Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Longest flights in RJ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2014, 6:16 pm
  #91  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: DAY
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 119
3.5h on a regional jet?

I'm flying from Dayton to Bozeman, MT in January. Flying via ORD its then 3.5h to Bozeman on a CRJ 700??? Thats an awful long time time on a RJ. Seems like they are replacing their entire fleet with them.
Snareman is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2014, 6:45 pm
  #92  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,891
Originally Posted by Snareman
I'm flying from Dayton to Bozeman, MT in January. Flying via ORD its then 3.5h to Bozeman on a CRJ 700??? Thats an awful long time time on a RJ. Seems like they are replacing their entire fleet with them.
That must be a very seasonal route, as I checked a few dates through this year and next and mostly found connections only. On that kind of route, the choice is likely going to be an RJ or nothing. Or routing through DEN instead, in which case you'd do the DAY-DEN in a CR7, which is practically the same distance.

On that note, it could be worse. Flew CVG-DEN yesterday in an ER4, which is only ~100 miles less than ORD-BZN.
emcampbe is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2014, 6:47 pm
  #93  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: DAY
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 119
Originally Posted by emcampbe
That must be a very seasonal route, as I checked a few dates through this year and next and mostly found connections only. On that kind of route, the choice is likely going to be an RJ or nothing. Or routing through DEN instead, in which case you'd do the DAY-DEN in a CR7, which is practically the same distance.

On that note, it could be worse. Flew CVG-DEN yesterday in an ER4, which is only ~100 miles less than ORD-BZN.
Yea, I figured Bozeman isn't exactly a huge destination. I'm going out to snowshoe in Yellowstone. I figured at least they could give me a crappy airbus. I'm coming home via DEN to DAY, also on a RJ. Can't wait.
Snareman is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2014, 6:56 pm
  #94  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DAY
Programs: UA 1K 1MM; Marriott LT Titanium; Amex MR; Chase UR; Hertz PC; Global Entry
Posts: 10,159
DAY->DEN has an occasional EMB145 pop up as well.

Crazy.
goodeats21 is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2014, 7:53 pm
  #95  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA USA (SFO/SJC)
Programs: 1K 2010, 1P in 2011, Plat for 2012,13,14,15 & 2016. Gold in 17 & 18, Plat since
Posts: 8,826
Originally Posted by goodeats21
DAY->DEN has an occasional EMB145 pop up as well.

Crazy.
Ok that wouldn't be fun. But a CR7 isn't that bad. It didn't occur to me to whine about it AUS-SFO. 1499 miles, up to 4:01 on UA's schedule. I could have gotten home on a mainline tube a couple hours later, but sometimes a couple of hours at home is worth more than a little bit nicer flight. I used to be addicted to CH9 but it's not the thrill it used to be. Give me an aisle or exit row seat and I'd be fine with a CR7 SFO-ORD. But don't tell UA I said that. I'd still prefer a 320.
Mike Jacoubowsky is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2014, 9:41 pm
  #96  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ORD-LAS
Programs: UA MM 1K, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 4,419
Originally Posted by Snareman
Yea, I figured Bozeman isn't exactly a huge destination. I'm going out to snowshoe in Yellowstone. I figured at least they could give me a crappy airbus. I'm coming home via DEN to DAY, also on a RJ. Can't wait.
It's mainline in the summer. And Billings.
LASUA1K is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2014, 11:26 pm
  #97  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SAN
Programs: AS MVP 100K, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Lifetime Titanium Elite, UA 1MM,
Posts: 1,710
Originally Posted by Snareman
I'm flying from Dayton to Bozeman, MT in January. Flying via ORD its then 3.5h to Bozeman on a CRJ 700??? Thats an awful long time time on a RJ. Seems like they are replacing their entire fleet with them.
Hard to complain about any nonstop service in to Bozeman really. Especially from Chicago. That would rarely be mainline, I would imagine, your only service there would be from Denver. When it comes to hub-hub or hub-major city, then yeah, let's talk.
JC5280 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2014, 4:02 pm
  #98  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA1K
Posts: 4,044
i did ORD-MSO back in july on the cr7. was in F but at a little over 3 hours of flight time, it wasn't bad. better that then connecting.
haddon90 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2014, 4:13 pm
  #99  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: EUG
Programs: UA Gold; IHG Spire Elite
Posts: 443
DEN-EUG is solely on CR2s these days, and it's scheduled at 2 hr 50 min. Against my better judgment, I did it a few weeks ago and it was terrible. In part because I had a larger gentleman next to me (not overweight, just a big guy), but it probably would have been pretty miserable regardless. I don't think I would mind a CR7 so much, but, unless it's absolutely 100% necessary I'm not doing that route in a CR2 ever again.
jewels421 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2014, 7:19 pm
  #100  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cle
Posts: 575
Eug-Den

Post 99# please correct your post to the following:

Den-Eug Daily service pattern:
Oct 1 CRJ and 1 CR-700
Nov 2 Cr-700's
Dec 2 Cr-700's
Jan 1 Cr-700 1 CRJ
trk1 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2014, 8:24 pm
  #101  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: EUG
Programs: UA Gold; IHG Spire Elite
Posts: 443
Well, I was talking about DEN-EUG, not EUG-DEN. But, probably more accurate if I had said DEN-EUG is "almost entirely on CR2s". Regular schedule is 15 flights a week (Sun-Fri 2x a day, 1x on Sat). Maybe 1-2 of those flights will be on a CR7.
jewels421 is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2014, 8:00 am
  #102  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
Originally Posted by Mike Jacoubowsky
Ok that wouldn't be fun. But a CR7 isn't that bad. It didn't occur to me to whine about it AUS-SFO. 1499 miles, up to 4:01 on UA's schedule. I could have gotten home on a mainline tube a couple hours later, but sometimes a couple of hours at home is worth more than a little bit nicer flight. I used to be addicted to CH9 but it's not the thrill it used to be. Give me an aisle or exit row seat and I'd be fine with a CR7 SFO-ORD. But don't tell UA I said that. I'd still prefer a 320.
I'd argue it is that bad. No Wifi, no meals in F, tiny F cabin, small E+ cabin too and just that single bathroom all the way at the back.
CMK10 is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2014, 8:04 am
  #103  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,172
Originally Posted by CMK10
I'd argue it is that bad. No Wifi, no meals in F, tiny F cabin, small E+ cabin too and just that single bathroom all the way at the back.
Plus - tiny OHBs and the new CR7s have wood planks for seats in Y.
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2014, 9:58 am
  #104  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,146
Originally Posted by emcampbe
That must be a very seasonal route, as I checked a few dates through this year and next and mostly found connections only. On that kind of route, the choice is likely going to be an RJ or nothing. Or routing through DEN instead, in which case you'd do the DAY-DEN in a CR7, which is practically the same distance.

On that note, it could be worse. Flew CVG-DEN yesterday in an ER4, which is only ~100 miles less than ORD-BZN.
It is seasonal, though IIRC it's mainline for part of the year, too. I took a JAC-ORD flight last year during the shoulder of peak season (right as ski season winds down but before summer hits), and the A320 was a ghost ship.
exerda is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2014, 1:10 pm
  #105  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA USA (SFO/SJC)
Programs: 1K 2010, 1P in 2011, Plat for 2012,13,14,15 & 2016. Gold in 17 & 18, Plat since
Posts: 8,826
Originally Posted by CMK10
I'd argue it is that bad. No Wifi, no meals in F, tiny F cabin, small E+ cabin too and just that single bathroom all the way at the back.
Main issue for me would be the single bathroom. Not fun if you have the seatbelt sign on most of the flight, then a long line. So on that one, I agree, bigger planes are better. Might not always be the case though; bizarre as it may seem, there's no requirement for a given number of lavs for a plane.. regardless of size. And a working lav is not on the minimum equipment list either. That still surprises me.
Mike Jacoubowsky is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.