Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Consolidated LHR connection time/logistics

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old May 8, 2017, 3:57 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: WineCountryUA
Print Wikipost

Consolidated LHR connection time/logistics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2016, 1:48 am
  #121  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MRY - CNX - TXL
Programs: UA 1K / *G / Marriott PE / Expedia Gold+ / Hertz PC
Posts: 7,058
I believe you'll arrive near the UA gate. However the caveat is that it'll probably take you closer to 30-45 minutes to get to the lounge.
If you arrive in that area you have to walk through the terminal, down under the the tarmac, back up into transit security (there is a priority lane), a quick BP check, back into the main T2 departures area and then back down under the tunnel and back into the "satellite" area where the long haul flights/UC/UA gates are.
To put it into perspective from door opening to me at the gate getting on my UA-4U connection (which was from Satelite to Main, not Sat to Main to Sat) it took me 28 min which included some jogging as I would have missed the flight otherwise.
JVPhoto is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 2:40 am
  #122  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,439
begs the question, why don't they do a transit facility in T2B?
belfordrocks is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 6:16 am
  #123  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MRY - CNX - TXL
Programs: UA 1K / *G / Marriott PE / Expedia Gold+ / Hertz PC
Posts: 7,058
Originally Posted by belfordrocks
begs the question, why don't they do a transit facility in T2B?
One with think with all the space in the bowels before you have to cross back under.
JVPhoto is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 6:54 am
  #124  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by belfordrocks
begs the question, why don't they do a transit facility in T2B?
To avoid splitting the staffing and construction/security costs, I'd bet.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 7:04 am
  #125  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC / TYO / Up in the Air
Programs: UA GS 1.7MM, AA 2.1MM, EK, BA, SQ, CX, Marriot LT, Accor P
Posts: 6,319
Originally Posted by sbm12
To avoid splitting the staffing and construction/security costs, I'd bet.
+1 - and I'd bet that the majority of passengers arriving at LHR in that terminal are not connecting...
bmwe92fan is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 7:45 am
  #126  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: PHL
Programs: NEXUS, UA Club
Posts: 641
I see a lot of posts that say you are able to use other star alliance lounges if you have gold status. But what is the rule if you are traveling in J, but you have no status? For example, if flying UA in J from LHR, would I have access to the AC and SQ lounges as well? And what about when I am flying TG J? I've always assumed that I could go to any lounge with a J ticket, but I have seen a lot of replies here and elsewhere suggesting that you need star gold status to lounge hop like that, so now I'm not so sure!
Chiro1979 is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 7:59 am
  #127  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,439
Yes, any J gets you into any Star Alliance lounge (there may be certain exceptions which I can't remember right now, but that's the rule of thumb)
belfordrocks is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 8:10 am
  #128  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NYC, LON
Programs: *
Posts: 2,774
Originally Posted by bmwe92fan
+1 - and I'd bet that the majority of passengers arriving at LHR in that terminal are not connecting...
And the British Authorities and Heathrow don't seem concerned at changing that. Most major new airport terminals are constructed to facilitate seamless and quick transfers. That way they attract both airline and passenger business and lot of revenue. For a new terminal, T2 is indeed a disgrace as it seems to do its best to discourage transferring passengers. How a transfer within the same terminal from gates adjacent to each other in B wing could take 40+ minutes in a new airport design shows lack of insight. Of course maybe this could be deliberate as an efficient star alliance terminal would take business from BA and T5 so it may well be intentional that transfers are so much trouble.
ani90 is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 8:19 am
  #129  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by ani90
How a transfer within the same terminal from gates adjacent to each other in B wing could take 40+ minutes in a new airport design shows lack of insight.
Really not much different than a transfer between the B/C piers at T5. It does not make sense to put immigration/transfer points everywhere. A 40 minute connection - including security - at a major airport isn't the worst out there.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 8:30 am
  #130  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,439
Why not move the entire transit facility to T2B then? I'd say the number of pax connecting T2B to T2B is higher than those going T2A to T2A.
belfordrocks is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 9:08 am
  #131  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MRY - CNX - TXL
Programs: UA 1K / *G / Marriott PE / Expedia Gold+ / Hertz PC
Posts: 7,058
Originally Posted by belfordrocks
Why not move the entire transit facility to T2B then? I'd say the number of pax connecting T2B to T2B is higher than those going T2A to T2A.
I wonder if anyone has/can pull numbers.

From the looks of it the T2B seems the l/h wide bodies for UA, AC, TG, SA, SQ. Not sure the timing of the flights but that's putting it as UA/AC TATL connect to Africa/SE.A and vv. Those would be the back track transfers.

OTOH Europe to TATL/ZA/SEA and vv seem like they'd all be A-B or B-A not B-A-B.

You can tell from the design and the shops and food that T2A is supposed to be the center focus/terminal hub.
JVPhoto is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 9:28 am
  #132  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,439
B to B transfers would be anything like EWR-LHR-JNB, YYZ-LHR-DEL, ORD-LHR-BKK etc. A to A transfers would be FRA-LHR-DUB or similar. I'd argue there are much more of the former than the latter.

Of course A to B and B to A transfers would require crossing the tunnel at least once regardless of whether the transfer facility is in A or B, so is largely irrelevant.
belfordrocks is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 11:15 am
  #133  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.997MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,859
Originally Posted by Chiro1979
I see a lot of posts that say you are able to use other star alliance lounges if you have gold status. But what is the rule if you are traveling in J, but you have no status? For example, if flying UA in J from LHR, would I have access to the AC and SQ lounges as well? And what about when I am flying TG J? I've always assumed that I could go to any lounge with a J ticket, but I have seen a lot of replies here and elsewhere suggesting that you need star gold status to lounge hop like that, so now I'm not so sure!
Passengers departing as premium cabin of a *A international flight have access to *A clubs/lounges. No guests. {UA extends that to all airport UCs if traveling same day international UA premium cabin.}

*G members have access departing in any cabin on any departing *A flight. One guest. {UA *G are not allowed UC access on domestically only itins.}

Any additional access method is via a *A lounge membership -such as UA's UC membership. Requires BP for any departing *A flight. UC members presently do not require a BP for UC access but in August will require any departing BP (not necessarily *A)

More on lounge access in http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...15-onward.html.

More on the LHR UC in http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...on-thread.html

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Apr 10, 2016 at 12:53 pm Reason: links
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 6:10 pm
  #134  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: PHL
Programs: NEXUS, UA Club
Posts: 641
I have heard SQ tends to be a little pickier/more selective letting people into their lounges.
I've never had an issue with AC/UA/TK/LH/TG when flying J on another * airline, so I figured when I'm in LHR I'd like to check out the SQ lounge having not been to one, just curious if they allow others in or if should expect some pushback from them.
Chiro1979 is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2016, 7:09 pm
  #135  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Tri Valley Area Northern CA
Programs: UA GS
Posts: 579
Originally Posted by Chiro1979
I have heard SQ tends to be a little pickier/more selective letting people into their lounges.
I've never had an issue with AC/UA/TK/LH/TG when flying J on another * airline, so I figured when I'm in LHR I'd like to check out the SQ lounge having not been to one, just curious if they allow others in or if should expect some pushback from them.
Last month, I was connecting in LHR (UA to TK). I thought I'd check out the SQ lounge (economy class but Star Gold). I wasn't sure if the SQ lounge would refuse entry, but I had no problems getting in.

The lounge is very nice, perhaps a little bit better than the United lounge (more and better food). Prior to 9am, it was a little bit crowded (9:25 am SQ flight to Singapore). After 9 am, it was basically empty. I left around 9:45 am, and it started to fill up (another Singapore flight at 11:25 am).

Last edited by PBAudit; Apr 10, 2016 at 7:14 pm
PBAudit is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.