Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Flight Pass - Class Action Lawsuit!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Flight Pass - Class Action Lawsuit!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:35 am
  #46  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Canada
Programs: AC SE 2MM, HH Dd, SPG; IC Pl/A; AA; DL
Posts: 14,323
'Well if that's the case I think it is reasonable for AC to keep at least two seats open in J for those willing to pay full price at the "

It might be reasonable if they were starting anew but they must honor the terms of their existing contracts. By going vague on us now, they are undoing a lot of good will built up with most AC customers and the pass products. My experience has been the reverse with pass products (ie. bad), e.g. with the infamous unique V class China/Hong Kong Pass that I secured. Talk about hours on the phone getting things sorted out as AC decided to change the rules and didn't leave mine alone! I see the same thing happening here. You make the rules, I will decide if I like them and buy your product but don't undercut me half way through the process. This is repeated in Aeroplan elite/se benefits as well.

I don't mind the odd change with fair warning but a contractual agreement should be honored.
BlondeBomber is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:53 am
  #47  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: YYT/YYZ
Programs: AC*SE, AC*MM, SPG Gold, FPC Plat, HHonors Diamond, PC Plat Elite, R&C Club 5C, Hyatt GP
Posts: 2,201
Originally Posted by Machdiamond
Well if that's the case I think it is reasonable for AC to keep at least two seats open in J for those willing to pay full price at the last minute.
It might make business sense from AC's point of view, but they should have thought about that before they sold a product which allows upgrades within 24 hours if J space is available. These upgrades are not a perk - they are a part of the product.

It's just not acceptable to change the T&Cs on a purchased product in this way, and to do it surreptitiously makes it even worse.
antirealist is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 11:07 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,393
Originally Posted by antirealist
It might make business sense from AC's point of view, but they should have thought about that before they sold a product which allows upgrades within 24 hours if J space is available. These upgrades are not a perk - they are a part of the product.

It's just not acceptable to change the T&Cs on a purchased product in this way, and to do it surreptitiously makes it even worse.
And yet the info pages on passes says terms and conditions of can be changed at any time, without advance notice. Except nobody ever pays attention to that and assumes that terms and conditions aren't allowed to be changed.
Sebring is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 11:14 am
  #49  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: YOW
Programs: AC E75K *G
Posts: 7,108
Originally Posted by Sebring
And yet the info pages on passes says terms and conditions of can be changed at any time, without advance notice. Except nobody ever pays attention to that and assumes that terms and conditions aren't allowed to be changed.
So would the following change to the terms and conditions be allowed?

OLD:

Flight credit bookings are permitted up to 60 minutes prior to scheduled departure time
NEW

Flight credit bookings are permitted up to 60 days prior to scheduled departure time
zorn is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 11:14 am
  #50  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: YYT/YYZ
Programs: AC*SE, AC*MM, SPG Gold, FPC Plat, HHonors Diamond, PC Plat Elite, R&C Club 5C, Hyatt GP
Posts: 2,201
If I can't rely on AC not to make substantive changes to a product's T&Cs after sale, that's a good enough reason for me not to purchase that product in future.
antirealist is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 11:21 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,393
Originally Posted by antirealist
If I can't rely on AC not to make substantive changes to a product's T&Cs after sale, that's a good enough reason for me not to purchase that product in future.
Indeed, that may be a good enough reason not to buy the pass, and AC will have to live with that, but it is not, IMO, the substance of a successful class action suit.
Sebring is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 11:41 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: YUL
Programs: AC SE
Posts: 2,103
Originally Posted by Machdiamond
...I think it is reasonable for AC to keep at least two seats open in J for those willing to pay full price at the last minute...
BS! They sold a product to me with no limits on J upgrades.

Originally Posted by Sebring
And yet the info pages on passes says terms and conditions of can be changed at any time, without advance notice. Except nobody ever pays attention to that and assumes that terms and conditions aren't allowed to be changed.
BS! This clause is null and without force. You can't sell a pre-paid product and then change the rules.

Originally Posted by Sebring
Indeed, that may be a good enough reason not to buy the pass, and AC will have to live with that, but it is not, IMO, the substance of a successful class action suit.
Successful? You are successful once the class is certified. They are never going to go to trial on something like this. BTW this type of thing is exactly what class action litigation was meant to redress. Stealing a little bit from many people.
fly-yul is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 11:53 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: YYT/YYZ
Programs: AC*SE, AC*MM, SPG Gold, FPC Plat, HHonors Diamond, PC Plat Elite, R&C Club 5C, Hyatt GP
Posts: 2,201
Originally Posted by Sebring
...it is not, IMO, the substance of a successful class action suit.
Sure. But ongoing commercial relationships are constrained by more than just what is legally permissible. Just because you can legally mess people around after you've taken their money doesn't make it a good idea if you want to continue taking it in the future.

When Latitude passes originally came out there was some discussion about how long the upgrades and other benefits would last. This move is a strong indicator of ACs attitude to pass buyers, and I'm going to respond to it by not being one any more.
antirealist is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 12:31 pm
  #54  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,068
Originally Posted by BlondeBomber
...........

I don't mind the odd change with fair warning but a contractual agreement should be honored.
I agree with you on this one 100%
acysb87 is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 12:54 pm
  #55  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,449
This has the all too familiar ring of other recent AC/AP changes and resulting outrage and I can't help but wonder how many of those folks who were mad enough then to swear off flying AC actually have and how many that will make the vow now actually will follow through.

While not affected by this pass benefit revision, I have quietly decided after empting out my AP account in recent weeks to start pushing my future *A miles to UA MP as I felt the time has come to try something else. No sermons, no eulogies, no nostalgic considerations just the cold calculations which is what AC/AP have seemingly adopted as standard operating procedure to a large extent. It's a business and the bottom line is the bottom line and good for them for running it like a business. However, it's these sort of surprises that may untimately encourage others to see if the grass really is greeener on the other side, which may mean savings pennies today and losing dimes or quarters next year. That is though just my two cents...
tcook052 is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 1:10 pm
  #56  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,068
Originally Posted by tcook052
......
However, it's these sort of surprises that may untimately encourage others to see if the grass really is greeener on the other side, which may mean savings pennies today and losing dimes or quarters next year. That is though just my two cents...

You have coined the phrase quite well.
acysb87 is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 1:19 pm
  #57  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: YVR
Programs: WS Platinum, former AC E35K
Posts: 6,335
If AC ever needs to increase CF significantly ever again they can forget about it. The goodwill that they have built up will be gone, and the next time they get into some sort of trouble, customers will not be so understanding, nor forgiving. They should get off their high horse, everyone is doing well right now, there will be a time down the road where they will be more desperate for pax. I hope the next time they are in trouble people just waive bye bye to them as they have lost their trustworthyness and credibility as an airline.

As Tcook said, penny pinching now may see them lose a lot more down the road, surely they must know that too.
shore9 is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 1:22 pm
  #58  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: YVR
Programs: WS Platinum, former AC E35K
Posts: 6,335
Originally Posted by antirealist
Sure. But ongoing commercial relationships are constrained by more than just what is legally permissible. Just because you can legally mess people around after you've taken their money doesn't make it a good idea if you want to continue taking it in the future.

When Latitude passes originally came out there was some discussion about how long the upgrades and other benefits would last. This move is a strong indicator of ACs attitude to pass buyers, and I'm going to respond to it by not being one any more.
I kind of wonder if this was just a test to see how many pax would not buy a pass if they moved to a Z booking class. If it is in fact just a test, good luck getting pax back if they move it back to J booking class.
shore9 is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 1:47 pm
  #59  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E50K MM * DL MM * HH Diamond * Marriott Lifetime Titanium * Queen's '92
Posts: 5,950
Originally Posted by tcook052
This has the all too familiar ring of other recent AC/AP changes and resulting outrage and I can't help but wonder how many of those folks who were mad enough then to swear off flying AC actually have and how many that will make the vow now actually will follow through.
Based on what I have seen, very few have voted with their wallets. A lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth and then skulking onto the same old planes as before.

Simon
Simon is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 1:51 pm
  #60  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: YVR
Programs: WS Platinum, former AC E35K
Posts: 6,335
Originally Posted by Simon
Based on what I have seen, very few have voted with their wallets. A lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth and then skulking onto the same old planes as before.

Simon
well I think people will continue to give some business to AC, they are by far the biggest player in the country. However since I have been here, I have noticed many people starting to only get the req'd # of Q miles for status and then credit miles elsewhere.
shore9 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.