Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Current UA Process for Prioritizing Meal Orders in Premium Cabins

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Feb 2, 2015, 1:14 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: WineCountryUA
Official UNITED policy for meal preferences is to prioritize in the following order: (as of late 2023)
  1. Pre-orders
  2. Global Services members
  3. 1K members
  4. All other revenue passengers from front to back (no difference between $$$ or mileage or upgraders)
  5. Non-Revs

The proper way is to take orders front-to-back, and apply priority in the galley afterwards. Some FAs may still hop around the cabin seeking GS and 1Ks and take their orders first.
With the sharp increase in passengers pre-ordering meals, front-to-back ordering is now predominant.



Previous thread: Current UA Process for Prioritizing Meal Orders in Premium Cabins [ARCHIVE]

Print Wikipost

Current UA Process for Prioritizing Meal Orders in Premium Cabins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2021, 9:20 am
  #76  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: CT/NY
Programs: UA 1K/1MM, AA EXP, Marriott LT Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 6,020
Originally Posted by HGPilot
Row 4 was the most forward row with 2 available seats. Plus there was a GS and a ton of 1Ks on the flight and I'm sure plenty of them were in F who probably got their order in first. I just don't get why it's so hard to load a few more meals. It's obvious that passengers have dietary choices/restrictions and by having zero extras this is going to happen. On the plus side the alcohol gets you harder on an empty stomach.
How many extra would you propose to include, and what happens when everyone in rows 1-3 wanted the non-meat option? What are they going to do with all the extra/wasted food?

If you have a dietary restriction, and knowing that you're going to be one of the last people to order, let the FA know up front. Sometimes they can accomodate the request if they know ahead of time, but it becomes much harder when everyone else had ordered.

Or bring your own food as insurance, since catering mistakes can strike on any flight.
PTahCha is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 9:37 am
  #77  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Traveling the World
Posts: 6,075
Sorry your flight was not what you expected in terms of the meal. I will go to the lounge before and eat there just in case the meal on the flight is not what I expect or there is a delay in serving the meal. It is not a cost saving move airlines both domestic and international have always had this issue for many years in First Class and on the menu there is something that says" We apologize if your first choice of meal is not available'. Generally when I sat in the bulkhead on my AA and United First Class flights I got my first choice only once did I not get my first choice but it was an amazing Cheese Pasta Dish that was quite delicious and I enjoyed every bite of it. I usually go for the steak option!

if the flight has preordering for meals this is a great option to see what they serve, you can also request a special meal on longer domestic and most international flights. I am so sorry about the flatulence passenger that must have been gut wrenching and another reason perhaps why you did not want to eat!
danielonn is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 9:41 am
  #78  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,174
If the vegetarian meal was vegetables, sauce with polenta, you didn’t miss anything. Yuck.
uastarflyer is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 10:47 am
  #79  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HNL
Programs: UA GS4MM, MR LT Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,447
While I usually bring my meal anyway (hello Klein’s Deli at SFO later today) if I were vegetarian or any dietary restriction I’d ALWAYS bring my meal
chavala likes this.
HNLbasedFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 11:11 am
  #80  
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: TX
Programs: Alaska, AA, Marriott
Posts: 943
Originally Posted by HGPilot
Oh and top it off someone around me has really bad, mask penetrating flatulence,
Probably all those vegetarians in front of you.
neuromancerLKLB likes this.
thatmikereed is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 12:20 pm
  #81  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 179
Originally Posted by PTahCha
How many extra would you propose to include, and what happens when everyone in rows 1-3 wanted the non-meat option? What are they going to do with all the extra/wasted food?

If you have a dietary restriction, and knowing that you're going to be one of the last people to order, let the FA know up front. Sometimes they can accomodate the request if they know ahead of time, but it becomes much harder when everyone else had ordered.

Or bring your own food as insurance, since catering mistakes can strike on any flight.
This is actually pretty simple to solve. As a test, UA would need to over cater for a statistically significant number of flights (say 50) and then would get a distribution of customer preferences. They could use this to know how many extra to cater to satisfy a threshold, say 90 or 95% of FC passengers. Should be no wasted food BTW as they can keep in stored for the next day or next flight. It is that simple right? Someone tell me I'm not missing something here.

But to go to my original point. I purchased two FC tickets. Both reservations said dinner. I don't think it's unreasonable at all for UA to either let you pre-select, put down dietary preferences or have extra meals on board. I'm not asking for a lot. BTW for contrast my Polaris flight from EWR-LAX a few months ago was 10/10.
HGPilot is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 12:27 pm
  #82  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,762
Originally Posted by HGPilot
This is actually pretty simple to solve. As a test, UA would need to over cater for a statistically significant number of flights (say 50) and then would get a distribution of customer preferences. They could use this to know how many extra to cater to satisfy a threshold, say 90 or 95% of FC passengers. Should be no wasted food BTW as they can keep in stored for the next day or next flight. It is that simple right? Someone tell me I'm not missing something here.

But to go to my original point. I purchased two FC tickets. Both reservations said dinner. I don't think it's unreasonable at all for UA to either let you pre-select, put down dietary preferences or have extra meals on board. I'm not asking for a lot. BTW for contrast my Polaris flight from EWR-LAX a few months ago was 10/10.
I'm sorry about your experience with the audacious and unmitigated flatulence... One would think this was a very solvable problem but I think its pathetic they don't have meal pre-ordering.
entropy is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 12:52 pm
  #83  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,227
Originally Posted by HGPilot
This is actually pretty simple to solve. As a test, UA would need to over cater for a statistically significant number of flights (say 50) and then would get a distribution of customer preferences. They could use this to know how many extra to cater to satisfy a threshold, say 90 or 95% of FC passengers. Should be no wasted food BTW as they can keep in stored for the next day or next flight. It is that simple right? Someone tell me I'm not missing something here.

But to go to my original point. I purchased two FC tickets. Both reservations said dinner. I don't think it's unreasonable at all for UA to either let you pre-select, put down dietary preferences or have extra meals on board. I'm not asking for a lot. BTW for contrast my Polaris flight from EWR-LAX a few months ago was 10/10.
And, of course, this is what good airlines do.
lhrsfo is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 1:40 pm
  #84  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,026
Originally Posted by HGPilot
...I purchased two FC tickets. Both reservations said dinner....
You were offered dinner. You declined. UA is off the hook on that challenge.

Statistically, the deviation from the average in a small cabin (12-20) passengers would probably not result in much difference. You were sitting at the back - you would have been exposed to (or driven) that deviation. UA already does not cater half/half or third/third/third - it is already skewed towards preferences. On any one flight, the calculation could be spactacularly wrong (family of 6 vegetarians riding in front of a 16-pax 738, for example). If you think the calculated proportion of meals based on a large sampling would solve the problem of meal preferences of a small number of passengers, you don't know statistics. The solution is to (wastefully) double-cater (even then, there will be some who won't like either: "I want mushrooms grown only in Tibetan caves massaged by monks"). A partial solution, as you mentioned, is to slightly over-cater based on their current skew to reduce the instances of disappointment. Even then, there will be some disappointed passengers (usually) sitting in back,

As others mentioned, the best solution for those with dietary preferences is to bring acceptable food, especially if seat position lowers chances of primary choice.

Airlines generally do not "save (boarded) food for another flight" or the "next day", so yes, there would be wasteage.

Last edited by IAH-OIL-TRASH; Oct 20, 2021 at 1:59 pm
IAH-OIL-TRASH is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 1:54 pm
  #85  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 179
Originally Posted by IAH-OIL-TRASH
. A partial solution is to slightly over-cater based on their current skew to reduce the instances of disappointment.
This is what I suggested in my post.
HGPilot is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 2:01 pm
  #86  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton ♦ , Hyatt Carbonado, Wyndham ♦, Marriott PE, "Stinking Bum" elsewhere.
Posts: 5,000
Originally Posted by IAH-OIL-TRASH
You were offered dinner. You declined.

Statistically, the deviation from the average in a small cabin (12-20) passengers would probably not result in much difference. You were sitting at the back - you would have been exposed to (or driven) that deviation. UA already does not cater half/half or third/third/third - it is already skewed towards preferences. If you think the calculated proportion of meals based on a large sampling would solve the problem of meal preferences of a small number of passengers, you don't know statistics. The solution is to (wastefully) double-cater (even then, there will be some who won't like either: "I want mushrooms grown only in Tibetan caves massaged by monks"). A partial solution is to slightly over-cater based on their current skew to reduce the instances of disappointment.

Airlines generally do not "save (boarded) food for another flight" or the "next day", so yes, there would be wasteage.
The best solution for OP would be to take something onboard that they like to eat. It's what my family does whenever we're in F, which is most of the time. I even take my own soft drink now because UA has been under-catering my favorite soda for at least 8 months.

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Oct 21, 2021 at 8:48 am Reason: let's stay ontopic
zombietooth is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 2:05 pm
  #87  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Programs: Hyatt Globalist | Jumpseat Platinum
Posts: 546
Originally Posted by HGPilot
This is actually pretty simple to solve. As a test, UA would need to over cater for a statistically significant number of flights (say 50) and then would get a distribution of customer preferences. They could use this to know how many extra to cater to satisfy a threshold, say 90 or 95% of FC passengers. Should be no wasted food BTW as they can keep in stored for the next day or next flight. It is that simple right? Someone tell me I'm not missing something here.
UA currently collects data from FAs for meal preferences. Every time you see* someone taking orders on the LINK (FA iPhone), that data gets sent to determine customer preferences. IME, pre-2020, they did factor in market tendencies into the amount of meals catered. Sometimes though, there's just no accounting for the family of 4 vegetarians sitting in row 1. Obviously, pre-orders will help, but I'm not sure what the status of those is at the moment, given the (self-induced) catering woes around the system.

As far as carrying extra meals... impractical at best. Hot meals are loaded directly into the ovens, as galley space is at a premium. Even if there were space available, 737s & 757s do not have chillers, and thus, no way to ensure extra food is kept fresh from day to day. Even if all planes did have chillers, that's extra weight on every flight, and extra energy costs overnight. All to prevent the minor inconvenience of not having one's first choice on a shorthaul flight. As a pickier eater, I sympathize, but I just eat in the terminal.

* - I prefer taking orders with pen & paper, and input the preferences to the LINK later in flight. But I'm a weirdo who hangs out on FT on days off, so...
FLYMSY, SPN Lifer, HNL1K and 11 others like this.
fezzington is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 2:40 pm
  #88  
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: IAD
Programs: UA Plat, HH Diamond, Supersonic (BA1Y, BA1223)
Posts: 221
I suppose this could quickly devolve into a "best ideas" thread....
But I will always remember the UA FA that stood at the front and announced "Gentlemen, if its ok with you, I will go through the cabin and take orders from the ladies first..." I thought that was great and a pretty fair way to approach it.
I book early, and get row 1 and when my wife complains (about lack of under-seat stowage) I remind her she is the one with special meals 'requirements'.
When it doesnt work, I ask for a box, and if thats not available, I point out its an airplane, not a restaurant...
Because of my experiences with her, whenever I am asked for my meal preference, I mostly always tell them to bring me whatever is left over. Usually gets me a little more attention when the glass runs dry.
SPN Lifer likes this.

Last edited by huey_driver; Oct 20, 2021 at 3:13 pm
huey_driver is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 5:27 pm
  #89  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Programs: UA MM 1K, AA MM Gold, Marriott LT Platinum
Posts: 3,236
Originally Posted by huey_driver
....Because of my experiences with her, whenever I am asked for my meal preference, I mostly always tell them to bring me whatever is left over. Usually gets me a little more attention when the glass runs dry.
I agree - the best overall meal choice you can make if you're flexible is to smile and say, "just give me whatever's left." Then leave the wine glass you brought with you on your tray table.
tarheelnj is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2021, 5:29 pm
  #90  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 6,338
Originally Posted by huey_driver
I suppose this could quickly devolve into a "best ideas" thread....
But I will always remember the UA FA that stood at the front and announced "Gentlemen, if its ok with you, I will go through the cabin and take orders from the ladies first..." I thought that was great and a pretty fair way to approach it.
I book early, and get row 1 and when my wife complains (about lack of under-seat stowage) I remind her she is the one with special meals 'requirements'.
When it doesnt work, I ask for a box, and if thats not available, I point out its an airplane, not a restaurant...
Because of my experiences with her, whenever I am asked for my meal preference, I mostly always tell them to bring me whatever is left over. Usually gets me a little more attention when the glass runs dry.
With my upbringing and nature I would also be happy with that approach...I am curious however as to just how it is "pretty fair"? Well mannered yes, fair...not really!
trooper is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.