Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

AC says Elites "cheapen" their business class

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AC says Elites "cheapen" their business class

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26, 2014, 1:39 pm
  #106  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,153
Originally Posted by SparseFlyer
From an investor point of view, I would say no.

I put in the money to buy planes and the infrastructure to bring people from A to Z. And I am taking all the financial risks of running this company.

Either you pay the price that I charge in order to pay for these costs and get a decent return for the risk I am taking, or take one of the following two options:

1. Fly on another company.
2. If #1 is not available, then build your own airline and try to undercut me.


If both 1 and 2 cannot be done, then basic economics indicate that I should maybe charge even more for the service I am providing.
This is a frequent flier forum/talk board. FLYERtalk.com. Not an investment stock forum.
FlyerTalker683455 is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 1:43 pm
  #107  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: YYZ
Programs: NEXUS; *A Gold
Posts: 990
Originally Posted by CloudsBelow
Great .... Sounds like we can look forward to more whining from flyers unable and unwilling to move on and less actual input from insiders and leaders within AC.

Isn't this just delightful.

Winners in life pull up their big-boy pants, wipe the tears away and move on to the product that best suits their needs in the marketplace. Sure, announce the changes AC have made will cost them your business. Let your actions speak.

Winners don't throw pity parties for pages and pages, winners don't slice and dice words to gin up some anger/pushback, winners don't callout company reps like some internet basement keyboard warrior

How embarassing
well said! ^
Neil791 is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 1:53 pm
  #108  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 492
Originally Posted by SparseFlyer
From an investor point of view, I would say no.

I put in the money to buy planes and the infrastructure to bring people from A to Z. And I am taking all the financial risks of running this company.

Either you pay the price that I charge in order to pay for these costs and get a decent return for the risk I am taking, or take one of the following two options:

1. Fly on another company.
2. If #1 is not available, then build your own airline and try to undercut me.


If both 1 and 2 cannot be done, then basic economics indicate that I should maybe charge even more for the service I am providing.
You forget the whole reason why there are frequent flier programs

It is to provide incentives for repeat business.

If the incentives are poor, then there would be less repeat business.

With less repeat business, EBITDAR may go down.

Judging from comments on the other threads people are already buying tickets with other airlines as a result of the Altitude program changes.
theseatbelt is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 1:53 pm
  #109  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,314
Originally Posted by CloudsBelow
Sure, announce the changes AC have made will cost them your business. Let your actions speak.
This exactly.

There are declarations made year after year, after enhancement after enhancement, and the behaviour is not unique to the AC forum.

.... and after a keyboard vent session - people dont act on any of it.
rankourabu is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 1:55 pm
  #110  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: sqrt(-united states of apologist)
Programs: *$ Green
Posts: 5,403
Originally Posted by Allvest
This is a frequent flier forum/talk board. FLYERtalk.com. Not an investment stock forum.
This is a keyboard. http://gaming.logitech.com/assets/52...g-keyboard.png

It's used to type messages, not hit people on the head.



As far as I am concerned, in this thread, people are discussing Air Canada's business practice/decisions.

I am commenting on why they seem to be taking the actions they are taking, and why they would be.



As long as people don't follow option 1 or 2, nothing will ever change, and opinions will not matter.
SparseFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 2:03 pm
  #111  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Programs: AC SEMM DL DM
Posts: 393
Originally Posted by canadiancow
So here's a question for people:

What percentage of your flights in Y are you able to eUp, and what fare classes do you buy?

Last year, when I started at E35K, and went through 50K and 75K before early recognition, I had enough eUps to attempt every flight in M (so not that many credits required), plus my EYW run.

This year, most of my flights have been paid J or a Y FP with complimentary upgrades, so I'm not getting to use my eUps for normal flying.

However, I can't imagine that someone flying V fares is really spending that much time in the J cabin. We just don't get that many credits, right? Or am I missing something? Is there some way to buy cheap Y fares and upgrade them all?
Holdovers from last year were the big one for me.

Just looked through my spreadsheet, I'm counting 14 domestic/transborder routes upgraded from lower Flex fares out of about give-or-take-a-few 30 opportunities. Not all of those opportunities were attempted to Upgrade though.

The majority were 10 credit flights, but also a number of 6 credit flights, and a few 4s early in the year when I was burning credits with a Feb 2014 expiry date. It would appear I had 38 "holdover" credits from 2013 that account for the early-2014 upgrade spree -- 6 of those 14 domestic/transborder upgrades were in January and February.
HometoYYZ is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 2:10 pm
  #112  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: sqrt(-united states of apologist)
Programs: *$ Green
Posts: 5,403
Originally Posted by theseatbelt
You forget the whole reason why there are frequent flier programs

It is to provide incentives for repeat business.

If the incentives are poor, then there would be less repeat business.

With less repeat business, EBITDAR may go down.

Judging from comments on the other threads people are already buying tickets with other airlines as a result of the Altitude program changes.
Oh for sure, I agree 100%.

And if I was running an airline, the first thing I would think about is how I could integrate a FF program to increase my business.

Nonetheless, the environment is not static, and I would have to constantly balance my FFP depending on how the business is running, and the kind of FF the program attracts.

If the FFP starts to become more of a hindrance than something that drives my bottom line, then the rational thing to do is to close the FFP (or "enhance" it).

If running the program makes my revenues go from $100 to $200, but my N/I goes from $20 to $22 after all the costs of running it, maybe it seems logical to keep the program running. But if I have to double my NWC in order to maintain the program, then my ROIC falls by a lot, and I would be better off just putting my money in a savings account instead of going out of my way to please people that would take their business elsewhere in a heartbeat.

I don't really like the EBITDA metric. Unless when trying to evaluate how much a company is worth, it's a poor metric to gauge company performance/profitability. A company can have a rising EBITDA, but really ...... ROE, as it pumps capital on running projects that yield inferior/negative returns, and would've been better off not investing in the project in the first place.

Last edited by SparseFlyer; Oct 26, 2014 at 2:16 pm
SparseFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 2:13 pm
  #113  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,153
Ben S

I don't want to second guess your business decisions. But I can explain my own.

Our little family does nearly 20 trips to Asia (BKK and TPE)

Let's cut the crap and tell me how much you want me to pay per flight and sitting up front all the way, with or without code share portions.

I used to average $2500 with code share connectors in Y in the days of paper certificates.

In recession years it went as far as under $1000

Now it's back to $2500-3000

If I want the connectors in J I buy a separate ticket. Add $850 or so.

Now you will ask me to keep buying around 2 round trips in flex with upgrades and the rest in Z. Cheapest Z is around $4500-5000 but with AC I don't get the codeshare connections in Business. That's a non starter. Because other airlines give me all J when booking discounted business

To make SE I need 4 round trips if two are Y and 2 are J.

How much revenue do you need from me for those 4 trips to make you feel that as SE I don't cheapen your premium product? Obviously it's more than $11-12,000 but less than $17,500 (cost of 4 discount business).

We are talking about a $5000 delta over 4 TPACs here. Average of $1200 per trip.

But because of my eUPs I choose to make far more than 4 trips because it allows me to make shorter trips and spend more time at home. That gives you another $10-12,000 now which I wouldn't spend otherwise if I had to pay $5k a trip.


So, if you want to fly me in business on the connectors I think $5k per trip is the max I can spend or have to spend based on competitive and even AC's discount J dates. But based on your new system of restricted upgrades you'll only get the $5k for the upgraded flights and the rest will go to another airline because you want me to sit in Y on the Hkg BKK connection.

Tell me how the above sample is good for your bottom line. Remember, AC is going from $20+k total spend to less than $5k and I still am super elite.

Isn't that weird to you? This rinses and repeats twice more in our household of three top tiers in Altitude.

I am happy to be more exact if you want me to PM the details.
FlyerTalker683455 is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 2:22 pm
  #114  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: sqrt(-united states of apologist)
Programs: *$ Green
Posts: 5,403
Originally Posted by Allvest
Ben S

I don't want to second guess your business decisions. But I can explain my own.

Our little family does nearly 20 trips to Asia (BKK and TPE)

Let's cut the crap and tell me how much you want me to pay per flight and sitting up front all the way, with or without code share portions.

I used to average $2500 with code share connectors in Y in the days of paper certificates.

In recession years it went as far as under $1000

Now it's back to $2500-3000

If I want the connectors in J I buy a separate ticket. Add $850 or so.

Now you will ask me to keep buying around 2 round trips in flex with upgrades and the rest in Z. Cheapest Z is around $4500-5000 but with AC I don't get the codeshare connections in Business. That's a non starter. Because other airlines give me all J when booking discounted business

To make SE I need 4 round trips if two are Y and 2 are J.

How much revenue do you need from me for those 4 trips to make you feel that as SE I don't cheapen your premium product? Obviously it's more than $11-12,000 but less than $17,500 (cost of 4 discount business).

We are talking about a $5000 delta over 4 TPACs here. Average of $1200 per trip.

But because of my eUPs I choose to make far more than 4 trips because it allows me to make shorter trips and spend more time at home. That gives you another $10-12,000 now which I wouldn't spend otherwise if I had to pay $5k a trip.


So, if you want to fly me in business on the connectors I think $5k per trip is the max I can spend or have to spend based on competitive and even AC's discount J dates. But based on your new system of restricted upgrades you'll only get the $5k for the upgraded flights and the rest will go to another airline because you want me to sit in Y on the Hkg BKK connection.

Tell me how the above sample is good for your bottom line. Remember, AC is going from $20+k total spend to less than $5k and I still am super elite.

Isn't that weird to you? This rinses and repeats twice more in our household of three top tiers in Altitude.

I am happy to be more exact if you want me to PM the details.


That's probably one of the most cohesive and relevant question I have read in this thread so far.
SparseFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 2:23 pm
  #115  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: YOW
Programs: AC SE, FOTSG Platinum
Posts: 5,734
Originally Posted by Allvest
In my case it literally makes me feel dirty. Combined with "Ac is not a charity" it makes me feel sort of like I am knocking on a homeless shelter door whenever I upgrade now.
Okay, now you need to pull your head back out into the sunlight, please. You're talking about flying on airplanes so much that the airline decides to start occasionally comping you into the rich-people section of the plane, and then comparing this to a bloody homeless shelter?

Please don't get me wrong, I also enjoy using this forum to better understand business travel, but if your mindset is so skewed that you want to compare receiving slightly fewer premium airline upgrades to homelessness, it's time to step back and re-evaluate.
YOWgary is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 2:27 pm
  #116  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: sqrt(-united states of apologist)
Programs: *$ Green
Posts: 5,403
Originally Posted by yvrgary
Okay, now you need to pull your head back out into the sunlight, please. You're talking about flying on airplanes so much that the airline decides to start occasionally comping you into the rich-people section of the plane, and then comparing this to a bloody homeless shelter?

Please don't get me wrong, I also enjoy using this forum to better understand business travel, but if your mindset is so skewed that you want to compare receiving slightly fewer premium airline upgrades to homelessness, it's time to step back and re-evaluate.
I think a lot of the comments on this thread are just the result of uncontrolled emotional reactions.

In 1-2 months, we will see the usual "So, what are the most efficient MR routes" threads again, and all will be back to normal...
SparseFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 2:28 pm
  #117  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,153
Originally Posted by yvrgary
Okay, now you need to pull your head back out into the sunlight, please. You're talking about flying on airplanes so much that the airline decides to start occasionally comping you into the rich-people section of the plane, and then comparing this to a bloody homeless shelter?

Please don't get me wrong, I also enjoy using this forum to better understand business travel, but if your mindset is so skewed that you want to compare receiving slightly fewer premium airline upgrades to homelessness, it's time to step back and re-evaluate.
I was painting a picture.

And I did step back. See my post just above yours.
FlyerTalker683455 is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 2:55 pm
  #118  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: sqrt(-united states of apologist)
Programs: *$ Green
Posts: 5,403
Originally Posted by Allvest
Ben S

I don't want to second guess your business decisions. But I can explain my own.

Our little family does nearly 20 trips to Asia (BKK and TPE)

Let's cut the crap and tell me how much you want me to pay per flight and sitting up front all the way, with or without code share portions.

I used to average $2500 with code share connectors in Y in the days of paper certificates.

In recession years it went as far as under $1000

Now it's back to $2500-3000

If I want the connectors in J I buy a separate ticket. Add $850 or so.

Now you will ask me to keep buying around 2 round trips in flex with upgrades and the rest in Z. Cheapest Z is around $4500-5000 but with AC I don't get the codeshare connections in Business. That's a non starter. Because other airlines give me all J when booking discounted business

To make SE I need 4 round trips if two are Y and 2 are J.

How much revenue do you need from me for those 4 trips to make you feel that as SE I don't cheapen your premium product? Obviously it's more than $11-12,000 but less than $17,500 (cost of 4 discount business).

We are talking about a $5000 delta over 4 TPACs here. Average of $1200 per trip.

But because of my eUPs I choose to make far more than 4 trips because it allows me to make shorter trips and spend more time at home. That gives you another $10-12,000 now which I wouldn't spend otherwise if I had to pay $5k a trip.


So, if you want to fly me in business on the connectors I think $5k per trip is the max I can spend or have to spend based on competitive and even AC's discount J dates. But based on your new system of restricted upgrades you'll only get the $5k for the upgraded flights and the rest will go to another airline because you want me to sit in Y on the Hkg BKK connection.

Tell me how the above sample is good for your bottom line. Remember, AC is going from $20+k total spend to less than $5k and I still am super elite.

Isn't that weird to you? This rinses and repeats twice more in our household of three top tiers in Altitude.

I am happy to be more exact if you want me to PM the details.
Westjet seems to paint a very clear picture of what your spending means to them if you want to compare:



Seems like $10000 in spending would yield around $410 in cash value plus 1 Canadian trip and one international trip. But scam-charges don't count in the $10000, so maybe ~$12000 in 'real' money spent?

You have to get the CC for the other cool stuff though.


I wonder how that would compare to AC's FFP?
SparseFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 2:56 pm
  #119  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: YVR
Programs: AC*SE MM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 4,604
Originally Posted by Allvest
We live in an age of tweets and sound bites. Context is irrelevant.
Context is everything. If you feel otherwise, you should work for one of the 24 hour U.S. news networks.
yvr76 is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2014, 3:05 pm
  #120  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,153
Originally Posted by yvr76
Context is everything. If you feel otherwise, you should work for one of the 24 hour U.S. news networks.
In this case it is irrelevant because I merely highlight what people remember. "Cheapening the product" and "Charity". Emphasized with a "for the record". Amongst a few choice words which ought to be on the auto delete program of any social media rep. That then endorsed by the big chief Ben S. assures everyone that little Ben didn't just make a slip up but actually and truly represents the company's thinking.

AC should be, and probably are, grateful for the cheap feedback they are getting here. I hope they put the money saved into scrubbing their smelly pods.
FlyerTalker683455 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.