Predeparture Drinks in First Class?
#31
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,651
I understand what you are saying; however, the "Full VX Interior" is the ONLY thing of familiarity for those revenue F pax. You can't call VX to make a reservation, - VX is defunct - the signage at the gate is different, the uniforms are different, boarding passes are different... You should know by the time you board that you purchased an AS flight. It takes time and a lot of money to update an airbus fleet.
#32
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
And by the same token, AS management should not be surprised at all to find that that F revenue from the Bay Area is drying up. Many, many transcons have no F seats sold a day or two in advance of the flight during peak summer travel when other carriers are sold out. Nobody in their right mind will redeem an award for 70,000 miles each way either. Management has their heads buried very deeply in the sand.
#33
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Alaska
Programs: Alaska MVPG
Posts: 265
Just returned from a RT Anchorage-Denver trip two days ago in first class. Alaska seems somewhat out of sync right now. Our airbus flight from Denver to Seattle two days ago was "insufficiently catered" with water and beverages in short supply. Didn't even get a preflight bottle of Dasani. We were given a $50.00 "sorry about that" voucher.
#34
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
And by the same token, AS management should not be surprised at all to find that that F revenue from the Bay Area is drying up. Many, many transcons have no F seats sold a day or two in advance of the flight during peak summer travel when other carriers are sold out. Nobody in their right mind will redeem an award for 70,000 miles each way either. Management has their heads buried very deeply in the sand.
I don't profess to be a CEO, not even from my armchair, so whether AS Management does or doesn't have their head buried in the sand and how deeply isn't something I will comment on but I will add that AS is more encompassing than those narrowly focused just on the SFO perspective. The bigger picture adds a SEA of complexities. Let's focus on SFO, create a sub-fleet of lie-flats and serve Dom before departure. Everyone in SFO content? Wonderful! Hey, home come our Hawaii Numbers are down? Well Sir, WN started flying to Hawaii while you were busy focusing on getting that sub-fleet going in SFO. Damn!, cancel the red-eyes and double up the Dom order. We need those lie-flats for Hawaii.
James
#35
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Programs: DL-Platinum / AS-PlatPro / Hyatt - Glob / Hilton-Diamond
Posts: 1,573
I'm not sure how lie-flats got into this conversation. Isn't that already discussed in other threads ?
And PDB doesn't mean "Dom".
VX is history. I get that.
As time goes on, the service on Alaska's Airbus flights will match that of the 737s more and more. I get that.
Aligning service between the 2 fleets doesn't always have to be to adopt the "AS" way. In fact, Alaska's "new" catering (IMHO) is more "VX" than it is "AS".
This thread is about another step in the alignment. It seems the Airbus PDB policy has been aligned with the 737 policy. It could've easily been the 737s aligned to match the Airbus. This would not only align the PDB policy within Alaska's 2 fleets, but also align Alaska with the industry. I think that's the point of this thread.
And PDB doesn't mean "Dom".
VX is history. I get that.
As time goes on, the service on Alaska's Airbus flights will match that of the 737s more and more. I get that.
Aligning service between the 2 fleets doesn't always have to be to adopt the "AS" way. In fact, Alaska's "new" catering (IMHO) is more "VX" than it is "AS".
This thread is about another step in the alignment. It seems the Airbus PDB policy has been aligned with the 737 policy. It could've easily been the 737s aligned to match the Airbus. This would not only align the PDB policy within Alaska's 2 fleets, but also align Alaska with the industry. I think that's the point of this thread.
#36
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kirkland, WA
Programs: AS 75K,UA Gold 1.6MM, Hilton Dia, Marriott LT Plat, Hyatt Glb, Natl Exec, Hertz 5*
Posts: 3,657
Use "Alaska Listens" on this, folks. Especially you paid F flyers. I remember all my United surveys asking me if I was served a PDB...
#37
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
Um, not quite. I flew on a VX plane in June, and (1) there was a full PDB service, there was the old VX safety video, there was no AS magazine in the (non-existent) F seat pocket, the serviceware was VX. The only thing that was not VX-like (other than the gate area) was when I asked if they still had the cookies from the back, the FA snapped at me, got them, and admonished me never to ask for them again.
AS has about 1200 flights a day. Lets say 75% have F and we use 12 seats as an average. If only 75% of those consume a 50 ml mini and we estimate a very low $2.00 per unit cost with mix, glass & cleaning we are looking at $5,913,000 annually for a single round PDB service across AS operations. If you go out for a few beers on a Friday night, your tab isn't all that much, however if you are the Boss and are picking up the tab for the table while your shareholders are looking for better performance, higher yields and dividends, what are you going to do?
James
#38
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
It is time to stop talking about VX. If it had been financially viable, it would not have been eaten by AS. It is gone. People spent years whining about NW, US, and CO. But, it did not unwind the relevant acquisition.
AS has adopted the business model of a LCC and not the benefits of one, e.g. "low cost". It would be better from a branding perspective, if AS abandoned F and simply came up with some nice term which made it clear that it is a better seat with a few cubes of cheese.
For sophisticated fliers on routes where there is competition, if you are still flying AS, it is proof certain that AS's strategy works. Writing to AS is meaningless. If you want an impact, stop flying. If enough people stop, the issue may be revisited.
AS has adopted the business model of a LCC and not the benefits of one, e.g. "low cost". It would be better from a branding perspective, if AS abandoned F and simply came up with some nice term which made it clear that it is a better seat with a few cubes of cheese.
For sophisticated fliers on routes where there is competition, if you are still flying AS, it is proof certain that AS's strategy works. Writing to AS is meaningless. If you want an impact, stop flying. If enough people stop, the issue may be revisited.
#39
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
It is time to stop talking about VX. If it had been financially viable, it would not have been eaten by AS. It is gone. People spent years whining about NW, US, and CO. But, it did not unwind the relevant acquisition.
AS has adopted the business model of a LCC and not the benefits of one, e.g. "low cost". It would be better from a branding perspective, if AS abandoned F and simply came up with some nice term which made it clear that it is a better seat with a few cubes of cheese.
For sophisticated fliers on routes where there is competition, if you are still flying AS, it is proof certain that AS's strategy works. Writing to AS is meaningless. If you want an impact, stop flying. If enough people stop, the issue may be revisited.
AS has adopted the business model of a LCC and not the benefits of one, e.g. "low cost". It would be better from a branding perspective, if AS abandoned F and simply came up with some nice term which made it clear that it is a better seat with a few cubes of cheese.
For sophisticated fliers on routes where there is competition, if you are still flying AS, it is proof certain that AS's strategy works. Writing to AS is meaningless. If you want an impact, stop flying. If enough people stop, the issue may be revisited.
James
#40
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,651
Further, your PDB cost estimate is way off. Your're at least double the actual, as there's no glassware, the minis are about 50¢ a piece, and also, not every seat would get a water, if choosing an alternate beverage.
#41
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CONUS
Posts: 947
You're referring to any airline that flies a narrow body except the 757 which boards through 2L.
What makes it worse for AS is on the 738/9 there are always 2 flight attendants in the forward galley just chatting away. And given that AS wants you in your seat 45 minutes before departure, it's an even worse showing.
Poor showing for AS but it's saving $ and trying to appease investors. See the other takeaways.
What makes it worse for AS is on the 738/9 there are always 2 flight attendants in the forward galley just chatting away. And given that AS wants you in your seat 45 minutes before departure, it's an even worse showing.
Poor showing for AS but it's saving $ and trying to appease investors. See the other takeaways.
Doesn't a lot of this have to do with airframe config? On Alaska FC is always crowded with a line of passengers heading to coach which makes it tough to serve anything. Not impossible if the FA gets to it before the crush but still not easy. I would enjoy a PDB on many occasions but generally speaking I just make sure my lounge experience sets me right for an hour or so.
#42
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: LAX, BOS, and Seat 1A
Programs: DL Plat, VS Gold, UA Plat, VX Gold (RIP), AS MVP 75K, Starriot Plat, Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 387
Alright, time to blow the sh!t out of "Alaska Listens."
This is a complete farce. While this was an unwritten policy forever, that they're telling this to pmVX FAs means that it's an official policy. Why isn't this advertised? Why is AS doing everything it can to be uncompetitive with DL/AA/US? They're basically like a worse version of Sun Country with a better network.
This probably is the straw that breaks the camels back for me. AS clearly have no desire to pick up even the smallest service features of VX.
This is a complete farce. While this was an unwritten policy forever, that they're telling this to pmVX FAs means that it's an official policy. Why isn't this advertised? Why is AS doing everything it can to be uncompetitive with DL/AA/US? They're basically like a worse version of Sun Country with a better network.
This probably is the straw that breaks the camels back for me. AS clearly have no desire to pick up even the smallest service features of VX.
#43
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: LAX, BOS, and Seat 1A
Programs: DL Plat, VS Gold, UA Plat, VX Gold (RIP), AS MVP 75K, Starriot Plat, Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 387
This cut can't even save that much money. It's just cheap.
#44
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 87
I don't buy the "Alaska has perfect information and makes decisions based off that" line, but I don't think a lot of companies do tbh
#45
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle
Programs: AS
Posts: 2,293
A complementary upgrade to first is meaningless if the cabin is garbage. I'd rather pay a small upgrade fee to move from Main Cabin Select (now Premium) to a stellar F product than get a comp upgrade to a garbage F product.
This cut can't even save that much money. It's just cheap.
This cut can't even save that much money. It's just cheap.