Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

Discussion: AA Catering still Disgusting (separate from description / menu threads)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Discussion: AA Catering still Disgusting (separate from description / menu threads)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2015, 4:49 am
  #136  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,764
Originally Posted by dickinson
Perhaps we all are, but as a PLAT I have found myself much less motivated to buy stickers for upgrades.
I don't see stickers as a big revenue source for AA. The 100% EQP bonus is minting tons of new EXPs, anyway; and they're getting those upgrades before anyone else, of course, and sticker-free at that. The earn/burn ratio is excellent with AAdvantage, -- try beating roundtrip TPAC CX F for 135K miles with a similar quality carrier on *A or ST. And with the extra miles and low TPAC fares ex-ICN, AA has essentially purchased all of my business for 2015. I commute more or less monthly BKK/BOS.
Dr. HFH is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 3:07 pm
  #137  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Programs: AA Lifetime Platinum (3MM), QF Lifetime Gold, Bonvoy Lifetime Platinum, Ex-Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 7,541
Originally Posted by gordon0808
I agree. I flew UA F for the first time in nearly two years recently from IAH to EWR, and the food was much better than anything I have been served on AA recently. Such a shame! AA used to have decent food, but now has the worst catering of them all.
You'd think AA would step up in response to competitive pressures.
nologic is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 3:14 pm
  #138  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Programs: AA Lifetime Platinum (3MM), QF Lifetime Gold, Bonvoy Lifetime Platinum, Ex-Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 7,541
Originally Posted by bcj1949
Was UG'd. 2+ hr flight. Work to do. Knew meal would not be great. True saw the two selections as others served. So skipped and was happy with nuts and good wine pours. Good seat. WiFi. Power. I was fine. Eat at home or go out for dinner somewhere. Food not at the top of my list (but nuts and wine are!). Understand everyone has there own priorities etc which is AOK!
I used to enjoy the F dinner ORD-BOS...seems a route they spend extraa on to provide superior offerings.
nologic is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 3:19 pm
  #139  
Moderator: American AAdvantage
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
Originally Posted by orbitmic
I would have sworn that was a sponge! Maybe I know croque-monsieurs (in their various conceptions) too well for my own good?
I think they mix-spelled; it obviously should read "croak messier".
JDiver is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 3:33 pm
  #140  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
Perhaps. But from a bottom line perspective, AA has reduced its cost and we're all still flying.
Perhaps. But AA's unit revenue since September 1 has fallen much more than the paltry savings from the Dougie-Brand Dog Food. Save a few million in costs, reduce revenues by a hundred million or more. Smart move.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 4:51 pm
  #141  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Programs: AY+ Plat, Marriott Plat, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 2,846
Originally Posted by FWAAA
Perhaps. But AA's unit revenue since September 1 has fallen much more than the paltry savings from the Dougie-Brand Dog Food. Save a few million in costs, reduce revenues by a hundred million or more. Smart move.
I think AA's declining unit revenue is a little more complex than simply its lower quality catering since 9/1. The Wright Amendment was lifted completely in Oct, which would affect AA disproportionately compared to UA or DL, and the recession in Brazil cannot be helping. There could also be overcapacity in some markets due to the merger, although probably less likely since AA and US didn't overlap on too many routes. Yes, some pax could be leaving AA due to its declining food quality, but is it driving the declining unit revenue? I am not so sure.
flyingeph12 is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 6:00 pm
  #142  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
Originally Posted by flyingeph12
I think AA's declining unit revenue is a little more complex than simply its lower quality catering since 9/1. The Wright Amendment was lifted completely in Oct, which would affect AA disproportionately compared to UA or DL, and the recession in Brazil cannot be helping. There could also be overcapacity in some markets due to the merger, although probably less likely since AA and US didn't overlap on too many routes. Yes, some pax could be leaving AA due to its declining food quality, but is it driving the declining unit revenue? I am not so sure.
I would expand it beyond declining food to also include declining customer service, declining onboard product (soft and hard, outside of 777s and 787s), massive schedule changes with very tight layovers, very early departures, and very late arrivals, rising prices, competition from foreign airlines with which AA simply cannot compete, and overall poor performance.
cmd320 is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 6:28 pm
  #143  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: AA ex-EXP, 2MM (ex DL, ex TWA)
Posts: 1,433
Originally Posted by cmd320
I would expand it beyond declining food to also include declining customer service, declining onboard product (soft and hard, outside of 777s and 787s), massive schedule changes with very tight layovers, very early departures, and very late arrivals, rising prices, competition from foreign airlines with which AA simply cannot compete, and overall poor performance.
Some of these factors are hard to address. But the quality of the food is not.
Wexflyer is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 6:33 pm
  #144  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: AA ex-EXP, 2MM (ex DL, ex TWA)
Posts: 1,433
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
Perhaps. But from a bottom line perspective, AA has reduced its cost and we're all still flying.
Yep, eliminating the olives, and introducing all the willted lettuce has saved AA, generating billions in profits!

And are we still flying? I don't have the same enthusiasm to fly anymore - and this is part of the reason.
Wexflyer is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 8:03 pm
  #145  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
Originally Posted by Wexflyer
Some of these factors are hard to address. But the quality of the food is not.
Agreed. None of it is really complex, meals are quite possibly the easiest fix.
cmd320 is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 8:20 pm
  #146  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DL: Silver; AA: EX PLAT; UA: Silver; HY: DIA; HH: DIA; MR: TIT
Posts: 1,708
Originally Posted by flyingeph12
Yes, some pax could be leaving AA due to its declining food quality, but is it driving the declining unit revenue? I am not so sure.
I know I am not alone in skipping on purchased first tickets and instead buying cheap coach tickets and playing upgrade roulette. The F meal service is no longer worth the price premium IMHO.
LINDEGR is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 8:24 pm
  #147  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by LINDEGR
I know I am not alone in skipping on purchased first tickets and instead buying cheap coach tickets and playing upgrade roulette. The F meal service is no longer worth the price premium IMHO.
It never was.
JonNYC is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 9:12 pm
  #148  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC LAX RDU
Programs: US-Plt;Concierge key; American AAirpass; Delta Silver;Starwood - Platinum; Amex Cent
Posts: 710
Originally Posted by JonNYC
It never was.
Agreed
morrisunc is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 10:06 pm
  #149  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
Originally Posted by JonNYC
It never was.
Originally Posted by morrisunc
Agreed
It was a benefit. One which helped justify the cost of F, and justify the cost of doing business with AA. A benefit which is long gone. I don't think anyone here is under the impression of thinking an F meal service was worth a $900 F ticket, but it was a component of the product which offered value. You can only take so many things away and continue to expect people to pay for what is a truly lousy product.
cmd320 is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2015, 10:24 pm
  #150  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Programs: AA Ex Plat United Premier Silver Hilton Diamond Marriott Gold
Posts: 104
Meal service isnt EVER worth the premium price. A meal of Chili's quality doesnt justify an extra $700....how does that make any sense? If you buy F for food thats just not a good setup for ROI. What meal is worth that price tag anywhere let alone on an airplane...


Originally Posted by cmd320
It was a benefit. One which helped justify the cost of F, and justify the cost of doing business with AA. A benefit which is long gone. I don't think anyone here is under the impression of thinking an F meal service was worth a $900 F ticket, but it was a component of the product which offered value. You can only take so many things away and continue to expect people to pay for what is a truly lousy product.
USAIRCHAIRMAN is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.