Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

Couple sues United for overserving husband!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Couple sues United for overserving husband!

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2008, 5:25 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 242
Couple sues United for overserving husband!

Just found this in the Chicago Tribune this morning, wow...

http://www.chicagotribune.com/travel...,7796929.story


This is no bar bet, it's a lawsuit. Can you get drunk on a flight, then sue the airline for giving you the booze?

A husband and wife are suing United Airlines for "negligently" overserving alcohol during a flight from Osaka, Japan, to San Francisco, saying the carrier's drinks fueled the domestic violence involving the two shortly after their plane landed.

Fortified with Burgundy wine allegedly supplied at 20-minute intervals by United crew members during the December 2006 trip, Yoichi Shimamoto became so inebriated "that he could not manage himself," according to a lawsuit filed Dec. 5 in U.S. District Court in Tampa.

Shimamoto was arrested, accused of disorderly conduct and battery after he struck his wife, Ayisha, six times, injuring her face and upper lip as they were heading through U.S. Customs in San Francisco, the complaint said.



The lawsuit is highly unusual and will likely hinge on whether Chicago-based United, in effect, operated a flying bar that's subject to the same legal liabilities as earthbound drinking establishments, legal experts said.

...
danielb6752 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 5:50 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TUS and any place close to a lav
Programs: UA 1.6MM
Posts: 5,423
Lawsuits like this one are the reason why we have those threads complaining about FA's cutting off people's alcohol.
warreng24 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 5:54 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,245
Originally Posted by warreng24
Lawsuits like this one are the reason why we have those threads complaining about FA's cutting off people's alcohol.
Yep. Expect to start seeing more of those threads...
i'mlovin'it is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 5:58 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,919
I do wish the judge would tell this woman the following... excuse me madam but your husband is over 21 and it is his responsiblity to live with the consequences!!! You should be suing YOUR husband and not the airline since they are not his baby sitter!!!

What in the world are these people thinking..... I am not THAT old but my parents taught me when I become 21 I get a heap of privilages but an even bigger heap of responsibilities one of which incl. alcohol. I was allowed to drink but at the same time responsible for the reactions.

Why do courts always rewards those who "forget" the responsiblities part of the deal? If you want to be treated as a child fine - but you give up ALL the other privialges you get as an adult too.
moeve is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 6:21 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Too many
Programs: Lots
Posts: 5,761
Originally Posted by danielb6752
Yoichi Shimamoto became so inebriated "that he could not manage himself," according to a lawsuit filed Dec. 5 in U.S. District Court in Tampa.
At least United was offered their defense strategy by the plaintiff.
Axey is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 6:35 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Programs: United 1K, *wood LT Plat
Posts: 826
Good Service At least!

What the article failed to point out was how impressive it was that the FAs were actually around enough to provide him with a new glass of wine every 20 minutes. I would love to fly with that crew!
lilpisher is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 7:01 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TYS (or BNA, or CLT, or ATL, or BHM)
Programs: DL GM (soon to be nada), UA 1P (hoping to keep that), IC A
Posts: 61
Originally Posted by lilpisher
What the article failed to point out was how impressive it was that the FAs were actually around enough to provide him with a new glass of wine every 20 minutes. I would love to fly with that crew!
Those certainly were some on-the-ball fa's. SA fa's might get close, but checking on you every 20 minutes, wow!
texfrazer is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 7:11 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: Nah.
Posts: 13,967
1. I don't believe this. UA crews would never serve pax that often.

2. These fivolous lawsuits seem to crop up more and more when the economy is in the dumpster. Oh well.
qasr is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 7:14 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lovely Tahoe City
Programs: UA 1mm Gold. Former 1K and GS.
Posts: 951
Just another example of someone refusing to take responsiblity for their own actions. Pathetic.
climmy is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 7:21 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: IAD
Programs: United 0, HH Gold
Posts: 2,827
I dunno ... there's a lot of case law that puts some responsibility on bartenders for serving people who are drunk. I think United deserves some of the blame... and I'd bet dollars to donuts that a jury would agree with that. Look for them to settle out of court.
Uniter is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 7:22 am
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,140
Originally Posted by moeve
your husband is over 21 and it is his responsiblity to live with the consequences!
Except that bars are held liable if one of their customers gets drunk and commits a crime (such as DUI or vehicular homicide), so the precedent is already there.

Originally Posted by moeve
What in the world are these people thinking.
Deep pockets (or so they think).

Originally Posted by Uniter
I think United deserves some of the blame
It's at least a violation of the FARs to serve an obviously drunk passenger. So, assuming the FAs are qualified to make that assessment, they will have to answer to the FAA at least.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 7:27 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Programs: 1MM BIS. Former 18-year segment 1K, 1997-2014...now just a distant memory.
Posts: 1,200
Originally Posted by qasr
1. I don't believe this. UA crews would never serve pax that often.
I can. The guy was drinking wine. I don't know how many flights I have taken over the years when I patiently waited for a second cocktail, while fellow wine drinkers in the FC cabin kept getting their wine glasses "topped off" by the FA.
ColoBill1 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 7:34 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 5 min. from ITH, 1:20 from SYR, but will drive for E+
Programs: UA 1K/MM
Posts: 542
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
Except that bars are held liable if one of their customers gets drunk and commits a crime (such as DUI or vehicular homicide), so the precedent is already there.
This is an international flight, so doesn't the Warsaw Convention preempt the wife's claim against UA, asserting duties under either common law or dramshop statutes?

The point being, anyone can file a lawsuit -- whether it will be successful is another matter.
UpstateNY is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 8:01 am
  #14  
Used to be 'g_leyser'
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brandon Johnson International Airport (expect delays)
Programs: AA PlatPro, HH Gold, Bonvoy Gold, IHG Plat, Reno Air MEGA Platinum
Posts: 10,039
Talk about a frivolous lawsuit
aisleorwindow is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2008, 8:32 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: IAD
Programs: United 0, HH Gold
Posts: 2,827
Originally Posted by g_leyser
Talk about a frivolous lawsuit
I don't see anything frivolous about it. Spilling coffee on yourself is one thing, serving a passenger who's obviously drunk seems serious.
Uniter is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.