... how do we fight back to UAL's latest devaluation of our points
#91
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,152
#92
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,943
Look, you've got a currency controlled by a for-profit business. Especially in a climate where businesses are puling out all the stops to save pennies where they can, and are incentivized to show whatever gains they can to Wall Street, the customer only makes out well in the situations where the business feels it benefits them. Let's get real - ff programs are not really about rewarding customers, at least not anymore, they are about the airlines doing what they feel they need to make money. Period. Anyone who thinks the ff program is there to benefit them, or that 'free' upgrades are there because the airlines have your best interest at heart is delisional - the carriers do it because they think this is the path to making the most money.
The alternative, by the way, is that airlines could get rid of the programs completely, maybe they would lower fares slightly (or maybe not even), and then instead of a little something, you'd get nothing except for what you get for the fare you paid for each trip, I'll take the former, thank you.
As to the answer to the OPs question, you can't really do anything. Any given customer doesn't have the sway to influence the way the airline operates in general, and you can go to another carrier, but honestly, what do you think is going to happen there. Same thing. the only variable is whether it takes a day, a month, a year, 5 years, etc. We have seen it time and time again. As mentioned above, airlines are a commodity - the times carriers have tried to appeal to an audience that would pay more to get more doesn't work (remember Vrigin America, MRTC, etc.). It can work on a sub-level, such as PE and E+ models where a small portion of people can get a bit of a premium that are willing to pay for it - otherwise, it doesn't work.
Honestly, be lucky for whatever you do get. As mentioned above, an airline run on FTer wants would be run into the ground in a short period of time - as you can't economically provide all the benefits at prices enough of the public is willing to pay. Welcome to the real world.
The alternative, by the way, is that airlines could get rid of the programs completely, maybe they would lower fares slightly (or maybe not even), and then instead of a little something, you'd get nothing except for what you get for the fare you paid for each trip, I'll take the former, thank you.
As to the answer to the OPs question, you can't really do anything. Any given customer doesn't have the sway to influence the way the airline operates in general, and you can go to another carrier, but honestly, what do you think is going to happen there. Same thing. the only variable is whether it takes a day, a month, a year, 5 years, etc. We have seen it time and time again. As mentioned above, airlines are a commodity - the times carriers have tried to appeal to an audience that would pay more to get more doesn't work (remember Vrigin America, MRTC, etc.). It can work on a sub-level, such as PE and E+ models where a small portion of people can get a bit of a premium that are willing to pay for it - otherwise, it doesn't work.
Honestly, be lucky for whatever you do get. As mentioned above, an airline run on FTer wants would be run into the ground in a short period of time - as you can't economically provide all the benefits at prices enough of the public is willing to pay. Welcome to the real world.
#93
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DAY
Programs: UA 1K 1MM; Marriott LT Titanium; Amex MR; Chase UR; Hertz PC; Global Entry
Posts: 10,249
Look, you've got a currency controlled by a for-profit business. Especially in a climate where businesses are puling out all the stops to save pennies where they can, and are incentivized to show whatever gains they can to Wall Street, the customer only makes out well in the situations where the business feels it benefits them. Let's get real - ff programs are not really about rewarding customers, at least not anymore, they are about the airlines doing what they feel they need to make money. Period. Anyone who thinks the ff program is there to benefit them, or that 'free' upgrades are there because the airlines have your best interest at heart is delisional - the carriers do it because they think this is the path to making the most money.
The alternative, by the way, is that airlines could get rid of the programs completely, maybe they would lower fares slightly (or maybe not even), and then instead of a little something, you'd get nothing except for what you get for the fare you paid for each trip, I'll take the former, thank you.
As to the answer to the OPs question, you can't really do anything. Any given customer doesn't have the sway to influence the way the airline operates in general, and you can go to another carrier, but honestly, what do you think is going to happen there. Same thing. the only variable is whether it takes a day, a month, a year, 5 years, etc. We have seen it time and time again. As mentioned above, airlines are a commodity - the times carriers have tried to appeal to an audience that would pay more to get more doesn't work (remember Vrigin America, MRTC, etc.). It can work on a sub-level, such as PE and E+ models where a small portion of people can get a bit of a premium that are willing to pay for it - otherwise, it doesn't work.
Honestly, be lucky for whatever you do get. As mentioned above, an airline run on FTer wants would be run into the ground in a short period of time - as you can't economically provide all the benefits at prices enough of the public is willing to pay. Welcome to the real world.
The alternative, by the way, is that airlines could get rid of the programs completely, maybe they would lower fares slightly (or maybe not even), and then instead of a little something, you'd get nothing except for what you get for the fare you paid for each trip, I'll take the former, thank you.
As to the answer to the OPs question, you can't really do anything. Any given customer doesn't have the sway to influence the way the airline operates in general, and you can go to another carrier, but honestly, what do you think is going to happen there. Same thing. the only variable is whether it takes a day, a month, a year, 5 years, etc. We have seen it time and time again. As mentioned above, airlines are a commodity - the times carriers have tried to appeal to an audience that would pay more to get more doesn't work (remember Vrigin America, MRTC, etc.). It can work on a sub-level, such as PE and E+ models where a small portion of people can get a bit of a premium that are willing to pay for it - otherwise, it doesn't work.
Honestly, be lucky for whatever you do get. As mentioned above, an airline run on FTer wants would be run into the ground in a short period of time - as you can't economically provide all the benefits at prices enough of the public is willing to pay. Welcome to the real world.
But the reason they can make money is the perception that the miles and benefits are valuable. If they devalue the miles and benefits too much, then the incentive to accumulate miles, use credit cards, etc all diminish. It is a balance that needs to be maintained.
The cost / benefit analysis works both ways.
#94
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 5,929
Once you have worked through, denial, anger, and negotiation ( this thread) the acceptance of the new world order comes
> no award J travel except for top tiers
> award travel for the rest will be economy only
top tier spend requirements will continue to climb at 10% per year, in jumps
> no award J travel except for top tiers
> award travel for the rest will be economy only
top tier spend requirements will continue to climb at 10% per year, in jumps
#95
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,943
I am going to push back slightly on the overall idea that airlines would want to get rid of programs completely.. FF programs are big money makers for airlines. If they were not making a lot of money with them, they would disband them quicker than you can say lifetime club membership.
But the reason they can make money is the perception that the miles and benefits are valuable. If they devalue the miles and benefits too much, then the incentive to accumulate miles, use credit cards, etc all diminish. It is a balance that needs to be maintained.
The cost / benefit analysis works both ways.
But the reason they can make money is the perception that the miles and benefits are valuable. If they devalue the miles and benefits too much, then the incentive to accumulate miles, use credit cards, etc all diminish. It is a balance that needs to be maintained.
The cost / benefit analysis works both ways.
I suspect the carriers will keep pushing the balance, to see how little they can give away while still retaining loyalty from profitable customers.
Once you have worked through, denial, anger, and negotiation ( this thread) the acceptance of the new world order comes
> no award J travel except for top tiers
> award travel for the rest will be economy only
top tier spend requirements will continue to climb at 10% per year, in jumps
> no award J travel except for top tiers
> award travel for the rest will be economy only
top tier spend requirements will continue to climb at 10% per year, in jumps
#96
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 58,292
I disagree the no award J travel except for top tiers will happen. They can basically already do this via inventory already. However, I can't imagine there are situations where they wouldn't want the flexibility to offer J awards to nobodys where it makes sense. It's not going to be every flight on every route, but in low demand periods/flights where they aren't selling all J/F seats, but they have the opportunity to get some miles off a balance sheet. If UA can't sell the last J seat on route XXX-YYY anyway, sure, they can send out the seat empty and save a little bit on variable expenses, or they can charge [a likely inflated] number of miles for someone to get the experience they weren't going to pay for anyway, and get those miles off the books. In that case, it is a win-win for them.
#97
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: NJ
Programs: UA Silver, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 556
I think we've already pretty close to the no award J travel except for top tiers position. Up to and including 2023 it was still possible to secure J seats to Europe during off-peak travel season with both legs confirmable at purchase with a MUA. Twenty years ago I did it regularly six months out, again not during peak season. This past January on my annual February trip to MUC, the best I could do is secure the outbound leg at purchase. While in Europe, I watched every possible return and realized that my MUA wasn't going to clear, so I bought up before <T-72. I will be pleasantly surprised if I can repeat this year's performance next year, but I'm not holding my breath.
#98
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 659
#99
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,389
#100
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: NJ
Programs: UA Silver, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 556
#101
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,617
There is a huge difference between "no award travel" and "no award travel for tiny amounts of miles that make it feel free".
Using a baseline 1 cpm valuation, a $2,000 one-way J ticket on EWR-NRT is not a deal you write home about but it is far from an expensive fare. What I really think is dying here is the inflexible award levels leaving behind unrealistic deals, and the consequent high that comes from hunting for them.
Using a baseline 1 cpm valuation, a $2,000 one-way J ticket on EWR-NRT is not a deal you write home about but it is far from an expensive fare. What I really think is dying here is the inflexible award levels leaving behind unrealistic deals, and the consequent high that comes from hunting for them.
#102
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: None - previously UA
Posts: 4,930
Using a baseline 1 cpm valuation, a $2,000 one-way J ticket on EWR-NRT is not a deal you write home about but it is far from an expensive fare. What I really think is dying here is the inflexible award levels leaving behind unrealistic deals, and the consequent high that comes from hunting for them.
#103
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 5,929
The top tier customers are driven by network and IRROPS handling andUA does well here. The business value of being in time exceeds M+ value by 100-1000x so its not even in the noise for such travelers. I use mine to fly family amd friends places.
#104
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SJC
Programs: Southwest, Alaska, United, American Airlines
Posts: 998
Even on the margins, you see the same effect most passengers who are willing to pay for PE or J dont appear to distinguish greatly between different PE or J products...
...Personally, Im fine with that: I want a cheap fare and enough room to sit my rear end. Thats why I tend to fly UA, and thats why I dont care if they make further cuts to the lounges I rarely use, or the catering I rarely eat, or whatever else.
...Personally, Im fine with that: I want a cheap fare and enough room to sit my rear end. Thats why I tend to fly UA, and thats why I dont care if they make further cuts to the lounges I rarely use, or the catering I rarely eat, or whatever else.
Even United recently sent out surveys to test the waters on this.
It's just a matter of which TATL/TPAC alliance grouping(s) will blink first and roll out the fares.
#105
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 529
Partner redemption are hard to redeem across all alliances. Airlines have figured that they want to sell their own miles vs have Avianca be the star alliance consolidator. This allows them to charge variable and higher rate for mileage redemptions.
There are still some good redemption options on UA metal. I just booked a transcon trip in domestic J for 30k points each way for 2 seats. Not much higher than the ancient 25k each way saver level, and way lower than the common 100k each way that we see now. Cash fares are $1k each way in J and $500 each way in Y.
Diversify your source of miles. Have some across the major carriers, have some in transferable currencies. UA miles won't be the best deal for every trip. Best way to protect yourself is to keep them as Chase UR and transfer them as you need them, but the PQP you earn on cobrand card purchases will ensure they sell a good amount of miles to those playing the game.
Unfortunately canceling your chase cards aren't going to move the industry away from this path. If UA is behind on their mileage sales to chase, all they need to do is some targeted promos. I maxed out my q2 promo and found some great redemptions. If they sweeten the pot for q3, I would be a buyer of more points through cobrand point spend.
There are still some good redemption options on UA metal. I just booked a transcon trip in domestic J for 30k points each way for 2 seats. Not much higher than the ancient 25k each way saver level, and way lower than the common 100k each way that we see now. Cash fares are $1k each way in J and $500 each way in Y.
Diversify your source of miles. Have some across the major carriers, have some in transferable currencies. UA miles won't be the best deal for every trip. Best way to protect yourself is to keep them as Chase UR and transfer them as you need them, but the PQP you earn on cobrand card purchases will ensure they sell a good amount of miles to those playing the game.
Unfortunately canceling your chase cards aren't going to move the industry away from this path. If UA is behind on their mileage sales to chase, all they need to do is some targeted promos. I maxed out my q2 promo and found some great redemptions. If they sweeten the pot for q3, I would be a buyer of more points through cobrand point spend.