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2016 | 10:04 am
  #188  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
Originally Posted by Superguy
So am I better off calling in or heading to an AC?

My normal plan has been to go to an AC if the airport has one, and calling in if not.
I call the EXP desk as I am walking to the AC. In general I find the EXP desk somewhat better at doing rerouting.
MiamiAirport Formerly NY George is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2016 | 2:24 pm
  #189  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Programs: UA 1K, Bonvoy Titanium, AA Lifetime Gold
Posts: 357
I'm so tired of AA purposely lying about on-time departures. Am on 2386 today. Inbound from MEX is delayed with estimated arrival 35 minutes before 2386 departure. No way for 2386 to depart on-time with an inbound int'l arrival that requires a security sweep. The agents at the admirals club said this keeps happening and it's frustrating everyone. Why has AA ops become so terrible on very basic things? Fix it.
bustraveler is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2016 | 4:21 pm
  #190  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP/OWE, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 881
Originally Posted by dls25
It ended up being 3.5 hours late yesterday - did not leave until 2:15 AM. My colleagues are so done with AA on this route...
Trying to see potential silver lining here:

If it were me, I'd just keep taking this route, budgeting time accordingly for the delay, and purchase the flight on Citi Prestige due to their amazing $500 trip delay benefit after only 3 hours delay. Lots of stories out their show that the insurance adjusters via this benefit are very generous on reimbursing just about anything, and the claims process frequently taking 24 hours from claim to reimbursement. Taking that into account, great way to finance one's holiday gift shopping list. @:-)

Slight eye roll at my own post for that one...
GlobalMatt is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2016 | 4:25 pm
  #191  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP/OWE, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 881
Originally Posted by bustraveler
I'm so tired of AA purposely lying about on-time departures. Am on 2386 today. Inbound from MEX is delayed with estimated arrival 35 minutes before 2386 departure. No way for 2386 to depart on-time with an inbound int'l arrival that requires a security sweep. The agents at the admirals club said this keeps happening and it's frustrating everyone. Why has AA ops become so terrible on very basic things? Fix it.
This happened to us yesterday. The previous/inbound flight was deplaning at the time of our boarding. GA's did not even make an announcement about "20min" delay until 5min after when boarding was supposed to start. My wife and I have become accustomed to, and almost expect, to play AA's "20min game" with every one of our flights now...
GlobalMatt is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2016 | 4:52 pm
  #192  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: BUR/LAX
Programs: AS MVP
Posts: 312
Originally Posted by meunger11
This happened to us yesterday. The previous/inbound flight was deplaning at the time of our boarding. GA's did not even make an announcement about "20min" delay until 5min after when boarding was supposed to start. My wife and I have become accustomed to, and almost expect, to play AA's "20min game" with every one of our flights now...
Happened to me last week flying LAX-PHX out of T-6.

First the inbound flight was changed from an A321 doing PHX-LAX, to one dong CLT-PHX.

That inbound wasn't due at the gate until ten minutes after boarding started. At boarding time, radio silence at the gate. Plane shows up at 2:15PM for a 2:30PM departure.

New crew waiting at the gate to board. Obviously not going to go out on time. Departure was not pushed back to show the delay until after we missed our scheduled departure time.

I'm assuming that the delay, on time performance data is coming from the main flight database. Not keeping this updated causes cascading problems you can't plan for. How can the next plane scheduled for that gate get in (or even, get sent to another gate) if no one updates the database with a new departure time? Operations people are making decisions based on bad data in their system because it's not being updated appropriately. What a mess.
northwesterner is offline  
Old Aug 25, 2016 | 10:36 pm
  #193  
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Long Beach, CA
Programs: AA PLTPRO, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Marriott Plat, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 3,655
I've been tracking AA215 (LAX-GRU) for a few weeks now as I'll be on this flight in a week. It's seemingly delayed more than it's on time.

What's interesting is when I track the travel of the specific aircraft, the delays seem to get worse. While there's no tolerance built into the scheduling as it seems the plane is operating continuous turns, they don't seem to be able to make up any time.

As an example, a 1:45 delay on arrival somehow turned into a 2:45 delay on departure. If they schedule the aircraft with no slack in the system, how can they expect to not have this snowball out of control?
OskiBear is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2016 | 8:24 pm
  #194  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: IL
Programs: AA PLT, HYT PLT
Posts: 211
AA 46 strikes again, we are over 2 hours late and counting. Worst of all, heading to EDI and we now have a 6 hour layover instead of the original 2. The other direction and I'd be due a check, thanks Doug and co.

Oh, BTW, no PDB!
mialink is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2016 | 2:42 pm
  #195  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Programs: AA PLT PRO, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plt. Premier
Posts: 594
Going from CLt-CRW today, incoming flight gets in at 10 AM, it was a "ferry" no passengers, we are supposed to board at 10:45. They do the boarding announcement etc then 20 mins later say that the security check is not done and they have to wait for that. We stood there over a hour waiting for this BS. Who is responsible for that ? I assume AA is supposed to let whoever does this screen know the plane is there and hustle them over to walk on the plane and perform this BS 5 minute procedure ?

Also of course the AA app/website never displays the correct info., at 11:30 the app said we were in the air, they finally change the timing to depart at 12:05 - at 12:07 we are still waiting to board, so you can't actually leave the gate and hit the AC up, just stand there waiting and waiting and waiting.
dgparent is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.