Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > American Airlines | AAdvantage (Pre-Consolidation with USAir)
Reload this Page >

AA Expands NYC Service, Announces "Partnership" with JetBlue / B6 (consolidated)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AA Expands NYC Service, Announces "Partnership" with JetBlue / B6 (consolidated)

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2010, 2:29 pm
  #106  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
Originally Posted by ijgordon
Well, the current "partnership" on domestic routes is only for non-overlapping routes. I assume if they did get to a codeshare agreement, it would also be for non-overlapping routes.

So the question is whether you'd take two AA flights in F over one flight in B6's good coach product?

My time is too valuable to take a voluntary connection on a domestic flight. Fortunately, I can get most places I need to nonstop on either CO or AA, and B6 fills in the holes (like SLC )
I am following the speculation of some that a code share is in the future but I too doubt that. Even if it came to be, I still would take AA over B6, even with a connection, given AC access and the fact that if irregular ops occur I can go running to the AC for help or even the EXP line. B6, I'd stand in line or phone with hordes of Kettles.
MiamiAirport Formerly NY George is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 2:40 pm
  #107  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AA 1MM LT GLD, SPG PLAT, National Exec Selc, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,278
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
The addition of RIC and IAD connections is welcome. The loss of 8 slots from DCA is not (esp. including DCA-JFK). Wonder what other destinations are being lost from DCA?
I'd expect a couple to be cut from RDU. There are 8x a day currently and from my observation rarely go out close to full. There is competition with US to DCA, UA to IAD and WN to BWI.

RDU-BOS often goes out full yet they are still cutting 2x. Not saying full equals profitable but generally the DCA fares are far lower than BOS.
sts603 is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 2:41 pm
  #108  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: DL Platinum, AA Lifetime Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Radisson Premium
Posts: 6,638
I honestly think that the best part of a potential codeshare agreement in the future would be for New Yorkers earning miles on B6 via flights to areas AA doesn't serve, such as BTV, PWM, ACK et al...

Those kind of flights are short enough for AA loyalists to take and not have to worry about upgrades.

Perhaps those who are not too concerned about F product longhaul would be able to fly direct JFK-OAK/SJC/BUR/LGB/SMF instead of simply to SFO/SAN/LAX and earn AAdv miles. Back in the day, we had direct JFK-OAK/SJC/LGB/SNA service on AA

Last edited by demkr; Mar 31, 2010 at 2:47 pm
demkr is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 2:59 pm
  #109  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 142
I think the best part of this news is that no one saw it coming before the announcement.
Give me hope for DEQM/DRDM starting tomorrow.
Setven567 is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 3:18 pm
  #110  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AA 1MM LT GLD, SPG PLAT, National Exec Selc, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,278
Originally Posted by Setven567
I think the best part of this news is that no one saw it coming before the announcement.
Give me hope for DEQM/DRDM starting tomorrow.
And good thing they didn't make the announcement tomorrow. Because no one on this board would have believed an AA-B6 tie-up being announced on April 1st.
sts603 is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 3:50 pm
  #111  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,473
Originally Posted by newyorkgeorge
I am following the speculation of some that a code share is in the future but I too doubt that. Even if it came to be, I still would take AA over B6, even with a connection, given AC access and the fact that if irregular ops occur I can go running to the AC for help or even the EXP line. B6, I'd stand in line or phone with hordes of Kettles.

As EXP, if given a choice of an AA versus B6 flight for the same route (if it was ever offered), I'd take AA because:

- With AA you can reach someone without B6's excessive telephone hold times. Since transitioning to their new res system B6 has some very long hold times.

- My AA flights seem to run on time more than my B6 flights.

- Lounge access.

- Priority security lines and boarding at JFK and other places.

- Upgrades.
Globehopper is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 4:04 pm
  #112  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: RDU
Programs: AA LTP, Bonvoy Titanium; AA CK before I retired
Posts: 1,597
Even if B6 didn't mention RDU, I suspect this is a prelude to American Eagle's dropping some RDU-JFK flights... especially given the other announcement that RDU-LGA will be upgraded to CR7s.
ccengct is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 4:14 pm
  #113  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: los angeles, calif.
Programs: Alaska Airlines Gold MVP
Posts: 7,170
Originally Posted by chuck till
Even if B6 didn't mention RDU, I suspect this is a prelude to American Eagle's dropping some RDU-JFK flights... especially given the other announcement that RDU-LGA will be upgraded to CR7s.
JetBlue and American do not have anti-trust! AA must act in its own best interests. It cannot discontinue routes just to please JetBlue, and visa-versa.

A codeshare is in the works, and like Alaska Airlines, it will likely be a selective codeshare created to benefit the two airlines the most, while limiting passenger/revenue bleed. So absolutely expect the AA* code on JFK-PWM or the B6* code on STL-JFK, but we likely won't see them codesharing on BOS-LAX or FLL-JFK, for example, anytime soon.

RDU-LGA will be reduced by two daily, but all flights will use the CR7.
MAH4546 is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 4:18 pm
  #114  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AA 1MM LT GLD, SPG PLAT, National Exec Selc, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,278
Originally Posted by chuck till
Even if B6 didn't mention RDU, I suspect this is a prelude to American Eagle's dropping some RDU-JFK flights... especially given the other announcement that RDU-LGA will be upgraded to CR7s.
See Post #16 for all the reductions at LGA and JFK. JFK-RDU will be reduced by 2 daily. I believe that will make 4x.

So weekday ex-RDU Eagle service after all these adjustments will be:
5x BOS
9x LGA (CR7)
4x JFK
8x DCA (given that AA is losing 8 slots at DCA and these flights aren't usually full, I'm guess there will be a pull back of a couple frequencies there).
2x ORD (in addition to 3 mainline)

Amazing to see the pullback at RDU though.
sts603 is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 5:23 pm
  #115  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, USA
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, Lifetime Platinum, Marriott Titanium, HH Gold
Posts: 10,968
I'm disappointed to see the reduction in JFK-DCA service.

I've been flying DCA-JFK-DCA weekly and it's almost always completely full....in fact, usually when I do standby, I get the very last seat. Now, of course that doesn't tell us anything about yield, but it is Eagle, and yields on smaller aircraft tend to be higher than on mainline on most domestic routes.

Plus, there is significant regular non-rev traffic on this route given how many JFK-based International crews live in WAS and commute up to JFK. I can't see AA pulling back too much from JFK-DCA-JFK.


One thing I constantly wonder is: WHY on earth isn't there a ~6pm DCA-JFK flight, when there is a 6:30pm JFK-DCA? Most of us working people can't make the 4pm flight DCA-JFK, so we have to wait all the way until 8:20pm!!!! Plus, a 6pm DCA-JFK would connect smoothly to the EZE/GRU/late-CDG flights. Currently, the only reasonable international connection from the 8pm DCA-JFK is the latest LHR departure.

I also suspect AA loses some customers on this route to Amtrak given that a 6pm Acela would get to Penn Station before the 8:20pm flight gets to JFK, with the added benefit of already being in midtown. I find that the 5-7pm time frame is not a particularly productive part of my day, so I'd rather just get on the road on my way up to NYC instead of waiting around until 8pm just to be able to sit in the office a bit longer, and then have a long AirTrain+Subway/LIRR trip into Manhattan.

Last edited by ESpen36; Mar 31, 2010 at 5:30 pm
ESpen36 is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 5:27 pm
  #116  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AA 1MM LT GLD, SPG PLAT, National Exec Selc, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,278
Originally Posted by ESpen36
I'm disappointed to see the reduction in JFK-DCA service.

I've been flying DCA-JFK-DCA weekly and it's almost always completely full....in fact, usually when I do standby, I get the very last seat. Now, of course that doesn't tell us anything about yield, but it is Eagle, and yields on smaller aircraft tend to be higher than on mainline on most domestic routes.

Plus, there is a significant contingent of non-revs on this route given how many JFK-based International crews live in WAS and commute up to JFK. I can't see AA pulling back too much from JFK-DCA-JFK.


One thing I constantly wonder is: WHY on earth isn't there a ~6pm DCA-JFK flight, when there is a 6:30pm JFK-DCA? Most of us working people can't make the 4pm flight DCA-JFK, so we have to wait all the way until 8:20pm!!!! Plus, a 6pm DCA-JFK would connect smoothly to the EZE/GRU/late-CDG flights. Currently, the only reasonable international connection from the 8pm DCA-JFK is the latest LHR departure.

I also suspect AA loses some customers on this route to Amtrak given that a 6pm Acela would get to Penn Station before the 8:20pm flight gets to JFK, with the added benefit of already being in midtown.
Remember that JFK-DCA is being uped to a CR7 so this isn't necessarily a loss in capacity.

I don't think DCA-JFK flights are timed for WAS-NYC commuters. But I do agree, the lack of a flight to connect to EZE/GRU/late-CDG and GIG (?) doesn't make sense. Maybe the idea is to feed all S.A. traffic from DCA via MIA?
sts603 is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 7:23 pm
  #117  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
Good to see a CR7 flying between NYC and RDU. Still not as good as the erstwhile S80 that one stopped LGA-RDU-AUS but it's something.
CMK10 is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 8:30 pm
  #118  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: RDU
Programs: AA LTP, Bonvoy Titanium; AA CK before I retired
Posts: 1,597
Originally Posted by MAH4546
JetBlue and American do not have anti-trust! AA must act in its own best interests. It cannot discontinue routes just to please JetBlue, and visa-versa.
This has nothing to do with anti-trust. It has a lot to do, however, with reducing AA's ERJ usage and freeing up other slots at JFK. AA ERJs RDU-JFK are almost certainly unprofitable, given the price competition from B6 on the same route. AA does need a way for RDU pax to connect with JFK int'l flights, but B6 can do that. Anyone reading between the lines will see that the next shoe to drop will be a codeshare (possibly with B6 entry into OW).. after which B6 will take over the route entirely. It's only a question of when.
ccengct is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 9:28 pm
  #119  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Florida
Programs: Mileage Plus, Priority Club
Posts: 4,649
I expect this will lead to B6 inevitably joining AA in OneWorld. Even without a defined first class product, B6 is still alliance worthy and B6's entrance into OneWorld strengthens the alliance in North America and makes a whole lot of sense for all parties involved.
FreequentFlier is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2010, 11:54 pm
  #120  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southern California
Programs: Alaska MVPG,AA EXP, SPG Gold, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 50
Thumbs up AA and B6 sign Agreement for Cooperation at JFK

JetBlue Agreement

American Airlines and JetBlue Airways today announced an agreement for commercial collaboration in New York and Boston that benefits customers of both airlines. The agreement will provide customers with interline service in non-overlapping markets, which will offer them more choices and convenient connections. The companies are also exploring other commercial cooperation.

The partnership will focus on routes into and out of JFK and Boston Logan International Airport that extend and complement each others' networks. For example, it would provide seamless service for customers who wish to fly nonstop from Nantucket to JFK on JetBlue and from there to London on American. Likewise, customers can board American from Paris to JFK and connect to a nonstop flight on JetBlue to Burlington, Vt. JetBlue customers will be able to effortlessly connect on flights to 12 of American's international destinations from JFK and Boston including Barcelona, Spain; Sao Paulo, Brazil; and Tokyo, Japan.

On domestic routes where the carriers don't currently compete, American customers can book convenient, nonstop JetBlue flights from JFK and Boston to 18 domestic markets, including Portland, Maine; Nantucket, Mass.; and Burlington, Vt.

Under terms of the agreement, American intends to transfer eight slot pairs at Ronald Reagan National Airport and one slot pair at White Plains, N.Y. to JetBlue, and JetBlue intends to transfer 12 slot pairs at JFK to American.

Customers of both airlines are expected to benefit from improved connections, while each airline will see additional customers fed into their networks. None of the routes on which the airlines will cooperate overlap current flights served by the other. The agreement will provide connections for more passengers at JFK and Boston to American's international destinations in Europe, Asia, and South America. It also will generate more traffic and support for American's planned joint business with oneworld partners British Airways and Iberia between North America and Europe, and with Japan Airlines between North America and Asia.

"This new agreement with JetBlue complements our domestic and international network and will bolster our partnerships with other oneworld members. It will provide important opportunities to grow international traffic flowing into and out of the United States for American," Arpey said. "That ultimately strengthens our operations, network, and customer feed at JFK and at Boston Logan. And, while we bolster American's own network, in turn we will help solidify oneworld as the premier global alliance with the finest airline brands and networks worldwide."

Certain portions of the cooperative agreement may be subject to regulatory review.
travelRN777 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.