Consolidated "United SYD/MEL Flight Delays or Cancellations" Thread [2012]
#46
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco/Sydney
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Something, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,179
For the past few years at least it's been :
LAX-SYD-MEL-SYD-SFO and
SFO-SYD-LAX
If you look at the times this rotation makes sense - the flight from LAX arrives first (even if only by about 20 mins), so it can be ready earlier to proceed to MEL. The flight to SFO departs later, so it makes more sense to use the MEL plane.
The plane to SFO normally then continues on to a different route - frequently becoming UA900 to FRA, although it varies. The plane to LAX normally sits at LAX for about 12 hours and then returns to SYD. Not great utilization, but given that it's the only 747 flight out of LAX there's not a lot of choice!
![docbert is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#47
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MEL/LAX/JFK
Programs: UA 1K(0.7MM) Hilton Gold/La Quinta Gold
Posts: 897
UA840 was cancelled on Sunday out of MEL, it made it back to SYD as UA9911 and then continued onto SFO as UA9911 as a ferry flight only, no passengers.
The LAX flight was delayed and arrived into LAX at midday.
The LAX flight was delayed and arrived into LAX at midday.
![Asuka is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#48
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Million Mile Nobody, Marriott Platinum Elite, SPG Gold
Posts: 25,228
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Last edited by flyinbob; Jul 8, 2012 at 9:24 pm
![flyinbob is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#49
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney, NSW Australia
Posts: 895
Fog in SYD
839 & 863 plus the QF 747 QF 108 & the Air Canada 777 ex YVR were diverted to BNE this morning. Delta & Virgin Australia in their 777s made it in on time plus the QF A380.
Last edited by Aspen; Jul 10, 2012 at 12:11 am Reason: Asuka kindly informed us AC33 diverted to BNE
![Aspen is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#50
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MEL/LAX/JFK
Programs: UA 1K(0.7MM) Hilton Gold/La Quinta Gold
Posts: 897
863 didn't depart until 1am as well, not sure why, 839 left on time, so I doubt it was predicted fog.
Tuesday Depart SYD, 840 18:00, 870 14:45 Ontime
Last edited by Asuka; Jul 9, 2012 at 6:20 pm Reason: +1 hour for 840 departure
![Asuka is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#51
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney, NSW Australia
Posts: 895
This makes sense. The aeroplane going to SFO usually sits at SYD for ~ 8 hours and is used in SFO for another flight fairly soon after landing where as the LAX bound aeroplane sits on the ground in LAX for ~12 hours before returning to SYD. The inconvenienced passengers are the MEL for final destination SFO passengers. Anyone hazard a guess how many of those there are?
(not forgetting the 840 passengers who are not re-routed onto 870 to make connections etc) - wow - running an airline is hard
(not forgetting the 840 passengers who are not re-routed onto 870 to make connections etc) - wow - running an airline is hard
![Aspen is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#52
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MEL/LAX/JFK
Programs: UA 1K(0.7MM) Hilton Gold/La Quinta Gold
Posts: 897
This makes sense. The aeroplane going to SFO usually sits at SYD for ~ 8 hours and is used in SFO for another flight fairly soon after landing where as the LAX bound aeroplane sits on the ground in LAX for ~12 hours before returning to SYD. The inconvenienced passengers are the MEL for final destination SFO passengers. Anyone hazard a guess how many of those there are?
(not forgetting the 840 passengers who are not re-routed onto 870 to make connections etc) - wow - running an airline is hard
(not forgetting the 840 passengers who are not re-routed onto 870 to make connections etc) - wow - running an airline is hard
They do sometimes switch this order depending on delays like today.
SFO flight looks light today, maybe they just off loaded all the MEL SFO people onto 840. I would kill to have a decent few hours at the NZ lounge on the way out. It's a long time between food from breakfast to dinner doing MEL-SYD-LAX, since they don't serve a snack to SYD.
Either way Annie would be earning her money today with all the rebookings.
We are in fog season, so this won't be the last time this happens, maybe UA should look at reopening the LAX-MEL route, leave early, arrive at MEL without a Curfew and then fly back via SYD.
![Asuka is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#53
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Programs: UA Gold; Million Miler
Posts: 78
Melbourne to SFO people indeed the victims
Reporting from United Lounge at MEL... Indeed all the MEL people en route for SFO were rebooked for LAX with connections to SFO and other places. Initially we were told that the SFO flight 870 had been cancelled. Then the flight was 'uncancelled'. We managed to get our J uogrades recognized on the LAX flight but I think there were some disappointed passengers. As always the communications at MEL's Tullamarine airport were poor although the non UA check in folk were very pleasants and helpful, They seemed to be in as much of a bind and fog as we passengers. Currently the take off of flight 840 to SYD is 3.15 pm but who know when we will take off from SYD?
![aussiebart is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#54
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Programs: UA Gold; Million Miler
Posts: 78
Those seat maps on UA's web site are sure inaccurate
Re the light load that ASUKA reports for today's UA 870 SYD to SFO. When I checked my reservation online last night the seating plan showed the flight was very full, almost completely full in Y. But the checkin people at MEL told me it was a light flight this morning on arrival at the airport - so merging 870 with 840 ( which was originally rumored to be the plan ) would be easy. So much for UA's seating maps. A little wrong is fine but something on this scale is ridiculous.
![aussiebart is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#55
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MEL/LAX/JFK
Programs: UA 1K(0.7MM) Hilton Gold/La Quinta Gold
Posts: 897
SYD-LAX 18:00 arriving 14:02, which will give you some time in the NZ Lounge, go the Hot Dogs ![Stick Out Tongue](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I didn't think there were any UA staff in MEL? The lounge has contract staff as well, last time I asked about an upgrade, was told.
If you get really hungry go check out the NZ lounge, just say you would like a look around during a delay, they normally have a decent feed compared to the breakfast foods in UA.
Good to see they are keeping the lounge open, as it normally shuts after the last customer for 840 before noon.
Edit: 839 just fired up in SYD, on taxi about to depart to MEL according to FlightRadar24
![Stick Out Tongue](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I didn't think there were any UA staff in MEL? The lounge has contract staff as well, last time I asked about an upgrade, was told.
If you get really hungry go check out the NZ lounge, just say you would like a look around during a delay, they normally have a decent feed compared to the breakfast foods in UA.
Good to see they are keeping the lounge open, as it normally shuts after the last customer for 840 before noon.
Edit: 839 just fired up in SYD, on taxi about to depart to MEL according to FlightRadar24
Last edited by Asuka; Jul 9, 2012 at 8:59 pm
![Asuka is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#56
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Programs: UA Gold; Million Miler
Posts: 78
No UA checkin people in MEL
Indeed, there are no UA staff at MEL. The checkin staff are employed by handlers who also deal with a whole range of other airlines. The checkin staff are very competent and pleasant all the same. They did, politely, tell me that SHARES was, ahem, somwhat less useful than UA's old software but that they mastered the essentials in a three week course. Mind you, when it comes to dealing with many issues, upgrades is one, the checkin people have to call the US with the same kinds of delays that we ordinary mortals experience. Surely check in staff. Should have a fast track phone?
![aussiebart is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#57
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MEL/LAX/JFK
Programs: UA 1K(0.7MM) Hilton Gold/La Quinta Gold
Posts: 897
UA840 - New Departure 18:40, the crew must be ready to exceed duty time and turn into pumpkins if I read the pilot Q&A correctly.
What has been the latest time of departure?
They will need to turn a 747 in 1h30mins and it normally only gets new head rest covers, vacuum in SYD too![EEK!](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Edit: Looks like they held 870 Departure 17:16 on taxi for take off
What has been the latest time of departure?
They will need to turn a 747 in 1h30mins and it normally only gets new head rest covers, vacuum in SYD too
![EEK!](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Edit: Looks like they held 870 Departure 17:16 on taxi for take off
Last edited by Asuka; Jul 10, 2012 at 1:31 am
![Asuka is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#58
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney, NSW Australia
Posts: 895
UA840 - New Departure 18:40, the crew must be ready to exceed duty time and turn into pumpkins if I read the pilot Q&A correctly.
What has been the latest time of departure?
They will need to turn a 747 in 1h30mins and it normally only gets new head rest covers, vacuum in SYD too![EEK!](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Edit: Looks like they held 870 Departure 17:16 on taxi for take off
What has been the latest time of departure?
They will need to turn a 747 in 1h30mins and it normally only gets new head rest covers, vacuum in SYD too
![EEK!](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Edit: Looks like they held 870 Departure 17:16 on taxi for take off
Any clue as to this 2.5 hour delay ex SYD for the SFO flight ? Was it mechanical?
![Aspen is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#59
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MEL/LAX/JFK
Programs: UA 1K(0.7MM) Hilton Gold/La Quinta Gold
Posts: 897
It left rather quickly after 840 arrived, so I would say MEL SFO people did the ramp walk up/down in SYD and it left ASAP. It shot out of SYD like a rocket!
![Big Grin](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Aussiebart said all MEL SFO people were rebooked to LAX and onwards, but they might have changed their minds as they would need to use the Shares rebook code, which was published in the one of the threads recently, if they didn't know how.
Edit: 840 took a stroll out to the end of the runway and has now departed. Nothing speedy about that. The UA website did change the departure time to 10mins less than when I saw it pop up on the radar during taxi from the gate.
Last edited by Asuka; Jul 10, 2012 at 2:57 am Reason: 840
![Asuka is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#60
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MEL/LAX/JFK
Programs: UA 1K(0.7MM) Hilton Gold/La Quinta Gold
Posts: 897
839 Went MX Wednesday out of LAX, looks like it took off and then returned
![Asuka is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)