![]() |
Originally Posted by Scots_Al
(Post 33795955)
Presumably they'll adopt the same practical approach as in Scotland, whereby clubs are obliged to randomly check 1/5. I've been to Murrayfield for rugby internationals since this was brought in and it's no hassle whatsoever.
EDIT to add: which is not to say you don't have a point about the notice period. IIRC the Scottish Government had to delay implementation whilst these sorts of issues were worked out in practice. |
Originally Posted by fransknorge
(Post 33797515)
The UKHSA disagrees with you, as well as the WHO. Their latest Risk Assessment of the UKHSA has a Red on immune evasion with moderate evidence. Since it seems a third dose restore protection against Omicron any weeks where we can delay more infections give us time to put boosters in arms. As for the WHO, they explicitly say to act now:
https://twitter.com/kakape/status/14...786074123?s=20 As for the NHS being the same each Winter, you might want to pull yearly reports of bed occupied vs staff attendances to check out the major difference compared to last winter. Saying this winter is the same as all Winter shows blatant ignorance of the current situation. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGG2oLCW...pg&name=medium You are dealing with folk who simply know better, and can provide snippets of quotes to prove it :) |
Well this should be an eye opener to anyone who thought we may actually get out of this pandemic.
These are pre-emptive restrictions, there is no impact whatsoever on the NHS so far based on omicron. Instead we are imposing restrictions, including mandatory vaccine passports which we have never had before in England and now "a national conversation" on mandatory vaccines because of something which hasn't even happened and may not do. Dodgy variants will appear again in the future so if this is how we are going to react every time be prepared to keep repeating this cycle every few months. |
Originally Posted by KARFA
(Post 33797757)
These are pre-emptive restrictions, there is no impact whatsoever on the NHS so far based on omicron. |
This is rapidly turning into a Bad OMNI discussion, but I was amused by the Torygraph today which reported HMG's official advice as being "Don't go to work, but do go to parties". Of course HMG is led by science.
|
Originally Posted by 13901
(Post 33797771)
I don't know if it's done on purpose (all those who had to have help are European immigrants) but it felt as if the response was designed to tell people to eff off and go private/back in their home countries.
|
Originally Posted by Misco60
(Post 33797833)
I'm quite certain that you don't really even believe this yourself.
A friend of mine was told that she'd probably be better off by going back to check with doctors her EU home country when the gynaecologist here had a 6 month waiting list for a specialist visit (she did and was operated for a tumour that, left untreated, could've caused her to lose her uterus). Another was told that there was nothing the NHS could do for her when she sought professional help to deal with the follow-up of an assault and she should check with private providers or "elsewhere". All these people are legal residents here and pay taxes here. |
I think everyone is getting the 'go-away' treatment:
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...ca106ae920.jpg |
We can all present our own personal data points on how the NHS is coping - mine are all overwhelmingly positive. My own GP surgery is operating very efficiently and we have had no issues with appointments, referrals, flu jabs etc. I also spent 6 hours last weekend in a big city A&E department at peak time, and there was no sign of a service 'on its knees'.
I see the Sage and Indy Sage are trotting out their usual set of doom predictions again. Given that their previous attempts to scare us all were off by a factor of 10, you would think they would get less coverage than they do... |
Originally Posted by KARFA
(Post 33797757)
Well this should be an eye opener to anyone who thought we may actually get out of this pandemic.
These are pre-emptive restrictions, there is no impact whatsoever on the NHS so far based on omicron. Instead we are imposing restrictions, including mandatory vaccine passports which we have never had before in England and now "a national conversation" on mandatory vaccines because of something which hasn't even happened and may not do. Dodgy variants will appear again in the future so if this is how we are going to react every time be prepared to keep repeating this cycle every few months. |
Originally Posted by fransknorge
(Post 33798241)
Come on you know that mutations are due to large transmissions. Dodgy variants will not appear every few months if transmissions are down. You do not heard of mutations for endemic disease with low transmissions due to them being controlled (plague, malaria, etc ....). If the pandemic is controlled the cycle will disappear. The big unknown is the animal reservoir, but nothing we can do about this for the moment.
|
Originally Posted by KARFA
(Post 33769532)
Well that certainly is one point of view. You might have a look at current infection rates in Germany and draw some conclusions about how effective this 99% face mask compliance has actually been.
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...b4170b891e.png |
The evidence is gathering that Omicron is generally a lot more mild but I'm comfortable with application of the caution principle. Data is key; the more the better.
South African Covid cases up 255% in a week as Omicron spreads | South Africa | The Guardian |
Daily data:
Cases 50,867 (53,945 last Thursday) Deaths 148 (141) Patients admitted 813 (705 on the 28th) Patients in hospital 7,347 (7,330 on the 1st) Patients in ventilation beds 890 (895 on the 1st) People vaccinated up to and including 7 December 2021: First dose: 51,183,457 Second dose: 46,640,237 Booster: 21,715,504 The rolling seven day daily average for cases is now up 8.0% on the previous week and the same measure for deaths is up 0.7%. The rolling 7 day daily average for deaths is 122.0 today. |
Originally Posted by 13901
(Post 33797771)
I don't know if it's done on purpose (all those who had to have help are European immigrants) but it felt as if the response was designed to tell people to eff off and go private/back in their home countries.
My GP diagnosed a likely solar keratosis on my skin, possibly a precursor of skin cancer. Nothing urgent, but something better seen to sooner rather than later. There was no foreseeable NHS dermatology appointment so my insurance kicked in with a private one a week later, where the lesion was frozen into oblivion. Chatting with a medic friend in Lisbon over the weekend he assured me my local centro de saúde/policlínica would have got me referred within six weeks. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:50 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.