AC says Elites "cheapen" their business class
#151
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: YKF
Programs: AC Elite 50K, Amex AP Plat, Choice Privileges, National Exec Elite, Via Prefrence
Posts: 2,996
Interesting FT handle btw.
Bingo ^
Last edited by tcook052; Oct 27, 2014 at 5:49 am
#153
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver • DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold, AA EXP, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 21,603
Amazing so many people on this board harp about AC employees sitting in J using a company perk, such as a B1. It is almost like no one here has any such perks at their given place of employment. Bringing AC employee travel benefits into this discussion has no bearing on the devaluation of the FFP.
If AC wants to sell J seats, lower the price differential between and Y and J. Duh.
#154
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,153
However, if I fly that routing every month making judicious use of my eUps, I can buy a flex fare for just slightly less than the $3000 and be called a charity case.
Go figure.
My head is still spinning about this.
#156
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,153
#157
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,006
Originally Posted by Ben Lipsey
What I said was that paying for Y and regularly getting J is not a sustainable business practice. Period.
How about when the J cabin costs less than Y cabin?
Maybe AC needs to stop continuously selling the Y cabin below cost, then trying to make up the difference with the front cabin.
What I said was that paying for Y and regularly getting J is not a sustainable business practice. Period.
How about when the J cabin costs less than Y cabin?
Maybe AC needs to stop continuously selling the Y cabin below cost, then trying to make up the difference with the front cabin.
#158
Formerly known as jsfrSuperElite
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hong Kong, Montreal
Programs: Air Canada SE100K-1MM, Hilton Honors Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 590
As someone pointed upthread, how many posts in the SQ, TG, CX sections ask about upgrades and the replies are posted by fellow FTers in such a manner? Softer words probably could have been used, but hey, FTers have been less than civil as well.
I've sent PMs to Ben L. and he's been nothing but kind, and has told me as much as he's allowed to.
So to both Bens, please continue to post here on FT. I may or may not be able to maintain SE status, but the engagement has certainly been informative and welcomed.
I've sent PMs to Ben L. and he's been nothing but kind, and has told me as much as he's allowed to.
So to both Bens, please continue to post here on FT. I may or may not be able to maintain SE status, but the engagement has certainly been informative and welcomed.
#159
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,314
Same ones that cheered on the cuts to all other levels over last couple years.
#160
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Programs: AC E, SPG Plat, FPC Plat
Posts: 35
Your comments and tone are not constructive to a discussion with AC. If you don't want us to participate on here then just say so. All of us at AC will stop replying or discussing anything with you personally on a public forum effective now. A few months ago Ben Lipsey (who we met off this site before he joined AC) personally convinced me to have AC officially rejoin the conversation on FT in the open transparent manner that you have seen take place over the last few months. We choose to post under our real names and therefore the conversation can be challenging at times. We fully expect to hear both positive and negative posts about how we run our business and the reason we participate here is to share some of our thinking and hear opinions from our customers on what improvements and/or changes they would like to see. We have listened to many of the various suggestions from this board and over the past few months when appropriate have instituted several ideas that came directly from FT members.
Air Canada has consistently produced a lower profit margin than our NA peers. Although over the last few years we have made big strides in improving our bottom line even in 2013 WS AA DL all outperformed us from an EBITDAR perspective. Our current model which includes many things needs to better adapt to our marketplace in order for us to improve our financial position and reach higher overall margins. We are a service business and in order to strive and succeed we need to significantly improve in many customer facing areas of our business. When it came time to decide on what type of product to put on our new 787s as well as our new fleet of 737MAX aircraft we needed to choose how best to position ourselves to improve our service while also expanding our margins. Having best-in-class J seats and lower than average premium revenues (which is what we currently have on many routes) is not a sustainable strategy. We don't expect all of our J customers to be paying full J fares all the time but we do need the average fare to improve to justify the investments we are making. We have experimented with lower quality J products and you will now see us move toward a more uniform product across our fleet. We did not expect to get this changeover 100pct correct and are open to tweaks where they make sense. We are more than happy to take comments and views from our customers but I'm not prepared to have you bully one of our most dedicated employees on a public site. If you have an issue with Ben L personally please PM me directly.
Air Canada has consistently produced a lower profit margin than our NA peers. Although over the last few years we have made big strides in improving our bottom line even in 2013 WS AA DL all outperformed us from an EBITDAR perspective. Our current model which includes many things needs to better adapt to our marketplace in order for us to improve our financial position and reach higher overall margins. We are a service business and in order to strive and succeed we need to significantly improve in many customer facing areas of our business. When it came time to decide on what type of product to put on our new 787s as well as our new fleet of 737MAX aircraft we needed to choose how best to position ourselves to improve our service while also expanding our margins. Having best-in-class J seats and lower than average premium revenues (which is what we currently have on many routes) is not a sustainable strategy. We don't expect all of our J customers to be paying full J fares all the time but we do need the average fare to improve to justify the investments we are making. We have experimented with lower quality J products and you will now see us move toward a more uniform product across our fleet. We did not expect to get this changeover 100pct correct and are open to tweaks where they make sense. We are more than happy to take comments and views from our customers but I'm not prepared to have you bully one of our most dedicated employees on a public site. If you have an issue with Ben L personally please PM me directly.
What you are seeing is emotional reaction to a poorly thought out implementation of changes to your loyalty program. The logic for the changes might be sound but the execution nothing sort of a public relations disaster. Customers put in mileage on AC with a reasonable expectation of a certain set of benefits only to be disappointed after crossing the finish line. The comments being posted reflect this disappointment and have little to do with Air Canada's participation in this forum or not. If you don't like the backlash, do something positive about it rather than prattle on about how lucky we are to have official AC representation on this forum. Your participation gives you the opportunity to present the company's point of view, do damage control and conduct a little market research for a lot less than an IPSOs-Reid survey. You want a well mannered conversation, start treating the other side of the loyalty game with a little respect at the end of the year.
#161
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: YXU
Programs: AC SE100K, National E/E, HH Diamond, IHG Diamond, MB, Avis PC
Posts: 971
Amazing so many people on this board harp about AC employees sitting in J using a company perk, such as a B1. It is almost like no one here has any such perks at their given place of employment. Bringing AC employee travel benefits into this discussion has no bearing on the devaluation of the FFP.
And back to the topic: AC has consistently high load factors. I hear the phrase "We have a full flight" on most of flights I take. So what will happen now in oversell situations? Will AC stop overselling the Y cabin? Or will AC pay IDB compensations and planes will fly with empty J seats? Or Op-Up's don't cheapen the product, only E-Ups?
Last edited by WildcatYXU; Oct 27, 2014 at 7:23 am
#162
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton Honors Diamond. Priority Club Platinum. Emerald Club Executive Elite
Posts: 446
Amazing so many people on this board harp about AC employees sitting in J using a company perk, such as a B1. It is almost like no one here has any such perks at their given place of employment. Bringing AC employee travel benefits into this discussion has no bearing on the devaluation of the FFP.
#163
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUL
Programs: AC SE (*A Gold), Bonvoy Platinum Elite, Hilton Gold, Amex Platinum / AP Reserve, NEXUS, Global Entry
Posts: 5,691
Mr Smith;
What you are seeing is emotional reaction to a poorly thought out implementation of changes to your loyalty program. The logic for the changes might be sound but the execution nothing sort of a public relations disaster. Customers put in mileage on AC with a reasonable expectation of a certain set of benefits only to be disappointed after crossing the finish line. The comments being posted reflect this disappointment and have little to do with Air Canada's participation in this forum or not. If you don't like the backlash, do something positive about it rather than prattle on about how lucky we are to have official AC representation on this forum. Your participation gives you the opportunity to present the company's point of view, do damage control and conduct a little market research for a lot less than an IPSOs-Reid survey. You want a well mannered conversation, start treating the other side of the loyalty game with a little respect at the end of the year.
What you are seeing is emotional reaction to a poorly thought out implementation of changes to your loyalty program. The logic for the changes might be sound but the execution nothing sort of a public relations disaster. Customers put in mileage on AC with a reasonable expectation of a certain set of benefits only to be disappointed after crossing the finish line. The comments being posted reflect this disappointment and have little to do with Air Canada's participation in this forum or not. If you don't like the backlash, do something positive about it rather than prattle on about how lucky we are to have official AC representation on this forum. Your participation gives you the opportunity to present the company's point of view, do damage control and conduct a little market research for a lot less than an IPSOs-Reid survey. You want a well mannered conversation, start treating the other side of the loyalty game with a little respect at the end of the year.
I'd hate to see AC minimize or end their participation on FT over this announcement and the ensuing backlash. Their presence on FT benefits the entire community, just as our presence does.
#165
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E50K (*Gold), DL, CZ
Posts: 1,252
Oh, these PMs I was referring to were a week or two before the 2015 Altitude announcements. And they were about things of a general nature, anyway.